More Domain Disputes Labeled 'Reverse-Hijacking'
merodach writes: "This article on technews.com actually has a rare piece of good news in it - two corporations whose attempts to take domains from others were rebuked as attempts at "reverse hijacking." We can only hope that maybe the arbitrators are finally beginning to see the light." Read the story and be amazed at the audacity of these companies.
Technews was slashdotted before any comments went up! Now that's effeciency, folks!
IF REFFERINGURL="http://www.slashdot.org"
:P
THEN chmod 000 slashdottedpage.html
Sorry bout the pseudocode, it would probably work though
Talez
"Findings of reverse hijacking are relatively rare under ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), even though the system for settling disputes over conflicts between trademark holder and domain-name registrants has seen more than 4,500 cases in less than two years."
Hmmm, now I wonder why that is...
Oh, wait, corporations have more money than ordinary shmoes. I knew there was a simple reason!
(sigh)
-Kasreyn
Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger
Whoever you are, whatever you put in the coffeepot at WIPO headquarters, please keep doing it. Thanks.
$x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
$x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
Did you at least send a "congratulatory" e-mail to its top executives when you heard they went out of business? ;-)
Right, I know you were tired when you wrote that, but I'd appreciate it if you kept ESR away from my anal nonetheless. Thanks.
-Legion