More Domain Disputes Labeled 'Reverse-Hijacking'
merodach writes: "This article on technews.com actually has a rare piece of good news in it - two corporations whose attempts to take domains from others were rebuked as attempts at "reverse hijacking." We can only hope that maybe the arbitrators are finally beginning to see the light." Read the story and be amazed at the audacity of these companies.
At least goatse.cx is still up.
fuck you fuck you fuck you ya god damn nigger!!!
Is this this in fact RMS?
It looks a lot like him to me.
How the fuck is this post scored a 3? I visited the site with my wimpy 56k modem no prob.
Let's moderate up the comments which offer some new insight in the story, not just regurgitation.
SEO Copywriter. Just Say ON
Like I said, ignorant people may be good for a laugh if they try to take you to court, but what happens when you come up against an ignorant judge? There is yet to be an intelligent judge who does not give in to s famous person saying "Give me back my net-name" to someone who has bought a domain name including the famous person's name.
Sigh -_-;
Doesn't it make you wonder what sort of hardware they have behind goatse.cx, to survive the /. effect so well? ;-) I mean just the /. newbies alone who go to the site not knowing what it is, have to produce considerable traffic.
I'd like to see goatse.cx guy's hardware and bandwidth statistics. Lord knows it would be a lot better than what he's been showing us...
Chasing Amy
(We all chase Amy...)
"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
(if you want it)
someone please explain this to me
what the fuck is an invalid formkey!
thank you
The Slashdot Effect: A new for