Slashdot Mirror


The Birds and the Boats

siimat writes: "Wow, a bat-winged sailboat! Richard Dryden has produced "a variable geometry mast and sail that can adapt intelligently to changing wind conditions, and fold away conveniently after use without the need to dismantle. The inspiration has come from the remarkable wings of bats and birds." Too bad you won't be able to buy one until later this year..."

84 comments

  1. Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    The worst terrorist attack in recorded history occurred in September, and now we're involved in a WAR against Islam and you people have the gall to be discussing sailboats???? My *god*, people, GET SOME PRIORITIES!

    The bodies of the thousands of innocent civilians who died (and will die) in these unprecedented events could give a good god damn about sailboats, your childish Lego models, your nerf toy guns and whining about the lack of a "fun" workplace, your Everquest/Diablo/D&D fixation, the latest Cowboy Bebop rerun, or any of the other ways you are "getting on with your life" (here's a hint: watching Cowboy Bebop in your jammies and eating a bowl of Shreddies is *not* "getting on with your life"). The souls of the victims are watching in horror as you people squander yo
    ur finite, precious time on this earth playing video games!

    You people disgust me!

    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      By the way, FP! :-)

    2. Re:Let me get this straight... by sianide · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Ever heard of a distraction?

      People do not want to hear about the WTC nor the war 24 hours a day. It gets to be a bit too much, this is a pleasent diversion from all the drama of the WTC/war.

      Sometimes you've got to move on and learn from the past. Reliving 9/11 is useless, we cannot stop what happend so move on.

      --
      .::[sianide]::.
    3. Re:Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hah, 2 of the subnets I post from have been banned (and it 'aint a "72 hours" ban, either.) Good thing I have plenty to choose from! :-)

    4. Re:Let me get this straight... by All+sporks+are+fags · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Ever heard of a troll? Ever hear YHBT, YHL, HAND.

  2. Stephen King, author, dead at age 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I just heard sad news on talk radio - Horror/fiction writer Stephen King was found dead in his Maine house this morning. I'm sure we'll all miss him - even if you didn't read his books you've probably enjoyed one of his movies. Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:Stephen King, author, dead at age 54 by CaptTrips · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Another off-topic poster?! What's this world coming too... while your on this rumor that talk radio guys must have author Steven King Ainsworth and his numerous books like Welcome to Hell: The Dead and the Damned, Sister Helen and the Nobel Peace Prize, and The Fear Factor. You can reach him at San Quentin Prison, San Quentin, CA -- Cellmate number C-13201 4E81L

      --

      grep >= ! == $your
  3. We disgust you? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Good - another job well done.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  4. *BSD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    *BSD is dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered *BSD community when last month IDC confirmed that *BSD accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyist dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    *BSD is dying

    1. Re:*BSD is dying by CaptTrips · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hey Coward do you like even read the topics before posting?! Are you like one these people that insist on crossing the street, in heavy traffic when the DON'T WALK sign is flashing or speed up when you see a YIELD sign?

      --

      grep >= ! == $your
  5. Nice concept by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    You'd think this kind of thinking would be more widespread - I mean, various animals have been doing stuff we attempt to copy for hundreds of thousands of years, but instead of copying from them, we try to reinvent the wheel (probably with four corners, so it'll store neatly in containers) time and time again.

    It's not like the animal kingdom has lawyers that'll take inventors to court for infringement.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:Nice concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "reinvent the wheel" - that's funny. The wheel is just about the only structure not found in the animals kingdom.

    2. Re:Nice concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      This is just an unstayed implementation of the remarkably efficient Chinese junk rig that's been around forever.

      No big points for originality, though the simplicity of operation will be a boon to the *sailboard* crowd.

    3. Re:Nice concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Inventors HAVE been modeling after the natural world for hundreds of years. This is NOT a new concept (unless you are a British patent examiner). The bat-wing will not be a success for the same reason that commercial air liners don't have flapping wings. It is too heavy, too complicated, too weak and requires flexible sailcloth that reduces efficiency and will deteriorate quickly. Designs need to be optimized for available materials. Until we have synthetic bone and skin, look elsewhere for your sails.

      -Chris Schaening

    4. Re:Nice concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. the dinghy in the photo is Mirror. It has a daggerboard. Mirror's aren't the most fun to sail, but if you're a sprog they're easy to handle and quite tough. You're mistkaing a Mirror for a rowing boat.

  6. HELLO!!!! by cmdr_shithead · · Score: -1

    goat!

    1. Re:HELLO!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I woke up with some serious 'wood' this morning...

      Makes it damn hard to take a leak...

  7. Dinghy going upwind? by michaelmalak · · Score: 2

    Without a centerboard or keel, my guess is that dinghy version would be difficult but not impossible to take upwind. The windsurfing-style universal joint would allow one to rotate the sail fore and aft, which would steer the boat upwind or downwind. But even steering upwind there would be slippage downwind without a keel. A good aerodynamic sail, which this would appear to be, could overcome (outweigh) the slippage. But a keel would help, and dinghy without a keel could be frustrating.

    1. Re:Dinghy going upwind? by asb · · Score: 1

      You are confusing rowing dinghies with sailing ones. Sailing dinghies have keels.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    2. Re:Dinghy going upwind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Are you new to Linux?

    3. Re:Dinghy going upwind? by Anonymous+Pancake · · Score: -1

      My dinghie is bigger than your dinghie

  8. ep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    early post for Heather Donahue

  9. Currious by CaptTrips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found that design uncannyingly similar to a da Vinci drawing. Does anyone else notice the similarities?

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
    1. Re:Currious by asb · · Score: 1

      Given the fact that both da Vinci and Mr Dryden were inspiredby bats and birds I don't find the similarities surprising at all.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    2. Re:Currious by miTMan · · Score: 0

      he didn't get it to work either...

    3. Re:Currious by michaelbyrne · · Score: 1

      Considering that they were both copying wings found in Nature, they are actually very different. Did you look closely at the image you posted?

  10. Slow News Day by ScumBiker · · Score: 1
    Actually, I agree with a post above. It's kinda nice to not be buried with 9/11 stuff all day.


    The bat wing sail is a pretty decent idea, to bad the web page sucks.

    --
    --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
    1. Re:Slow News Day by Macka · · Score: 1


      Why do you say it sucks? I found the information presented to be very intelligently broken up over multiple, small, fast loading pages with lightweight pictures that painted a very effective visual description of the product!

      Define sucks!

    2. Re:Slow News Day by nesthigh · · Score: 1

      View the source Luke...

      <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">

      ... I think that pretty much sums it up

      next.

    3. Re:Slow News Day by nesthigh · · Score: 1

      mkay.. the Extrans option is hosed... preview looked perfect.. oh well.. back to the drawing board.

    4. Re:Slow News Day by ScumBiker · · Score: 1

      What I saw was a small page set for a 640x480 window, with some pictures. No evident navigational aids, no obvious links. It looked pretty crappy to me. I dunno, I guess I was grumpy this morning.

      --
      --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  11. Obvious quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "To the Bat-yacht, Robin!"

  12. how it works by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    The concept is pretty straight ahead, but I was wondering how you operated the wing. then I saw this:
    The sailboard version changes shape according to the amount of downforce exerted on the boom - in stronger winds the increasing lift generated by the rig is counterbalanced by the sailor leaning out more over the water, which in turn causes the rig to flex
    Now that's clever. But that rig is going to have to be pretty strong, given the stress on the joints.
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:how it works by cmdr_shithead · · Score: -1

      eat shit, loser

    2. Re:how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how some of mine, bill gates

    3. Re:how it works by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Then again, how to they expect the boat version to work?

      A sailboard does lean the rig into the wind and pulls down on it to take the sailors weight off the board.

      But a sailboat leans away from the wind - does that mean that the wing would get stretched upwards thus making it less and less suited to strong winds as the wind increases.

  13. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's been a while since the last Natalie Portman post, don'ya think, eh?

    1. Re:Hmmm by Hektor_Troy · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Yup ... which brings the following to mind:

      I'm not sure how a Beowolf cluster works, but I'm quite sure, I'd like to see a Beowolf cluster of Natalie Portmans ...

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      I hear that! The quote of the day!

    3. Re:Hmmm by Anaki+SkyHawk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      so we get another email address and stop coming here, .. not a big deal anyway

  14. It'll never Fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given how much "stretch" the fabric would have to have in order for the sail to keep half decent shape... this one is "not going to fly".... A far better example of efficiency are the wing sails used in Little America's Cup Catamarans.

    Sail fabric needs to have minimal "give" in order to effectively translate the force derived from the wind... into a thrust vector. I see no way to adjust how much sag/bag is in this sail... and if it's a stretchable fabric... then you're going to loose much of your efficiency...

    Looks cute... but the new focus for sailboards are kites... (Robby Naish is now only playing with kites)... the wind vector is both stronger and more consistent as you get off the surface and get the sail higher up... as to multihulls... the sails are getting to have higher and higher aspect ratio sails... more like the wing sails of the previously mentioned Little Americas Cup boats... and the vast monohull community... they're still so in love with wood... no .. I'll be nice.. by and large their efforts are along the lines of hull materials and shapes... as well as trying to get the least stretch in sail cloth by new materials... roller reefing is about to catch on big time for the mainsail (on the boom please and pray not in the mast)...

    This is a cute experiment... but it is a evolutional dead end....

    1. Re:It'll never Fly by asb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You completely missed the whole point of the rig. It is not efficiency but it's ability to automatically adjust to the wind conditions.

      The reason why sails are not used in commercial watercraft is the fact that handling sails requires much more men than handling a huge diesel engine does.

      One of their patent applications suggests that they are attacking this exact problem.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    2. Re:It'll never Fly by ctenophore · · Score: 1

      the problem with kites is that when too many people get them, the danger/mess potential goes up a lot faster than with traditional sailboards.
      for average people, this is an excellent compromise between convenience and performance. especially with the range of applications his wing-sail has (sailboards, canoes, boats)

      you and i both know we'll dread the day when everyone and their brother show up at the local sailing spot trying to launch an 11m kite with 40m lines.

    3. Re:It'll never Fly by 2b · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I missed the part on the website where he indicated that he was going after the Little AC.

      I disagree that a lack of efficency spells doom for this idea. Let's face it, the Little AC, formula 400, A-class etc etc, are extremely fast and efficient but commercial disasters. Compare them to, say, a Hobie 16. Some people race them, but 90% just want to splash around and anything that makes that easier to do has a chance to succeed, even if it won't appear on very high-performance craft anytime soon.

    4. Re:It'll never Fly by DrSpin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and the vast monohull community... they're still so in love with wood...

      Wood is so repairable. Its fine to use high tech materials, but what happens when they break in a remote part of the world?

      You may not sail to the West Indies, but the next owner might, so wood has a higher resale value.

      Wooden monohulls have a life well over 60 years with proper maintenance. Glass fibre does not.

      I think stainless steel's pretty cool, but in the cold climate of Northern Europe, I'm not sure cool is what you want!

    5. Re:It'll never Fly by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It can't be too long before someones kitemare ends up in the darwin awards.

      One or two kites at the beach is fine, but a dozen or more can get pretty hairy.

    6. Re:It'll never Fly by mzweng · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason why sails are not used in commercial watercraft is the fact that handling sails requires much more men than handling a huge diesel engine does.

      Hmmm... interesting. For some reason I always thought that the reason commercial ships didn't have sails was because commercial ships have hulls that are more suited to cargo placement than speed/seakeeping, requiring much more power to plow the brick of a ship through the water than sails could ever give.

      Take, for instance, a tanker, where the block coefficient (the ratio of the displaced volume of the ship's hull to a rectangular block having the dimensions of the ship's length, breadth and draft) approaches 1. That's honestly a brick, and unless you want it to travel at a disgustingly slow speed, you really need more than sails.

      Forgive my antagonistic, sarcastic post, but that's crap.
      _________________________________________
      fear the wrath of the naval architect...

    7. Re:It'll never Fly by Phrogz · · Score: 2
      Sail fabric needs to have minimal "give" in order to effectively translate the force derived from the wind... into a thrust vector. I see no way to adjust how much sag/bag is in this sail

      I'm just guessing based on the minimal pictures at the site, but the whole point of having a flexible, changeable frame system, as this does, is to adjust the give in the sail by changing the structure of the support geometry, not by attaching an enormous rubber sieve to a frame.

      Do you see anything in the original article itself about using a flexible fabric? I sure don't...

    8. Re:It'll never Fly by Grab · · Score: 2

      But most of the sailing community never goes beyond a couple of hundred miles of home, and certainly won't go outside "civilisation" (ie. somewhere with shops, or at least somewhere you could hire a car to get somewhere with shops). Most ppl just sail between marinas, where there's good facilities at each end if you have had problems in between, and where there's a coastguard to rescue you if you do get into a situation you can't handle. So most boats sold today are GRP - the benefits of wood or steel aren't worth the extra cost or maintenance problems.

      The key with wood is the phrase "with proper maintenance". "Proper maintenance" on the exterior of a wooden boat involves vast amounts of work on sanding down and revarnishing every year. "Proper maintenance" on the exterior of a GRP boat is basically limited to applying antifouling and filling any bubbles in the gelcoat which do appear. A wooden boat takes an order of magnitude longer to maintain, believe me. It currently takes my parents much less time to sort out the underside of their GRP cruiser (Achilles 27 IIRC) than it ever did for them to rub down and repaint the 16-foot wooden Fireball dinghy they had before, or even the 10-foot Mirror dinghy we had when I was a kid.

      For serious cruising use in the boonies, steel is usually recommended - whatever place you limp back to after grounding out, there's bound to be someone with a welding set. And steel only punctures at the place you hit, unlike wood (and GRP) which crack and splinter. But you get all sorts of condensation problems with steel, and the boat tends to get too hot in summer and too cold in winter, so you need lots of insulation.

      Grab.

  15. Alright! Finally! by mESSDan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick Robin! To the BatBoat! ;)

    --

    -- Dan
    1. Re:Alright! Finally! by CaptTrips · · Score: 0

      There will be a boat for Robin based on the studied birds. This will probably make Batman's directions a little harder to say.

      "Quick Robin! You go to your BirdBoat, and I'll go to the BatBoat! Meet me at Jokers place in 45 minutes. I may be late. It's rush hour traffic. If I am, use OnStar to locate me. Yadda yadda yadda..." (insert 26 corporate sponsors) Robin yawns. Alfred makes coca. And the Bat signal is still looming in the night sky.

      --

      grep >= ! == $your
  16. Holy floating vessels Batman! by Xpilot · · Score: 2

    I looked for "Richard Dryden" on Google but all I got were soccer sites. His name seems vaguely familiar... something to do with NASA?

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Holy floating vessels Batman! by Moofie · · Score: 2

      You're probably thinking of the Dryden Flight Research Center, where they have all SORTS of cool airplanes. And one of the best aviation photography resources on the net.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  17. plugs in answering machine by CaptTrips · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    *beep* I'm sorry I can't listen to the corporate media news anymore. Bin Laden, Talaban and Anthrax do not compute. Please leave me news for nerds and stuff that matters. Thanks! *beep*

    pfft... some people don't get it do they?

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  18. Older news (new to /. I guess) by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    I heard of this a long time ago... the key thing about this design is that although it is very adaptable, easy to use, and stable, those same qualities come at a cost to performance. For speed, you gotta go with another design.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  19. STEVIE237 IS A FUCKING BASTARD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I am binladen+ from the v-cade ancd stevie237 is a fucking bastard!

    See the whole truth!

    And JEFF IS TO!

  20. their quote by Anaki+SkyHawk · · Score: 1

    "We cannot direct the wind, But we can adjust our sails..."

    hey, wouldn't it be easier to control weather with a few of those nasa sattelites?

    1. Re:their quote by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      We can't. The Fremen are bribing the Guild in order to prevent weather satellites from flying over most part of the planet.

      Errr... I seem to be confusing with things from another time and another place.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
  21. Hmmm by Anonymous+Pancake · · Score: -1
    I just found this [slashdot.org] [slashdot.org] at the Slashdot Privacy Watch [slashdot.org] [slashdot.org] page. This article (and the others posted by Slashdot Privacy Watch) present some seriously scary possibilities. I'm posting this in order to have your comments, CmdrTaco.

    What is the Slashdot Customer Profile?

    Slashdot is owned by VA Linux, and VA Linux is a for-profit Corporation. This means that, like other corporations, Slashdot must maintain a customer profile for every user (yes, even you Anonymous Cowards!). These customer profiles are kept in Slashdot's master MySQL database, which is archived on a frequent basis to preserve VA Linux's valuable Intellectual Property rights to its' customer information. The Customer Profile contains many fields, such as the email address you used to register your Slashdot account. In addition, it contains these fields [slashdot.org] [slashdot.org] which are accessed in users.pl [slashcode.com] [slashcode.com], line 1898.

    They're Tracking WHAT?

    You may have noticed that the Customer Profile contains a field called $iplist. You're not dreaming, this is a list of every IP address anyone has used to access Slasdot - ever. Slashdot has a perfectly legitimate reason [slashdot.org] [slashdot.org] for maintaining these detailed records on every customer. However, while every Slashdot user understands that the privacy of each Slashdot user is paramount to the current management of Slashdot, we must also understand that Slashdot is property, and that it has been bought - and sold - before. Therefore we must not consider the implication of the existence of Slashdot Customer Profiling under the existing management, but rather the implications under any future management.

    Who Would Want my IP?

    Let's assume, for the sake of argument only, that VA Linux decides to sell Slashdot to DoubleClick [doubleclick.com] [doubleclick.com] in order to boost its' short-term cash supply. Doubeclick would be looking at Slashdot mainly as an Intellectual Property asset, and its' customer database as the primary portion of that asset (because Slaschode is GPL'd). How, then, can VA Linux maximize the resale value of Slashdot's Intellectual Property assets? By tracking every possible piece of information. The list of IP addresses used by every Slashdot user, reverse-correlated by email, would provide a very lucrative marketing tool to a would-be buyer of Slashdot. Doubleclick could use this Intellectual Property to:

    • Correlate web hits to member sites by IP address, sending an email to every Slashdot user who visits a target site.
    • Correlate web hits by IP address and present customized content to each Slashdot user who visits a target site, for instance: "Welcome to Superdomains.com, Slashdot user Jamie!"

    It is easy to see why recording the IP profiles of every Slashdot customer maximizes the value of the Slashdot Customer Database. The question is, should you be given the option to opt-out?



    Last time I posted this, I was immediately censored. Please distribute this and other Slashdot Privacy Watch publications extensively until CmdrTaco responds satisfactorily.

  22. I HATE BEING A TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    STOP ACCUSING ME OF BEING A TROLL, just because im an anonymous coward!

    1. Re:I HATE BEING A TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      TROLL!

  23. Remember the Rotating Sail? by wnknisely · · Score: 1

    This new sail design reminded me of something that I once saw in a book of sail design.

    In the 1920's a German designer started designing sailing ships that used a rotating sail pillar as a mast rather than a sheet of material. Here's a link to a page that describes not only the concept but a a way to put together a modern version.

    I always figured this was a wonderful idea because this way I wouldn't have to put down my beer when the person on the wheel called out a turn while tacking. I mean for heaven's sake - let's keep in mind the real point to recreational sailing. Grin.

    --
    In illa quae ultra sunt
    1. Re:Remember the Rotating Sail? by Moofie · · Score: 2

      The problem is that magnus effect sails (and aircraft wings, for that matter) are colossally draggy. You're looking at approximately three times the lift/drag ratio, and that's a Bad Thing. Couple that with the power requirements for spinning the drum, and you've got a really poor compromise design.

      I was fascinated with this idea for about five minutes in my aerodynamics class, but the drawbacks are rather massive.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  24. Never gonna make it by Brento · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, folks, but as a sailor, I've gotta tell you that this bat will never fly. A big, big part of the romance of sailing is the beauty of the sailboats. Spend enough time around sailors, and you'll get to know the various boat designers and be able to recognize their work from afar.

    Anything with this hideous-looking contraption on board is going to be shunned at the local yacht club, and that's where the real decisions are made. Whether you agree with the rationale or not, most sailboat buyers are going to live with their purchase for a decade or more, and they want their boat to be a representation of their own personality. Boats are purchased with 30-year loans - think about that for a second. Do you really, really want a boat ahead of its time? Nope, almost everybody wants timeless classics, gorgeous boats with clean lines.

    Take a look at any marina, and you'll see what I mean. This is an industry where teak is still preferred over carbon fiber, where people talk about canvas sails, and where tradition dictates that you never change the name of a boat. A lot of people still don't even accept catamarans as real sailboats, let alone contraptions with folding bat-like sails.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Never gonna make it by Moofie · · Score: 2

      I'm a hardcore aero geek and an aspiring sailor. I'm really looking forward to the day I can actually afford to design the boat of my dreams, and I could give a damn what those poncy jerks at the yacht club think. I'll be glad to show them EXACTLY why my boat will be funny lookin', by blowing them out of the water on the race course.

      I'm not saying it will be commercially successful: Only competitively successful. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Never gonna make it by 2b · · Score: 1
      A lot of people still don't even accept catamarans as real sailboats

      While it's true that there are still a lot of monomaran bigots out there, their numbers are dwindling. I find that most sailors nowadays (OK, outside the NYYC) are pretty open to new ideas. Sure, things got pretty boring for a while but the new crop of CF-rigged planing sportboats has made people more willing to look at new ideas with an open mind. Once you sail a Melges 24 a J-24 seems pretty boring, and it's not that great a leap from a Melges 24 to an F-24.

    3. Re:Never gonna make it by cnkeller · · Score: 2
      Take a look at any marina, and you'll see what I mean.

      Hmm, I would disagree. Being from the *real* sailing capital of the world, Annapolis MD, I tend to see plenty of carbon stuff at AYC (from Fahr's shop), St Francis, NYYC, Wakiki YC, etc. I've had the luxry of racing from a few of the more prestigous (snobby) yacht clubs around the country and I've seen plenty of both. Those with the money buy the latest toys (Sayonnara???) and others buy the classics. Much like cars, everyones tastes are different and usually go along with the cash flow. It also depends a lot on where you are sailing or racing. I race, not pleasure sail, so that usually dictates the latest and greatest gear. Perhaps you are visiting yacht clubs where racing isn't big?

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    4. Re:Never gonna make it by armb · · Score: 2

      > Boats are purchased with 30-year loans

      Windsurfers, small dinghys, and sea kayaks aren't, and are among the target applications. Some windsurfers and dinghy sailers absolutely want a boat ahead of its time so long as it's legal in their racing class (for values of "ahead of its time" that mean "faster", which this might not).

      If he can really make a sail that instantly reefs to best suit conditions while retaining efficiency, there might be a market. I'm dubious, but it's possible.

      Then again, your arguments certainly seem to apply to rigid wingsails. Boats like
      http://www.linfield-yachts.com/lnfield-yachts/ze fy r43/technology.html exist, but are hardly common.

      (See http://www.baloghsaildesigns.com/pro.html for an existing "batwing" (non-folding) kayak sail. Is it really any more elegant than the new one?)

      --
      rant
  25. It will only sink by Unanonymous+Coward · · Score: 0

    Boats, they always sink!

    --
    The Unanonymous Coward
  26. Seems Backwards by Bryan_K · · Score: 1

    As a dinghy sailor, the concept of changing the sail shape seems rather backwards to me. Generally, you want a rather loose, billowy sail in light to medium winds, because this produces a more rounded airfoil, which produces more lift. In heavy winds, you stretch the sails out flatter, because a more rounded airfoil will overpower you and pull you over. By this logic, the mast should be more erect in heavy winds (pulling the sail flatter) and should be pulled downwards in lighter winds (allowing the sail to fill more).

    1. Re:Seems Backwards by Siva · · Score: 1

      By this logic, the mast should be more erect in heavy winds (pulling the sail flatter) and should be pulled downwards in lighter winds (allowing the sail to fill more).

      well, i dont think pulling the mast of this design downward has the effect of making a more rounded airfoil. from what i can gather from the (rather small) images, it looks like lowering the mast introduces near-horizontal folds in the sail. i would think the main effect of this would be to start spilling air off the leech of the sail. this would sort of be like slackening the main halyard slightly on a normal rig without reefing it. it would also reduce the percentage of the sail area that was maintaing the airfoil shape.

      --Siva

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
  27. Just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the average /. reader actually trying to do something involving boats, water, and the real world. Man, the traffic on this site will go WAY down once the drownings begin...

  28. A proper name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about....Dingbat. Ya baby...yaaaa

  29. Why a bat, when a Star is just a good by theEd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I sail a Star boat(www.starclass.org) and this one-design class has used a flexible rig since the 1930s. The mast is extremly long and thin and tapers at the tip. The running backstays have both an upper and lower attachment and each is a adjustable so that one can change the shape of the mast changing the tension of the stays. There is also a rammer which allows one to move the mast fore/aft in the step.

    Another thing is the sail needs to be cut correctly because in a situation in which one increases the bend of the mast during a heavy air condition could lead to increased fullness, which is the opposite of what one wants in heavy air. The Star main is shaped such that when the mast is bent back, most/all tension on the upper backstay. the main is "flat". As one shifts the tension from the upper to the lower, the sail is pulled in a way that increase the fullness of the main, which is better in light wind conditions. But I'm sure Mr. Dryden has thought of this.

    --
    "And now you shall learn the secret of boot to the head"
  30. Resistance to change... by chazR · · Score: 2

    ...is not as strong as you think.

    Otherwise, we'd all be sailing gaff cutters. The gaff rig is *much* prettier than a bermudan. Unfortunately, it's less efficient, more expensive and takes a lot more effort to use.
    In the fast dinghy/sailboard arena, this could sell *because* it's new and unusual. For Eris' sake, sailboarders have been known to use dayglo pink sailcloth.

    I'm sticking with my high-aspect fractional rig while the class rules require it...

    1. Re:Resistance to change... by styrotech · · Score: 1

      In the fast dinghy/sailboard arena, this could sell *because* it's new and unusual.

      I disagree. The windsurfing market has been subjected to so many fads over the years (especially during the 80's - ie when lots of other things were dayglo pink!) that they are pretty resistant to 'out there' ideas like this.

      It always comes back to the simplest, cleanest shapes and ideas. Now developments are all evolutionary rather than revolutionary, and progress is being made much faster that way.

      Most windsurfers wouldn't buy this unless it had proved itself in competition for a year or two.

  31. Looks cool, but... by jcr · · Score: 2

    The only advantage this design offers is that you can increase or reduce your sail area (reefing, we call it), quickly.

    Well, that's nice and all, but frankly, you don't NEED to reef a sail all that often.

    This looks to me like the kind of thing someone who's not a sailor would have designed.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Looks cool, but... by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. It depends on what type of sailing you do. If you just hit the lake for the afternoon on nice days, then no, you don't have to reef that often. But if you, like me, take any opportunity to go sailing - almost regardless of conditions - then the ability to reef becomes very important. Sailing a small boat in wind speed of 20+ knots will get your blood up - you should try it. But that's not the real reason I want one of these things. As an avid small boat sailor, bridges are the bane of my existance. This rig would make that a non-issue. Is a bridge in the way? No problem with a rig like this! Strike the sail and mast, ship the oars and row under it. Then raise the mast again and off you go. Beautiful!

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    2. Re:Looks cool, but... by jcr · · Score: 2

      But if you, like me, take any opportunity to go sailing - almost regardless of conditions - then the ability to reef becomes very important.

      Of course reefing is important, but it's not something you need to do as often as you trim sail. When you're out in heavy weather, how often to you change how much sail you've reefed? I don't know about you, but I've rarely had occasion to reef or unreef a sail away from the dock.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Looks cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      sailors are gay.

    4. Re:Looks cool, but... by kanet007 · · Score: 1

      Some of latest mast technology uses carbon fiber w/o shrouds so that the top of the mast tapers off automatically in heavy air. This depowers the sail nicely. I agree that the bat wing will compress and actually give a more full shape, and make the boat harder to drive. The Escape (even though I hate the look of it) has an auto-depowering rig like the one I mentioned above. I believe they've played with a carbon-fiber stayless mast on a stock J/92 and it worked well.

  32. See how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You produce a witty remark and post it on Slashdot under the Anonymous Coward pseudonym. It is summarily ignored or possibly moderated down to -1 as I am sure that this post will be.

    But later, one of the Slashdot members posts virtually the same message(#2516027), after probably reading yours, and it is moderated to +5 Funny.

    Yours wasn't at all funny or worthy of being on Slashdot because you posted as AC. His was hilarious, even though it was the same, because he is one of the brethren.

  33. "the new focus for sailboards are kites..." by SimCash · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of an old Sci Am article that discussed the vectors that make a sailboat work, considered the advantages that iceboats have, and concluded that the ideal sailboat would have a kite for a sail, a sort of "underwater kite" for the keel, with the payload suspened above the water.

    If memory serves me, the improvement gained by reducing the H2O drag offset the loss of suspending the bayload from the kite. Working models seem to have been built (see aerohydrofoil ).

  34. Great by iso_bars · · Score: 1

    State of the art sail technology... well i hope... and yes, thy put it on plywood. Comon guys, a mirror?!

    Genius, Genius. Although having said that i cant for the life of me think of any better alternatives ;-)

    Oh and BTW the *real* sailing capital of the word (for dingies at least) is one of the fantastic clubs in the UK, such as Weymouth, Hayling or Grapham.... want proof? check the olympics