Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

More Domain Disputes Labeled 'Reverse-Hijacking'

Posted by michael on from the no-harm-in-trying dept.

merodach writes: "This article on technews.com actually has a rare piece of good news in it - two corporations whose attempts to take domains from others were rebuked as attempts at "reverse hijacking." We can only hope that maybe the arbitrators are finally beginning to see the light." Read the story and be amazed at the audacity of these companies.

3 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Well there half goes my anti-terrorism ideas. by inio · · Score: 0, Troll

    (blatatantly americo-centric comment warning)

    Had Nestle's reverse hijacking attempts been more sucsessfull I was going to suggest that we contract with them to protect our skies...

  2. Re:The link's dead, Jim! by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 0, Troll

    Huh? You mean people actually read the article before posting?

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  3. Re:slashdotted already? by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1, Troll
    Yeap. I have a mirror... hanging in my bathroom above the sink.

    By the way, what's up with your horrible sentence structure? 'Looks like a new record.' -- No subject

    The first sentence refers to the linked page as plural (because the site root is in parens). Please doublecheck your grammar next time and keep Slashdot a quality news site.

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.