Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

More Domain Disputes Labeled 'Reverse-Hijacking'

Posted by michael on from the no-harm-in-trying dept.

merodach writes: "This article on technews.com actually has a rare piece of good news in it - two corporations whose attempts to take domains from others were rebuked as attempts at "reverse hijacking." We can only hope that maybe the arbitrators are finally beginning to see the light." Read the story and be amazed at the audacity of these companies.

3 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. The page hasn't been Slashdotted! by rinkjustice · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How the fuck is this post scored a 3? I visited the site with my wimpy 56k modem no prob.

    Let's moderate up the comments which offer some new insight in the story, not just regurgitation.

    --
    SEO Copywriter. Just Say ON
    1. Re:The page hasn't been Slashdotted! by NightRain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It was rated up because earlier some people couldn't see the story in question. And by rating it up, it makes it through peoples filters so everyone can get it. Simple really :)

  2. Yeah... by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Doesn't it make you wonder what sort of hardware they have behind goatse.cx, to survive the /. effect so well? ;-) I mean just the /. newbies alone who go to the site not knowing what it is, have to produce considerable traffic.

    I'd like to see goatse.cx guy's hardware and bandwidth statistics. Lord knows it would be a lot better than what he's been showing us...

    --

    Chasing Amy
    (We all chase Amy...)
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus