Clockless Chips
iarkin writes "TechReview is running a very interesting
article about clockless chips.
Clockless, or asynchronous, chips work very much faster and consume less power than their synchronous equivalents (Intel hade some experiments on these chips back in -97, the results showed that the asynchronous chips were three times faster and consumed only half the power)."
can you imagine a beowulf cluster of those!
The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
.. otherwise people would've noticed this has been
posted before (sept 15)
Seems like there was a story about this earlier...
Hmm.
Oh! Here it is:
Clockless Computing: The State Of The Art by timothy with 140 comments on 01-09-15 6:26
Love,
Ahem.
Not A Sig
If there are no numbers to prove it?
Slashdot is SO behind. Kuro5hin had a story about this back in -96, right after the tests were done! Leave it to /. to wait 2,098 years to post a story. Sheesh.
"Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
It's not even that they "aren't good enough", it's more a matter of inertia.
Currently all the training, design tools, verification tools, etc, are geared towards solving the particular problems that come up through synchronous design. Asynchronous design avoids some of those problems completely, but has others of it's own.
Major companies are unwilling to trade a known set of problems for an unknown set.
When some of the small start-ups that are currently pursuing asynchronous chips release product and show that those problems can be practically and regularly solved then the world will sit up and take notice, but until then we're just another 'technological curiosity'.