And... so? I mean, what do you care? Clicking on some type of "next" for subsequent pages is quite common. What's your real problem here? It's obviously not the fact they're getting ad revenue. You've got a different chip on your shoulder. Did they not choose your game?
The US south is not already separate, nor is Quebec already separate. You don't see Canada firing missiles "across the strait" when Quebec holds a referendum, do you?
Well, well, well. I lived in Taiwan for a couple years and feel I can talk to this.
Japan occupied Taiwan for almost 50 years prior to 1949 and the revolution. Fair enough, you won it back (actually, didn't the US, Britain and the Commonwealth win it for you?) But that's not the point. The people of Taiwan don't want to be part of China. They consider themselves separate. So it is. It's not your place to tell them where they belong, is it?
This can't be true. Here's my point: why would you buy the sequel (is there one?) if you'd bought the original? I think it's obvious, anyone having seen the original would *never* consider shelling out money again for that crap:)
"accused the russians of ruinin ghte game of chess by always playing for mates against eachother and always playing western masters for the win"
What? I think you forgot to check the quote. In this context "mates" and "win"(s) means the same thing. Perhaps "draws" against each other and wins against the west?
...but as far as democracies go we've raised the "artform" to a new level.
However, this article is just another example of the erosion of freedoms going on in the US. 20% of us will vote in the fall and the rest won't care. Just let me drive my SUV!
The question is: where, for you, did Jini not deliver?
For certain problems, more than people might realize, Jini is delivering now. We use it at work and love it. Caveat is of course, right tool, right job. For us it is.
Dude, are *you* serious? I made a point, which you seem to have grossly misinterpeted. I admit that perhaps the question was better written "Should we?", but I only want the question asked.
I really have no idea how science really works. Guess what, I'm not a scientist. No, not going to learn how real scientists go about their work either... we all specialize in our respective careers. I'm sure the majority live by a code of ethics that I would approve of, while a minority don't. So don't ask me to be naive and trust all scientists to behave ethically.
By asking "must we?", I would hope that your question of "how?" gets careful and serious consideration. I believe we both share the feeling that it should be done carefully, right?
Now, as far as "reactionary"? You, sir, fairly exploded on me.
No offense but I would assume all AI tricks currently know are being tried. These problems tend to obsess programmers so chances are very good that alot of things are being tried.
You know... I agree. Looking at the spammers is indeed a great place to start. And don't worry, I do not think they have a trace of morals:)
I for one am absolutely sick of their attitudes, tactics and utter lack of respect for others. They have the audacity to hide behind "capitalism" and some "right" to make money in their dealings.
Slashdot Mirror
When did this happen? Let me know when you can state facts rather than Faux News blurbs (tm).
Bill
Must be great unless you're a snowplow driver:)
Bill
And... so? I mean, what do you care? Clicking on some type of "next" for subsequent pages is quite common. What's your real problem here? It's obviously not the fact they're getting ad revenue. You've got a different chip on your shoulder. Did they not choose your game?
Bill
And to be fair, my respect to your Grandfather for his resistance to the Japanese invasion. A horrible, horrible thing is war.
As far as your roommate's Grandfather, none of us were there. There may have been no choice on what side to fight.
Bill
Also...
The US south is not already separate, nor is Quebec already separate. You don't see Canada firing missiles "across the strait" when Quebec holds a referendum, do you?
Toe the party line, Xiao Mao.
Bill
Well, well, well. I lived in Taiwan for a couple years and feel I can talk to this.
Japan occupied Taiwan for almost 50 years prior to 1949 and the revolution. Fair enough, you won it back (actually, didn't the US, Britain and the Commonwealth win it for you?) But that's not the point. The people of Taiwan don't want to be part of China. They consider themselves separate. So it is. It's not your place to tell them where they belong, is it?
Bill
Our server was slashdooted...
Yeah, I'm Canadian.
Bill
"eh" is a very common word and was not included in your search.
Bill
"...just walking up and down the isles."
Waterworld, great movie. And that Costner, what an actor. I'd love to see him team up with Barney Rubble.
Bill
This can't be true. Here's my point: why would you buy the sequel (is there one?) if you'd bought the original? I think it's obvious, anyone having seen the original would *never* consider shelling out money again for that crap:)
Bill
"accused the russians of ruinin ghte game of chess by always playing for mates against eachother and always playing western masters for the win"
What? I think you forgot to check the quote. In this context "mates" and "win"(s) means the same thing. Perhaps "draws" against each other and wins against the west?
Bill
...but as far as democracies go we've raised the "artform" to a new level.
However, this article is just another example of the erosion of freedoms going on in the US. 20% of us will vote in the fall and the rest won't care. Just let me drive my SUV!
Bill
The question is: where, for you, did Jini not deliver?
For certain problems, more than people might realize, Jini is delivering now. We use it at work and love it. Caveat is of course, right tool, right job. For us it is.
Bill
NP, you were at least well spoken in your comments... and you called me "sir":)
Cheers,
Bill
I'll choose Cartier as my exploratory hero:)
Bill
Dude, are *you* serious? I made a point, which you seem to have grossly misinterpeted. I admit that perhaps the question was better written "Should we?", but I only want the question asked.
I really have no idea how science really works. Guess what, I'm not a scientist. No, not going to learn how real scientists go about their work either... we all specialize in our respective careers. I'm sure the majority live by a code of ethics that I would approve of, while a minority don't. So don't ask me to be naive and trust all scientists to behave ethically.
By asking "must we?", I would hope that your question of "how?" gets careful and serious consideration. I believe we both share the feeling that it should be done carefully, right?
Now, as far as "reactionary"? You, sir, fairly exploded on me.
Bill
"... -- a vast, still pool unstirred for millennia..."
Until we taint it with our presence.
"...even though I feel the Saturn looks neater than the Mustang"
Did my gaydar just go off? Oh, wait a minute, I might have set if off myself - it might be because I drive an Integra:)
Really though? Mustangs are in my opinion much better looking cars.
Bill
Perhaps they could seize the IP rights to the code? At least we would see a new icon when SCOT news regarding linux is released on Slashdot...
B
No offense but I would assume all AI tricks currently know are being tried. These problems tend to obsess programmers so chances are very good that alot of things are being tried.
Bill
And what would that mean? Would Linus' opinion discount the rest of the GPL?
Bill
Hi, this is Steve. Why don't you just stop and leave me alone? Is there no end to your torment?
Nice... real nice. And highonhimself() returns true for you? You have an intelligent reply except for the ad hominid attack.
Bill
You know... I agree. Looking at the spammers is indeed a great place to start. And don't worry, I do not think they have a trace of morals:)
I for one am absolutely sick of their attitudes, tactics and utter lack of respect for others. They have the audacity to hide behind "capitalism" and some "right" to make money in their dealings.
Sometimes I just like playing devil's advocate.
Bill
There's no connection proven yet between the ddos and spammers. That's like the fact that no WMDs being found proves they're there and hidden.
Where did you learn to draw conclusions, from the president?;)
Bill