Slashdot Mirror
Still More Evidence of Life of Mars
dirtyhank writes: "According to this article a group of Hungarian scientists have found another potential evidence of life on Mars. Apparently some groups of dark spots spread every martian spring. They say this could be caused by photosynthetic organisms."
finally!! first post!!! ok that was lame
not likely but i might as well try
This sig will make it clear that ANYONE can use this post for ANY purpose WITHOUT the written consent of the NFL.
I submitted a post about this very item and it was rejected.
or it could be shadows
discovered a new drug , did ya Sharadin?
Interesting... but believeable? Somewhat But, as much as I place faith in ancient writings *snickers*, I must remember the golden rule of humanity: People lie
Rykard
Breaking the Internet one standard at a time, since 1999
-Legion
I thought the Nephilim lived on our planet X, the planet that may or may not exist in our solar system that is twice the size of jupiter or more.
Lowmag.net
...they have also found thriving life in Uranus.
naah, the DNS was planted here [whitehouse.gov] -- surprisingly this is not a link to - which is an evil site.
It would have been more appropriate for a goatse.cx troll to write "orgasm" as opposed to "organism."
Just a thought. (And please, Slashdotters, have a sense of humor for a day... You just might enjoy it.)
Do you like German cars?
. | '(' ')' { $$=cgr_graph_node(param,CGR_ABSTRACT_FUNC_NO_PARAM S,0); }
| '(' parameter_type_list ')'
{ $$=cgr_graph_node(param,CGR_ABSTRACT_FUNC,1,$2); }
| direct_abstract_declarator '(' ')'
{ $$=cgr_graph_node(param,CGR_ABSTRACT_FUNC_NO_PARAM S,1,$1); }
| direct_abstract_declarator '(' parameter_type_list ')'
{ $$=cgr_graph_node(param,CGR_ABSTRACT_FUNC,2,$1,$3) ; }
Don't you see that this story and the one posted before it are connected? The spots they see changing are evidence of digital paper on Mars!
Bush's education improvements were
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
spam spam spam
postercomment compresssion filter? WTF!
Happy Billioniversary!
Spam spam spam!
May W. Richard Stevens Rest In Peace!
Your sig:
s .htm)
"Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics" (http://home1.gte.net/res02khr/crackpots/notoriou
As far as I can tell, this is much hot air to the effect that "time travel is motion through spacetime, which is impossible because it already contains time, so all the physicists talking about time travel are crackpots".
This seems rather silly, because what physicists actually talk about when they say "time travel" is simply a configuration of an object's world-line (graphed in spacetime) such that the world-line can intersect itself (or that the "future" light-cone from the world-line crosses some "past" part of the world-line, allowing communication, or any of a number of similar scenarios). This does not involve "motion" of the hypothetical fabric of spacetime; it's just a class of paths that objects can take within it.
Possibly I have misinterpreted the document, but this seems unlikely, as it makes it abundantly clear that time travel involves "motion" of spacetime, which "is impossible".
Can you clear up this apparent discrepancy?