Death of a Rebel
jwunderl writes: "Just a quick word to let you know that Rebel, who took over the NetWinder line from Corel has gone the way of the dodo. Claining a failed partnership with Fuji, the company informed it's creditors it could no longer continue. The full story is available at the Ottawa Citizen's page." Linux appliances don't seem to be the sure-sell that everyone thought they would be.
The problem was for private companies like mine. Call for a quote? Never call you back. Call again for a quote? Send you a quote for the wrong items. Call for service? "Call the manufacturer, it's not our problem". I did manage to drop a few tens of thousands into them over the years because they did have good prices (over say... Sun Canada, which wasn't saying much). They were the quintessential canadian business: buy something from someone else, and sell it for a higher price, and offer nothing added.
Then they did this whole $5million for James Dean and scribbling "LINUX LINUX LINUX" over everything. I could never get a quote out of them again. I will not miss them.
1- They paid a fortune for the 'James Dean' image and the Rebel.com domain. .com heyday) Flush with Corel money, they went on a 'branding' and 'mindshare' quest. woohoo.
I remember hearing $6 million at the time. I could be wrong (especially since I thought it was way too much money, even in the
2- The hardware remained essentially the same years after its introduction.
(Since Rebel.com is down, I can't verify though) Why would I pay a premium price for a 266Mhz StrongARM, when I can get a crazy PIII Celeron system for cheaper. At the time it was introduced, the NetWinder was a decent price point (as a dedicated web server), but not now.
3- Out of their league.
Hardware Computer Canada (HCC) was a small reseller before becoming Rebel.com, and trying to compete with the likes of VA Linux, Sun, and whoever else. They also lost sight of the fact that NetWinders appealed to geeks, and they tried to reposition it as an workgroup office server (an underpowered office server, that is)
Anyway, take what I say with a grain of salt, since they haven't been on my radar screen for a while, and since the site is down, I can't verify what I'm stating based upon today's information. And you can't trust AC's. *wink*
Okay, dildos aside, how many of those actually are going to happen?
Yes, I'm still a junky. Are you still a bitch?
All these Linux-based appliances are failing for one reason:
They're Linux-based appliances first, appliances second.
Come in with a sound business plan and a device that fills a niche, and happen to use Linux on it, and you'll clean up.
Come in with Linux in your head and try to build a "cool" device, then try and graft on a half-ass business plan, and you'll fail.
Duh.
-
Yesterday Andrew E. Mileski, a senior software developer at Rebel.com, posted the following to the netwinder.announce newsgroup on netwinder.org:
Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.
In this case, Rebel is was in my opinion having problems because they were unable to carry through their promise of "total network management". Their service was supposed to totally manage a network for a small company from ground 0 ... they would handle any problem and necessary network reconfigurations.
In practice their techs have proven to be less than knowledgeable and incapable of trouble shooting problems. In the end, our marketing guy knew more about trouble shooting the network then they did.
The problem was not the technology. It was 100% an execution problem.
Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
First of all Rebel was not selling the OS they where selling hardware.
1. The Tivo line which is just what Rebel was a box with Linux inside.
2. Cheapbytes.com keep in mind profitable does not mean huge.
3. My consulting side job. I make a tidy profit using and giving away Linux.
3. Sun with the whole qube thing.
4. IBM with all the hardware with Linux on it that they sell.
5. I would assume most of these people (http://www.linuxports.com/guide/consultants/)
6. I have not looked in a while but I think Loki is also.
You are right selling Linux is most likely not a good idea but selling hardware and servicing that hardware is a *very* good idea. The basic concept behind the Netwinder was not flawed. It would seem the implementation was though.
Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
The government would have bailed them out with a couple of billion dollar grants *cough BOMBARDIER cough*
--- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
From the FAQ on www.netwinder.org:
It wasn't a information appliance for newbies, it was a small form-factor Linux server or thin-client.www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance