Slashdot Mirror


Color Photographs with Game Boy Camera

An anonymous submitter sends in: "For the first time, the Game Boy Camera has been used to take COLOR Photographs. It's the Game Boy Camera Color Photography Project." The previous slashdot story that this reminds you of is this one about digichromatography.

104 comments

  1. Techniques by Wire+Tap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is similar to the technique used to add color to pictures of Russia, circa 1863-1944. Images can be found at The Library of Congress's website. The link is: (http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/gorskii.html). Enjoy!

    --

    Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.

    1. Re:Techniques by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Lets face it, the story is a bit dull. Who cares? Is there a category in the Darwins Award for people who dont kill themselves, but rather keep themselves so busy with pointlessness that the effect is the same?

    2. Re:Techniques by jwhyche · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I respectfully disagree. This is exactly what the spirit of hacking is about. Making a piece of computer equipment do something that its not ment to do.


      Good Job


      Would someone please mod me up? I need the karma :)

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:Techniques by geekster · · Score: 1

      No, let's face it, your attiude is dull. I think this is interresting, you don't, who cares.

    4. Re:Techniques by scumdamn · · Score: 2

      I don't believe that's true at all. I just looked at the loc.gov link and compared it to the story and they are, in fact related. I don't know how you can say the parent was offtopic or unrelated to the article. In fact, I found his link to be more interesting than the game boy link.

      Note how vivid the pictures taken in Russia are. Also, read the article and you will see that the glass plate negatives were reflected through a device known as a "magic lantern" that combined the three images to make one full color image.

    5. Re:Techniques by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Yea, but I did that in 1993 with my Apple Scanner. It probably wouldn't have been news then, either.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    6. Re:Techniques by staili · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually that link to digichromatography tells also about that same.

    7. Re:Techniques by jwhyche · · Score: 0

      I also did the samething back in the late '89 with my Amiga and Digiview. But I would like to see more articles like this on /. and less JohnKatz type articles.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  2. Re:Nice Job by Sc00ter · · Score: 0, Redundant
    You forgot to mention that the GBC is sensitive to Infrared, so he also needed to filter that OUT on all three images, otherwise it doesn't work.

  3. This is great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the site: "with the Game Boy Camera, it's not possible to hand-hold it."

    Wow, all the poor-quality, low-resolution pictures you'd expect from a bargain basement digital camera with none of the portability. This guy is going to make millions!

  4. Gba Boy Advanced by JohnHegarty · · Score: 1

    Would the Game Boy Advance be a better platform for this. Is has alot more power , resolutions , colours then the GBC.

    1. Re:Gba Boy Advanced by Hougaard · · Score: 1

      Right now no camera exists for the gameboy Advance, but if Nintendo made a camera for the GBA, it would properly be in color anyway.

    2. Re:Gba Boy Advanced by Space+Coyote · · Score: 1

      The very beauty of this project, IMO, is that they are doing something so cool with such limitted (and cheap) hardware.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    3. Re:Gba Boy Advanced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pictures would be no different with the GBA. The sensor in the camera only does b you don't automatically get color by plugging it into a color GameBoy.

      I use mine with my old GameBoy Pocket. See my pictures at :

      http://www4.ncsu.edu/~twk/gg/

      The MadKatz GameBoy camera link lets you dump the pictures.

      This thing is loads of fun.

  5. snooker robot by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few years ago (back in the 1980's I think), I saw a science show on british TV, where a group of Ph.D. (graduate) students were building a robot to play snooker. They only had a black and white video camera and needed some way of recognising the colour of the snooker balls. Their solution was to carefully detect the grey level of each ball. I thought at the time that a better solution would be to use 3 filters in this way (perhaps on a rotating wheel in front of the camera), which would have given them colour images from a black and white camera. Can I claim prior art? Maybe I should have patented the idea :-)

    HH

    1. Re:snooker robot by Uberminky · · Score: 1

      Your idea is what I would have proposed, too. :) Anyway, they've been doing this stuff forever. It wasn't THAT long ago but they did the same thing with the original b&w QuickCam, among other things. This story got a bit of a yawn out of me, but oh well.

      --

      The streets shall flow with the blood of the Guberminky.

  6. Old method by rasty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, this is a quite old and well-known method of obtaining color images with a non-color camera. The first video digitiser that I got way back for my Amiga came with 3 filters (R, G and B of course). The main problem was holding the camera and subject perfectly still while capturing the 3 separate shots, otherwise you'd get an effect similar to that of a disaligned RGB beamer.
    The biggest logical step made by that individual was the application of the IR filter.

    What could actually be interesting would be writing a native GameBoy software to both combine the 3 images and correctly align them if the camera slightly moved during the process, which is something really likely with a GB camera. Keep in mind that you'll have to hold the GB *really* still, put filter 1 in front of it, take picture, repeat 3 times...

  7. Infrared photo... It is kind of cool. by AtomicBomb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just come across a tutorial about near infrared photography. If the gameboy cam are IR sensitive, it will be quite cool. We can even build a "flashnight" with an array of remote control IR LEDs.

    Next time I know how to take a close shot of the penguins without waking them up (I live somewhere in south hemisphere, within very long driving distance to a penguin colony..)

  8. IR coolness! by glebite · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not attach the gameboy viewscreen to sit in front of one eye and aim the camera forwards, attach some high-output IR LEDs to project out and run as a hacked/cheap nightvision?

    --
    I donate all spillover Karma to the charity of my choice... Ada was still a babe despite what people may say...
    1. Re:IR coolness! by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good idea, but you'll need something set up to illuminate the viewscreen with, yet not allow any visible light to leak out the sides and give away your position.

    2. Re:IR coolness! by uchi · · Score: 2, Informative

      The CCD in the Gameboy camera only picks up infrared light which is near visible(red) light - which is approx. 780 nm i believe. The infrared light emitted by humans and animals would not be perceptable by the contraption, I think.

    3. Re:IR coolness! by Radnor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder what kind of picture would come up if you used a Photon micro-light that emitted IR? Here's what their web page says about the IR light:

      "Used by members of the Secret Service, this Photon light creates a powerful infrared beam invisible to the naked eye. Rated at 11mW, this little light is quite a bit more powerful than your average IR illuminator. When used in conjunction with night vision equipment, it will illuminate a large area. This Photon light is ONLY useful when used with night vision equipment or other equipment sensitive to infrared light."

    4. Re:IR coolness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Perhaps that is why the poster indicated he would use some IR LEDs to *illuminate* the targets with near-visible IR? Or perhaps you just didn't read his entire post.

    5. Re:IR coolness! by sh00z · · Score: 1

      $25 for an LED? Bah. I spent about 8 bucks on an 87C filter, slapped it on a Mag-Lite, and got about 50 yards' range when viewed through a Sony camcorder with NightShot.

    6. Re:IR coolness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just imagine someone running around with a gameboy and attached to his eye! and just imagine that someone does it in public! if you buy me a beer, i will do it.

    7. Re:IR coolness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, to see through people's cloths (granted at very low resolution). Sony has had this ability for some time now!

  9. Re:Nice Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to /. ! :-)

  10. Re:Nice Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All CCD-based cameras are sensitive to IR. For example, if I point my remote controller towards mu AGFA CL20, I can see the IR-leds blink on and off (using a video-software that is.)

  11. High precision scientific cameras... by VDM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... sometimes do the same, i.e., a motorized filter wheel placed in front of the CCD. No realtime acquisition, but very good for static/very slow subjects (i.e., microscope and telescope images). This because single CCDs are more precise/sensitive than 3CCD cameras.

    With this technique you may also select other primary colours (i.e., CMY), and filter strange colour combinations.

    You may find some picture of such weels for example at http://www.ghg.net/cshaw/filter.htm (applied to telescope observation).

  12. gameboy camera pics by friscolr · · Score: 4, Informative
    that's nice and all, but it's not like it's a photo of a supermodel.

    seriously though, i remember seeing a webpage about a guy using his gameboy as a webcam (the aforementioned website, http://www.lunacy8m.com/, does this as well) and he also had colour photos taken with 3 filters. That was at least a few months ago and definitely before October 2001, so it would have been the first. can't seem to find the site anymore, though.

    1. Re:gameboy camera pics by friscolr · · Score: 4, Informative
      yes i get to respond to my own post!

      ten more minutes of searching and i found the site i was thinking of:
      Gameboy Camera Parallel Port Interface
      website features colour photographs taken using the gameboy camera, though since it didn;t use an ir filter the images appear washed out. Also has a lot of other info about hacking the gameboy camera.

    2. Re:gameboy camera pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other guy to do this did not filter out the Infrared.

      Also, he was no longer using the game boy camera. He had attached the chip to his computer with a parallel port, giving him a full 256-gray scale camera. In my view, this is a whole new camera made from game boy parts (also a great accomplishment) and not a game boy camera any more.

    3. Re:gameboy camera pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The webcam is easy. Plug the GameBoy Camera into a SuperGame Boy. Plug Super GameBoy into Super Nintendo. Get composite video out from Super Nintendo.

    4. Re:gameboy camera pics by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      I've also got a Gameboy Webcam that I run irregularly (dial-up connection). I've got one black jumper I wear frequently that comes out white on the camera (and with a heavy blue tint on my old Kodak DC20). After reading the site a few days back I decided I'd try to pickup a "hot mirror" filter to get rid of the IR at my next opportunity, but I did only find the site three days ago (which I suspect was went it was submitted to /.).

  13. You only really need two components by yerricde · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's possible to create reasonably convincing color with only two components: red and cyan. Try it. Turn off your NVIDIA video card's blue gun, or grab an image in GIMP or Photoshop and turn off the blue channel, and see that it affects the image very little (other than giving a yellow cast which can be fixed by copying the green channel into the blue channel). This works because the human eye isn't very sensitive to blue light.

    I'm considering using this fact for image compression on a Game Boy Advance homebrew game.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:You only really need two components by friscolr · · Score: 2
      It's possible to create reasonably convincing color with only two components: red and cyan.

      wait a minute, aren't red green blue primary colours, cyan yellow magenta secondary colours, with cyan falling right between blue and green, thus being made up of green and blue. So using only 2 colours, red and cyan, is like using 3 primary colours, red blue and green, but guaranteeing that blue and green will exist in equal quantities.

      but i've always been a it confused about emitted vs. reflected colours, and with light vs. paint, so if anyone can confirm and/or explain more, please do.

    2. Re:You only really need two components by Uberminky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are correct, sir. Cyan is indeed the two colors, blue and green, together.

      Whenever I'm making a color stereo anaglyph, I combine the red channel from one image, with the green AND blue channels of another image (effectively copying the cyan channel). This works because the anaglyph glasses have a red filter over the left eye, and a cyan filter over the right.

      Get yourself some anaglyph glasses and check out some of my pics:

      http://php.indiana.edu/~dgsharp/gallery.html

      Or if you don't have any glasses you can see the non-anaglyph stereograms by crossing your eyes. As far as I know, the crappy little gallery I made has the only existing stereo images of The Matrix. :)

      --

      The streets shall flow with the blood of the Guberminky.

    3. Re:You only really need two components by Will_Malverson · · Score: 1

      I figured this out when doing color photography with my B&W QuickCam back in 1998:

      Using a standard pair of red-blue 3d glasses, take a red image and a blue image. Subtract these two from the full image to generate the green image, and remix. This method has the advantage of not needing anything fancier than the free 3d glasses that Wendy's was giving away at the time.

  14. Filters by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
    While I was succesfully filtering out red, green, and blue light, infrared light was still reaching the lens of the camera.
    A "red" filter should filter out everything except red, likewise "blue" filters filter out everything except bluie, etc. - so how come the infrared was getting through? Okay I know that all filters have limits, for example covering your radio in green cellophane won't stop you getting decent reception. I am surprised that IR was getting through, though.
    1. Re:Filters by The_Jazzman · · Score: 1

      Infrared isn't red as you're thinking. Nothing to do with the color red.

      A red filter will block out all light on the at the wavelength we associate the color red with.

      Infrared is on a whole different wavelength.

      Therefore, a 'red' filter will only filter out those on the red wavelength... which infrared is not.

    2. Re:Filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A "red" filter should filter out everything except red, likewise "blue" filters filter out everything except bluie, etc. - so how come the infrared was getting through?

      I'm not a expert but.... ordinarily a photographic filter only has to filter visible light. For example, ordinary photographic film isn't sensitive to infrared light, so nobody cares if the filter passes infrared or not.


      In this case, of course, CCD cameras are sensitive to infrared, so it matters.

    3. Re:Filters by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2

      A red filter has to filter out all wavelengths except for red (green, blue, violet, etc.) but let through red-ish frequencies. Red light goes through virtually unaffected, but orange light is partially blocked, and yellow light a little more so. Green filters have to filter out red and blue, and partially filter out yellow, lime, cyan, etc. This represents two frequency bands, on either side of green, which is in the middle of the visible spectrum. I was just expressing surprise that the wavelengths that are blocked doesn't cover the infra-red, that's all.

  15. Prior art? ;-) by Looke · · Score: 1

    Prior art? That would be the works of Sergei Produkin-Gorskii, who used filters to create colour images from B&W slides almost 100 years ago. As pointed out in the article, Slashdot has already covered this impressive merit.

    1. Re:Prior art? ;-) by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was joking about prior art. I've seen the work of Sergei Produkin-Gorskii, as I did some research recently into early colour photography. There's some truly amazing stuff out there. If you're interested then check out the Lumière Autochrome process too. It produces absolutely beautiful pictures (See www.autochrome.com)

      HH

  16. The color photo's not the amazing part by Mr.roboto · · Score: 1

    The idea that GB camera can do IR is more incredible to me. imagine it, GB night vision! I imagine there'll be someone who read that and is hacking it up as I type this =)

    --
    Don't call my crazy, that's what they called me back in the home!
  17. Re:Karma Whore by nervlord1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    gosh someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed didnt they? What a sad, sad little man you are I got real money that says your that guy who had a go at me when i said the price for vegtable oil price is about 69 cents, who then proceeded to say melbounre pricing is 72, ofcourse, after i refuted his baseless claim by saying its 92 cents here in perth, and melbournes not the center of the world, he shut up what hte hell do you have against me? i know its the same guy. Sigh, i relaly couldnt care actually, go away

    --
    Microsoft IIS is to webserving as KFC is to healthy eating
  18. Moderators on crack today by WD · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know what the moderators are thinking. They're about as confused as the posters.

  19. Digiview by deanj · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda surprised it took someone this long to figure this out. Newtek's Digiview did this a long time ago...it would work with any black and white camera.

    1. Re:Digiview by Deep+Penguin · · Score: 1

      My reaction too, but which is older, The DigiView or the guy with the "first color pictures in the world from a GameBoy camera"?

      History was easier to learn when we were kids - there was so much less of it.

  20. X-Ray Vision Game Boy? by bjb · · Score: 1
    I don't know the technical details, but thinking about the old Sony camcorder that had "night vision", couldn't this be done on the game boy?


    The thing with the Sony camera was that it emitted an infrared light which was picked up by the camera and allowed some sort of night vision (or X-Ray through thin materials). They later crippled the feature so that it could only be used at night (thus no longer working "X-Ray").


    Would this work here? I'm not going to run out and buy one, I'm just curious if it is something specific to infrared and cameras that detect infrared, or if Sony had a special CCD.

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    1. Re:X-Ray Vision Game Boy? by sporktoast · · Score: 1

      Of course it can!

      Now you can use your GameBoyCam to get pics of the panty lines and bra straps of random strangers and post them to your favorite website.

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
  21. One new ability this *does* give us... by joshjs · · Score: 1

    I've as yet been unable to capture an image of the back of my webcam, and this is broundbreaking on that front... :)

  22. I can't believe that he actually spent money... by EEEthan · · Score: 1

    Dude...the gameboy camera sucks. I mean, digichromawhatevertography is cool and all...but the gameboy cam still sucks...
    Why can't he concentrate on making a supercool GBA light like this guy?

  23. Addative and substractive Colors by cmacd · · Score: 1

    RED BLUE and GREEN, and cyan, yellow and magenta. are the complements of each other. Cyan looks like "Sky Blue" and magenta looks like a "redish purple"

    Cyan is the "opposite" of RED.
    Yellow is the "opposite" of BLUE
    Magenta is the "opposite" of GREEN

    Adding them up you will find that red and green will look Yellow, for example.

    Blue and green will look Cyan

    Red and green will look Yellow.

    --
    Another Wild-Eyed CANADIAN.
  24. 1930's Technicolor ® by cmacd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The very early Technicolor® process only used two colors, at the time it was hard to get pancromatic film. They shot two strips of film, though color filters and combined them for presentaion.

    --
    Another Wild-Eyed CANADIAN.
  25. CBS Colour TV - Color wheel. by cmacd · · Score: 1

    The CBS colour TV system used a color wheel, to present sequental views through three filters. The principle is still used in France and Russia, (electronicaly) with a system called SECAM

    --
    Another Wild-Eyed CANADIAN.
    1. Re:CBS Colour TV - Color wheel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, SECAM is a European standard for broadcast TV just as PAL is eastern euro and ours is... I think it's ansi. It includes information like how to synch up the seperate RGB channels... but also much more.
      At this level of detail ALL video was black and white until CCDs (charge coupled devices, the solid state replacement for TV tubes) became widely used. For consumers (or even "prosumers") this happened just a few years ago, like around 7 or so. Even still, the best CCD cameras have three different CCDs off a prism so that each color is gathered by completely seperate mechanisms. That makes it faster and effectively higher resolution. In cameras, more is better. bk425

    2. Re:CBS Colour TV - Color wheel. by cmacd · · Score: 1

      Actually, The french Sytem, "Sequential avec memory.." sends each color separatly, and then the TV set puts them together again..It is used in france and some Eastern European Jurisdictions (for political rather than technical reasons)

      The rest of Europe uses PAL, Phase alternation line, which is an upgrade of the system used in North America and Japan, Called NTSC (National Televison Systems Committee). NTSC and PAL hide the colour information on a subcarier, and use the finest compresion that was avalible in the 1950s to only send the minimum amount of color information. PAL adds a method to correct for Phase shifts in transmission.

      NTSC came out in 1954 replacing the earlier CBS system, CBS recalled the few sets thay had sold. The CBS system was not compatible with existing Black and White Sets.

      The NTSC signal combines the three colour chanels into one Black and White signal, and computes the color signals as a differnce signal (much the same way as FM stereo works)

      As I recall, there were a few single tube colour cameras, which used a grating in front of the Vidicon to create a color signal which could be prosessed into a a NTSC signal. Broadcast cameras tended to use three pickup tubes, at first Orthocons, and later Plumbicons. It took quite a while for CCD sensors to reach the point where they could surplant camera tubes.

      CCD sensors can be made with individual filters on each cell.

      --
      Another Wild-Eyed CANADIAN.
  26. ISPY by JustJoking · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's it, get the kids into Voyeurism early.

  27. Oldie but goodie by greygent · · Score: 1

    I remember owning the old Digitech (Newtek, Video Toaster, Digipaint 3) camera stuff for the Amiga way back when.

    Since color cameras were still prohibitly expensive back then, they gave you a black and white video camera, with three color filters to hold in front of the camera while taking a snapshot. THIS is how you used their product! The program would then combine the color values into a color picture for you.

    Old hack, but still neat. I might have to get me one of those Gameboy thingies, what with the digital cameras and plethora of audio sequencing software for it.

    1. Re:Oldie but goodie by Deep+Penguin · · Score: 1

      It's not just the expense, B&W cameras produce a sharper image than color cameras due to the way they work. In addition to the DigiView, I have this Polaroid image capture device that works the other way - you feed in an RGB or NTSC signal and inside the box is a B&W CRT - no shadow mask for monochrome video - gives it a nice, crisp image. There is a motorized color wheel in front of the CRT and a camera bolted on in front of that (I have both the instant camera and the 35mm camera for it). You preview the scene on a monitor, hit "print" and the circuits inside display each color component of the image on the CRT, move the color wheel and snap the shutter. It advances the film after the film has been exposed to all four color seps.

      I used it to produce some title slides for a presentation I gave at a science-fiction convention. The unit cost me $40 at the Hamvention, film and processing is less than $8 for 35mm slide film. It was cheaper than paying for one set of slides to be cut by a service bureau.

  28. Mitsubishi Electric M64282FP by dlleigh · · Score: 1

    The imager in the gameboy camera is a Mitsubishi Electric M64282FP CMOS image sensor (not a CCD). It is slightly more sensitive to near infrared than it is to visible light. The '282 has a resolution of 128x128 pixels, will do 30 frames per second and outputs the pixels in analog format.

    You can find more information on hacking this chip and the gameboy camera at http://home.earthlink.net/~apendragn/gbcam/

  29. For all the ex-Amigans in the crowd... by NM156 · · Score: 1

    ...does this remind anyone of the good ol' Digiview for the Amiga back in the 80's? It used the exact same process to make color HAM ('Hold And Modify' for the uninitiated) images. I remember being so impressed with the results, especially when one compared it with the B&W Macs of the day, and the 16 color EGA x86 clones.

  30. Superiority of B&W films plays a role by Buran · · Score: 2
    Digichromatography is often used in applications where color photographs of objects are needed in high detail. This is because black and white film often has a finer grain than color does (I don't know the specifics, though. I invite comments from more avid photographers than I). It is also used, as in this case, at times when color cameras are not available -- for example, prior to World War I.

    Here's how the process works. I plan to try it myself in Photoshop.

    Many planetary probes don't carry color cameras but instead use high-resolution black and white cameras to shoot three images of the same scene, which are combined to produce those stunning photos that we see on sites like the Jet Propulsion Laboratory site.

  31. Not a new idea by any means.. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    Anyone remember NewTek's DigiView Gold?

    The mainstay of digitizing for the Amiga back in the late 80's and early 90's consisted of what amounted to a black and white security camera with a color wheel mounted infront of the lens. Not a new development here, kids. Besides that, as someone else pointed out, people have been taking RGB Composite photos for close to 100 years now.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  32. Night vision by winse · · Score: 1

    so with an infrared light source you could take great pictures in what appears to be the dark....interesting.

    --
    this sig is deprecated
  33. First done in 1869 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first color photographs made using this system were done in 1869, just after the American Civil War. Two men working independantly each discovered it. Later Technicolor movies were made this way also using three color filters with black and white film. In fact modern video camera use red, green and blue filters over every third pixel. and color film uses three layers each senitive to either red, blue or green so the technique is over 130 years old and in wide use today.

  34. Yipee-fuckin-Skippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats just fucking great, what are they going to think of next? COLOR TELEVISIONS? also, I would like to add that the mod aka Michael, is a CUNT.

  35. Cool by Altern-X · · Score: 1

    But how cameras work today in 2001 to get the colors exactly ?

  36. Done before on Amiga... by tsangc · · Score: 1
    What a cute idea. It reminds me of the NewTek DigiView, one of the most popular products on the Amiga (NewTek went onto to produce the famed VideoToaster card for the Amiga).


    The DigiView was a slow scan digitizer that took a PAL or NTSC signal and turned it into an IFF Amiga image. To get colour, you mounted a filter wheel of Red, Blue and Green filters just like in this Game Boy article. They even had a motorized attachment that went to the Joystick port called a DigiDroid, it was a software cued servo IIRC which rotated the cardboard (or sometimes plexiglass) filter.


    You have to remember, for the price of $249 back in 1988, this was a really big deal. It usually came with a Panasonic WV1410 CCTV camera and a copystand...scanners were really much more expensive, like $2500-3000.


    Calum

  37. Important!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when will you stupid americans realise that the correct spelling is COLOUR
    by using COLOR you only make yourselves look stupider than you already are

  38. Angry Black Man is a TROLL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you moderate this up, PLEASE check Angry Black Man's posting history, READ his posts, and check the links in those posts. You'll see that every one of them is an Adequacy-style troll.

    Proof that Angry Black Man is a troll:

    1. Most of his posts are crafted to look informative but contain gross factual errors that nobody could make inadvertantly.

    2. Angry Black Man posted to the old Trolltalk.

    3. Angry Black Man often goes for obvious karma-whores early in a story, such as copy-pasting kernel release notes.

    4. Angry Black Man often lies about his identity and flat-out makes things up in order to deceive people.

    5. Angry Black Man lies about his race -- he is NOT Black, he is a pasty-white Adequacy editor. Black people are not intelligent enough to use computers, so obviously he is not black.

    Please send his karma to negro hell.

  39. 64 colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This process only allows 64 colors (4 reds, 4 greens, 4 blues).

  40. yes yes it's old news but still... by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    ...it's pretty cool to see a bright person work through this engineering problem, especially the IR snag. good job!

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  41. Colour? Tell It To Webster by cmholm · · Score: 1

    If you look at how the inhabitants of southern Great Britain mangled the language of Chaucer, I think Daniel Webster could be forgiven for chopping off a superfluous 'u', or rearranging the odd 're'. ;-)

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  42. I have one of these cameras by anotherone · · Score: 2

    I have the model of the camera that was contriversial... It's nothing at all like you've probably seen. If a girl is wearing a thin shirt you can make out her bra. You can usually do that anyway. YAWN

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  43. Still Jones'in by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

    Nope...it didn't work. I'm still Jones'in for a Canon E-20.

    --

    There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  44. Great timing... by sunhou · · Score: 1

    Great! Now that people are dumping broadband, there will be growing demand for low-bandwidth porn. Sure, there's ASCII porn, but that's not in color...

  45. You can't see a Gameboy screen in the dark. by inKubus · · Score: 1

    You can't see a Gameboy screen in the dark.
    Cheer.s

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  46. GB colour camera? Allready been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inspect http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~vkemp/gbcam.htm

    not only had he tried colour filters, the GB camera (or at least its core component) is attachable to a parallel port. all sorts of info there