Slashdot Mirror


God's Debris

Thank reader mblumber for this review of Scott Adams's God's Debris, newly republished in hardcover after starting out life a few years ago as an e-book. For those who've never seen Adam's serious side, this is an interesting introduction. God's Debris author Scott Adams pages 128 publisher Andrew McMeel, Publishers rating 9 reviewer mblumber ISBN 0740721909 summary An existential thought experiment in the form of a dialogue.

I like reading books that make me think, but not in the same way that I think when I'm at work or doing homework. When reading for pleasure, I want something that at first glance is so strange it's absurd, but at closer examination makes a tremendous amount of sense. That depth is the essence of Scott Adams' God's Debris, A Thought Experiment.

Adams is not known for writing super-intelligent commentaries on life, at least ones without a punchline or visual gag. Creator of Dilbert, his writing to this point has focused upon the world of cubicles and shifting organizational charts where engineers and management ('induhviduals' as he often calls them) square off in battles where the engineers are right and management is wrong. Very straightforward, enjoyable reading, but nothing compared to his latest work.

God's Debris was first published in May of 1999 as an e-book. It is sold by Digital Owl and can be purchased as bits for $4.95 or in hardcover wherever books are sold. The story focuses on both the physical laws of nature (relativity, gravity, the origin of the universe) and the psychology behind religion. The story is told by a fairly educated narrator talking to an unseen second character who seems to hold a deep understanding of the universe. As I read more, I found my own questions being raised by the narrator, and addressed by the other character. This arrangement makes for a very strange read, but the unusual format enhances the overall reading experience.

This book second guesses everything one learns in school, and comes close to succeeding. I cannot think of a single statement in the book that can be proven incorrect. To a college-educated reader like me, some of the assertions may seem totally ridiculous -- the problem is that they make just as much sense as Einstein's relativistic physics. In the introduction to the book, Adams observes the fact that ' ... the simplest explanation usually sounds right and is far more convincing than any complicated explanation could hope to be.'

The protagonist makes some very peculiar assertions throughout; My favorite is a statement he makes about the true nature of gravity, specifically that it is fueled by probability. The idea his advances is that all matter is constantly switching in and out of existence, and that is how objects move. The reason that matter appears to be attracted to other matter is that, according to the rules of probability, each piece of matter will inherently appear closer to massive objects the next time it comes back into existence. If you didn't understand that, and you'd like to, then you should read the book.

If you are a religious person, I can assure that this book will be disturbing. Although not told from an atheist point of view, the protagonist rejects the traditional view of religion. There are references to religious beliefs as 'delusions' only intended to allow the less-enlightened to live in relative peace in a world which has little. Taken as a whole, the views expressed can best be summarized ala Jesse Ventura, that 'organized religion is a crutch for the weak-minded.'

I'm purposely avoiding going into detail about the contents of the book. This is not only because a small piece doesn't make sense by itself, but also because most of the fun is in the discovery. Reading this book, you feel as if you are the first and only person to truly understand the world. I wouldn't want to spoil that for you. It's only 132 pages, broken up into very short chapters, and it can be read on your lunch break. I highly recommend it.

You can purchase this book at Fatbrain. Do you want to see your book review on Slashdot? Please take a look at the book review guidelines first.

8 of 334 comments (clear)

  1. I read this book by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1, Funny

    I liked it.. but I read the whole thing and there was no fucking Dogbert! What the hell..

  2. I'd have a hard time taking this book seriously by tmark · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be hard to take any book by him that does not contain comic strips, seriously. I would also find it hard to take seriously a book on philosophy by Charles Schultz, Stan Lee, O.J. Simpson, or Tonya Harding. There's just too much extra baggage tied up with what I think I know of the author. Plus I still haven't forgiven him for that damn Dilbert T.V. show.

  3. Re:Organised religion quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think what he actually said was "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."

  4. Re:Organised religion quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course Karl never had cable tv... or Everquest.

  5. A little Marxist-Deist humor. by laetus · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're splitting angel hairs here. Marx was an athiest. But we can still have a little fun:

    Karl Marx dies and shows up at the gates of heaven to be met by Saint Peter.

    "Name?" asks Peter.

    "Marx, Karl Marx." replies the famous author.

    "Hmm," says Peter to himself, "why do I know that name?"

    "I am Marx," Marx said, beaming with pride, "founder of socialism and the driving force behind the communist ideal called Marxism."

    "I see," Peter said. "I'll have to check with God."

    So Peter rushes off to confer with God. God hears the name Marx and immediately a look of disgust infects His face. "Marx?" God says, "He's nothing but a trouble maker. Send him down to hell."

    So Peter happily signs the appropriate forms and deports Karl Marx to Satan's fiery hell.

    Some time later, a free trade agreement is forged between Heaven and Hell. The deal is hailed by all to be a great economic leap forward that would revitalize both struggling economies. But soon after the treaty, God realizes that Heaven is no longer receiving any products
    from Hell. So he sends Saint Peter down to investigate.

    "Well?" asks Peter of Satan, "What's the hold up? We have an agreement!"

    Satan shrugs his shoulders, exasperated. "It's that Marx fellow," Satan
    replied. "Ever since he got down here, all we've had are strikes and labour demands. Productivity has dropped to zero!"

    "So?" Peter asks, "What would you have us do?"

    "Take him back. Take Marx back to Heaven, and I guarantee productivity will sky rocket!"

    So Peter agreed, on God's behalf, to accept Karl Marx back to Heaven.

    Some time later Satan realizes that Hell has not received any orders for product from Heaven. In fact, very little communication at all has leaked from Up Above. So, concerned for the economic welfare of Hell, he makes a trip to Heaven.

    "Peter! Peter, are you there?" Satan demands.

    "Yes, what is it?" Peter answers.

    "What's the hold up? What about the flow of trade?"

    "Oh I'm sorry," Peter said, "We have decided to adopt a Marxist isolationist stance. We are an intrinsic self-governed body that is now based on the needs of the prolitariate. It is our opinion that this free trade agreement only benefits the bourgeois."

    "What?!" Satan was furious. "I demand to speak to God!"

    Peter's eyebrow is raised in confusion. "Who?"

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
  6. people are the television of God by tinkerton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Excuse me, but Marx said that television is the opiate of the people. Yes, he was ahead of his time.

    And John Lennon said that lsd should be the religion of the people.

    Then Postman said television is the religion of the people.

    Then Burroughs said lsd is better than television

    Ventura just was trying to start a new thread.

    Actually I prefer "consumerism is the religion of the people" .
    Working to buy a bigger car than your neighbor sure makes life meaningful.

    Sarcastic? Who, me?

  7. I gave up on Dilbert...er....Scott Adams by eaddict · · Score: 2, Funny

    After the 3rd or 4th book his style became like "Family Circus" and "Peanuts" to me. Predictible and common. I don't think I'll invest in his book (even though the government has asked us to keep the economy going). I think I'll buy a multi-pack of snickers instead....

    --
    "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
  8. Re:as far as religion goes (from a Christian) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...and you are not using it. That God did give you such a gift is a testament to his nature. That you do not submit to what you know to be true is the most heinous crime of all, and it is for this that you will be damned for all eternity, save that you repent of your pride, and submit to God from whence your existence originated.