Slashdot Mirror
BBC's Water Rocket-Vehicle Contest
jmichaelg writes: "The BBC is running a rocket contest to see who can build the fastest 2 liter water bottle propelled vehicle. The idea is you use a bicycle pump to pressurize the bottle to drive the vehicle. There are pressure limits (no more than 70 psi) so dry ice is out of the question. Gotta use a bike pump. Fastest car to go 20 meters is the winner. If you're going to play, you had better get going ... contest ends on Nov 6." Bonus points if you're riding it at the time.
this is how they're going to attack the taliban?
;(
time to go back to the drawing boards
And you thought you escaped racing little model cars when you got out of boyscouts.
Since the vehicle can have a moving start, just give it a good kick. This will easily move it 20 meters. (Well, maybe not easily, so get a little propulsion from the bottle too).
No sig for you.
Mercury!
Cleanup is left as an exercise for the experimenter.
With a very high proof... Once atomized by the high pressure air and ignited - it should make for a nice flame effect even if it doesn't do anything for increased propulsion. Flying two litre bottles of doom!!! Sounds like it would also make a good weapon for the next version of Quake...
---
DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
Wasting booze is a sin, dammit! My adult beverages are for entertainment purposes only, true...but watching them burn isn't as entertaining as consuming them and watching something else burn.
Writers imply. Readers infer.
Finally, something to use those old school NASA programs on!
forget it.
No, no.
Clearly you want something that will combust when exposed to air.
After all they called it a "rocket" contest.
OK, it's clearly not what was intended :-) But use the same bicycle pump pressure mechanism to push the jet fuel / gasoline / whatever out to the nozzle and let it burn there.
Bill Stewart
New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
Suppose you could generate a lower E.T. by driving wheels with the power instead of using strictly the push of the jet? 20 meters on pavement seems like its a long enough distance that you'd be coasting by the end under jet power. Perhaps you could harness more of the energy by driving wheels.
Or not. What do I know. Guess I'll have to try it and see. Incidentally, why do they limit charging it to a bicycle pump? 70 psi is 70 psi if it came from a pigs lips or an air compressor.
If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
OK, so the 20 meters wasn't along a set course and described the blast pattern instead...
My vehicle would probably be a three-wheeler made primarily from balsa-wood, with ceramic skateboard bearings (coated with a thin film of latex for wheels. I figure if I can minimise the weight of this thing, and keep the rolling resistance down then I am in with a good chance of winning
I just hope they let American Residents enter the comp. I cannot wait to get going on this.
Since the rules allow a rolling start, here's my plan: :)
Take a pop bottle. Pressurize it to 70psi if you feel like it. Hook it onto the catapult on an aircraft carrier. Start timing once the bottle's airborne.
Pop bottles and bike pumps can be dangerous. Last time those two came together I ended up with quite a lump on noggin. Just thankfull that the lead nosecone wasn't on at the time :)
thats funny you just described my car in exact detail. too bad youre too late.
Hang with me for a minute here. If you are entering into their little contest, I would assume that you are at the very least going to give them your name, phone number, address, etc. Add this to the fact that Britons don't seem to give a damn about other peoples' privacy (witness the pervasiveness of surveillance cameras in their country), and I can see genuine concerns arising.
What will the BBC do? Sell your data to marketers who need to target the geek and engineer audience? Because, as we've already established, this is an OK thing to do in their country. I would recommend that any freedom-loving person stay out of this contest for as long as you value your privacy. Who knows, one day, your life may depend on it!
--sdem
I guess now I know why the British have never been to the moon.
Thank you for reading One Man's Opinion. No participation necessary. Offer void where deemed by law or PATRIOT Act.
... just drop off a bunch of pressurized 2 liter bottles of water and watch 'em drink!
Fastest Taliban head to 20 meters wins!!!
Not only would this be the fastest car to cross the finish line, it would be the fastest car to melt into a puddle at the end too!
WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
The Rules
:)
*Use a 2 litre pop bottle
*The pressure must not exceed 5bar, 70psi, this is about the amount of pressure you can get from a cheap bike pump.
*The car can have a rolling start or fixed start - it's up to you.
*The car that completes the straight 20-metre tarmac/concrete course the fastest wins!
*Anything else goes!
Anything? MAAAAAAN that leaves SOOOOO many things to try.. TNT.. JetFuel.. Beer.. a Catapult.. and whatever else is posted here
... so what about a bit of JET A and a little jet motor? You use the pop bottle for the fuel.
Where does it say you can use water? Oh, anything goes. So, if the Jet A idea doesn't pass, what about using good old coca-cola instead of water? That should give it an extra kick (without exceeding the pressure limits, you should get a bit of extra pressure over time once the soda starts bouncing around... Pump it up to, oh, 60 psi. Let it rip. The CO2 released from the soda as the car bounces around should keep the pressure up there for longer than just air and water alone....)
Nevermind.
if not, have a tiny matchbox car get a massive kick by some force from the bottle
why would you want ceramic bearings? there's really no benefit until the bearings get rolling quite fast? i would go for a oil bearing instead of a grease packed bearing but presumably the wheels won't be spinning too fast on this thing, eh?
Chassis - The car that wins is going to have very carefully measured and constructed alignment. Getting the vehicle to run 20 meters straight, and with the thrust exactly aligned (in whichever direction the particular design calls for) is key. You can't afford to waste any of those thrust newtons on trying to drive the car sideways, or having the car trade forward velocity for lateral movement.
Water/Air ratio - if you run out of air too quickly, you are hauling excess water all the way down the track. Similarly, if you design the vehicle such that air can escape freely once the water level falls below a certain point, you are wasting power.
"Gearing" - one has to wonder if a direct-drive design (air pushing water out the back) is the most efficient. If you used hydraulic principles, you could in effect "gear down" the high pressure, resulting in high-torque that could drive over-size wheels, similar to the way that a hydraulic lift works. The winning design is going to have to find a tradeoff between quick accelleration/coasting and continued power for the duration of the track. Could the careful design of a nozzle accomplish the same thing? (/me thinks back to the model rocket days)
Multiple pressure vessels - this is just fanciful thinking, but one of the techniques steam locomotives used was to use the high pressure air in one set of cylinders, and then re-use the resulting lower pressure to drive a second set of cylinders. Extrapolating from this, I wonder if having two pressure vessels, totalling the legal limit, and firing at different times (ie. one for acceleration, one for maintaining speed) might be feasible.
I guess, though, in the end, the simplest, lightest design will win. Having a good chassis is still key though.
... of course.. it doesnt say how _much_ of the bottle has to break 20 meters :)
"Ahh.. our british water is undrinkable.. we must find a way to use it!"
Not likely. You'll be lucky to get more than 35 pounds out of it.
Tank up with heavy water.
This brings back memories of playing with water bottle rockets as a kid. You'd take a 2-liter bottle, fill it half way with water, mount it on a thingamajigger, and pump it up. If it didn't explode, you could launch it fifty feet in the air. Hours of fun for the whole family.
I ended up drawing a picture of it and using it for the science fair. It's amazing how low your standards go when you've put it off until 10:30 the night before it's due.
Ideally, the design for this vehicle would keep the water relatively high, for added pressure, and keep the nozzle fairly small, to increase the velocity at which the water leaves. Balsa wood might also be involved.
Finally, this post was actually a clever ploy to hype my new sig. Try it. It's pretty cool.
You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!
I remember playing with bottle rockets a while ago. I don't remember the pressure, but we were using a bike pump I think. Unlike what they're showing, our nozzled was actually just the end of the bottle. When we'd let it go, it emptied almost instantly while the bottle would rise above 10 meters faster than we could track it.
Wonder what it would look like when fired horizontally. I bet you'd do the 20 meters in about one second. I'm not sure you could make it stay on the ground though. And, well there might be safety issues...
Opus: the Swiss army knife of audio codec
We did something similar in my high school chemistry class several years ago. We were allowed to use chemical reactions as a source for the propulsion. We had a 2 lane "water drag track", and were given 1 soda bottle, and some basic supplies, like rubber bands, balloons, soda straws, etc.
The easiest rig to build, and the most common, was simply the soda bottle with a rubber stopper in the opening. The rubber stopper had a hole in it, which would function as an outlet... the bottle would then be filled with the infamous vinegar and baking soda mix. This provided enough fuel for long lasting propulsion, while being simple. One of the biggest problems with this design however, is the outlet on the bottle was usually above water. To acheive optimal propulsion with this method, the best thing is to make sure the jet is below the water line.
Another method (and the winning method) was to completely seal the bottle with a full rubber stopper. The bottle was filled with the infamous (and bad smelling) baking soda & vinegar mix, and promptly plugged with the stopper. After about 2 minutes of building pressure, the stopper would fire out of the bottle, propelling it forward with great velocity. There were some minor problems keeping the boat in the water, but that was the winning design.
Fancy designs don't work... some over-acheivers were inclined to build more complex designs, incorporating a lot of internal parts, etc. Go for the K.I.S.S theory! (Keep It Simple Stupid).
Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
First off, minor correction:
*The pressure must not exceed 5bar, 70psi, this is about the amount of pressure you can get from a cheap bike pump.
so they weren't saying you gotta use a bike pump, just that thats the best you can get w/ a bike pump. You can fill it up any way you want (so long as the pressure dosen't exceed 75psi).
Second, they didn't say the 2 letre had to be the main part of the body, so how about taping one to the inside of, say, a farrari. I bet that'd take 1st place vs anything else they could throw at it ^_^
You just the terrorists win! Congratulations.
Live your life. Don't forget. And go get laid it seems like you need it!
This was actually an event in a High School science competion called Science Olympiad. I participated in it about six years ago, and I'm not sure if they are still doing doing that event (called Bottle Rocketry). The object of the game was to keep the 2 liter bottle aloft for as long as possible. People used streamers or parachutes, all sorts of stuff. The hardest part was to get the parachute to deploy correctly. My designs would always accidentally deploy the parachute while the rocket was still on it's way up... So we scrapped the whole chute idea and just decided to go for altitude. After experimenting with a few designs, it was found that attaching a funnel for a nose-cone and using triangular fins that encircled the body of the bottle worked best. Simple and light, shot off like a bat out of hell, and would stay aloft for around 8 seconds before lawn-darting in the field we launched it from. It rocked. Next year we got a bit fancier. A friend of mine came up with this really cool way to keep the chute from deploying until the rocket was at it's apex. It's actually a lot harder than you think...
Eric
Make it idiot-proof and someone will build a better idiot.
Why do people not realize you're a troll?
Yeah, I know, I should have read the article first. D'oh.
Eric
Make it idiot-proof and someone will build a better idiot.
The worst terrorist attack in recorded history occurred last month, and now we're involved in a WAR and you're wasting your time on Slashdot????
Seriously, this troll is getting old. If you're serious (doubtful), try complaining offline somewhere, or at least not on Slashdot. In case your efforts over the past month haven't taught you anything, you're wasting your time here with us. We don't completely stop our lives and start living in fear of tomorrow just because a few lunatics want us to.
Anonymous Cowards will be treated as such.
As it doesn't mention *water* anywhere, just for kicks I would fill the bottle up with a liquid right on the verge of vaporizing at room temperature when kept at a pressure less than 70psi. As long as the car is kept cool and pressurised, it will stay in liquid form, but as soon as it starts slushing around and depressurising, the liquid will begin to vaporize and ramp up the pressure. Additionally, since you don't actually have to have the liquid escaping (as long as the liquid remains, you will have a very hefty supply of gas), only the gas, you will be under acceleration for the entire trip!
"Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
What are the rules concerning weight and kinetic energy? Can I make a pressurized bottle trigger a trip mechanism to a heavy weight attached to a gear?
This sig may be reproduced by anyone for any reason.
1. Get horse and chariot hooked up.
2. Fill 2 liter bottle full of cayenne pepper solution.
3. Attach bicycle pump to bottle.
4. Attach hose from bottle into horse's ass.
5. Pay up life insurance, make out will and start pumping.
The problem with all wheel-driven designs is that they are limited by the friction coefficient between the tyres and the ground and therefore can't accelerate faster than ~1g. This figure might be much lower if you don't get all the weight to the driven set of wheels and if the floor is wet (due to "exhaust" from the vehicles in front of yours or due to british weather).
Jet-driven pop bottles, on the other hand, can definitely accelerate faster than 1g as you can make them start vertically as real rockets (though I don't know what pressure they use for that).
fill a 2 liter bottle with liguid nitrogen, cap it and throw it in water. Although the explosion is relatively non-destructive, it makes quite a boom.
love is just extroverted narcissism
It would be great to have a follow-up contest to see who can make a bottle travel the furthest distance, not necessarily fastest. The key here would of course be steering. I imagine you could figure out some pretty creative ways to keep a 2-liter bottle going for a mile or so on a flat road.
$x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
$x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
Actually, Beer might be an ideal replacement for water! The CO2 would provide extra power when it came out of solution in the beer as it depresserizes
That, and it'd spray beer foam all over the track!!
Sorta like a beer fight bottle rocket hehe
The rules seem to be pretty open - perhaps guide wires could be used ala CO2 racers.
If you try to drive wheels your maximum force is the kinetic friction of the wheels on the ground. Not likely to be very high. But if you use thrust you don't have to worry about friction (except to lessen it). Go to the website and check out first submission video. No way is gearing going to beat that.
324006
In high school, we had a competation to launch a bottle the higest through the same methods. We found this out:
1) Bottles with the big ridges (bumps) on the bottom actually went farther and stratighter then just round bottoms.
2) The bottle would need to be filled no more then a 1/3 with water to get the most thrust.
If you are worried about it going straight, just add a few fins. E-mail me if you have any questions.
It probably would be the noisiest entry. Particularly loud if the liquid hydrogen version shatters the plastic bottle while the glowplug is hot.
No.. it doesn't tell you how to create the pressure.. just that the pressure inside the bottle must not exceed 5 bar.
You were referring to the use of the pump.. sorry, I misunderstood what you meant.
Links about Water Rockets:
/ je lly.htmo zzle.gifi ll/pad_fil l.htma grosse/ h2oRocketIndex.htmc ket/index.htm
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/3810
http://www.netspace.net.au/~bradcalv/t-n
http://mpassero.tripod.com/rocket/pad_f
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/p
http://mpassero.tripod.com/ro
There are probably more links than these. I am not karma whoring, it just didn't seem like anyone posted links to the "sport" of water-rocket building. It is too bad that they limit the size, etc - some water rocket builder/enthusiasts have built 2 and 3 stage rockets, added cameras and other payload packages - sent thier rockets up super high (higher than you would think)...
Reason is the Path to God - Anon
There's been a water rocket mailing list running for three years now, accumulating 15,000 messages. The home page is at .
:-), and the canonical links from the mailing list.
There's a fine simulator there too (though I say it myself
Optimum density for the reaction mass is around 0.3 - mercury would be *way* slower than water. Remember you have to accelerate some of it. Try it at http://www.osa.com.au/~cjh/rockets/simulation/ except the server is down (being fixed) at the mo.