Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Episode I DVD Review

dswensen writes: "Theforce.net has an in-depth review of the forthcoming Star Wars: Episode I DVD (due for release October 16th). Looking at all the great features packed into this DVD, I'm glad Lucas decided not to just toss off a cheap version a year ago. Love it or hate it, it looks like they really pulled out all the stops." Plus Ant points out that there is some teaser movie available for Star Wars Galaxies, the upcoming massively multiplayer game.

54 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. Okay, but.... by Migelikor1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We still haven't seen the original trilogy that didn't suck on DVD, and there is no plan to release it. I find it somewhat ridickulous.

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    1. Re:Okay, but.... by Tet · · Score: 2
      We still haven't seen the original trilogy that didn't suck on DVD


      Yep. I've got the complete set three times on video. The original set, plus the special editions, in both normal and widescreen. Even so, if they were on DVD, I'd buy them tomorrow. I'm sure I can't be alone in that.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    2. Re:Okay, but.... by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Informative
      • We still haven't seen the original trilogy that didn't suck on DVD, and there is no plan to release it

      ...until after episodes 2 & 3 are out. Wierdly, Amazon has the DVD of Episode 4 listed, complete with ASIN number.

      But sure, let's have it, George. Heck, I'd settle for being able to get pristine VHS tapes of the unbutchered versions.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Okay, but.... by connorbd · · Score: 2

      You know, I have to disagree -- with the exception of Greedo shooting first (a very badly rendered addition to ANH as well as a bad idea) and giving the Sarlaac a proper mouth (also a little pointless, especially as it broke a number of fanfics and even a book or two), the special editions were actually very well done. The Ewok village at the end of Jedi is much improved, Cloud city is a much brighter place, the picture quality is vastly enhanced... on the whole, I have no trouble accepting SW:SE as Lucas' definitive vision of the movies.

      The only objection I have to the Special Edition versions of the movies is that they gave Lucas license to go crazy in TPM; after all, if he could digitally map Jabba into ANH, he could get away with pretty much anything, which he tried to in TPM. And so we got Jar Jar Binks...

      /Brian

  2. Why the delay? by Chazmati · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He probably postponed it so he could include some teasers of Episode 2...

  3. RCE disc by onion2k · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but its going to be an RCE disc, and it isn't going to work on a region 0 multi-region player..

    1. Re:RCE disc by Malc · · Score: 2

      "I'm not 100% sure, but an RCE disk is locked only for Region 1. It won't play in region free or non-region 1 players. Just another feature of the movie studios. "

      I think that you're right. I believe the scripting on the DVD disc asks the player which region it is, and then compares the response to what it thinks it is.

  4. If only he could write... by DudeTheMath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only the movie were any good. Lucas should get Kasdan in on this one, too. "Yippee," indeed.

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  5. RCE not necessarily a problem. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    It depends on the player. There are patched BIOS files for the Apex600A that allow RCE disks to work if the player is in Region 0 mode. Also, it isn't too hard to put mulitple BIOSen in many players and switch between them. RCE is ineffective on players that can actually be switched to a target region. I would assume by now that many players other than the Apex have been hacked to deal with this.

  6. not at all biased, no... by Scryber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there anything about Star Wars that the TheForce.net doesn't wet their pants over? Granted, the DVD is chock full of stuff, but it could've been encoded as MPEG-1 and they still would have been flipping out about how great it is.

  7. Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by Keelor · · Score: 2
    Yes, it's great that that Ep. 1 is coming out on DVD, and that the DVD is not one of those throw-in-the-PR-crap-and-some-random-cast-member's -commentary items. However, the tone of voice that the reviewer uses seems to imply that DVD features that have been standard for high-quality DVD's have never appeared until now.


    And while around 90% of the movie remains identical to the theatrical version, it appears that George can't leave the film alone.

    Yes, it's called the director's cut. I'm personally all for them, but they even appeared back in the days of *gasp* VHS. And some people might be a tad bit annoyed that they can't get the version that they saw in theaters on DVD.
    Make a special point to know that the DVD is divided into 50 chapters for those that want to pinpoint the moment they are looking for in a flash. It goes against traditional thinking, but mass chapter listing is quite possibly a new trend for franchise films to start following.

    50 does seem higher than many DVDs, I'll give that. But there is a point that's it's too much--you spend more time flipping through the channel selection (there's no way they show all 50 chapters on one screen) than actually watching the scene you want to see.
    ...instead of having just Dolby 2.0, like the VHS version, DVDs with a moderate home theater will enjoy the vibrancy of Dolby 5.1 Surround EX.

    Yes, I'm fairly sure I've heard of the rare DVD have 5.1 surround sound.

    The fully animated menus are terrific and randomly reflect (or when chosen) the unique planets of the movies.

    I can't make a judgement here, since the reviewer doesn't mention the only aspect I truly care about with menus: do I have to spend 8 hours watching flashy menu transitions just to watch the movie? On the other hand, if the DVD bucks this trend, it's approximately the only DVD in existence that does, and I salute the makers.


    As for the huge wait, I would like to point out that this DVD seems ~about the same level in terms of effort as the Gladiator DVD, which was a 2-disc set released simultaneously with the VHS version. If Lucas was _so_ intent on spending hours upon hours to make this DVD, I don't quite understand why they didn't release a standard DVD (with the usual "extra" of 5.1 surround sound and widescreen) at the same time as the VHS, and then market this as the Director's Cut/Collector's Edition, which it obviously is.


    ~=Keelor

    1. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3
      • since the reviewer doesn't mention the only aspect I truly care about with menus: do I have to spend 8 hours watching flashy menu transitions just to watch the movie

      Or in the case of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, see a spoiler of the end of the movie!. Yes, this irritates the hell out of me as well. I wonder why they think it's necessary.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by tb3 · · Score: 2

      Obviously not, since he is a Star Wars fan-boy, and this is the first Star Wars DVD. It's a whole new world to him.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    3. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

      I'm wondering how long it took this reviewer to pull his/her lips off of the proverbial ass of LucasFilm...

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  8. Good things about episode 1 by 0-9a-zA-Y_.+!*'(),-$ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, there were quite a few things I liked about Episode I.
    First of all, he established the groundwork for what are sure to be two very dark and combat-filled movies.
    Also, the lightsaber fight at the end was the best filmed so far.
    Even during a second viewing, I was still laughing every time I saw the "thin client" attack droids in action. IMHO, anybody who doesn't think an entire army of Crow T. Robots getting their asses kicked by lizzard men is funny needs to lighten up a little. That battle alone was worth my seven bucks.
    On the downside, turning The Force into super-intelligent germs was a huge mistake. In two brief scenes, he ruined the whole series by turning a beautifully impossible fantasy into a very implausable sci-fi load of crap.
    This was even less forgivable than the cartoony Jar Jar, the Bat-Grapling-Guns that Amidala's royal guard used, or the fact that Brian Blessed (voice of the Gungan King) put in the corniest performance of his carreer since his hammy appearance in Flash Gordon.

    --
    Everything but Z
    1. Re:Good things about episode 1 by connorbd · · Score: 2

      I don't know; calling the attack droids "thin clients" is probably funnier than anything in the movie...

      /Brian

    2. Re:Good things about episode 1 by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

      On the downside, turning The Force into super-intelligent germs was a huge mistake.

      Yeah, that midi-chlorox stuff was crap.
      I think Lucas could have handled the detection better with something like a PKE meter, leaving the Force as pure mysticism, rather than trying to explain it pseudo-scientifically.

      I could care less about the E1 DVD, I want the original trilogy on DVD.

      C-X C-S

    3. Re:Good things about episode 1 by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      First of all, he established the groundwork for what are sure to be two very dark and combat-filled movies.


      Excellent point. Most people tried to evaluate Ep. 1 in isolation, forgetting the overall story arc. The Phantom Menace had to start out "up" (which apparently means childish to Lucas). Otherwise, there would be no reference point for the downward spiral to come. I'd be willing to bet that Ep. 3 will be darker than Empire Strikes Back, and a marathon viewing of all six episodes will make Jar-Jar a little easier to tolerate, as he can then be seen in the context of the greater story.

      ...Brian Blessed (voice of the Gungan King) put in the corniest performance of his carreer since his hammy appearance in Flash Gordon.


      Have we forgotten his scenery-chewing cameo in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves? :-)
      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  9. Other 'Missing' DVD titles by Masem · · Score: 2

    Also conspicuously missing from DVD releases are two major triologies: Back to the Future, and Indiana Jones. You'd think having both of these out as well as SW on DVD, all in maximum featuritis, would help to improve the acceptance of DVD.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by Monte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Currently, according to the CEA, there are 20,235,574 DVD players in the market (as of 9/18/01 - U.S. only. Divx included.

      Both of them?

    2. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      Also conspicuously missing from DVD releases are two major triologies: Back to the Future, and Indiana Jones.

      And this is the kind of bullshit that is pressing people to buy bootleg copies. Do you know how easy it is to get these films on DVD? They were released on laserdisc; you can find nice DVD transfers just about anywhere. I already own Star Wars on VHS and I'll tell you what, if Lucas continues to take his sweet ass time in releasing the DVD, eventually I'm just going to up and order myself some bootlegs. My VHS copies are getting worn out and I want to watch a digital version without buying a used laserdisc player. If I have to buy bootlegs Lucas can bite my ass on a real release, because I won't buy it. Same thing applies to BTTF and Indiana Jones.

      Just release the movies on DVD already. I don't get what this bullshit hold up is. It shouldn't take years to release these films, considering they've already been released on laserdisc.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  10. Re:Bad review by Stormie · · Score: 2

    In fact it was remarkably mediocre.


    In fact, the only way this DVD could not suck is if you got a copy which accidentally had a different movie pressed onto it.


  11. Another Review by krugdm · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're looking for another review that doesn't involve Force.net drool, here's one from The Digital Bits which has a lot of the same information, but some different criticisms.

    1. Re:Another Review by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • If you're looking for another review that doesn't involve Force.net drool

      Well, to be fair, there's no point in giving anything like a critical review of the movie itself. You've either seen it before, or you're not going to see it, love it, hate it, or are bored hearing about it. But, that said, it really is appalingly sycophantic.

      • But don't worry, the podrace has never looked better. [...] Podracers roar like never before and you will appreciate the nuance of sound design. Laser blasts and the roar of the crowd fill the rear channels and the subwoofer roars appropriately. [...] including a major sequence around the podrace a second time with Anakin losing control of his pod and Sebulba getting his flamethrower out and trashing other contestants in the Boonta Eve race. You'll be greeted by several new racers, new pods and plenty more action in the Deleted Scenes section

      Sounds like someone's got a real Pod Racer hangup (George or Joshua, the reviewer, or both). It's just one scene, dudes. In fact, it's (to my eyes) a shoddy, dull and overlong scene, cynically designed to look a lot like the game it was intended to sell. Hey ho.

      • In this copy the documentation was not included but will probably lean more towards functionality and less on innovation

      Does it scare anyone else that there's any question that a DVD needs "functional documentation"? ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  12. Worth to purchase a DVD player for by ballpoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The Episode I DVD is even worth your investment in a DVD player if you have continued to delay the purchase."

    Well, I decided to go all the way to setup a full-size, no expenses spared, home theater nearly two years ago, just to be able to see 'The Fifth Element' again.

    Since my family and I have been watching hundreds of rented movies on DVD, and we all agree that the investment has been utterly worthwhile.

    Why invest $10000 in a home theater when you can go and see a movie on a much bigger screen with a family of four for $25 ?

    Well, there are a couple of reasons:

    • At $22 saved on every movie, I'll recoup my investment in 5 years.
    • I can see movies again in their former glory, which is not possible with a VHS tape and a television screen.
    • DVD extra features sometimes provide valuable insight in the movie-making process, and make you appreciate the typically enourmous efforts required.
    • Carefully chosen and positioned speakers provide an audio treat you won't find in a theater filled with a popcorn-popping and coughing audience.
    • I prefer the comfort and security of my home. Best of all, I can sip a cocktail while watching.

    All said, even if this movie isn't going to make anyone go out and buy a DVD player, I'm glad it's finally there.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    1. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by ryanwright · · Score: 2
      I've got some better points for why I enjoy my home theater much more than a "real" theater:

      I can sit back, put my legs up on the coffee table and relax without being bitched at.

      I can pause the movie if I have to take a leak.

      If some asshole leaves his cellphone on, I can kick his inconsiderate ass out of my house.

      The popcorn costs ten cents a bag and tastes better, too.

      Pizza & beer. Need I say more?

      No chance of some morons bringing their screaming 2 year old in to watch Sleepy Hollow.

      No chance of being hit with popcorn thrown by a group of obnoxious teenagers.

      I can watch almost any movie I want, any time I want, as many times as I want.

      I don't rent, however. I buy. The point of an HT isn't to save money, anyway. If I wanted to save money I never would have gotten into this hobby...

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  13. A much simpler review by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4, Informative

    I mean this in all honesty:

    1. Phantom Menace was a poor to mediocre movie no matter what your point of view, unless you saw it when you were 7 without seeing the original movies. It does not deserve to be talked about any more that Waterworld does.

    2. DVD extras cannot change #1.

    1. Re:A much simpler review by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Lucas's big mistake with TPM was creating a more sophisticated plot than the original trilogy. A plot that apparently went completely over the heads of all the Lucas bashers out there.

      No, Lucas's big mistake with TPM was that he created a trite, predictable movie, which assumed that the viewer had the intelligence of a third grader.

    2. Re:A much simpler review by elmegil · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Thank you for proving my point. Know-nothing blow-hards don't get it. btw, can you tell me the real reason why the Trade Federation invaded Naboo? Show me you have the intelligence greater than a third grader...

      In other words: "I am one of the elite few who understand the true genius inherent in the movie, and the rest of you who actually thought movies are to be enjoyed instead of analyzed are just morons. Nany nany boo boo!"

      Get real. TPM was trite and occasionally offensive. Most of the acting sucked (little Anniken in particular). A lot of effort was spent and the result should have been mind blowing on its face instead of requiring deep analysis and "understanding" to "get it".

      Actually though, this should have hardly been a surprise to anyone who went to see the re-issues of the original trilogy; it has not aged well, and the first movie which knocked everyone's socks off at the time in particularv is not much better than TPM except in the effects for the time department. Of course today those effects look dated too....

      If you want to live in your nostalgia land where Star Wars was the best thing your 11 year old eyes ever saw, feel free, but forgive the rest of us if we've grown up and placed higher expectations on our movies (even action movies need to surprise us).

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:A much simpler review by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Lucas's big mistake with TPM was creating a more sophisticated plot than the original trilogy. A plot that apparently went completely over the heads of all the Lucas bashers out there.

      But then he squandered about 3 hours of the movie on that interminable race, and all the pretty eye-candy under the ocean, and the third version of "Blowing Up the Big Spaceship with a Lucky Shot"(TM) while glossing over much of the really interesting political stuff. The Jedi Council meeting should have been shown in more detail. They decide not to train Anakin, which is illogical, and no justification is given for this bizarre decision.

      Granted, Lucas doesn't want to bore the kiddies, but let's face, if you are going to introduce political intrigue into your story, you shouldn't gloss over it so well. You can always cut back periodically to Jar-Jar getting his tongue scissored off or pod racers exploding or Darth Maul flossing his horns or something to keep the Ritalin set in their seats.

      In summary, if you are going to make a movie with a two-hour plot, don't waste two-thirds of the movie showing stuff that does little or nothing to advance that plot. One or the other has to go.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:A much simpler review by geomcbay · · Score: 2

      Cloning technology? There was no cloning technology on Naboo.

      They invaded, at the behest of Palpatine/Sideous to further the political chaos that was already beginning to occur in the Galactic Senate. Palpatine used this chaos to force a no-confidence vote of the senate leader and then took his place, setting himself up as the eventual Emperor.

      Anyway, my take on the whole suck/doesn't suck is that TPM *was* a Star Wars movie. It fit in neatly with all of the rest of the movies. In fact, I'd personally say it was a better movie than all the others except The Empire Strikes Back.

      The issue here is that if you look at any of the movies past or present you can find all sorts of faults, if you're looking at them as anything more than pure serial escapist fantasy. The problem most people have is they saw the originals when they were much younger when they could overlook such issues.

    5. Re:A much simpler review by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Yoda: The most powerful wielder of the Force ever he may potentially be, but train him we don't want to do. So loose let's just cut him and if an apprentice a Sith Lord takes him as in the future, deal with it we will in a sequel.

      Mace Windu: I bet they don't sell as as many stuffed me's as they do Jar-Jar.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    6. Re:A much simpler review by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      The existence of subtleties in a movie does not make it a good movie - it just means you might gain some enjoyment from noticing them.

      And balancing out these subtleties were blatantly stupid parts, like the goofy attack robots that used war tactics from the 1700s--lining up in a big row so they could be mowed down--rather than being bent on actually killing things. Heck, humanoid robots weren't even needed.

    7. Re:A much simpler review by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > A lot of effort was spent and the result should have been mind blowing on its face instead of requiring deep analysis and "understanding" to "get it".

      This seems to be a standard claim from people who for some reason need to defend lame-o movies. "It was too deep for you lot to understand." I heard the same thing about the überpathetic Starship Troopers.

      Yeah, deep.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  14. Re:What's an RCE disc? by Jungleland · · Score: 2, Informative

    Region Code Enhanced. It basically tells the player that it is region 0 disk(so the player switches to region 0), then during the menu sequence checks that the player is region 1. The Idea being that only region 1 locked players will be able to play. I have heard that a lot of mods get around this, mine for example wont change to Region 0, so in theory it should work. All of the RCE disks so far have been crap so I havent tested this so far.

  15. DVD of Christmas Special? by jonerik · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is all well and good. But when is the DVD of the Star Wars Christmas Special coming out?

    http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/feature/2000/12/05/s ta r_wars_tv/index.html

  16. Not Again by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess we're going to go through that whole long, drawn-out discussion of TPM:It Sucked vs. TPM:I Loved It again. The way I see it, TPM was no more hokey or badly acted than ANH. The casting was about the same, maybe better than ANH. The story is still classic space opera.

    I don't bother comparing the SW films to truly great moviemaking much. ANH is obviously a far inferior film when compared to the earlier 2001:A Space Odyssey. What's important about the films is the sea change they brought in the acceptance of SF in mainstream American culture, and the role it played in many of our childhoods.

    Bringing TPM do DVD in such a spectacular way can only be a good thing. If you don't like the movie, you shouldn't even be wasting your time reading this thread.

    --
    "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  17. No, that's wrong... by artemis67 · · Score: 2

    Lucas has publicly stated that he will release the original trilogy on DVD, but after Episode 3 comes out. He wants to release all 6 films in a special box set. If the review of Episode I is any indication, it should be worth the wait.

    Personally, I hope there is an option to watch the original trilogy before they mucked it up with that "Special Edition" crap....

  18. No, you're wrong too... by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

    No, what he SHOULD do, is release the original trilogy on DVD soon, one at a time, then a boxed set with maybe a fourth disc of extra crap, then episode 2 on vhs, then on dvd, then epsisode 3 on vhs, then dvd, then a boxed set of all three 'episodes' with an extra feature disc, then all six with a ton of crap. Only then will Lucas have "Used the Force" (of marketing).

    I wish he'd just hurry up and release the original trilogy like everyone else though....

    --
    Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  19. RCE is overrated by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
    Basically there are TWO places in a DVD player that contain zone information. There's a 8-bit bitmap in the MPEG stream that says which regions it's playable on (enforced by the player), and there's also an region number register in one of the GUI registers of the playback control software which can be read by the DVD's scripting (allowing enforcement by the DVD disc).

    The bitmap can easily be ignored, but it's hard to put six or eight integers simultaneously into a single register without resorting to quantum computing, which is still a few years off. So-called "region zero" players have the bitmap bypassed, but "region switchable" players let the user choose (and maybe automatically try based on the bitmap) which region number will be presented to the DVD's scripting code.

    Region switchable players also let you take advantage of discs which enable extra features (like subtitles in Asian languages) based on the player's region number.

    Anyhow, I don't expect to be getting this disc because I don't f'ing care about Episode I. I know it's heresy, but I never saw it in the theatres, and aside from Wierd Al Yankovic's summary of the movie, I have only the vaguest idea of what is contained within. I do know that I would hate Jar Jar, though.

    I also doubt I'll be getting the Episode 4-6 DVDs, because they'll likely only be available in the "Ministry of Information approved" edition. I've got the widescreen stereo release and the widescreen THX release on LD, without the "Han Solo didn't really shoot first" crap. I'll live with the disc change to watch the end of the movies on side 3, if that's what it takes to avoid the Politically Correct version.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  20. Much better review at DVDFILE.com by Malc · · Score: 4, Informative

    This review is dreadful. Are the reviewers suffering from tunnel vision? Did they have their Lucas goggles on? Were they paid by Lucas? It's a bit of a brown-noser and the tone suggests to me that even if the quality of DVD had been really crap, they would still have written good things about it.

    I prefer the review at dvdfile.com. When they discuss the transfer to DVD, you can't but help feel that they know what they're talking about. Perhaps I also share the same opinion as the reviewer: this wasn't a great great film, but we all liked the *idea* of a Star Wars film. The review is here: http://www.dvdfile.com/software/review/dvd-video_4 /starwars_episode_i.html.

  21. dvd? passe. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had it on Laserdisc for almost a year now.
    No region encoding, No content controls.
    Same resolution you have on your DVD and in Dolby 5.1

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:dvd? passe. by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      Errr... Laserdiscs have never supported as high-resolution images as DVD, especially when you take into account anamorphic enhancement.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:dvd? passe. by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2

      The resolution of LaserDiscs is inferior not only when you consider the anamorphic enhancement, but also when you consider that the frames are interlaced.

      However, LaserDiscs can in some ways look much better than DVDs because the video is not compressed. No MPEG artifacts, etc. It's pretty much a "pick-your-poison" thing. Visually, I would say that a well-mastered DVD is superior to a well-mastered LaserDisc, but an average DVD is inferior to an average LaserDisc.

      BTW - I use both formats; I own about 4 times as many DVDs as I do LaserDiscs (~200 vs ~50), mainly because they are cheaper and easier to obtain. But when I do go back and watch my older LaserDiscs, the lack of compression artifacts is very apparent.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    3. Re:dvd? passe. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      BZZZZT! Wrong.

      Laserdisc - a LARGE 2 sided CD which are pits just like your CD and read by a laser (hence the name laserdisc) It is purely digital, uncompressed video.

      you are thinking of videodisc - 5 phonograph needles running on a PLASTIC disc to produce sub VHS video.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  22. In other words... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    Phantom Menace was a poor to mediocre movie no matter what your point of view...

    So no matter what I actually thought of it, it was a poor movie? And here I thought movies were subjective! Good thing your comment was moderated as +1 Insightful, or I might never have learned this valuable information.

    P.S. I thought it sucked ass, too.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  23. no 4:3 aspect ratio? by pomakis · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I couldn't help but notice that there's no option for a 4:3 aspect ratio in the specs for this DVD (using either pan-and-scan information or a separate side). The ability to encode multiple aspect ratios on a single DVD was one of the things that really excited me about DVD technology when it first came out. It allows a person to evolve his/her home entertainment system from a regular television to a widescreen system without making any sacrifices at any time. Unfortunately, very few DVDs are produced with this in mind. Most are widescreen only. So when I watch a movie on my 4:3 television I have to put up with a smaller letterboxed picture, causing me to almost have to squint at times to see see details in the movie. Sure, when I get a widescreen TV in the future this won't be a problem, but it frustrates me that I have to put up with this problem now, especially since DVD technology has a solution to it.

    Using the zoom feature of a DVD player to zoom in past the letterbox strips is not an option for me. It blindly cuts an equal amount off both the left and right sides, regardless of the scene.

    I'd like to know why very few DVDs include pan-and-scan information to allow proper viewing in a 4:3 aspact ratio. Is it that much more expensive to produce a DVD this way?

  24. Dolby Digital EX v. 6.1 by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

    In a DTS 5.1 or Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack, there are 6 independent sountracks-- one for each speaker. The .1 bit refers to the fact that the Low Frequency Effects channel contains about one tenth as much information as a front or surround channel.

    In the old Dolby Surround system, the surround and center channels were extracted from the left and right stereo channels...

    For example, if the left and right channels contained the same audio at a particular time, the audio would be directed to the center channel. Don't ask me how the surround channel was extracted.

    Unfortunately, such a system is essentially unable to play sound from two speakers at once. Dolby Digital 5.1 improved on this system by seperating the surround channel into a left and right surround, and futher, by eliminating the extraction step-- six tracks are recorded instead of just the right and left. This allows the sountrack to use all of the speakers simultaneously.

    With Dolby 5.1 Surround EX, we're back to matrix surround. If the right and left surround channels contain the same audio, that bit is directed to the rear surround. 5.1 EX is 6 channels mixed so that a seventh can be extracted.

    6.1 would imply that the rear surround channel is recorded seperately. I believe that DTS has a discrete 6.1 mode.

    1. Re:Dolby Digital EX v. 6.1 by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2
      BTW, is Pro Logic the same as Dolby Surround 2.0 that we get on DVDs?

      Essentially, yes. Here's a brief run down of the various technologies. Dolby Surround: a method of matricing four tracks into a stereo soundtrack. Often called 2.0, to highlight the fact that only two discrete channels of sound are recorded onto the film, DVD, laserdisc, etc. .

      These channels can be uncompressed (PCM, usually 1536 kbs), or compressed using the Dolby Digital compression system (varies, can be as high as 448 kbs, or as low as 192 kbs).

      Dolby Digital: a method of storing up to 5.1 channels (the .1 referring to a low bandwidth "Low Frequency Effects" channel) in a compressed format (maximum bitrate is 640 kbs, usually less than 448 kbs).

      Dolby Surround EX: a method of matricing 3 channels into the Left Surround and Right Surround channels, so that a Rear surround channel can be reproduced.

      Dolby Prologic: the most common method of extracting the extra channels from a Dolby Surround soundtrack. 4 channels are reproduced--Left, Right, Center and Surround. Typically the Rear channel is piped to two rear speakers.

      Dolby Prologic II: a newer decoding sytem with more advanced decoding algorithms-- supposedly it can mimic a left and right surround.

    2. Re:Dolby Digital EX v. 6.1 by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Pro Logic uses a matrix to combine the left and right channels to make a mix channel, from which the centre and rear channels are extracted.

      You can get an approximation of the rear channel by wiring a speaker between the (+) terminals of your hifi amp. Get two speakers, connect the positive tags to the positive tags on the amp, and connect the two negative tags on the speaker together. Don't connect them to the amp, or anything else.

      This is called a Hafler system. It works reasonably well, for something that costs nothing.

  25. Where's The Phantom Edit? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2

    I want a copy of The Phantom Edit. Heck, I just want to see The Phantom Edit. Any hints?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  26. Wow- talk about BLIND. by solios · · Score: 2

    I personally don't think it would have been possible for Jesus to give a better review of God.

    Reread the sentence, consider the originating website of the article (theforce.net) and you'll see what I mean exactly.

    I read about five paragraphs of it, and very nearly puked. I viewed source, expecting to see a suspected <drool> review </drool> tag set in there somewhere. No luck.

    This isn't a review- it's Lucasfilm Masturbigratification.

  27. Various vulgarities by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

    I like how they, for no apparent reason, tied the SWG teaser into a download from doubleclick.net. Will I be expected to sign up for the game through doubleclick also? As far as I'm concerned, this is a criminal organization that bribes and lobbies it's way out of legal trouble. Why not just have the mafia handle the subscriptions? Does anyone have a mirror for the movie?

  28. Its the force.net by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    I'd like to a review from non-zealots as well.