Slashdot Mirror


Apple Cancels Apple Expo 2001

Ziploc writes: "Apple today announced the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001, which was scheduled to take place at Paris Expo, Porte de Versailles, from September 26th to 30th, 2001. See the press release here."

41 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. Steve Jobs keeps his promise by Lemur+catta · · Score: 3, Funny

    Steve Jobs promised "No new hardware at Expo Paris."
    Looks like he'll be keeping his promise!

    1. Re:Steve Jobs keeps his promise by piecewise · · Score: 2

      Of course that's really NOT funny, considering the subject matter.

      Eh, I should lighten up.. You're right, this is all really funny. Ha ha. I'm chuckling, really.

      --
      The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  2. Mac OS Rumors was wrong! by eAndroid · · Score: 2

    Turns out there actually won't be any new products announced at Apple Expo this year.

    --

    I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
  3. Apple donates $1M and iBooks by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Informative
    From MacCentral: An Apple spokesperson confirmed for MacCentral today the company would donate $1 million dollars to the families of rescue workers that lost their lives in the attacks on two American cities last week.

    Apple will also be donating an iBook to each of these families with children.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  4. I can see the logic by HerrNewton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The expo starts on the 26th, 15 days after the attacks on the WTC. Apple has to move a lot of key personnel from Apple USA to Paris for the expo, personnel which are not always American citizens and some are quite likely "Arab looking".

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
    1. Re:I can see the logic by Spruitje · · Score: 2

      There goes my trip to Paris.

  5. Re:Jobs toys not yet ready? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

    I'd bet that it was because there would be logistics problems right now with the backlog of flights steming from last weeks events.

  6. Apple Expo 2001 by Migelikor1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On one hand, I sympathize with security concerns. This is a frightening time. On the other hand, is a congregation of nerds in Paris really much of a target? If the terrorists were going after intellectuals, they could have crashed into harvard or MIT (15 minutes into their flight from boston). If they want to damage the economy, damaging such a narrow (1 company+peripheral manufacturers) target wouldn't be nearly effective as hitting, for instance, the Stock exchange. It's like my school, where janitors were posted to make sure nobody bombed. Seems like a bit of paranoia to me, but on the other hand Apple didn't have much to say.

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
  7. Jobs has an excuse now by hoss_33 · · Score: 2

    Apple was not happy with the press ranting about "no new products".
    The show would have been very weak, with another Jobs keynote just about the Mac OS X upgrade.
    Now the terror threat comes in very handy to cancel the fiasco show.

    --
    -- bmp System Support - Vienna, Austria
  8. From the press release... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh.


    Good work back in the 70's and 80's, but - what have you done for us lately? ;-)


    (Yes, that was a joke. When a dual G5 hit's the shelves with MacOS 10.1, I'm probably buying one!)

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  9. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Spruitje · · Score: 5, Interesting


    After all, they don't have many left as it is...


    Strange, they are the only computercompany which didn't made a loss last quarter.
    And the iBook and G4 ti is selling like crazy..
    Typical anti Apple FUD as always.

  10. Hate to say it by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but as much as I'd like to see things continue like normal, it is probably wise to cancel events such as these for a short time. Air travel has suffered a horrific blow that has made many unsure of the safety of air travel. I hate to see the world shut down over this but some things should be put on hold for a little while.

    1. Re:Hate to say it by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Ironically, air travel is probably much safer today than it was two weeks ago because of increased security and the likelihood that terrorists will use a different means of attack next time.

    2. Re:Hate to say it by banuaba · · Score: 2

      If people cancel events like this, and if people change the way that they lead thier lives, then the terrorists win.

      We cannot allow these dirtbags to change our way of life, both as Americans and as citizens on the world stage. What happened on Tuesday was terrible, but it was (as far as existing data indicates) essentially unpreventable for we Americans living the lives that we do. Freedom comes with a price, and that price is danger and risk.
      We could change.
      we could close our borders to all Arabs.
      We could have full time tracking of all citizens.
      We could require people to be naked and locked up on all airline flights.

      I don't want to live in that country. I am willing to take the chance that there is some crazy asshole out there who wants to kill me. The reason I am willing to take that chance is because the rewards that I and that the rest of the country get are so very great.

      We cannot live in fear. If we do so, they win.

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
    3. Re:Hate to say it by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      I agree. We shouldn't stop our lives. If we do, they win. That's the message that Congress and the House was trying to get across to us on the night of the incidents. Still I can see the point in postponing some of these events. What the terrorists did was very symbolic. It was an attack on America and our ideals. What better thing to attack than a major league baseball game. That's truly American. I can understand Apple's concerns with the Paris Expo. We simply can't be sure that France will take all possible security precautions to protect this event. France hasn't been attacked yet so their guard may be down or not as high as our's is right now. Plus all aircraft were grounded. If half the people can't get to their destination for their event (ball game, expo, conference, whatever) how can the people having the conference justify going through with it. Now that things a more under control I think we should all go out and have a huge public showing of support. Fireworks and singing sounds good.

  11. Re:Figured he'd do that... by Spruitje · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Apple really needs to refocus and release tech. info on their older systems anyhow. I've been fighting for 2 years to get driver-level specs for a Powerbook 1400, and have yet to recieve anything but a runaround. MacOS X based on a BSD core is pretty cool, but Apple just like IBM-clones need a choice. BeOS comes close, but neither of these will run on my PB. I'd hate to think I'd wasted my money.


    Like Compaq, Toshiba, Dell and some other company's.
    I have a five year old Pentium 90 laptop with 8 mb and Windows XP won't install on it.
    Yeesh, get a live.
    The powerbook 1400 is almost 5 years old.
    And it isn't a PCI machine.

  12. Jobs's full letter to employees by HerrNewton · · Score: 5, Informative

    Snagged from Macnn.com:

    Message from Steve

    From: Steve Jobs
    Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
    Subject: Message from Steve

    Team,

    Last week's devastating and tragic events have touched everyone at
    Apple. We are all grieving for the victims and their families.
    Thankfully, no Apple team members were among them. I know many of
    you have taken time to support various relief efforts, give blood,
    and support those around you. We all appreciate your extra efforts
    to do so.

    I want to let you know that Apple is donating one million dollars to
    the families of the firefighters, police and other emergency
    response personnel who lost their lives, through the American Red
    Cross Disaster Relief Fund. In addition, we will donate one iBook to
    each of these families with children this holiday season.

    Also, today we are announcing the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001,
    which was scheduled to take place in Paris on September 26-30. We
    are very sorry to disappoint our customers and developers, but their
    safety must be our primary concern at this time. Apple is a very
    visible American company, and having a highly publicized event at
    this time would be irresponsible.

    We are also taking extra precautions to insure our safety. Apple
    security will remain on heightened alert at all our facilities
    around the world for the foreseeable future. Please immediately
    report any suspicious events or personnel to security.

    It's going to take time for the world to return to "normal", and
    some things will never return to the way they were. The next few
    months may be rocky. Please take the time you need for your
    families, and please lean on one another. Together, we will all get
    through this.

    I want to commend everyone for their efforts throughout this
    difficult time. As always, I am very proud of this team.

    Steve

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  13. This reminds me of the 80s by Rupert · · Score: 2

    I forget what the event was, but numerous luminaries in the US film business (most memorably Sylvester Stallone, since it was the Rambo era) refused to go to Cannes.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  14. Apple is a US company by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Terrorists might view Apple as a target because of that.

    The WTC didn't house many (if any) government offices, they were businesses.

    Personally, I also think it's a little too reactionary; they should just beef up security and go on with the show.

    There was a report on Marketplace on Friday about how many organizations within the US are cancelling their conventions because of the tragedy. The financial impact on the tourism industry of those cities is in the tens of millions of dollars. Think about it, if a convention has 30,000 people, and each person spends an average of $300 apiece on food, lodging, and such, then the loss of that one convention would mean the loss of $9 mil. in revenue.

    1. Re:Apple is a US company by artemis67 · · Score: 2

      My point was that attacking symbols of America are just as valid, if not more so, to terrorists than attacking the US government or the US military directly. The WTC is a symbol of America. Apple is a symbol of America.

      Read their press release.

    2. Re:Apple is a US company by artemis67 · · Score: 2

      I said the press release, but was thinking of this quote from the internal email. Sorry.

      Also, today we are announcing the cancellation of Apple Expo 2001,
      which was scheduled to take place in Paris on September 26-30. We
      are very sorry to disappoint our customers and developers, but their
      safety must be our primary concern at this time. Apple is a very
      visible American company, and having a highly publicized event at
      this time would be irresponsible.


      Any questions?

  15. Jobs can't be serious by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Safety? What big name terrorist is going to hit a computer company convention? Sure they're pretty well known, but hardly a good target for destroying the Western world's economy or confidence. The number of attractive destruction targets that come ahead of Apple Expo number in the thousands. Why, even in Paris, I'd think there are more than a few famous landmarks that would be well publicized if they were to get destroyed. Apple Expo getting bombed would make front page news maybe, and only for one day.

    If anything, we should be promoting these kind of event, not just to show that our lives continue on despite the terrorists attempts to change them, but also to help bolster the airline industry. If things don't pick up quickly, even with the gov't bailout, several of the majors may go down this year.

    --
    "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  16. The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. by wiredog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Info here. It was going to be here in DC next week, and I imagine most of the attendees were flying into National Airport, which is closed indefinitely.

    1. Re:The O'Reilly P2P Conference also. by AJWM · · Score: 2

      There have been calls to close National Airport since that iced-up 737 crashed into a bridge over the Potomac years ago, probably even before that. It's location is just awful for jet aircraft, which have to fly some pretty bizarre approaches and takeoffs. But it was just too damn convenient for congresscritters wanting to commute home to their constituents.

      They really ought to close it permanently. It's an anachronism. Unfortunately now would be a psychologically bad time to do so.

      --
      -- Alastair
  17. Re:Postponing the inevitable by bellings · · Score: 2

    Apple is slowly dying anyway.

    Well, duh! What did they expect when they decided to use BSD?

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  18. AppleInsider was right! by artemis67 · · Score: 2

    They didn't predict anything for MacWorld Paris, and it looks like they were right!!!

  19. Re:Coward. by daviddennis · · Score: 2

    This isn't about him; he has a Gulfstream V he would have used to fly to the expo.

    I predict a lot of large corporations are going to consider following his lead in the very near future.

    D

  20. Careful... by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're already in the midst of one jihad, don't get another one started... :-P

  21. logistics by rob+colonna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As one of the Anonymous masses mentioned above, this is not merely an issue of fearing potential attack upon the expo itself. Each of these expos has 100+ exhibitors, all of whom need goods transported, on time, safely, and, worse, in this case, across international borders. This may be now, and for the next few weeks both more difficult, and probably more expensive.
    Many companies nation, and even world-wide have issued directives stating that 'no one will be forced to fly'. Can you blame them for cancelling an event that may have been plagued by the resultant no-shows of the exhibitors? Business-wise it makes sense, and then, given that they are a prominent American corporation, the over-arching safety concern makes it a very sound decision indeed.

  22. disagree by ragnar · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure where you get that impression? One of the first world leaders to speak out in support of the United States was the French Prime Minister.

    I would confidently say that Apple had no political angle on this. I would suspect that Apple is primarily concerned about the logistics of people travelling all over the world to attend the conference. In addition, a sparcely attended event would only further aggrivate economic troubles that Apple will be facing from this tragedy. Like it or not, the terrorism has taken the wind out our sails for a little bit. I'm sure we will all get along with life once a critical mass of society feels normal again. That time hasn't been reached yet.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
  23. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
    True, but the next attack isn't going to come on a plane.

    My guess: nuclear bomb on a boat in NYC's harbor. You read it here first.

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  24. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
    There are three advantages to using the boat method:

    1. There's no need to clear any sort of customs. The more you move the bomb, the more people might see it.

    2. A large cloud of radioactive steam will be created, killing millions more from radiation poisoning and cancer.

    3. It's a terror attack. Americans are now scared of planes. A boat-based nuke will make American scared of boats. Slowly, the US cuts itself off from the world, which is what Bin Laden and his ilk wants.

    Personally, I think we're doomed to lose this battle because we aren't willing to be nearly as evil as our enemy. It wasn't always like this. As mentioned in an editoral in the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41 213-2001Sep16.html), the US killed 900,000 Japanese civilians (not including Hiroshima and Nagasaki!) in the closing months of WWII. Today, we won't do that, even though the stakes are far higher today than they were against a Japan that was isolated, out of fuel, and starving.

    Meanwhile, our enemy hides among civilians, and has no qualms about using anything as a weapon. We have qualms about killing the civilians they surround themselves with. In short, we're fucked. Even after we are nuked and gassed and exposed to smallpox and anthrax, we won't do what's necessary to save our civilization against the Hordes.

    Ah well, it was a good civilization while it lasted.

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  25. Re: Low-level specs for "dead" Apple tech by frankie · · Score: 2

    I can't think of any reason not to release specs on legacy products though.

    One easy reason: Apple makes most of its money on hardware sales. They don't want you to keep your old stuff running; they want you to replace it with a new Mac instead.

    It would be nice if they released all of their discarded software as public source, but hiring someone to sort through the old code files and tech notes costs money that a tech biz is hard to afford in these lean times. Maybe someone could convince Jordan Hubbard to let them do it as a volunteer?

  26. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
    Or LA. Source of the chief export of American culture, our TV and film industry.

    Either way, the US can't win unless we're willing to kill about a billion people first. We're not. We'll lose.

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  27. Re:WTC terrorists == airline security consultants by TWR · · Score: 2
    Nahh...even rabid religious fanatics get discouraged after the first 10-20m get whacked.

    Really? Then Islamic fanatics must be losing their nerve; the wars of conquest which spread Islam killed more, (pro-rated to the current world population).

    I don't think the Muslim fundamentalists will stop until every Christian and Jew (and non-fanatical Muslim) on the planet is dead. What they may not realize is that the world will be destroyed by the US response to these terror attacks. Or perhaps they do realize, and want to destroy us all. I dunno.

    But if you're right, should you wait for them, or just kill yourself now? Better play it safe. Do it now.

    We live to say NO to death. Dying for a cause is easy. Living for one is hard.

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  28. I really don't follow this... by catseye_95051 · · Score: 2

    US Airliners are safer now then they have been in a long time thanks to beefed up US airport security. Noone has even made a peep that I've heard of a threatening move towards france.

    This is the wierdest PR excuse for a chnage of direction I've ever heard. Can ANYONE make sense of it for me??

    Frankly the US Airliens need the business, if Apple really was concerned with the fall out from this attack I'd thnk they'd want to help promote intercontinental flight...

    1. Re:I really don't follow this... by yuriwho · · Score: 2

      Pretty Simple really. Steve did not want the true OS X comming out party to be a flop. He did not want it remembered for being insensitive to the crisis at hand. He would rather quietly release 10.1 in the specified time frame (Seybold) and let the passion of the Mac Faithful and new adoptees, with their newly aroused patriotism, be the show.

      I think it is a good call.

      --
      no sig.
  29. Re:Dissapointed in Apple by Phroggy · · Score: 2

    I don't think "let's write something to put on our web site, and get one of the graphics guys to make a pretty logo with an American flag or something, so everyone on Slashdot will see how much we care" was the first thing that came to their mind. I think they were busy watching CNN. I know I was. When I did go to Apple's Web site, I was very impressed that they had replaced their entire front page.

    Snapshots from around the Web on 9/14/01

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  30. Re:Apple can't afford to lose any more users... by Phroggy · · Score: 2

    After all, they don't have many left as it is...

    That's right, and they certainly can't afford to give away ONE MILLION DOLLARS and a truckload of laptop computers.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  31. Kitten in the mini-blinds by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Let's say you're a billion dollar corporation who's just seen a huge tragedy happen in your home country possibly with several employees directly related to people involved in the tragedy. Are you going to force them to hope on a plane to some expo? Besides that, are you going to ask a bunch of other corporations to do the exact same thing? You won't be a billion dollar corporation for long with that sort of insensitive bullshit happening. It's also pretty ludicrous to try to hae a big international expo at the same time as a major downsizing in the worldwide travel market.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  32. Re:Then don't... by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    That's right. The numbers prove that it's safer. Doesn't mean that people will believe it though. Air travel accidents get promoted by the media to an extreme point. People typically believe what the media tells them. If they tell them that violence in schools is increasing, they'll believe them even though the numbers prove that to be an absolute crock of shit--it's been decreasing for decades. A car wreck on the news is nothing; people don't even bat an eye. A plane crash is big news; people sit up and take notice then. Yes, air travel is safer in reality. It's not safer in the minds of the majority people though.