Slashdot Mirror
AMD Athlon XP 2000+ Review 6 Weeks Before Release
Mathew Solnik writes: "Tom's Hardware has a review of the AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 6 weeks prior to its official release. This review shows how to unlock the multiplier on the AthlonXP and how to reach AthlonXP 2000+ speeds easily." Note that by doing so, you are voiding any warranty you may have started with, risk blowing up your eyeballs, etc; do proceed with caution.
> Is AMD trying to associate itself with a software
..." they sure want to ride that wave...
> company out of Redmond?
Well... not with the software company itself but when Microsoft spends huge amounts of $ to make everyone associate that "XP" with "modern, fast, up-to-date, stable,
as has been stated on
they stand for different things, etc.
try doing a little investigation before you just blurt out some random stupidity.
...dave
Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
Now all that is quite an achievement, that they figured out all what's involved, but let's face it: Overclocking an Athlon XP 1900 to 2000 won't do anyone any good. That's like 2% more performance and at what kind of expense and risk? What would be informative and what wasn't provided would be if an Athlon XP 1500 (1.33GHz) can be rigged to reach 2000+ (1.66GHz) that way. It's all about how much headroom the CPU-core has and the price/performance overclocking provides. ... at least until they go 0.13micron.
Tom's article shows that the Athlon XP clearly doesn't have a lot of it. We can expect the Palomino core to stick around the 2000-rating (1.66GHz) for a while
The issue here is (for me), what is your time worth. It probably takes an hour to make this modification and you risk trashing the processor. With all that fancy modifying, you wind up with a few percentage points increase in benchmarks.
Now, if you could take the very cheapest XP and achieve the same results, I might be interested....like the old celeron 300a that would clock right up to 450mhz by simply changing the bus speed from 66mhz to 100mhz. Those were the days. 8-)
It is pretty interesting that the high end athlons spank the 2ghz P4 in most benchmarks and cost about 50% as much (and you get to use geek friendly DDR memory instead of paying through the nose for evil RDRAM).
Think Alpha AXP.
AMD + XP = AXP.
AMD has quite a few features from the Alpha processor, so I guess this is not too far-fetched.
It's a few hours of work besides, and they run the risk of destroying a piece of expensive hardware to do it.
This space for rent.
Also, bear in mind that not only will your warrenty be void, but some people have said you may be liable to penalties under the DMCA, since the clock multiplier lock is considered a form of 'encryption' and the increased processor speed gained by unlocking it can be seen as 'copyrighted software'.
Quite how this can be the case is beyond me, surely the speed at which I run my software is down to me, but you never know with these DMCA issues. It can all get a bit surreal at times.
I make this simple for you. THG haked the motherboard that the AMD proccessor was sitting on. When a processor over heates the mother board shut off. By the way look at THG again and you see that the AMD proccessor fan was hooked stright in to the power supply, not in to the motherboard. So the motherboard could not recive information on the fan.
Well I for one and most people I know who frequent places like HardForum the forum sister site to HardOCP use burn in programs like SiSoft Sandra's burn in program for at least 12 or so hours before we leave the overclock in place.
An Education is the Font of All Liberty
I have had server with MoBo's without fan outputs. It always worries me to have the cooling system hooked directly into the power supply. So I aggree wholeheartedly that MoBo controlled cooling is the way to save your equipment.