Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: The Motion Picture DVD In Nov

CliffSpradlin writes "The Motion Picture will be released as a two-DVD set. More info can be found here on TrekToday about what is on the DVDs. At the bottom of the page, there is a form to ask the developers of the DVDs questions about the release. This rerelease is totally revamped, with a new sound mix, better effects, and a better feeling of continuity. For more info what has been changed technically, go here for information from the official website, StarTrek.com"

31 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. Oh great by isorox · · Score: 2

    When Enterprise was annouced, trektoday/trekbbs was slashdotted all day. Same again this time? Use a fscking cache, /please/

    1. Re:Oh great by isorox · · Score: 2

      well, maybe not that cache, as its over a month old, but go find another one, please!

    2. Re:Oh great by isorox · · Score: 2

      hence the follow up, guess I really should check my posts first :)

      I'm still waiting for slashdot to mirror smaller sites, adverts are no good to the site if no one can get there in the first place!

  2. just one question ... by Frizzled · · Score: 3, Interesting

    did they "re-master" the part where spock is out, flying around in a spacesuit?

    the first film really did set a tone for the rest of the series (saving the planet, one episode at a time) ... but that scene still gives me chills.

    _f

  3. Planet Vulcan? by rakerman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it just me, or does the newly rendered Planet Vulcan look like something out of a level from Quake?

    1. Re:Planet Vulcan? by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you look carefully, the rocket launcher is on top of a pillar in the background to the left.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  4. first star trek movie by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    The main hassle fro the first star trek movei was that it didn't appeal to everyone. Which is hard to do in the first place.

    Specifically, it didn't appeal to the shot'em up types, and the "gimmick" used for the plot was a little too pat for my taste.

    So in some ways, it was typical Star Trek. I wonder how much the new graphics, and special effect enhancements can make up for the weakness of the original story.

    To tell the truth, it would have been better to have a revisit from Harry Mudd, or something.

    The common consensus was that the movie with Kahn was a much better story all around.

    Still, should be interesting

    - - -
    Radio Free Nation
    is a general news site based on Slash Code
    "If You have a Story, We have a Soap Box"
    - - -

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:first star trek movie by CleverNickName · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Alien54 said:"To tell the truth, it would have been better to have a revisit from Harry Mudd, or something"

      Harry Mudd was supposed to make an appearence on TNG, way back in the day. The idea was that the Enterprise D would come across this guy who was sitting in hypersleep (or whatever they'd call it on Trek) and when they woke him up, the scene would go something like this:

      MUDD:"Where am I?"
      DR.CRUSHER: "You're on the starship Enterprise."
      MUDD(incredulously):"Oh, great!"

      Cool idea, right? It never got made, because the actor who played Mudd died. So we got the *ahem* "Outrageous Okona" instead.

      Just your daily dose of useless Star Trek trivia. (I hear that there's a market for that stuff)
    2. Re:first star trek movie by jnik · · Score: 4, Informative
      I wonder how much the new graphics, and special effect enhancements can make up for the weakness of the original story.

      Really, it's far, far more than that. The official line is that the DVD is finishing the film. They're doing post on some footage that never got used, re-editing, and overall trying to do the film the way it was meant, rather than under the Christmas deadline. All-in-all, it should be a better, not just prettier, flick.

    3. Re:first star trek movie by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      It never got made, because the actor who played Mudd died. So we got the *ahem* "Outrageous Okona" instead.

      These days with digital actors, it might not be so much a problem.

      - - -
      Radio Free Nation
      is a news site based on Slash Code
      "If You have a Story, We have a Soap Box"
      - - -

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    4. Re:first star trek movie by steveha · · Score: 3, Informative

      The official line is that the DVD is finishing the film.

      Oh, I hope so. Specifically, I hope the "Doug Trumbull" ending gets put on!

      I read in some SF fan magazine that they had an ending planned where, at the very end when V'Ger makes a bright flash of light and disappears, V'Ger first spit out all the stuff it ate, including a Federation space station and a few Klingon battlecruisers. The Klingons, noticing that they are now right next to Earth and all Earth defenses are at the moment shut down, start attacking things, and a pitched battle (Enterprise vs. 3 Klingon cruisers) ensues. Enterprise wins, but damage is heavy and they have to eject the saucer!

      I doubt they can finish it that far because I don't think any of the scenes involving actors were ever filmed. And the whole thing could have just been a rumor. But it would have been cool...

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  5. The big question on everyone's minds by IceFox · · Score: 2

    When will the box set of 1-6 (DVD) come out? Anyone know? Anyone have any information about it?

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  6. Woo hoo! Select scene 1, loop, pop open a beer. by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hurrah, now I can watch the best bits without wearing out my tape. Specifically, the first two minutes: that spine shivering D7 battlecruiser flyby intro, and the sterling example of a thorough Klingon scientific investigation: "Visual! Tactical! Stand by torpedoes! Fire! [pause, oops] Evasive!"


    After that though, the boring old Federation Dudley Dorights take over, and it all kind of goes downhill from there. ;)

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  7. Boycott! by Trollificus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't we supposed to be boycotting anything that has to do with DVD? Ohhh, I forgot. That doesn't apply to Anime and geek movies. Silly me.

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

  8. TWO discs?! by nougatmachine · · Score: 4, Funny
    Help! Say it isn't true! They've taken the limping snail's pace of the first Star Trek Movie and made it longer?!

    This is not a good sign...

    1. Re:TWO discs?! by zpengo · · Score: 2

      Yeah, nothing like taking a movie where nothing happened and watching it in excruciating, vivid detail.

      --


      Got Rhinos?
  9. Star Trek.. by OpCode42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This should have been called "Star Trek : The Slow Motion Picture". Terrible.

  10. Special Edition by 6EQUJ5 · · Score: 3, Funny


    Features digitally enhanced Shatner hair-piece!

    "However.... bad.. acting.. cannot.. be.. edited..."

    --

  11. Lost, lamented aliens by fm6 · · Score: 3, Informative
    To tell the truth, it would have been better to have a revisit from Harry Mudd, or something.

    The guys I miss are the Iotians. The closing line from that episode begs for a sequel. Alas, the official party line is that Sigma Iotia II is under permanent quarantine. Mustn't give the Federation any real competition.

  12. NOT 3D Graphics!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I read about this new release a couple weeks ago and cried with disbelief when I read they are replacing the ship shots with computer rendered ones. One of the things that always made star trek, star wars etc look so great was the fantastic battleship looking models they all used on classic blue screen setups, not this cheap garbage like in Bablyon five. I've seen examples from the dvd of the ship and sure enough it looks computer generated, plus in the pictures I saw they didn't even bother to render in the random hull plating look that the models have, which make them truly look like a battle ship.

  13. Re:ST:TMP is a good movie... by cheesebot · · Score: 2, Funny

    you're probably right. if they didn't waste about two hours oohing and aahing over the enterprise in "dry-dock" and hired some actors it probably wouldn't have been so horribly nauseating.

  14. Re:Why 2 DVDs? by camusflage · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to the rec.video.dvd FAQ, it is in fact a technical limitation. You're looking at four layers in one disc. Combine that with changers built to play only single sided DVD's, and you won't see many DVD-18's around.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  15. Re:Rainbows by SparkyMartin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope not. STTMP is the only movie where they looked cool and only appeared during acceleration. All of the other silly ST movies show them any time the ship is in warp and as it goes by it makes a silly "whoosh" sound.

  16. Re:Why 2 DVDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gladiator was DUAL LAYER, not DOUBLE SIDED.

    I haven't heard of a DVD player which will read both sides of a double sided DVD, nor have I heard of double sided DVD's being used for a single version of a movie... I've only seen double sided used for widescreen/regular view versions of a movie so you don't have to flip it. But I won't deny the possibility those exist.

    DUAL LAYER means that the laser focuses deeper into the DVD to read multiple layers. I believe they actually did some tests with up to 4 layers, or maybe it was 10 layers. Of course your DVD player must support the number of layers to be able to read them and older DVD players only supported one layer. Newer ones support two. That means you can't even use the dual layer CD on an older DVD player at all. It's not as simple as getting up to flip it over.

    Also, Dual Layer DVD's have a little bug in them. Many DVD players will pause for a second when they switch to read the next layer. Apparently the DVD player manufacturers have never heard of anti-skip technology where you buffer the data so that it doesn't skip when something like that happens. Or maybe they just didn't want to increase the costs of the DVD player.

    Gladiator has this problem near the end. I thought the DVD was messed up at the time because I'd never heard of this issue before then. I don't know why they didn't disguise it by makign the swap when the screen was dark and there wasn't anything on the screen. Maybe they wanted more room for extras.

    I think the newest DVD players don't have this problem anymore, but I'm not sure about that, and I'm not upgarding my DVD player until recordable DVD's come out... I was planning to wait for those before I even bought my first DVD player, but when a couple years went by and there was no recordable DVD in sight, I was kinda forced to buy the regular kind of player. They'd better get those recordable DVD players out soon!

  17. The one thing I cannot figure out... by SparkyMartin · · Score: 2, Funny

    is why are they all wearing their pajamas in STTMP?

  18. Models are better than rendering. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Little models are better than rendering because computer programmers still don't know shit about texture and (un)rigidity and natural motion.

    A two-foot piece of plastic with funky lighting looks a hell of a lot more real than a wire-frame sprite with a shaded skin.

    --Blair

  19. mmm....dmca by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot user #1: The actions of the MPAA in trying to restrict free speech and stifle scientific research are unconscionable. Let's hit them where it hurts - in the wallet - and refuse to buy their products until they respect their consumers!

    Slashdot user #2: ooh look, a new Star Trek DVD!!

    1. Re:mmm....dmca by crucini · · Score: 2
      Yup. And the interesting thing is that Taco does not seem to see the contradiction, even to the extent of saying, "I know the MPAA are bad guys, but...". It's like each 'category' of slashdot is a water-tight compartment. I'm really curious to know what it would take to pierce the barrier. If MPAA 'enforcement agents' were running around killing people like the 'death squads' in El Salvador, would Taco still be happily promoting their wares?

      Of course it's easy (and cheap) for me to take this stance, because:
      1. I have neither a TV nor a DVD player nor a computer running Windows.
      2. I no longer have the attention span for 90 minutes+ of passive "entertainment". And my big goal in life is to get outside more, not to spend more hours in front of a CRT.
      3. The whole "Star Trek" thing strikes me as egregiously awful rubbish, summing up the worst and most embarassing stereotypes of the 'geek'. Not to mention the deeply authoritarian, imperialistic ideology underpinning the shows. Did you notice that the riot control expert (a Marine Colonel, I think) quoted in a recent non-lethal-weapon thread cited the phaser as the dream weapon they're working towards? Oh, and feel free to 'rebut' this by pointing out the episode where Captain Picard orders the Deltachrons not to impose their culture on the Anabonkas. You will be missing something.
      4. For some reason I associate Star Trek with Microsoft. Every MCSE I've worked with seems like he wants to prance around in a spandex uniform saluting and saying "Thrusters full ahead, Captain!" (Or whatever they say). The whole tone of Microsoft's communication to developers/sysadmins seems to say, "Aren't you lucky to be on board our great big high-tech ship? You are hereby promoted to assistant technical system support engineer! Click OK to continue." Of course the abuse of the word "Enterprise" underscores the link.
      So how am I doing in the real world? Well, I bought a book recently. Although book publishers haven't taken the spotlight yet, they all seem to support the DMCA. Some association of publishers was quoted as celebrating Sklyarov's arrest. My hands are not altogether clean.

      By the way, if you mod this down for mocking Star Trek, I hope you are magically transported to the Enterprise and get to find out how an outspoken intelligent person would fare in such an environment.
  20. Star Blech: The Motionless Picture by catseye_95051 · · Score: 2

    To Go Where Nomad Has Goen Before.

    What a waste of plastic.

  21. Re:ST:TMP is a good movie... by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2
    This movie probably would have become as big a hit as Blade Runner...

    Blade Runner (new special edition due on DVD later this year, BTW) tanked at the box office originally - it found its legs on TV and video. Scrapping the voice-over and sappy ending in the Director's Cut didn't hurt either.

    --

    ---

    Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  22. Taking technology and advances too far? by Seemlar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While being able to get ST:TMP on DVD was something I looked forward to, I can't help but be greatly disturbed by a certain trend.

    For twenty years I've greatly enjoyed ST:TMP. Now I find the only version I can see coming in the DVD format is.. the Directors Edition.

    What if I don't want a directors revised version? Where do I get ST:TMP it its pure unaltered version on DVD?

    Now I'm all for a film being enhanced or added to.. but NOT at the cost of its original vision, flawed or not.

    I'm similary going to be force fed a bastardised version of Star Wars when George Lucas feels worthy to put them on the DVD format, most likely only in his 'special' editions.

    I personally feel an altered movie should not be allowed unless its true original version is also made available.