Slashdot Mirror


ReplayTV 4000 Series Shares TV Over Net

REden writes " ReplayTV announces their ReplayTV 4000 Series networkable PVR. Features include video sharing between LAN attached Replays, sending a show to another Replay over the internet, and automatic commercial skip. Prices start at $700 for a 40 hour unit and max out at $2000 for a 320 hour unit. ReplayTV guide service included. Units are scheduled to ship November 14th." 320 hours. I can't imagine holding on to that much TV - but space is cheap, so, eh, why not?

60 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Headed for a lawsuit? by FatSean · · Score: 3, Redundant

    This device sounds great! Too great, in fact. You can skip the commercials, then send the shows to people on the internet?! Surely some body will sue this company into oblivion, as their device enables users to enjoy TV without being subjected commercials!

    Maybe I had better buy one before it's too late.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Headed for a lawsuit? by dair · · Score: 3, Informative
      No mention was made of sending shows over the internet...rather, it was to other units on a LAN.
      From their FAQ:

      Q. How do I share television programs with my friends?
      A. If your friend has a ReplayTV 4000, they can "talk" to each other over the broadband Internet connections.


      It sounds as if you need a ReplayTV unit at each end, but capturing what they send to each other would be trivial. The datastream is probably encrypted, but you have to wonder how long that would last.

      -dair
    2. Re:Headed for a lawsuit? by Legal+Penguin · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is extremely carefully worded. It does NOT say that you will be able to send copies of copyrighted materials to friends over the internet. It says the machines will be able to "'talk' to each other". I haven't read the FAQ, but this leaves plenty of wiggle room.

      "Talking" in this context might mean sharing programs, but it might also mean sharing programming data only or some other lame restriction. The fact is that, the way the law looks now, a Court could well find that there would have to be a "substantial non-infringing use" for the sharing feature to make it legal. In the context of the ReplayTV units (which I love -- I own one myself) that use would be hard to find. ReplayTV units record essentially only copyrighted material, so the sharing function (outside of a home LAN) would seem to have little non-infringing purpose.

      Within a home LAN, an argument could be made that the purpose is "space shifting" -- making legally copied content available in other places in the home for the person who made the legal copy. This is an extension of the "time shifting" rationale used to justify the existence of VCRs in the Supreme Court's seminal Betamax case. "Space shifting" was also found to be a fair use (by a lower court) in the RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia (Rio) case, and is one reason that MP3 players are not actionable.

      But the space shifting argument has not been extended in recent cases (either in New York or California, where most of this gets tried, see the various DeCSS cases) so I think the "sharing" feature, if it really does allow people to share copyrighted content with friends in distant locations, would be fertile ground for a lawsuit.

      Note that, much as I love 'em, ReplayTV has backed off its promises in the past. It originally told buyers that their personal viewing information would NEVER be collected or sold. It is now clear that such information IS being collected for the my.replaytv.com service. That's fine -- good, even, my.replaytv.com is very cool -- it just happens to be a clear, unannouced change in policy.

      Now if they put 802.11b in the thing, I'd pre-order right now.

      --
      "The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government." - George Washington
    3. Re:Headed for a lawsuit? by mr100percent · · Score: 2

      mst3k? Where? gnutella?

    4. Re:Headed for a lawsuit? by IronChef · · Score: 2


      If there is an ethernet port on that thing, someone will figure out how to make your computer look like another unit. Patience, Grasshopper.

    5. Re:Headed for a lawsuit? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2

      The MST3K Digital Archive Project. They share most of their stuff over eDonkey and IRC.

      They only share episodes which haven't yet been released on video, which makes it slightly more legal. (It might even be entirely legal, since the MST3K people encouraged fans to share tapes.)

  2. Re: ReplayTV 4000 Series Announced by seanellis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmm. "Automatic commercial skip facility." If spammers can sue their ISPs now, how long until some advertiser sues Replay for loss of revenue?

    Sean

  3. I'll tell you why not! by HiroProtagonist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Space might be cheap but $2000.00 just for a larger hard drive isn't. I'm sorry, but I will never love TV that much.

    Especially when NVidia is coming out with a product that will run on my PC and support as large a HDD as I can afford!

    NVIDIA Personal Cinema Redefines PC Home Entertainment

    --
    --Remove chicken to e-mail
    1. Re:I'll tell you why not! by Yokaze · · Score: 2, Informative

      From their technical specs page
      - Up to 320 hours using MPEG 2 video encoding

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    2. Re:I'll tell you why not! by stripes · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Space might be cheap but $2000.00 just for a larger hard drive isn't. I'm sorry, but I will never love TV that much.

      Esp. since I expect someone to figure out how to send shows to a Linux box rather then another ReplayTV, so you don't need to store everything on the Replay, just whatever you don't have time to transfer.

      Especially when NVidia is coming out with a product that will run on my PC and support as large a HDD as I can afford!

      There is some advantage to having a dedicated device with (I assume) a real OS. Maybe not such an issue if your PC runs Linux, but I'm expecting it will be a while until you can use the NVidia with ease to capture TV shows (including tuning the cable box) under Linux. I have the competing product (TiVo) and it has never ever crashed. It has lost power a few times, but never had some random DLL blow up and cause me to miss a TV show.

    3. Re:I'll tell you why not! by Paul9196 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only thing mine can't do, which is only a software limitation, is that I can't skip over commercials. I love the looks of Nvidias new entertainment system, but it was a little pricey for me. The only real thing I am lacking is a way to change the channel on my digital cable box. I could by an IR shooter like my friend has to do the job, but it is like a 5 second delay on changing channels.

  4. Cunning... by r1ch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I suspect that this might even stay legal - it looks like they've limited it so that you can only send each show to a maximum of 15 units - enough to keep your average user happy, but it should also be low enough to stop it being a worthwhile means of piracy.

    Now why can't I have one in England? :-(

    1. Re:Cunning... by ethereal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But that might be sufficient for peer-to-peer transmission; if I send it to 15 people, who each send it to 15 people, etc. Or does it have some sort of serial copy protection, so that you can only send it once and your friend can't send on your copy to anyone else?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  5. How closely... by G-funk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Are these things tied to NTSC? Cause I'd absolutely love something like this, but as I live in australia, we're running on PAL. Does anybody know of anything in the PVR area that can run on PAL? Can these things be hacked to do it? What about a Tivo?

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    1. Re:How closely... by robbieduncan · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK (also PAL) we can get Tivo's (from evil BSB, but they work with all providers). I imagine these would work in other PAL areas?

  6. At that price... by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... its cheaper to build a dedicated box for compression :(

    Yes, there won't be a nifty display (unless you buy a LCD panel) but you won't be limited by their design.

    I know it's been in the discussion lists earlier, but... an AMD box runs around 250$, add a 200$ capture/ MPEG compression card and you are up to 500 with a 40 gig HD. Thats alot of space... there is still programming issues, but... could be conquerd if the desire was there :)

    1. Re:At that price... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

      Yes, but boxes like this and TiVo exist for a reason. Simplicity and integration. They integrate standard television with VCR like functions and an online guide. And now they've integrated file sharing (HURRAY!) into the deal. And it is simple to use.

      Sure, you could do the same thing with a PC. But you're always going to have to be futzing with it. The 'barrier to entry' for a normal consumer to make his own device is the convenience factor.

  7. Next week: "Replay sued by world+dog" by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Broadcasting video over a home LAN? To other replays over the internet? Jackie "the fish" Valenti will have them in irons by the end of the week.

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  8. 320 hours = 320 gigabytes = $800 by peter303 · · Score: 2

    They quote the most agression compression rate
    in these hour ratings. People who actually have
    these systems prefer 1.5-2 GB per hour for higher
    quality.

    At about $200 for a 80 GB disk, thats about $800,
    presuming the system ships with enough controller
    capacity.

    1. Re:320 hours = 320 gigabytes = $800 by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They quote the most agression compression rate in these hour ratings.

      And the most aggressive compression rates, too! But being able to select the compression rate you want really is a big win for the consumer and manufacturer. The manufacturer doesn't get flamed that they've made a hard choice which either makes a poor quality video, or doesn't have enough recording space.

      Get the cheap version. Hack on another disk.

    2. Re:320 hours = 320 gigabytes = $800 by cancrman · · Score: 2

      If you assume a TIVO like business model it turns out to be $200 for the drive, $350 for the rest of the hardware and $250 or so for the built in lifetime service that comes inculded with any replay machine.

      --
      The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
  9. Holy cow! by raygundan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There isn't a feature I can think to add to this thing! I've been complaining since I got my Tivo that it wouldn't automatically skip commercials-- if an $80 VCR can auto-FFW through the commercials, why can't my PVR? This solves that problem, and throws content sharing in just to sweeten the deal. Not to mention the huge storage capacities they have available!

    Tivo has always been chicken to try anything like this, and it looks like it's going to bite 'em now that somebody else has the guts to do it. Why would you ever buy a unit now that didn't allow commercial skipping and content sharing?

    It's probably too good to be true, though-- I imagine that this will be sued into oblivion before 20 units leave the stores. *sigh*

    1. Re:Holy cow! by stripes · · Score: 3
      There isn't a feature I can think to add to this thing! I've been complaining since I got my Tivo

      Sure you can, buy one and you'll miss a lot of the TiVo's scheduling features. The new "conflict catcher" is an improvement, but no session pass manager (for non-TiVo owners that lets you set up in advance which shows are more important, so if there is a schedule change the show that is most important will be recorded.

      That isn't to say that TiVo's scheduling is the end all. Both units could do better padding. TiVo could do even better with show tracking (yes I said new episodes of Sopranos are more important the The Practice, but since The Practice only shows up on Sunday and Sopranos all week, it "should" be able to figure out that recording Practice at 9 then Sopranos at 11 would be better then doing the simple greedy algo). Of corse ReplayTV isn't even good enough to complain about that yet :-)

      ReplayTV is also more irritating in the way it manages the disk space. You set aside disk for each show you want, so you can miss episodes of things you want even though there is ample free space. On the other hand that manages to deal with marathons without resorting to "Save at most N" on the TiVo (and "save at most" has similar problems to Replay's pre-allocate per show method).

      Tivo has always been chicken to try anything like this, and it looks like it's going to bite 'em now that somebody else has the guts to do it. Why would you ever buy a unit now that didn't allow commercial skipping and content sharing?

      Yes. But it is a harder sell now. Before TiVo's better scheduling was enough to make it a clear winner. Now it depends. Being able to move shows to a PC would win me over, moving between Replay's is not as exciting (but since it is likely that someone will manage to figure out how to make a PC accept the shows....). Commercial autoskip is nice, but not a super huge deal to me. It may be to others.

      If sending shows around is seamless enough (and I doubt it is just yet) it can be a lot better then two tuners (like MS UTV, or the Direct TiVo with the 2.5 software). Want two tuners, buy two ReplayTVs, want 4 tuners? Buy four.

      I'm glad someone has done it. It will be harder for TiVo to not do it now. The big questions is which happens first: TiVo gets networking, or ReplayTV gets better scheduling. Until one of those things happens it is a hard choice either way!

    2. Re:Holy cow! by logicTrAp · · Score: 2

      If you want to spend some money and time hacking on the Tivo you can actually install an ethernet card in it (well, the stand-alone units at least) and use some software to extract the mpeg streams onto your PC. Not sure if you can get them back in there but being able to create VCDs at least would be pretty nice. Check out 9thtee.com and avsforum.com

    3. Re:Holy cow! by stripes · · Score: 2
      If you want to spend some money and time hacking on the Tivo you can actually install an ethernet card in it (well, the stand-alone units at least) and use some software to extract the mpeg streams onto your PC.

      Yes you can, but it seems more likely that TiVo will change things that will break this. In part because they don't want to piss off their partners (they also don't want to piss off their customers, some of which do this, so it is a hard choice for them). In part because those programs rely on the internal structure of files on the TiVo which might be changes for reasons that are completely unrelated to wanting to break the hack. (For example the much rumored VBR in 2.5)

      Sonic Blue is less likely to change the way ReplayTVs send to each other because that would make a new one unable to send to an old one.

  10. doesn't look like it will be mainstream by dobratzp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from the faq...

    Q. I don't have a home network. Will I need to get one?
    A. Yes. ReplayTV 4000's are enabled by an Ethernet connection only. There are also all kinds of incredible features that work only when your ReplayTV is connected to your PC. But don't worry, home networks are relatively inexpensive and easy to install. And, to make this even easier, ReplayTV is providing, for a limited time, a choice of promotional offers including a Free NETGEAR Home Network (a $100 value), with the purchase of an RTV4080, RTV4160 or RTV4320.

    The fact that you can bypass commercials still will affect a very limited number of users. Yes, home networks are relatively inexpensive (less than $2000), but your average consumer will not want to set up a firewall/router and a home network just to watch TV. Looks like the mainstream is still bound to low quality "VHS" technology for a little while longer.

    1. Re:doesn't look like it will be mainstream by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, home networks are relatively inexpensive (less than $2000), but your average consumer will not want to set up a firewall/router and a home network just to watch TV
      Why would the average user NEED to settup a home firewall/router? connect the box to you PC via network, what use is a router? If it's not connected to out internet then whats the use of a Firewall? Alos, I don't think the person willing to spend $2000 for one of these would have much of a problem with the network harwdare costs.
    2. Re:doesn't look like it will be mainstream by ethereal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you just wanted to connect between two ReplayTVs to share the movies, couldn't you just use a crossover cable? That's relatively inexpensive. Or do you need the PC in order to manage the transfers?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  11. who watches 320 hours of TV? by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Assume I want time-shift ALL my weekly viewing
    from night to day or to weekends etc, I'd need
    a maximum of 20-30 hours on the laziest weeks.
    I have seven four-hour tapes now for this purpose,
    and rarely time shift ten hours a week.

    I suppose the other 300 hours could be for
    archiving, but there isn't that much I'd want.

    I'd guestimate 100 hours would satisfy all
    but the hard core vegetables.

    1. Re:who watches 320 hours of TV? by RedX · · Score: 2

      The 320 hour capacity is using the highest compression setting, or the worst quality. Using Best Quality is going to result in a very small fraction of that 320 hours, probably around the 100 hour target you mentioned. I've got a 100 hour TiVo and I've had it pretty close to maxed-out several times since I am storing a Godfather marathon from one of the movie channels and a few other non-DVD movies recorded in best quality.

  12. Deciphering the Marketing Speak by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    From their FAQ:

    Q. How does ReplayTV use my Ethernet connection?
    A. ReplayTV uses the high-speed Ethernet connection to connect to your home network. This means that your ReplayTV is now connected to your PC and to the Internet. If you have more than one ReplayTV, they'll be connected to each other, too. This means, you can now share recorded programming between multiple ReplayTV's within your home, access new television content through your PC via the Internet, and even share programs with friends who also own ReplayTV 4000s. The Ethernet connection can also be used to transfer digital photos from your PC to your ReplayTV and once on your ReplayTV, you can watch digital slide shows on your television.

    OK, this stops just short of saying, "Yes, you can record all those Simpson reruns on ReplayTV, then copy them to the hard drive on your PC for archival/editing/sharing with the entire world", but it seems like that would be a logical use as well. Then again, logic rarely plays a part in copyright/IP law. What do you guys think, would that sort of thing be possible with this unit, or do they have some built-in protection against it (i.e., only copying to other ReplayTV units)? And if so, how long before the MPAA comes a-knockin?

  13. Re: ReplayTV 4000 Series Announced by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Commercial skip is not new. They've been in VCR's for years, using an automatic fast-forward.

    Better still, can advertisers sue all those people going to the bathroom during commercials?

  14. Somebody figured it out... by raygundan · · Score: 2

    Lots of VCRs do this now-- they tag the commercials on the tape for auto FFWD when you replay it. Look for the "commercial advance" logo on the box/VCR. Since cheapo commodity VCRs can do it (although I don't know how...) it's a no-brainer to stick it into a PVR.

    Here's an article about one model. (just a quick search on google)

  15. Back To School, VideoOnDemand, Demographics by martyb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can just see the net admins at colleges trying to deal with this. They've had to deal with napster and the like and all the bandwidth they'd consume on their LAN. Now imagine an entire dorm (or campus!) sending saved shows to each other.

    If there's a way to hack the system, I can well imagine folks at the likes of MIT will find a way to do it. The result is that the initial broadcast of a show over the airwaves, cable, satelite, etc. could eventually be dwarfed by the time-delayed transmissions.

    The Result? Bypass the current transmission media and get your shows direct from Replay! Sign up for the shows you want and they'd send it to you, over the internet. Then, just add video servers on the internet with pre-compressed movies available on a pay-per-view basis and you've got all you need to bypass the Blockbuster video rental shops -- just watch what you want, when you want it, without having to go out to get / return a video and no worry about late fees. Sure, it'll be free to share between RePlays for now, but I suspect that's just the initial push to build market share, and then there'd be a rollout of central server subscriptions, copy protection, and per-show charges.

  16. Really a whole house media server by gduprey · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was surveyed by Replay a while back (I've had a few of their units) and what they are starting to build here is the idea of a whole house multi-media server. The fact that it happens to be targeted at the moment to TV recording is probably just marketing. Their getting folks interested in the concept (it's pretty new/foreign to many) and will probably "spin" it more toward that once people are familiar/comfortable with it.

    The idea is you can keep video, audio (not yet discussed, but I'm sure is in there), pictures, etc in this unit, share it with your desktop, TV and other units, download video/audio/movies from the internet/etc/etc. Just like a file server, but geared toward multimedia (with the requisite MM oriented management tools).

    It's really a powerful idea (IMHO) and while you can do this with a PC, they have a very nice interface and management tools and a nice "black box" approach. I think the $2000 for the extra space is silly, but...

    I've already updated my ReplayTV 3030 to 80 Hours and will go to 160 soon. Once you start using these things with expanded capacity, you do start to "cache" programs/movies more and more. In fact, once you get over 60 hours or so, you start thinking of the device as some sort of server/respository (unlike with the 30 hour models where you are frequently deleting things when done, making it feel much more like just a time shifter). I really hope the "folders" stuff they mention will be in the next firmware update for all ReplayTV units though. I could really use it about now...

    Unfortunatly, I think their likely to get sued to oblivion, but I have to beleive they expected this and have been preparing for it. I'd love to see them get through such a case unscathed as it would put a nice hole in the RIAA's dike.

    I don't work for Replay, just been a pretty satisfied user for 1.5 years :-)

    Gerry

  17. Good point-- no season pass manager sucks. by raygundan · · Score: 2

    I stand corrected.

    Without a way to prioritize your "record all" stuff, these things quickly become a giant pain to use. Just try getting a season pass to the simpsons and anything else, and watch how quickly you get conflicts. Being able to prioritize is nice. I had to get my Tivo replaced under warranty (fried modem, of course) and use the old 1.3 software (no way to set show priorities) for a few days-- it was absolutely impossible to get it to record all of my shows, since some episodes always overlap with others. (Simpsons/Junkyard Wars, for example)

    As much as I bitch, I do love my Tivo-- but I hope this is a swift kick in the rear for Tivo and that we see ethernet-enabled, commercial-skipping, internet-show-sharing, remotely-programmable, 480p-output Tivos with 320 hours of storage space in the near future.

    1. Re:Good point-- no season pass manager sucks. by stripes · · Score: 2
      Without a way to prioritize your "record all" stuff, these things quickly become a giant pain to use. Just try getting a season pass to the simpsons and anything else, and watch how quickly you get conflicts. Being able to prioritize is nice. I had to get my Tivo replaced under warranty (fried modem, of course) and use the old 1.3 software (no way to set show priorities) for a few days-- it was absolutely impossible to get it to record all of my shows, since some episodes always overlap with others. (Simpsons/Junkyard Wars, for example)

      Well it does let you choose what wins in a conflict, it might be fine grained then (TiVo isn't -- you can set the new show to beat all old shows, none of the old shows, or not go at all -- to get anything in between you have to visit the SPM, and watch the "Please Wait" icon for a bit). So it might be better then TiVo's 1.3 software, I'm sure it can't be as good as the 2.0 software without a SPM.

      I'm also not sure if it has wishlists, and I know it doesn't have suggestions. Not as important as the SPM though.

      As much as I bitch, I do love my Tivo-- but I hope this is a swift kick in the rear for Tivo and that we see ethernet-enabled, commercial-skipping, internet-show-sharing, remotely-programmable, 480p-output Tivos with 320 hours of storage space in the near future.

      I hope so, but I'm guessing the commercial-skipping is not coming anytime soon as they are trying to get money from advertisers (selling the iPreview stuff, and telescoping commercials). Show sharing, and seemless show sharing (making N ReplayTVs, or TiVos act as one unit with N tuners -- on Now Showing list, one ToDo list, one place to set a wishlist or pass and have the TiVo or Replay work out who records it, and what disk it lives on) would be enough to convince me to upgrade.

      Hopefully TiVo catches up with sharing, or Replay catches up with scheduling. Either would make me buy again, even in this economy :-)

  18. Nothing New by nhavar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is nothing new. My wife and I have been doing this for awhile with the ATI AIW cards. We have three computers running with the card and their default software (which includes guide and PVR functions) all hooked up over a home network. Movies can be shifted back and forth over the network and viewed from any machine/tv in the house. Additionally they can be DIVX'd and sent to CD, etc. It cost me around $150 for each card (the newer much faster Radeon is $200 and the even faster 8500 is around $500 w/RF remote). 20 gig hard drive is about $69 bucks...so for about 219 you can have most of the functionality that is offered by this set top box plus be able to play your favorite games on the big screen. Or you can overpay, or your can wait for nVidia to play catch up in this area.

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    1. Re:Nothing New by nhavar · · Score: 2

      BTW "NVIDIA Personal Cinema Redefines PC Home Entertainment" all the features listed in that article ATI has had for the past 3 or 4 years now. (Hardware DVD, PVR features (adjustable compression, zoom, pause, cc, video magazine, multichannel preview, editing), 3d acceleration etc.). And while ATI is playing catch up in the 3d accelleration market I think some of the new hardware they've had come out has proven that they can play with the big boys like nVidia.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    2. Re:Nothing New by nhavar · · Score: 2

      The service is Guideplus from gemstar and allows for regular scheduling (i.e. every monday, weekly, onetime, etc.) and then there is the hotword selection which allows the PVR to monitor channels and when a hotword which you've chosen appears it will record the program. Interface is extremely simple. The freebie software that ships with the card is actually pretty good quality. No it doesn't look for similar programs or "season pass" but then most of the Tivo users I've talked to hate some of the junk that gets taped using those features. I guess it's all up to personal preferences.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    3. Re:Nothing New by nhavar · · Score: 2

      All good points. Yeah the guide that comes with AIW allows you to do some pretty refined searches by genre, actor, rating, format, etc. and you can set favorites by any of those but it ends up still be a somewhat manual process to record what you want. You filter out the favorites and click the little checkbox thing to schedule. Good points though for people wanting to weigh their options.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  19. Ludicrous by Controlio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's funny... it seems as if ReplayTV has been scouring the TiVo message boards and looking for complaints from the underground. Every single one of these features are things that have been worked on or at least discussed in the TiVo Underground. Seems like the TiVo employees aren't the only ones browsing the bulletin boards in their free time.

    Things of this nature have been discussed for a long time, but eventually discarded as being impractical. Now, here it is in box form, and it's even more impractical than I would have ever imagined.

    First of all, I spent $250 on my 20hr TiVo, and then an additional $300 in hard drives for a total of ~144 hours recording time in 120gig of storage. This combined total is CONSIDERABLY less than their 40hr unit, and comes with over 3x more storage time. This, alone, proves that it's not worth it. And $2000? For a PVR? Don't even get me started. I would MUCH rather buy a video card with TV in and the PVR-like services that video cards are being bundled with now. Then I could record to my heart's content... not that I've ever been able to accumulate 65hrs of content on my TiVo to date...

    The networked video storage... this was never spoken of (out loud) because of the frowning of not only the TiVo sponsors, but the threat of lawsuits to a young company. People seem to have major issues when you distribute copies of programs with no visual loss between generations. At least someone else is here to take the fall that TiVo couldn't.

    Skipping commercials was the other big problem. This has always been available via backdoors in TiVo (removed in 2.0.1, rumored to be back in 2.5), but again, never a mainstream feature because of the sponsor problems it would cause. I'm going to be real interested to find out how the television community reacts to these features, and hopefully ReplayTV can be the whipping boy to pave the way for TiVo's next software update.

    This will be the only good thing to come out of ReplayTV, the fact that every legal team even eyeing TiVo in the past will all start looking Replay's way now... and if Replay can get away with these features without a problem, expect the apprehensive TiVo to have them Q1 next year. As for me, I couldn't even consider buying a PVR for $700. I almost never bought mine for $250, there's just NO WAY I could justify that much of an expense. Not when I could get at TiVo with better service (just a few less tricks up it's sleeve) for $199 nowadays.

  20. space not really the issue by chrisperfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an owner of a hacked ReplayTV (i stuck in an 80gb drive) i can tell you that, imho for most people going beyond 80 or 100 hours is not all that helpful. The ReplayTV is a time-shifting device, not an archiving device.

    As the space you have for storage goes up, the problem you immediately run into is the inability to record two things at the same time. This happens more often than you might think, principally because networks compete for the same audience by sheduling shows that have similar appeal opposite each other (the bastards) like for example, X-Files and Dark Angel.

    So, personally, i think that ReplayTV would be better served by sticking in an extra tuner in there in preference to a bigger harddrive.

    Tivo has announced a unit with two tuners, but i believe it only works with directtv. similarly, the microsoft ultimatetv can record two things at the same time, but only off directtv.

    Of course, once there are two tuners in there, it will be easier to use up the space. Harddrives are upgradeable, however.

    Another approach, since these new units are going to be networkable, would be to be able to network two or more units together. Have them negotiate between them who is going to record what when, and then present one user interface to control all of them. that would be nifty, though an expensive way to be able to record two things at once...

  21. It's not really 320 hours by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Everybody keeps saying, "Whoa - who needs 320 hours of TV?"

    However, I'm assuming that ReplayTV advertises their hours just like TiVo does, which is based on the lowest quality setting. If it's similar to TiVo, here is what it is probably like:

    • 320 hours = Basic = pretty crappy quality
    • 160 hours = Medium = tolerable but not great
    • 120 hours = High = cable TV quality
    • 80 hours = Highest = DVD quality


    1. Re:It's not really 320 hours by jaredcat · · Score: 2, Informative

      DVD quality? I don't think so.

      One of the main problems with PVRs like TiVo and ReplayTV is that it is preforming lossy compression on what is already a low-quality signal coming through your cable system. Think recoding VHS in SP vs LP/EP. In SP, its almost as good as watching whatever quality it was in the original broadcast-- Thats about what you get from 'High Quality' on a PVR, if even that.

    2. Re:It's not really 320 hours by discovercomics · · Score: 2

      It may not be "DVD Quality", it sure as hell looks pretty damn good to me, but the signal I'm pulling from the Sat to the south is a hell of a lot better than what my crappy cable company is feeding me....

  22. Too bad none of these systems are PAL enabled! by shri · · Score: 2

    I am about to start investigating and building a similar system using ATI's Radeon AIW cards and a P3 with tons of hard disk space. Too bad neither Tivo or Replay are available as multi-system devices :(

  23. Re:Decyphering the Marketing Speak by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

    would that sort of thing be possible with this unit,

    I also wonder, if instead of getting your video feed off the air you got it from your DVD player (or the DVD drive of your PC - since the devices aparently will shares data fairly seemlessly), couldn't this quickly become the ultimate DVD ripping device? (pardon me - I mean DVD backup device - soley for personal use with DVDs I actually own.) I mean it would go through a decompression/recompression cycle, but it would stay in digital format the whole time, certainly adequate to make a fairly good VCD copy of a DVD.

    Also, with your ReplayTV connected to your PC can you burn the files to CD then mail the disc to your friend (who I assume would have to run the CD off their PC and view it on their own ReplayTV due to ReplayTV's own encryption/compression) instead of sharing it over the Internet? (I'm asking whether this would be technically feasible, I agree the MPAA will have its own opinion as to whether it is legally feasible.)

  24. Re:Decyphering the Marketing Speak by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    I also wonder, if instead of getting your video feed off the air you got it from your DVD player (or the DVD drive of your PC - since the devices aparently will shares data fairly seemlessly), couldn't this quickly become the ultimate DVD ripping device? (pardon me - I mean DVD backup device - soley for personal use with DVDs I actually own.) I mean it would go through a decompression/recompression cycle, but it would stay in digital format the whole time, certainly
    adequate to make a fairly good VCD copy of a DVD.


    Not unless you have a better different DVD player and TV than most of us.


    The best quality video format that comes out of the back of my DVD player is S-video, i.e., analog. My TiVo accepts S-video input and provides S-video output, despite the internal digital storage format. There's D/A and A/D conversion happening a lot. The only device I have that produces native digital video output is my camcorder with IEEE-1394. Everything else talks via analog signals, even if the internals are digital.


    Likewise, the best quality input into my TV is S-video (also analog).


    I've seen a few new TVs with 480p and 1080i input jacks of late, but I am not familiar with the details of these digital formats. Likewise, I haven't seen any DVD players or satellite TV receivers that have digital video output jacks.


    I've become a lot more aware of some of the limitations in current consumer electronics since I recently purchased (and upgraded) a TiVo. It's a wonderful improvement over VHS, except for disk space limitations and archiving.


    In order to overcome the archive problem (and the device specific playback problem that I think is looming) my next venture will be looking at video capture on the PC.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  25. Irony and Eternal Service by KFury · · Score: 2

    The irony is that ReplayTV originally shipped with a Firewire port that wasn't activated, but was included for 'future enhancements.' It was removed in subsequent releases (and never supported in the original hardware) because of threatened backlash from the studios.

    Aside from having a les elegant interface (and, in my opinion, recording functionality) than TiVo, ReplayTV is basically selling you service all over again when you upgrade hardware. When you buy a TiVo you can get lifetime service or pay monthly, but there's not an inordinate amount of motivation for TiVo to drive their customers to buy new hardware. Replay gets another $200 (tacked onto the price) every time someone buys a box, and at no other time, so they aren't motivated to create hardware that won't immediately obsolesce. The LAN access is a good example of this. You want it? Fine, but you just ate the lifetime guide service you bought, because now you're going to pay for it again.

    The other problem I have is that without the option of month-to-month or annual service, you're counting on ReplayTV staying in business, a proposition they've already shown is speculative at best. Since TiVo actually gets money from subscibers every month or year to keep the guide up and running, that guide will continue, run by some company, even if TiVo goes bellyup.

  26. Service fees by Therlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love my TiVo but I'd like to make it clear that if you buy a new TiVo box, you cannot transfer your paid lifetime service to the new unit. But you can sell your current TiVo and the service goes along with it.

    On the positive side, if TiVo does not have a local dial-up number (and not all of us live in the usual metropolitan areas), it will use a toll-free number for its nightly call, not costing the owner any money. ReplayTV instead will use a long distance number if a local one is not available.

  27. Ethernet? Who still uses that? I want 802.11b by IvyMike · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, since I've had my ReplayTV, I've wished that it could get show listings, etc., over my home network. It was obvious when I first got it that one of the future upgrades should be an ethernet port. But my home network cabling doesn't go near the TV, as I suspect is the case for a lot of people.

    On the other hand, I now have an 802.11b base station. Wi-Fi would be perfect in this situation. No need to run cable out to the TV! Hopefully, the ReplayTV people are working on that right now. (Also, Xbox could use an 802.11b option, too. Listening, Xbox designers?)

  28. REALLY, $700 isn't that bad. No, I'm serious! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Start with the closest standalone TiVo model, the 30 hour HDR312 from Philips. It is $300 (list). Add in TiVo's lifetime subscription fee. It is $249. You're already at $550. Add in an Ethernet kit from 7thTee that you have to install yourself. That is $100. Now you're at $650 and you've got a TiVo that has 10 hours less, and an unsupported ethernet connection with a minimum of useful software.

    Shell out $700 for the low-end ReplayTV (40 hours), and it has the lifetime subscription at no charge. Ethernet is built in. You've got USEFUL networking apps that are SUPPORTED by the company. And you can download (via iChannels) content over the web so you've got a new content provider for non-mainstream media.

    I think it is almost a no-brainer for advanced TiVo users to get one of these. I really hope it takes off. Or TiVo gets their act in gear.

  29. Yes it does! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

    Read the features page.

    "The ReplayTV 4000 is so connected it allows you to share recorded programs with other friends and family that have ReplayTV 4000s. And with its broadband connectivity, sending and receiving programs is a breeze. So, if you forgot to record the last Friends episode, just ask your Mom to send it to you!"

    THIS ROCKS!

  30. Replay4xxx "promotional code" ? by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    The pre-order form has a space for a "promotional code", and the form suggests using their code "GG471297" for free installation.


    Anybody known of other promotional codes to use?

  31. Needed: peer-to-peer automatic commercial skipping by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What's needed now is automatic peer-to-peer commercial skipping. That way, once a few people have skipped a commercial, everybody else on the net then skips it.

    All that has to be shared is information like station="WMAL" date="2002-06-03" skip-start="08:31:00" skip-end="08:31:30". Every time you push the "30 second skip" button, an entry like that gets created. Entries are distributed over Gnutella or Freenet. When watching a show, your player queries the net for entries with appropriate station, date, and time info. If a few different people have skipped over the same time slot, your player should skip it too.

    Great open source project for somebody.

  32. Re:They could do it with timing... by IronChef · · Score: 2


    ReplayTV already has a dedicated 30-second-skip button on the remote. (and it's great!)

  33. depends upon the television by hawk · · Score: 2
    THe four-hour setting seems to have disappeared off the newer vcr's; it's either 2 or 6. BUt it doesn't matter for me; I have to use 2. My moster television has 700 horizontal lines, and extrapolates from the 450 or so usable lines. Anything short of full quality looks lousy. And then with the CBS feed apparently being digitized, then back to analog before my cable company redigitizes, then over inadequate bandwidth, then back to s-video before being interpolated like this, watching cbs is a pain--my analog signal is better! (ok, the second cbs channel is only bad rather than horrible, but still . . .)


    hawk

  34. Re:Ethernet? Who still uses that? I want 802.11b by IronChef · · Score: 2

    Seriously, since I've had my ReplayTV, I've wished that it could get show listings, etc., over my home network.

    It's not exactly the same, but are you aware of MyReplayTV.com?

  35. Networks can opt out of file sharing! by raygundan · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to this cnet article, the networks will be able to opt out of having their programs shared, even over the local network. This seems to put a serious cramp in ReplayTV's plans-- the only networks who won't immediately opt out are NASA TV and PBS. (Note that SonicBlue has purchased ReplayTV and that the names are used interchangeably in the article) To quote:

    Sonicblue jumped into the market for digital video recorders Wednesday, unveiling four high-end boxes it will sell under the ReplayTV brand.

    Sonicblue acquired the digital video recording pioneer on Aug. 2 after announcing the deal in February. Digital video recorders (DVRs) allow consumers to record TV shows onto a hard drive instead of onto videotape.

    As reported earlier by CNET News.com, the four boxes vary in price and capacity from $699 for 40 hours of recording to $1,999 for 320 hours. Unlike its competitors, Sonicblue will not charge a monthly service fee.

    The new boxes include broadband access and allow consumers to send TV shows via home networking to other ReplayTV boxes. However, Sonicblue Vice President Steve Shannon said the company will allow TV networks to decide if this capability should be disabled for their particular shows.


    So, in short, this feature will probably be disabled by angry networks before it leaves the gate. And it also answers the lawsuit question-- ReplayTV won't be sued, because this feature will come pre-disabled for your convenience.