Slashdot Mirror


Return of the Dragon

Lysander Luddite writes: "More CG actors, this time of Bruce Lee in a film tentatively titled "Dragon Warrior" by Korean filmmaker Chul Shin. Wired has the details. Compare to an older Wired article when this type of thing was just beginning." There's a Reuters article too.

138 comments

  1. Dragon Warrior? by turbine216 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if the title is any indicator, we'll be seeing a lot of 8-bit sprites running around fighting slimes and wraiths.

    1. Re:Dragon Warrior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't Enix sue them for using that title?

    2. Re:Dragon Warrior? by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

      hehe, yeah, their digital Bruce Lee is really the solid-color sprite from the Speccy Bruce Lee game...

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    3. Re:Dragon Warrior? by rikki_t · · Score: 5, Funny

      And man, just think about how boring it will be to watch while they level up....

      "Why are they running in circles, mommy?" "They need to gain a couple more levels, sweetie." "This sucks, mommy!"

      --
      Any technology which is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    4. Re:Dragon Warrior? by caesar.borgia · · Score: 1

      Dragon Warrior..... Hmmm....

      If the film is anything like my experience playing the game, it would run normally for about 20 minutes, just the usual, wandering around running into slimes and goldmen. Abruptly the screen would go blank, and super dodge ball would appear......

      --
      . . . m a s t e r o f t h e p a p a l a r m y . . .
    5. Re:Dragon Warrior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations to thee, Bruce L. Thou hast gained 1 point of experience.

    6. Re:Dragon Warrior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the Bruce Lee game from the C64. I fucking loved that... used to play it for hours with my mate. You played Bruce Lee trying to complete the game, until you got killed and then you took a turn as the fat green sumo guy and tried to kill your mate as Bruce. And both of you beat up on the weedy little ninja.

      Jesus... to think of the hours I wasted practising the timing to avoid those mini-volcanoes.

  2. What about voicies? by forgoil · · Score: 1

    I've never met a moviestar in my life, so I wouldn't know the difference between a real one, and a fake one;)

    1. Re:What about voicies? by forgoil · · Score: 2

      Ehm, having real actor means paying real actor. Just look at the voice actors/actresses in Japan with them doing anime.

      So, what I was _really_ talking about, is how they are going to _totally_ fake voices, hence ridding the industry of actors, making it possible to lower the budgets a lot. Good or bad? I am not sure myself yet.

      Karma whore? I am not even that fond of the karma system to begin with, I don't think it weed out uninteresting people efficiently enough...

  3. While they're at it... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

    Throw Brandon in there too.

    I'm all for using computers to generate characters, but when the technology gets good enough to recreate a living person, why not use it to create a totally new person?

    It just seems kinda odd that a company can buy the rights to a person's likeness.

    1. Re:While they're at it... by rm-r · · Score: 1

      why not use it to create a totally new person?

      They did that with the Final Fantasy film, and it sucked! It might have looked good enough but the characters barely showed emotion or reacted with their environment- making the film incredibly tedious to watch

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    2. Re:While they're at it... by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      When they can recreate a living person on screen, and can make them do whatever they want, screw you guys, I'm staying in with my copy of 'Cindy Crawford spanks Naomi Campbell whilst being orally pleasured by Claudia Schiffer'

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    3. Re:While they're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not use it to create a totally new person?


      ...cause it's Bruce Fucking Lee, dude

    4. Re:While they're at it... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      They did that with the Final Fantasy film, and it sucked! It might have looked good enough but the characters barely showed emotion or reacted with their environment- making the film incredibly tedious to watch

      I have to say that the FF film was the best I've seen so far (WRT to %100 CG). Although I agree with you.

      I'm kind of worried that they are going to screw it up. I mean, There is a lot more to a bruce lee movie that somebody that looks like bruce lee. Take "Game of Death" for example, that was made from bruce lee out takes, unused footage and look a likes, it really sucked. You can see straight a way that he doesn't move like Bruce Lee, B.L. has a very defined way of moving and I really don't see people getting that on computer.

      Basically, I think they have bitten off more than they can chew and will not make CG movies take off or look good. They should stick to trying to make FF type movies better before the insult really cool death people in corny ways....

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    5. Re:While they're at it... by bhudda · · Score: 1

      Heh, maybe they can replace him with a digital Jackie Chan near the end of the movie. If I remember right, Jackie Chan was the man who stepped in to be Bruce Lee once the origional died.

  4. Is it correct ? by dda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is that correct to put him in a film, without let him having the choice ? I think we should think about the respect of his memory ...

    1. Re:Is it correct ? by slitfinger · · Score: 1

      As long as they're not digging him up and doing a Weekend at Bernies type thing who cares?

    2. Re:Is it correct ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They asked his wife and kid. They think it's OK. Why should we second guess his family?

  5. Dragon Warrior by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    So...are they going to bring back all of the old video games as movies, then? And using actors who have very little to do with anything in the plot?

    I don't think I'm going to go see that. I think I'll wait for the pong movie to come out. I hear they're casting Elvis as the lead opposite Marylin Monroe. Apparently there's gong to be a musical number about hitting the ball.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  6. Gladiator and Olly Reed by MisterPo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Oliver Reed died during filming of Gladiator and apparantly they used some sort of pioneering CGI to finish his scences. Quite interesting as it was considered to be his finest role in years, so is this an indicator of how good Bruce's new movie could be?

    Or will it be more like that dreadful Pepsi add a few years back with Bogart, Marilyn and Einstein??

    Po

    1. Re:Gladiator and Olly Reed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oliver Reed died during filming of Gladiator and apparantly they used some sort of pioneering CGI to finish his scences. Quite interesting as it was considered to be his finest role in years, so is this an indicator of how good Bruce's new movie could be?

      They already did this with, coincidentally, his son Brandon. Many people remember Brandon more for his role in The Crow than any other, so I guess Oliver Reed isn't alone on this.

    2. Re:Gladiator and Olly Reed by Myddrin · · Score: 5, Funny

      And of course there is Plan 9 From Outer Space and their pioneering work with using actors who died during filming. ;)

      --
      Myddrin
    3. Re:Gladiator and Olly Reed by Malorian · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as I'm concerned, Proximo is the best role he had (Huge Gladiator fan) but don't think that the cgi 'acted' for him..
      The effect you mention involved a combination of out-take, cgi and a stand in (This is from memory, so correct me if I'm wrong).
      It strikes me that without any of the above, it would take a huge wodge of cash to film a new 'Bruce Lee'. Don't expect cgi to take over any time soon.

      Great quote attributed to Olly Reed:
      "My only regret is that I didn't drink every pub dry and sleep with every woman on the planet."

    4. Re:Gladiator and Olly Reed by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > As far as I'm concerned, Proximo is the best role he had...

      I think he outdid that in his role as Athos in Richard Lester's Three Musketeers and (especially) the "sequel" Four Musketeers , where he was pretty much the focus of the show.

      ps - Don't confuse these fine films with the dweebie pretty-boys-who-can't-act version of '93. If you haven't seen them, then waste no time in renting them.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Gladiator and Olly Reed by DThorne · · Score: 1

      The work they did to Olly was hardly "pionneering", however they did a very nice job. Suffice it to say, there's a universe of difference between some clever tricks on a few scenes with existing footage of an actor that has already created the character for the audience, vs making a digital human that must convey an entire performance from scratch. FF showed just how incredibly far the technology has to go to make people *care* about pixels pretending to be humans. This producer is doing what producers do best: BS

      DThorne

  7. Sloppy fellas, real sloppy by Flakeloaf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Instead of working to properly synchronize the actor's lips with the dialogue, just dig up an actor who couldn't do it when he was alive. Real clever :)

    (Yes, yes, I know the sound was recorded separately from the video for cost-cutting reasons, and yet somehow most real Chinese martial arts movies still take longer to watch than they did to make)

    --

    Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    1. Re:Sloppy fellas, real sloppy by justinstreufert · · Score: 1

      Even good movies often have their sound recorded seperately. Location dialogue often sounds like crap, so they use ADR (Automated Dialog Replacement) to record the same lines in a controlled environment. Lip sync is aided by computers.

      Actors dubbing these low-budget imports into English aren't so careful and don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of equipment to help 'em get it right.

      Justin

      --
      "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
  8. News? by Unknown+Bovine+Group · · Score: 1, Troll

    Release date: 2004.

    Post it as news then.

    --
    m00.
  9. What does hollywood want? by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    is developing software that will fool audiences into believing they're seeing Bruce Lee in the flesh.

    I can just imagine that what Hollywood wants is to be able to by the rights to the images of famous actors from their estates, so that they can pump out endless movies with familiar faces on the cheap. Just think of those commercials from a few years ago where bogart and wayne were seen to be pushing coca cola.

    If they had a chance, they would likely jump at the chance. Never mind someone who looks like some celebrity, but isn't quite. I can just see the law suits now!

    I recall some story on slash a while back about the chance of thise sort of thing happening down the road with digital actors on your computer desktop. (I think this was about using a gaming system as a movie production tool) A movie file then would in some way be sort of similar to a MIDI file, specifying the actors actions. There are obvious applications for all varieties of "Home Entertainment" projects (quit leering!)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:What does hollywood want? by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2

      Actually, there is a company that has done just that. I was trying to find the name and details when posting the story, but running off to work made me quit.

      The company in question has rights to WC Fields and several other "Golden Age of Hollywood" actors for use in future productions.

      There's another article on that here:
      http://www.infoculture.cbc.ca/archives/special_c ov erage/special_coverage_digicelebs1.html

      Other related articles:
      http://www.entrepreneur.com/Magazines/MA_SegArti cl e/0,1539,284880----1-,00.html

      http://www.moves.com/film/marlene.html

      Virtual Celebrity's web site points to Global Icons - "Defining Excellence in Licensing"
      check out this page: http://www.globalicons.com/Legends/index.html

    2. Re:What does hollywood want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want my "likeness" starring opposite jenna, kobe, and jill but definitely not ron jeremy or peter north

    3. Re:What does hollywood want? by rm-r · · Score: 1

      Ford have been using Steve McQueen to hawk cars for a couple of years over her in blighty also.

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    4. Re:What does hollywood want? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      I want my "likeness" starring opposite jenna, kobe, and jill

      I am sure that someone will come up with the software that will do just that trick.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  10. Digital Slavery by derrickh · · Score: 5, Funny
    Thats what it is.

    Here's a scenario: I want to make a porno starring Marilyn Monroe and Charlie Chaplin. I use computers to make a lifelike digital movie. Now theres a good chance that people won't associate these actors with the Little Dictator or Gentleman Prefer Blondes. Instead they'll be known for 'Charlie and Marilyns Hardcore Anal Fantasies (vol.1 - 25)'.


    Or take it to a greater extreme:

    Brad Pitt refuses to star in my next blockbuster. I kill him and have his digital copy star in it instead. (He's dead so he can't sue).


    D

    1. Re:Digital Slavery by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, that doesn't make any sense. You need the estate's approval to do any of this.

      (He's dead so he can't sue)

      Are you a troll? His family can certainly sue.

    2. Re:Digital Slavery by derrickh · · Score: 2
      By the time they try to get an injuction, the flick is already on DVD. The movie industry may be short on stars, but it certainly has enough lawyers to keep a couple of family members at bay.

      D

    3. Re:Digital Slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This was a movie with Albert Finney. It was called "Looker," and an evil advertising was killing models after creating computer generated duplicates of them for commercials.

    4. Re:Digital Slavery by radja · · Score: 2

      4 words:

      Debbie does Abe Lincoln

      Abe Lincoln has been dead for a long time, copyright has expired on his portrait (10 years after death, IIRC).

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    5. Re:Digital Slavery by MikeTheYak · · Score: 2

      Even if they manage to do this, the estate would still eventually take a big enough chunk out of the movie company in actual and punitive damages to make it unprofitable. I believe there are already cases on record about using celebrity voice impersonators in radio ads, so I don't think movie companies would be dumb enough to try it.

    6. Re:Digital Slavery by theghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What dumb-ass rated this as funny?

      derrickh may be simplifying it a little, but his point is valid and scary.

      People (or at least their images, voices, and names) will become commodities. They will be bought and sold by collectors, investors, studios, and Associations (as in MPAA and RIAA). Do you trust your "estate" not to sell you to the highest bidder to pay off their mortgage?

      How long will it be until the studios are getting desperate young actors to sign away the rights to their own face and voices? Suddenly a career consists of stepping into a biometric scanning booth and collecting royalty checks.

      How long before the MPAA buys enough senators to pass a law saying the actors' images are the studios' IP?

      The problem here is not with the technology, but with the organizations that control it. The technology could be used to encourage creativity and provide a continuing legacy, but in our world, dignity almost always loses out to greed.

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    7. Re:Digital Slavery by theghost · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of being "dumb enough to try it," it's a matter of being powerful enough make it legal. If they see enough profit in it, they can buy Senators all day long until it's legal. Politicians are cheap compared to actors.

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    8. Re:Digital Slavery by archen · · Score: 1

      as Gerald Ford said:

      "If Lincoln was alive today, he'd roll over in his grave."

    9. Re:Digital Slavery by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      How long will it be until the studios are getting desperate young actors to sign away the rights to their own face and voices?

      It's a possibility I guess, but why bother? When you can *design* the perfect face for the part, why limit yourself to real people? Any good artist could take directions like "Gimme a face somewhere between Cruise and DeCaprio, with grey eyes and blonde hair. That's good, raise the cheekbones a bit, no, lets try green eyes..."

      I can understand copying an existing face that people are familiar with, but copying an unknown face is pretty pointless.

    10. Re:Digital Slavery by Pennatus · · Score: 1

      Why wait 'till you're dead? Go into the studio for a few face/body scans a la Bruce Sterling's Islands in the Net. Julia Roberts could make $20M in a few minutes instead of slaving away for months on the set.

    11. Re:Digital Slavery by GISboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, sick and twisted.

      Which is why you might appreciate this:

      Asia Carrera and the Bruce Lee cgi "clone" in a porno called:

      Entering The Dragon.

      --
      If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
    12. Re:Digital Slavery by blowhole · · Score: 1

      Actually, wouldn't it make more sense as just "Enter the Dragon" ? When I think dragon, I think penis. Unless you're sticking things down the urethra... but that would be a sucky porno.

      Ouch, phantom pains!

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
  11. Bruce on the loose by imrdkl · · Score: 2
    Any Bruce is better than no Bruce at all. But, my guess is that they'll continue with animations along the lines of Hidden Dragon, Crouching Tiger. (soaring, levitation, etc)

    Bruce coulda kicked ass on all them pussies.

    1. Re:Bruce on the loose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Bruce Lee does that line of flying junk as "Hidden Dragon, Crouching Tiger" when he was alive. He is actually a martial art expert that happens to be a movie star.

  12. Shape of Things to Come... by Tsar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's fine to do this sort of thing, but that the film should indicate in the opening credits which actors are digital likenesses, so the viewer can take that into account.

    Remembering the Slashdot stories about the DVD player with adjustable ratings and this voice-duplication system makes me wonder&when will films come with face-mapping data built into the DVD (or whatever format) and allow us to replace any actor in the film with the face/voice combination of our choice?

    It could start out as a novelty, of course, where you and your friends pop up as extras in the background, but eventually I could see picking and choosing your favorite actors as easily as picking tracks for a CD compilation.

    How far do you suppose we are from this happening?

    1. Re:Shape of Things to Come... by Tsar · · Score: 2

      Remembering the Slashdot stories about the DVD player with adjustable ratings [slashdot.org] and this voice-duplication system [slashdot.org] makes me wonder—when will films come with face-mapping data built into the DVD (or whatever format) and allow us to replace any actor in the film with the face/voice combination of our choice?

      The '&' ampersand in the previous comment was intended to be an '—' em dash. Guess you never get too big to preview your posts.

      "Character entities are hard!" — Web Guru Barbie

  13. Priorities... by Man+of+E · · Score: 2

    You can't turn a crap movie into a good movie just by putting Bruce Lee into it. These people seem to care more about making a good Bruce Lee model than a good movie, and I bet it's going to show in the result.
    Pity - Bruce Lee would have kicked anyone's ass who tried to make a replica of him...

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
    1. Re:Priorities... by well_jung · · Score: 2
      I beg to differ. Bruce Lee made a number of otherwise crappy films worth watching simply becuase of his presence. Just like Jordan per se didn't make the Bulls a good team his rookie year. But he made the Bulls worth watching.

      --
      Carl G. Jung
      --
      "With one breath, with one flow, You will know Synchronicity" -La Policia
  14. Dragon Warriors, nah... by GISboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Crouching Clones, Hidden Actors.

    Article and Movie summation, but we'll see in 2004.

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
  15. WAHKAAA! ..it's just not the same. by Nijika · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You can't re-animate Bruce Lee, period. You can try in video games, you can try with CG, but you'll never get the essence. What hollywood should be doing is trying to find someone with the same charisma he had. Also, I think we're overlooking the Martial Arts stars we've already got on the market. Jackie Chan and the ever wired up Jet Li to name a few good ones.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  16. We`ll see by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 0

    People jumping in the air, then travelling horizontally, before landing vertically down again.

    Actors walking and talking in a strange, unrealistic manner.

    Loud cabbage-being-snapped type sounds whenever an arm breaks.

    A plot which doesnt make sense, and which can be completely ignored and not effect the enjoyment value at all.

    Sorry...is this a film, or a computer game?!

    1. Re:We`ll see by Flakeloaf · · Score: 1

      People jumping in the air, then travelling horizontally, before landing vertically down again.

      Actors walking and talking in a strange, unrealistic manner.

      A plot which doesnt make sense, and which can be completely ignored and not effect the enjoyment value at all.


      And exactly what do you have against Keanu Reeves? I happened to think The Matrix was... um...

      dammit I hate it when you're right.

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

  17. Bruce Lee has left the building by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

    Too bad they didn't have this available for Elvis' last concert :-\

    --
    --- Mercutio was right.
  18. Old-school martial arts by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

    While I question the taste of what looks to me like just a novelty project, at least this movie might mark a return to more old-school martial arts. I don't know about everyone else, but I've had my fill of people flying around, dodging bullets and hitting guys with motorcycles (wtf??). It was cool in the matrix but it's since lost its charm.

  19. If this works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this works out well, then do the same thing for Brandon and make a real Crow sequel.

  20. Re:WAHKAAA! ..it's just not the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude (damn, I sound like one of those college egomaniacs I always despised)
    Check out "Kiss of the Dragon" when it's available. Plot is predictable, but the action is phe-frickin'-nomenal and there ain't no wires, just Jet Li moving FAST.

    Bruce Lee was a great martial artist, and some of his fight scenes rocked, but all of his movies were awful. Somehow I doubt someone that would stoop to using a dead action star's image will put any serious effort into acting and storyline.

  21. God bless kung-fu flicks. by dave-fu · · Score: 1

    On a vaguely unrelated note, go out and rent "Wu Tang Champ Vs. Champ" for a truly sublime kung-fu experience. It stars Dragon Lee, also known as (here's where i keep from being completely off-topic!) Bruce Lei. Not to be mistaken for Bruce Le or Bruce Li, Dragon does Bruce Lee almost as well as Bruce Lee does Bruce Lee.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
    1. Re:God bless kung-fu flicks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce Lei. Was he the one in Exit the Dragon, Enter the Tiger. I use to love those flicks when I was kid. They played at a movie theater in the bad part of town, but you could get in for $0.50, or a $1.00 for a triple feature.

      It had the classic mismatched dialogue line with the character going, "You people killed Bruce Lee," and his mouth started moving before the line and continued moving after the line.

      I've got to go DVD shopping.

  22. It's more of the same, more of the same.... by laetus · · Score: 2

    Basically, this technology just allows us to remix, rehash pop (movie) art again and again.

    But where's the creativity? The budding young stars that will be left out while the digital imitations of former greats crowd the screens?

    I know, I know, look to music remixes and how creative they are. But honestly, I'd prefer a new artist with a great new sound to a remix anyday.

    I hope the same doesn't start happening as much with cinema.

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
  23. Cool, but seems wrong by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    This is kinda' cool in theory, but it opens the doors to a whole host of problems. If we keep using established actors, even after they die, what about the up and coming? What's next, a new Frank Sinatra movie, or better yet, lets take old actors and digitize their youth. We could make old actresses regain their sex symbol status. I don't know about you, but I don't want some dead guy taking my job.

    1. Re:Cool, but seems wrong by tb3 · · Score: 2

      lets take old actors and digitize their youth.

      That's already been done, or is being done. Some Sean Connery movie is using clips from his old movies as source material to create new flashback scenes.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  24. on AOL first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that bad, that I have read about this already... on AOL!!! sheesh!

  25. New talent by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of talented, new actors working there butts off to get a break. Any actor respectful of his/her fellow actors should refuse to do a movie with a dead man.

  26. Re:WAHKAAA! ..it's just not the same. by rikki_t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In Deed - the _entire_ point of Bruce Lee's skill was that he did things other people couldn't. Hell, he did things with his body we didn't think bodies could do. So they think that now they can find some guy who studied Jeet Kun Do, or whatever it is they are saying he has mastered, and he'll move like Bruce?

    The point is, nobody moves like Bruce. That's why we watch him. I'm thinking this will be bad not only for the moral reasons (which bug me immensely), but for the technical/practical reasons. And hell, why not just call it Tekken 8: The Movie. Starring Law.

    --
    Any technology which is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  27. Voice by bowunga · · Score: 1

    "he says it's a relatively simple task to digitally doctor the voice to make it a near-exact replica of Lee's voice." Why stop there! Im sure by 2004 at&t speach synth(http://www.naturalvoices.att.com) will be advanced enough to cause the executors of Lee estate to get worried.

  28. This isn't news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When Alias first released Maya 1.5 on NT (maybe a year and a half or so ago), a pair of artists created a very realistic 5 minute clip of bruce lee doing some martial arts and even a close up, I believe the quote when the camera zoomed for a close-up dialog was something about water and how it becomes whatever you put it in "you put it in a cup, it becomes the cup". There was voice, there was extremely realistic video, etc. Alias Maya is now at 4.0, I dont see what the big deal is, same model, some new backgrounds, a new plot, and a couple more animators to stretch 10 minutes to 90. *shrug* I woulda been impressed in 99, now its just a remake.

    1. Re:This isn't news... by ultitool · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That video was fairly impressive at the time, I believe it even won some siggraph awards. The audio seemed a bit unsynced with the lips at times and the face lacked a certain realism. Beyond that I would be very interested to see a feature length film reviving a star I never had the please to watch during his life time.

      If anyone wants to see the video mentioned here and in parent you can find it here

      --
      If You Drink, Don't Park, Accidents Cause People.
    2. Re:This isn't news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the one I was referring to. As I said, that was maya 1.5, 4.0 has better lipsync capabilities, but seriously, can you say it doesnt look real? Hell, his musculature works realistically, whats left? I mean, yeah, popping a zit in CG isn't quite realistic enough (not enough pop or goo squiriting out), but do you want to actually see that?

  29. Starwars... by Kewjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See i was thinking if GL ever wanted to make Episode 7,8,9 he'd have to CG Luke, Han, and Leia as they are way too old to play the roles now, and you *cannot* trying making 7,8,9 with other actors :)

    1. Re:Starwars... by theeds · · Score: 1

      No it would be more then perfect. Luke Leia and Han will all be about 20 years older in the film just like they are in real life. Plus they would show Leia & Han's children grown up as both being a Jedi. So GL could still make 7,8,9 w/ out CG characters for them.

      -Theed

    2. Re:Starwars... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Have you seen what Carrie Fisher looks like these days? She's lived those 20 years pretty damn hard.
      I'm actually really curious how espidoes 7/8/9 would relate to "Official" paper fiction such as the Timoth Zahn books (which, AFAIK, are considered canon)

    3. Re:Starwars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you guys actually have something labeled as 'canon' from something as worthless as star wars, you need to get a life.

    4. Re:Starwars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you seen what Carrie Fisher looks like these days?

      Mark Hamill doesn't look a whole lot better. Our young hero is slowly turning into a shriveled gremlin. It's kinda freaky.

      The work he's been doing for documentaries and animation vocals is excellent, though. It's nice to see that he didn't end up buried under Luke.

    5. Re:Starwars... by evilWurst · · Score: 1

      True. Or he could just advance time by 20 years and use other characters for the main plot, with the originals showing up here and there.

      But then, he already said he wouldn't be doing 7-8-9. Which is fine by me. I can always just re-read the Zahn books and pretend...

  30. They Did Get Permission, But... by libertynews · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I still don't think its right. I'm a huge Bruce Lee fan but it just doesn't seem right to resurrect him as a Digital Zombie. Are we going to see a film starring Bruce and his son Brandon (who was killed while filming The Crow)? I'd rather just enjoy the films he did make. There still isn't anyone who can move like he did.

    --
    Remember Lexington Green!
  31. False by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.fiktiv.com/crowe/articles/garticletf.ht ml

    Lines of interest: "Totally false," says Penny. "What we did was very similar to the process used on The Crow after Brandon Lee died. We did not recreate a CG Oliver Reed and get him to walk. We just took him from one scene and placed him into another."

    --
    324006
  32. We've done fur, now onto dead people. by phamlen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In the quoted 1995 Wired article, there's an interesting line:
    " They still can't do hair very well, though. "The big challenge [is] fur," says Johnston. "

    Today we have Sulley from Monsters Inc - every hair in his fur is separately modeled. I guess since they've mastered fur, they can now move onto dead people.
    1. Re:We've done fur, now onto dead people. by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
      Thing is, you can make a big blue furry monster look acceptably like a big blue furry monster quite easily because the audience doesn't see them every day.

      We're very good at recognising what a human should look like, and being just a bit off will make the CGI human look and feel fake compared to real actors.

    2. Re:We've done fur, now onto dead people. by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      every hair in his fur is separately modeled.

      Nope. Only about a thousand "key hairs" were calculated for motion, gravity, collisions, etc. The rest were just interpolated and cloned from the key hairs.

  33. Funny? by scribblej · · Score: 1
    Your post got modded funny -- and it was. But just in case you were being serious, do note that this guy had to get permission from Lee's family. There's no reason actors couldn't trademark their image -- I'd be surprised if some don't already. (Could they copyright themselves? Prolly not... could their parents? Hrm...)


    But your idea about killing Brad Pitt may have some merit...

    1. Re:Funny? by EasyTarget · · Score: 2

      There's no reason actors couldn't trademark their image -- I'd be surprised if some don't already

      Princess Diana's memorial fund has been having a big fight about this since her death (Ok, she was not an actor, or at least not a very good one..)

      This has raised all sorts of discussions in the UK and abroad about trying to copyright 'image'. In short, the use of her image for crap merchandising appears to be blocked in the UK (unless it is 'official' crap merchandising of course). But in the US some bunch of jokers were allowed to make a 'singing Diana memorial plate', very tasteful I'm sure.

      The BBC has done some articles on this, start here.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    2. Re:Funny? by eXtro · · Score: 1
      Right now the computers capable of this level of manipulation are out of the reach of mere mortals. What happens in a decade when people have enough compute power sitting on their desktops to do this? Sure, a real corporation might be detered by trademark and the possibility of a lawsuit but what about Joe Average, or Joe Below-Average? What happens when Stile of The Stileproject gets his hands on the technology and we've got a bukakke video starring the Bush twins and their dad?


      I don't think there's any legal means to prevent this that won't be just as bad as the current anti-napster methodology, but I still find the practice and potential for abuse rather hideous.

  34. Computerized asian characters in a movie? by infinite9 · · Score: 2

    I hope it's better than this:

    http://www.y2khai.com/khai02.html

    It's like this and like that and like this and huh.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  35. Initially it would be interesting... by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    Kinda like the John Wayne Commercials, but these too will lose their appeal... but then again, considering what HollyWood has been pumping out lately, who knows...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  36. Why stop at dead actors? by Bikku · · Score: 1
    Digitally capture those current film stars who, let's face it, just can't act worth a damn. They've got box-office appeal due to looks or fame carried over from another arena (musicians, wrestlers, etc). Now we have the technology to give them the acting talent they so sorely lack.

    I was going to name the specific "actors" I was proposing - but it seems unkind. They are so lame, they're sitting ducks.

    1. Re:Why stop at dead actors? by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      kinda like The Rock in The Mummy Returns? sounds like a good idea.

    2. Re:Why stop at dead actors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if we can fight scenes with Rachel Weisz and Patricia Valesquez.

  37. Fighting will be easy by theeds · · Score: 1

    Atleast we all know that the fighting will be much quicker and less drawn out once Christo gets his Defeat spell ;)

    -Theed

  38. So does this mean by marvin+tph · · Score: 1

    that Lee isn't doing all his own stunts?

  39. Subject goes here by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    So does this mean I'll see Bruce Lee hawking shitty fast food on TV (c.f. Monsters Inc./McDonald's tie-in) soon? Cool!

    If the studios think they can make a buck by exploiting dead actors, they will.

    -Legion

    1. Re:Subject goes here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasn't the fake Bruce in that commerical selling fake ice tea and beating up on the fake karate kid ?

  40. woh by mgbaron · · Score: 0

    i find this kinda spooky? will they use live action shots from older movies?

  41. Re:WAHKAAA! ..it's just not the same. by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2

    Well....

    Jackie is getting (and starting to look) old. He certainly has some charisma but his films are defintely not like Bruce Lee's. Jackie loves action, but not violence. Most of Bruce Lee's work relied on violence and venegence. I think he should do more behind the camera work.

    Jet Li looks great on film. He's helped in large part by camera and editting tricks. I'm not slamming Jet, but the style of movies from the early 70s to now is completely different. He does have a lot of charisma although his AMerican films seem to focus more on his "bad ass" side than his HK stuff.

    It'll be interesting to see if this proposed film will continue with the contemporary style or go back to the Cheng Che style of filming with lots of static shots that emphasize form and power over glitz and a melange of styles.

    You are right about the charisma thing. I'm sceptical a CG of Bruce Lee can capture it. And there are a lot of great martial artists available that just don't have the charisma to be the hero in a big box office draw. The opposite is true of course, although CGI is being used to make Ekin Cheng look like he can do martial arts.

    I hate the whole idea of CGI actors, especially using people who can't say whether they would want a CGI likeness of them being used. Its just another symptom of copyrights and IP being applied way too long IMHO.

  42. rather boring, i would think... by Magius_AR · · Score: 2, Funny
    Bruce hits Metal Slime for 1 damage.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Bruce hits Metal Slime for 1 damage.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Bruce misses Metal Slime.
    Metal Slime runs away.

    Awwwww :(

    1. Re:rather boring, i would think... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      ROTFL.... Damn metal slimes, how do you kill them anyhow?

    2. Re:rather boring, i would think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get lucky, basically. Three hits is all it takes.

    3. Re:rather boring, i would think... by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      I think there was a spell that auto-killed them...bedragon or something? Crit hits would do it too if you were lucky enough to get one ;P

      Magius_AR

    4. Re:rather boring, i would think... by lagredell · · Score: 1

      Fighters were always the best because they had the highest chance of an "Excellent Blow"
      Mmmm, I'm going to buy Dragon Warrior 7 [and a PlayStation] sometime this week.

      Metal Babbles were better than Metal Slimes anyways.

  43. Re:WAHKAAA! ..it's just not the same. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > You can't re-animate Bruce Lee, period. ... Also, I think we're overlooking the Martial Arts stars we've already got on the market. Jackie Chan and the ever wired up Jet Li to name a few good ones.

    I agree with your sentiment, but I'd still like to put in a plug for Jackie's cartoon series, The Jackie Chan Adventures. Made for children, but geeks might like it. No, it isn't like watching his better movies, but it's fun. And funny.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  44. Re:Selling a likeness... by KosovoYankee · · Score: 1

    What do you think Tiger Woods and and Michael Jordan are selling to Nike? Or what about those KISS action figures, for that matter?

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
  45. wee by glowingspleen · · Score: 2

    Color me virtually excited! I'll have to send my clone down to check it out first...I can't be bothered with the menial things.

  46. Has to be said... by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I see dead senseis"

    At least he's not dancing with a fucking vacuum cleaner.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  47. Koeran Movie Maker? What? by oktokie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ha ha ha...
    Korean Movie Makers don't know how to make movie.
    Their camera angle sucks & their lighting sucks.
    They cannot develop film correctly. Nobody in
    Korea write any good stories. Nobody has figured out on recording sounds correctly.
    It's simple...they have not figured out how to do the basics of film making. How will they able to out do the "Final Fantasy CG?". They may have money to burn but Koreans don't have talents to finish the product! I think this producer is a Crook!

    Oktokie

  48. You mean "WAHKAAAaaAAaahh!" by Dast · · Score: 2

    Your imitation needs work; you have to let it kinda trail off while you look intense and unhappy. Mine would have been better if the goddamn lameness filter wasn't such a piece of shit.

    I don't know if I agree with your view on the imposibility of re-animating Bruce. CG has come in leaps and bounds. I do a lot of graphics related work, but I still find myself astounded every now and then with some of the new techniques being published. Even if they fail to capture Bruce, the problems they solve on the way should make for interesting research. Don't prejudge this, it could blow you away.

    Wow, the lameness filter really sucks. qwerty

    --

    This sig is false.

    1. Re:You mean "WAHKAAAaaAAaahh!" by f00zbll · · Score: 1
      I would have to disagree. Some of the best moments in movies are accidental. Take the last fight in Return of the Dragon. The camera starts rolling, bruce and chuck spar. That fight was totally not coreographed. There are other movies like A Fish Called Wanda. In the sex scene, kevin kline sings opera because he didn't know what else to do. When he was interviewed on Inside the Actors Studio, kline said he didn't expect it to be in the movie, but it is one of the funniest scenes.

      You can't plan accidents or spontaniety. Considering how time consuming CG work is and how much planning is needed, spontaniety is close to impossible to achieve. Sure the voice actors can improvise like eddie murphy in Shrek, but the physical subtle accidents will be lost.

      When anthony hopkins was interviewed about the sound he makes to jodi foster in Silence of the Lambs, he said it just came to him. That is result of the moment, not detailed story boards or careful planning.

  49. Research and Development by SolidCore · · Score: 1

    The BBC's Research and Development Department, working in conjunction with Avatar and BT Labs and De Montfort University have come up with the Prometheus Project, which is an attempt to create high quality 3D animated actors.

  50. SLASHDOT ED.'s, not too bright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot editors have quite clearly
    never been able to accept that they
    werent capable enough to do real
    work. No, they will never do software
    development with coupled climate models,
    nor do research mathematics, and for that they
    lash out at decent posts. Very sad, I
    cant stand it for them.

  51. CG whiz-bang overkill by option8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shin is looking for an actor whose voice resembles Lee's voice to read his lines; he says it's a relatively simple task to digitally doctor the voice to make it a near-exact replica of Lee's voice.

    ...

    Shin also has a short list of Asian martial arts performers who have learned to imitate Lee's moves very closely. He plans to film them using motion capture equipment that he can then incorporate into his digital Bruce Lee models -- giving fight sequences a natural flow.

    so.. he's going to have a Lee talkalike and a Lee fightalike, and potentially a Lee lookalike (for wide shots and such). so why not just use them, and traditional photography, instead of trying to resurrect Bruce Himself through technology? Hell, Brandon Lee did an admirable job in his shot at it.

    the result would likely be a better homage to Lee, and less the necropheliac masturbation that has been the result of similar efforts thus far.

    let the dead stay dead, dammit. especially the dead guys we liked when they were alive.

  52. Let the cry go up by dswensen · · Score: 2

    I can hear it now.

    "Can't these CGI characters even act?"

    Besides, what the hell do we need with a CGI Bruce Lee, anyway? We already have a perfectly good CGI Jet Li in Romeo Must Die and The One.

  53. all my fantasies mpg'd by maxpublic · · Score: 1

    Ooooh, the potential! Natalie Portman and Jessica Alba doing the wild thing, and not just 28 seconds in mid-clip with bad disco playing over the grunts and groans! Talk about the internet killer app: porn that you can create with anyone you lust after doing anything you want! Including to you!

    Yeeee-eesss!

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  54. Re:WAHKAAA! ..it's just not the same. by Adam+Wiggins · · Score: 2

    Watch out for those rising stars! Although it wasn't a "pure" arts flick, Crouching Tiger: Hidden Dragon featured Ziyi Zhang, who at 20 years old already has moves that put Chan & Li to shame. The battle between Michelle Yeoh and Ziyi Zhang at the end of CT:HD was probably the best martial arts sequence I've ever seen, and yeah, I've seen pretty much every HK flick of any signifigance.

    Let's not worry about hanging onto the past, but instead look towards the future. There will never be another Bruce Lee, but you know what? That's okay. Watch his movies if you want to see him, watch new stars if you want to see new movies.

  55. Looker by DarthSensate · · Score: 0


    A moderately cheesy vision of this technology:
    http://us.imdb.com/Title?0082677#comment

  56. Using the likeness of Sonny Bono by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Abe Lincoln has been dead for a long time, copyright has expired on his portrait (10 years after death, IIRC)

    This may be true of Abraham Lincoln, but it isn't true of anybody who died on or after January 1, 1931. Copyright lasts until the later of 70 years after December 31 on or after the death of the last surviving author, or 95 years after December 31 on or after first publication. And yes I do think believe that the term is too long to effectively "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts." See also Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.

    Even then, trademarks never expire as long as they remain in use.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Using the likeness of Sonny Bono by radja · · Score: 2

      yes, the author of a pictures copyright lasts 70 years. I meant the portrait-rights though, which is slightly different.. they last shorter, and a CG image isn't a pre-existing picture, so author's rights do not come into play.

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  57. You wish by Snaller · · Score: 1

    You can't re-animate Bruce Lee, period.

    That's what you hope. Hope doesn't make it so.

    You acknowledge that a man can have talent, yet you don't think animators can have talent.
    They can.

    The producers may not have the money to hire them this time.. but eventually...

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  58. F.F. by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1

    Final Fantasy might not have had the best story line ever but it did have the best CG. There were times in which I'm sure I forgot they weren't real.

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
  59. Looker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long till we are totally in the world of looker, we have the CGI actors, now all we need is the hypnotic eyes.