Slashdot Mirror


Spintronics in your Future?

slugfro writes: "Do faster boot times and RAM that maintains memory after shutdown sound interesting? This article by a Science Magazine author details the study of utilizing the spin of electrons rather than just the charge in electronic devices (hence the name 'Spintronics'). Anyone out there researching this or have more info?" We do a story about MRAM every four months or so, and each time commercial development is a few years in the future. :)

148 comments

  1. Spinning? by thetechweenie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know, but I'm getting dizzy just thinkin about it.

    --


    Um, this is my sig.
  2. yo yo yo yo yo yo! feet are fun with feet and chee by cmdr_shithead · · Score: 0

    hey hey! I'm Jesus! And what would you like for Christmas, little boy?

  3. Sounds like by rhost89 · · Score: 1

    a subset of quantum computing to me. Mabey it will get us one step closer to quantum computing being a reality for joe luser.

    --
    I will bend your mind with my spoon
    1. Re:Sounds like by Computer! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not really. It's basically as binary as traditional computing, just using a different measure for "on" and "off": "up" and "down". Look:

      Just like the positive/negative duo of charge, the 0s and 1s of current information technology, this up/down pairing makes spin an attractive possibility for encoding and carrying information electronically.

      The "quantum-readyness" of this technology is the same as charge. The cat is spinning both upand down at the same time, until you open the box.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    2. Re:Sounds like by diverman · · Score: 3, Funny

      You would go and bring the cat into this, wouldn't you. Can't you just leave him out of it. As if that poor thing hasn't been through enough with the radiation... now you want to find out what happens when you spin it too? Leave the poor thing alone, already.

      Yeesh... I'm calling the humane society you sick puppy! heh.

      -Alex

    3. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please read the article and the nice flash thing, "Computer!". The coherence and decoherence cannot be expressed as simple as base^power. You must use methods of quantum physics.

    4. Re:Sounds like by DeePCedure · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really. It's basically as binary as traditional computing


      Yes, but this could open the door to the possibility of trinary computing. If circuit technology becomes "spintronically" advanced, then instead of the normal two state system (on and off) there would be three states: off, on(up), and on(down). Of course, off would still be a single state, because there is no spoon... I mean, spin... without the electron. :)

    5. Re:Sounds like by Computer! · · Score: 1

      Good point. Insightful. Thanks.

      P.S.: 20-second rule is pissing me off!

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    6. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't actually want a quantum computer. For looking at pr0n, playing games and everything else you do on your computer a QC would be slower and a waste of time.

  4. High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The cheap solution for persistant RAM is to provide a constant power source for your RAM from either some form of battery or just a power source that is always on.
    Where this stuff is actually useful is for better Hard Drives. In fact it's already being used for that, and has been for a while.

    1. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by Bubblesculpter · · Score: 1

      Batteries are okay for keeping RAM persistant...

      ...until your battery gets disconnected!

      RAM that never 'forgets' would be much better.

      Think about what would happen when you need to change the battery on your computer without loosing the RAM? hmm.....

      --
      www.Beyond7.com Insane modern art water sculpture.
    2. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is quite feasible...

      Actually SDRAM has a self-refresh mode that does internal refresh and intended for backup. The ATX power supply has an auxillary power output that is always on. I think there is enough juice (1A) for backing up the SDRAM.

    3. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Or, more importantly, cheaper flash RAM so that media cards don't cost $big.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    4. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by niteshad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I won't argue that this technology is useful for hard drives; obviously everyone likes larger hard drives. However, you miss the point when you advocate merely providing a constant power source. OK, that solution works somewhat for today, if you're using a desktop or a server-type system. For laptops and portables, however, "Spintronics" would be a real boon: zero boot time, zero latency when returning from sleep mode and no power consumption while in sleep mode. As a laptop user, I'd pay for those features.

      --
      To email me,subtract my nick from my email address, starting with the second character. (hint: adto.uiuc.edu is wrong)
    5. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by ryepup · · Score: 1

      Another option would be having a special disk that mirrors the contents of RAM. On shutdown, the ram backup disk gets the contents of RAM, with possibly a battery backup or some huge capaciter to keep the copy going in case power goes out. Then, on reboot, you have the option of loading up the old contents of RAM or actually rebooting.

    6. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      every few years you get to read about `bubble memory` and how its a few years away.... any year now.... :)

    7. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by Radnimax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this will be great for windows users. When the ram gets all garbled and windows is out of memory, not even rebooting or powering down will clear it! Whatever will we do? :o)

      --
      "You can kill a man, but you can't kill what he stands for. Not unless you first break his spirit."-Smoking man,X-Files
    8. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      Thats what "Hibernate" does, it suspends to disk, but you take the hit of spin-up and extracting 32MB-4GB of data off disk on restart, which could take as much time as a boot.

    9. Re:High Tech fix to a low Tech Problem by Thatman311 · · Score: 0

      My god...this is called "hibernation" or "save to disk" or "s4" depending on what camp you come from. WindowsME has this, Windows2000 has this, WindowsXP has this. Some BIOS support this feature. It is just that Linux doesn't support this...cause well..power management isn't something that Linux people seem to care about.

      --
      Silly Rabbit...Sig's are for kids.
  5. Clarification by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1, Troll

    Just a clarificaiton. Technically its Science Magazine not "a Science Magazine" as stated on the main page.

    Science is the Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and along with "Nature" (its british counterpart) it is one of the premier general science journals.

    1. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the "a" refers to the author.

    2. Re:Clarification by dencarl · · Score: 1

      Wonderful information about Science Magazine.

      However, just to clarify, the main page refers to "a Science Magazine author" not "a science magazine".

    3. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like anyone cares...

    4. Re:Clarification by talonyx · · Score: 2

      "by a Science Magazine author"

      You read it closely enough to see "a", but not see "author"?

      Get some glasses!

  6. Measuring spins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That article seemed to get a little wacky toward the end. I thought the paper posted at the beginning of this month about Why Quantum Computing Sucks or whatever it was called made the point that measuring spins is a hugely hard and unsolved engineering problem?

    1. Re:Measuring spins? by wass · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My research group has measured spin-polarization in CrO2 and determined it to be 96%, the highest spin-polarizatized material yet known. This is the first experimental confirmation of of a half-metal. (half-metallic ferromagnet).

      Measurement of the spin-polarization was done through Point-Contact Andreev Reflection (PCAR) measurements at the interface of a superconductor/ferromagnetic. Ie, at the interface between the CrO2 crystal and a sharp-tipped lead superconductor in the vicinity of 4K (maybe colder).

      For more info, see my other post further down on this slashdot article.

      --

      make world, not war

  7. Maintaing RAM memory by Delph · · Score: 1

    I only have a doubt about this RAM that maintains memory after shutdown. If a virus gets into the memory, how does this affect the system. The same goes to memory managment.

    Now I know I may be wrong or have the wrong idea since I ain't into memory allocation.

    --
    Writing: no longer done with the fountain pen, now done with an eraser.
    1. Re:Maintaing RAM memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that researchers in the field, whilst grappling with electron dynamics, are giving this question their utmost attention.

    2. Re:Maintaing RAM memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I'd think you would need some method of flushing memory in the same way that a reboot of current machines does.

  8. FAST, Useful Portables - Long Lasting Battery Life by Bubblesculpter · · Score: 2, Interesting


    This would be so great for portable computers.

    Imagine keeping a laptop/handheld with you wherever you go, but only having it on when you need it. You can instantly close the lid on it, shutting off it's power. This would preserve battery life to possibly many days at a time for a traveler. Then when you need to use the computer, just open the lid, and it's exactly where it was when you closed it.

    Desktop computers would also be nice to instantly shut off and turn on at the same state, but the portable computer market seems much more useful, especially for conserving battery life.

    --
    www.Beyond7.com Insane modern art water sculpture.
  9. stability and portability by jrs+1 · · Score: 1

    ram that retains what's in memory only really comes into it's own when it's either running on a machine that is:

    1. running a stable os that doesn't need flushing
    2. i tend to leave my computer on all the time - it's got enough to do without me using it (downloading stuff for me, curing cancer, cracking codes etc...). the only time i turn it off is when it needs it OR:

    3. being used with a limited power supply
    4. a laptop running on a battery which you'll be booting much more often (saves time) because it's off (to save power).

    it'd be nice to save the environment too maybe ;)
  10. So When Disk Drive Needs Repair by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    So .. when your disk drive needs repair .. take it to a quantum mechanic...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:So When Disk Drive Needs Repair by Zog · · Score: 1

      I resent that. I really do.

      <old-geezer-voice>new-fangled whippersnappers...</old-geezer-voice>

      (And Brian rejoices for his week off of physics from the evil Dr. Thomas)

    2. Re:So When Disk Drive Needs Repair by BenJaminus · · Score: 1

      I think there were a few episodes of Voyager when they did this after someone tried to delete stuff... of course in the 23rd century everyone's an expert in quantum mechanics. I guess it has to happen eventually. (mmmm holodecks too)

    3. Re:So When Disk Drive Needs Repair by dduck · · Score: 1

      ...or a spin doctor? :D

  11. How do you clear it ? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    What happens when MS shoots me a BSOD? How the heck am I supposed to reboot if the ram is going to remember what crashed My machine in the first place?

    Heh - aside from that, it would be way cool to power off the system, come back 24 hours later and have it boot up in seconds. Heck, Technically, it should be able to freeze a moment in Unreal Tournament , allow you to go get a beer, then comeback and pick up where you left off.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:How do you clear it ? by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Troll
      Heck, Technically, it should be able to freeze a moment in Unreal Tournament , allow you to go get a beer, then comeback and pick up where you left off.

      Yes. Lets all pray that someday the scientific community will develop some sort of hardware based solution that will allow us to freeze or "pause" a computer game.

    2. Re:How do you clear it ? by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 0

      Slashbot discovers the benefits of a "pause" key. News at eleven.

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    3. Re:How do you clear it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the other people on the server will really enjoy their game stopping randomly because the server admin decided to pause it.

    4. Re:How do you clear it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardware to pause games already exists. It's called the ESC key.

    5. Re:How do you clear it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i could do this in Doom with a 486 IBM Aptiva system - they had a feature that could dump ram contents to disk and reload it next time its powered up. dunno if more modern ones do it tho.

  12. More info here... by xmda · · Score: 2, Informative
    Spintronics, or spin electronics, refers to the study of the role played by electron (and more generally nuclear) spin in solid state physics, and possible devices that specifically exploit spin properties instead of or in addition to charge degrees of freedom. For example, spin relaxation and spin transport in metals and semiconductors are of fundamental research interest not only for being basic solid state physics issues, but also for the already demonstrated potential these phenomena have in electronic technology (some short reviews). The prototype device that is already in use in industry as a read head and a memory-storage cell is the giant-magnetoresistive (GMR) sandwich structure which consists of alternating ferromagnetic and nonmagnetic metal layers. Depending on the relative orientation of the magnetizations in the magnetic layers, the device resistance changes from small (parallel magnetizations) to large (antiparallel magnetizations). This change in resistance (also called magnetoresistance) is used to sense changes in magnetic fields. Recent efforts in GMR technology have also involved magnetic tunnel junction devices where the tunneling current depends on spin orientations of the electrodes.

    More of this here: http://www.physics.umd.edu/rgroups/spin/intro.html

  13. Re:FAST, Useful Portables - Long Lasting Battery L by tom1974 · · Score: 1

    Uhhmmm.....

    That's exactly what my Sony Vaio does actually right now, except for running for days, that, not yet!

  14. Photocanonic Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    The new technology call photocanonic storage is sort of along the same lines as this.

    With photocanonic's the bits of data are fired via a microscopic light canon toward the reading head. The head does not move at all and no mechanical moving parts are required. The idea I guess is to bring the data to the head instead of using the head to scan for data.

    1. Re:Photocanonic Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Photocanonics has been around for a long time... I remember my first photocanonic drive in the late 80's. That thing can still out-perform most SCSI drives out there in terms of data read speed.

      Recently they have been working on super-photocanonics which is essentially the same but with multiple light canons firing at multiple heads in a criss-cross layout.

  15. Problem? What problem? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    The Cambridge Z88 mostly used RAM for storage. Changing the batteries, you had about 30 seconds before you started losing data. Of course, there was still a low-tech solution for the slow: plugging it into the mains while you changed the batteries.

    Besides, I don't know about you, but I don't have to change my CMOS battery very often...

  16. Boot times probably would not change much by Marrow · · Score: 1, Informative

    The boot up time of current computer systems takes a long time because it is doing a lot of different things: 1. Power On Self Test 2. Memory Test 3. Waiting for Devices to power up and "settle" 4. Finding first available device 5. IPL from first available device 6. Setup the processor and address spaces 7. Switch to protected mode ( Intel ) 8. Search for more devices 9. Wait for devices to settle / initialize 10. Start initial program loader 11. Run startup scripts 12. Run network startup ( wait for dhcp ) 13. Initialize Graphics System A reboot would still have to perform many of these steps whether or not the Ram remembered the previous state. Since whats in Ram is dependent on what devices are present and what addreses are assigned, you would probably have to wipe the ram on each boot anyway.

    1. Re:Boot times probably would not change much by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 0
      Persistent RAM is useful to improve on what laptops have been doing for ages with suspend-to-RAM and suspend-to-disk (and they don't seem to suffer too terribly from any of what you've mentioned).

      Having persistent RAM just means you can do a suspend-to-RAM that behaves like suspend-to-disk, which is cool because it's faster and you don't need special "hibernation" partitions.

      --
      Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
    2. Re:Boot times probably would not change much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Power On Self Test: skipable

      2. Memory Test : skipable

      3. Waiting for Devices : warm up time is neglagable

      4. Finding first available device: you shuld NEVER do this unless you are adding a new device

      5. IPL from first available device: see 4, this is known

      6. Setup the processor and address spaces: not if there memory did not get flushed

      7. Switch to protected mode : gronk???

      8. Search for more devices : see 4

      9. Wait for devices to settle / initialize : see 3

      10. Start initial program loader: to load what you alredy have the kernal in RAM

      11. Run startup scripts : to load what?? The OS hass everything it needs in RAM

      12. Run network startup : if you use DHCP yes you will need to wait .5s tops

      13. Initialize Graphics System: Not if your grafix card did not lose its RAM

      You missed the point you don't loos your data and nither does your OS

  17. So what risks? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One of the old worries of Dynamic memory, ages ago, was that some cosmic particle could corrupt it, not that I've ever seen evidence of this happening, maybe it was just BS.

    As to the spin and orbital properties of an individual atom, particularly the risk which comes with such a density of memory, what could easily and commonly affect these properties? Strong RF? Magnetic fields? Xrays? (note: laptops currently survive airport Xrays, but I'm clueless as to how this happens and whether it's something that eventually will catch up with data stored on hard drives.)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:So what risks? by JesseL · · Score: 2

      It's not only real, it's not even that uncommon. This is one of the primary reasons that we have ECC RAM. I hear that it an even bigger risk at very high elevations where the atmosphere doesn't provide as much shielding.
      My Dad pointed out an article about a month ago (in EDN?) about this phenomenon even affecting really dense SRAM now.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    2. Re:So what risks? by jdrogers · · Score: 1

      One of the old worries of Dynamic memory, ages ago, was that some cosmic particle could corrupt it, not that I've ever seen evidence of this happening, maybe it was just BS.

      I just have to point out that Cosmic rays are probably not the cause. There are many causes for randomness, and especially when dealing with particles, these radnom factors become more important. Remember that all of quantum mechanics is based on probablities, not absolutes.

      This is from the Jargon File:
      Factual note: Alpha particles cause bit rot, cosmic rays do not (except occasionally in spaceborne computers). Intel could not explain random bit drops in their early chips, and one hypothesis was cosmic rays. So they created the World's Largest Lead Safe, using 25 tons of the stuff, and used two identical boards for testing. One was placed in the safe, one outside. The hypothesis was that if cosmic rays were causing the bit drops, they should see a statistically significant difference between the error rates on the two boards. They did not observe such a difference. Further investigation demonstrated conclusively that the bit drops were due to alpha particle emissions from thorium (and to a much lesser degree uranium) in the encapsulation material. Since it is impossible to eliminate these radioactives (they are uniformly distributed through the earth's crust, with the statistically insignificant exception of uranium lodes) it became obvious that one has to design memories to withstand these hits.

      JD

  18. MRAM!##% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying i can use MRAM in my portable dildo?? great

    1. Re:MRAM!##% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you need ram in your dildo for what particular reason???

  19. Don't believe it.... by tomknight · · Score: 2
    Don't believe it...
    ...it sounds like a load of spin...

    Tom.

    --
    Oh arse
  20. Breakthroughs in spintronics by Tsar · · Score: 1

    I submitted a story just recently about this story in SpaceDaily detailing a breakthrough in magnetic semiconductors, crucial to M-RAM technology. This group created a semiconductor that shows magnetic properties at room temperature and beyond. The excitement is palpable.

  21. What the hell?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What the hell is photocanonics? There is no such thing!

    1. Re:What the hell?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there is... I just bought a photocanonics drive yesterday. Have you been living in a cave or what?
      Do a search on google to find out more info... or even a search here on slashdot as I'm sure at some point they had an article about it.

  22. Quaternary computing by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...
    Left-pos, Left-neg, Right-pos, Right-neg.
    Four-states per bit (quit??)
    65,536 states per byte (quyte??)

    This is computing raised to the power of two...

    1. Re:Quaternary computing by KILNA · · Score: 1

      Quit that. It's quyte annoying.

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    2. Re:Quaternary computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just up-negative and down-negative. An electron is always negative. Ofcourse you could do a reduction of electrons(holes) type of thing but that takes away from the idea.

  23. quantum spin is damn simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that an electron is in
    either a spin-up or spin-down state.
    Then there are some boundary
    conditions, and a forward operator.
    Besides a few other un-niceties
    thats all!

    We need to ask why these researchers havent delivered to us Peta-flop home computers
    yet. Just what have they been spending they're research grant money on!

    1. Re:quantum spin is damn simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that an electron is in either a spin-up or spin-down state.

      In general, this is wrong. Electrons (generally quantum particles) can also be in mixed states, they do NOT have to be purely up or down.

    2. Re:quantum spin is damn simple by Arjuna · · Score: 1

      He's talking about when you measure it. Its rather difficult to measure a quantum system without forcing it to make a choice (though some team from cambridge succeeded at this using SQUIDs some time back)

  24. Don't think I like it by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    Since the only reason I ever shut my computer down is because it locks up, I think I'll stick with volatile RAM, thank you very much. Software is going to have to get A LOT more stable before I'll be willing to change my mind.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Don't think I like it by Graff · · Score: 1

      the only reason I ever shut my computer down is because it locks up

      If you want to avoid this problem in the future, your best bet is to switch to a more stable operating system. Under MacOS X, which is BSD-based, I've had up-times of weeks. The only real reasons to reboot are the occasional kernel panic (once in a blue moon, usually after installing a badly written kernel extension) and the occasional updates to the operating system which change the kernel.

      I would say that by using a Unix-like operating system such as Linux, MacOS X, BSD, etc., you will avoid having your computer lock up due to a program crash. You just kill the locked-up process and go right along using your system. It is so awesome to be free of crashes and lock-ups.

    2. Re:Don't think I like it by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      The only real reasons to reboot are the occasional kernel panic (once in a blue moon, usually after installing a badly written kernel extension)

      Like I said...

      I run Linux at home, and I have managed to lock it up, and I don't just mean X, I know how to deal with that. Don't ask me how, but I've done it.

      At work, though, I don't have the luxury of choosing my OS, and the CAD package we use isn't available for anything but windows.

      I'm glad to hear that Macs are stable these days. I haven't used a Mac since OS8, and that POS went down harder, faster, and more often than even my old win95A box.

      I don't mean that as flamebait, that was just my experience.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:Don't think I like it by Graff · · Score: 1

      Well, I agree that MacOS 8 could crash pretty good under certain circumstances, but that's all in the past now. MacOS X is stable, easy to use, extremely compatible, looks good, and has just about every advantage a Unix-like OS can have. It's a great marriage between BSD and Macintosh.

      I'm sure that it will only get better also. There are tons of developers churning out software for it, it's gotten rave reviews and people have taken notice. A lot of open source software has been checked and compiled and there are very few roadblocks to using most software packages for Unix-like OS's.

      Hopefully a lot of the one-platform programs will branch out a bit more and become available to alternative operating systems. With modern compilers and great frameworks out there it's getting to be easier and easier to produce multiple versions of a program which will run on a variety of systems.

  25. permanent windows crash??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does this mean that when your windows machine crashes and you reboot it will still be crashed???

  26. Photocanonics is the way to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is there anything faster?

  27. It's a technology maturity problem by JGski · · Score: 2, Informative
    First, it isn't related to Quantum Computing. It's just a regular old nonvolatile memory.

    The technology works real nice. I did technology development project management for the Air Force in the late 80s on this and other wild-ass NVM technologies. MRM is very sound, just too pricey for commercial use yet. The problem is that the manufacturing economics combined with market perceived risk keeps it from prime time. Flash (the next nearest alternative) is more mature, more familiar and comfortable (derived from EPROM and E^2PROM technologies which are 25-plus years old) dispite its speed and endurance shortcomings.

  28. Actually, no by Evro · · Score: 1

    RAM that maintains memory after shutdown

    I usually reboot my machine to clear the memory. While I there may be some benefits to keeping the memory state, like quick bootup, I boot in 20 seconds now ( 20 seconds from pressing the power button to the win98 hourglass disappearing) so that's not much of an issue for me. I would rather have the expected effect of a clean system startup on reboot than a 1 second boot time. Having the system remember bugs etc after a reboot would be awful, IMHO.

    --
    rooooar
  29. Lots of talk about Photocanonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see lots of talk about this in the comments but does anybody really know what it is?

  30. "Spintronic" by KILNA · · Score: 1

    Why does that sound like the name of a cheesy early-nineties techno/hip-hop group? "Tonight on In Living Color, Jim Carey does something incredibly silly, and the musical stylings of SPINTRONIC!"

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  31. Wiping stored information...not hard by cfriesen · · Score: 1

    A bunch of people have posted silly questions about what happens if they get a crash or a virus or something.

    All you'd have to do is to have something on the motherboard that resets the memory.

    Then you'd have the normal shutdown/reset buttons, and then another button (or combination thereof) that would also wipe the memory in case of bad stuff.

    There, now how hard was that...

    1. Re:Wiping stored information...not hard by PhiloMath · · Score: 1

      Awww, but that means we'll have to buy new cases! Cases with more buttons! Unless of course you have schematics for the button in question.

      Any technological advance not capable of fitting in my current case is not really a technological advance.

  32. The uses by JohnHegarty · · Score: 1

    There are alot of uses for this .....

    Just think about handhelds that don't need battery backup's .... and have alot more storage....

    Also , if memory by this system is cheap enough, could it replace smaller hard drivers , on systems which access time is critical. Eg. Large Scale web sites , (search engines..etc..)

  33. Why spintronics cannot work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in the quantum mechanics field and have been studying the spintronic model for a number of months now. My take on it is that it is not a feasible solution to any problem in the near future. It might seem that the tables have been turned on Einstein. The very argument he used in EPR to show QM must be incomplete requires that hidden variables models have explicit nonlocal operations. However it is experiments and not theoretical arguments that now must decide the issue. Although all experiments to date have produced results consistent with the predictions of QM, there is general agreement that the existing experiments are inconclusive3. There is no conclusive experimental confirmation of the nonlocal predictions of QM. If these experiments eventually confirm locality and not QM Einstein will be largely vindicated for exactly the reasons he gave in EPR. Final vindication will depend on the development of a more complete theory.

    Most physicists (including Bell before his untimely death) believe Photocanonics is correct in predicting locality is violated. Why do they have so much more faith in the strange formalism of P.C. than in basic principles like locality or the notion that observations are produced by objective processes? I think the reason may be that they are viewing these problems in the wrong conceptual framework. The term `hidden variables' suggests a theory of classical-like particles with additional hidden variables. However quantum entanglement and the behavior of multi-particle systems strongly suggests that whatever underlies quantum effects it is nothing like classical particles. If that is so then any attempt to develop a more complete theory in this framework can only lead to frustration and failure. The fault may not be in classical principles like locality or determinism. Their failure may only be in the imagination of those who are convinced that no more complete quantum RAM is possible.

    1. Re:Why spintronics cannot work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know we only need

      Humdingers equation
      Boundary conditions
      PDE solver(see note below)

      Thus we have a complete understanding of electron
      behavior.

      It couldn't be simpler! Don't say it cant be done,
      just do it, and deliver me my sub-$1000 peta-flop home PC(by christmas please).

      What have you been spending your grant money on?
      (NOTE)PDE solver may need to be infinitely fast.

    2. Re:Why spintronics cannot work! by xgz · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing spintronics with quantum computing. Spintronics include many different applications (just like electronics). From what I know, the status of each application is:

      1. GMR - it works and works beautifully. It has brought about a revolution in disk storage technology.

      2. MRAM - it works. Prototypes have been made and demonstrated. It's the matter of refining the technology so that it can be commerically competitive with semicondutors.

      3. Spin transistors - it may work. Many designs have been proposed. It's the matter of find the right design and figuring out how to make it work.

      4. Spin tunneling devices - the principle is understood but how to use it in real applications still needs to be worked on.

      5. Quantum computing - it will probably never work. Yeah, you can compute with no problem. The problem is, how can you get the results out without destroying the quantum states? We may need to rewrite quantum mechanics before this one works.

      So by and large, spintronics works.

    3. Re:Why spintronics cannot work! by fromage · · Score: 1
      Actually, refering to item 5, destroying the superposition of states (ie, measuring the final state of your QC) is exact what you so, over and over until you get it right. This requires/implies a few things:

      1) QC's are probabilistic computers, that attempt to reduce the probalitity of an incorrect answer by repeating the computation, just like classical probabilistic computer
      2) You must be able to able to verify your result in polynomial time in order for your QC computation to be efficient.

      What makes a QC so powerful for some problems is not that you can measure all of the states at once, but rather that you can act on them all at once (so long as you don't measure the wave function).

      Essentially, QC's bring us a step closer to an nondeterministic automata

      AFAIK, the big issue in QC design is dealing with the fact that wave functions have this tendency to evolve on ther own and rather quickly. If a stable superposition of electon spins could be quantumly linked and manipualted, then a QC is likely possible in the near future. This here spintronics stuff sounds like it holds promise to slove this issue.

  34. Main benefits by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 0
    There are two main benefits to this technology. First, it reduces power requirements, because you don't need to provide power to all of those gigabytes all the time. This yields smaller devices that run longer. Second, it allows stuff like quick booting.

    To the people who are worried about their system getting sullied by "traces" of viruses or somesuch nonsense: watch out! The Illuminati have already planted an evil "persistent storage mechanism" in your computer right now, cunningly disguised as a so-called "hard drive"! For your protection, you should wear a tinfoil hat. If you want maximum security you should locate and remove the "hard drive" from your computer put it in a microwave oven (careful to wear your tin foil hat!). This will destroy the hard drive's subspace transmitter that is being used to send information about you to a race of alien overlords who use this information in the planning of their military campaign against Earth.

    --
    Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
  35. Application to trinary computing? by slovo · · Score: 1

    I'm just throwing this out as an idea...

    But could this be combined with trinary computing? You could consider whether something is not charged, and if it is, there is the spin, which would give you 3 states, perfect for trinary computing.

  36. Electron spin useful to store other volatile stuff by imrdkl · · Score: 2
    Was awhile back, but I read that the effect of electron spin was also being used to slow, and even stop light.

    Is the basic phenomenon analogous in these cases? It seems like this was also reported here on /., but I can't find it right now.

  37. Reboot... by TheShadow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A lot of people are complaining that they only reboot their machines to "clear" the RAM. And they seem to think that if Windows crashed, this new MRAM stuff will cause their computer to be in a permanent crashed state.

    Well, obviously, computers making use of MRAM will have some way to purge the memory. And maybe the OS would set a flag on a normal shutdown that would tell the BIOS (or whatever it would be when this stuff comes out) that it can go ahead and just jump right to the OS (and the OS would clear that flag as it's first order of business). If the flag didn't exist, it would go through a boot sequence which involved loading the OS off a hard drive or whatever.

    But let's look at the advantages of having persistent RAM. If you have a journaling file system, the journal could be kept in memory without fear that it would be lost on a crash. When the system comes back up that data would be in memory and could then be used to repair the file system. Also, disk writes would be extremely fast because they could be cached and when the system is idle or when the disk is not busy, they could be written at that time instead of having to be written to a log that is physically on disk.

    Maybe, programs that are running could survive an OS crash because their state would be perfectly perserved in persistent memory.

    And if CPUs had persistent registers... recovering from a power failure would be seamless.

    Just some thoughts.

    --

    --
    "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    1. Re:Reboot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. Also, Ffiiiiiiiirrrrrsstttt PPPPPooooossssstt!!

    2. Re:Reboot... by TheShadow · · Score: 1

      Dumbass... how could a reply be a first post?

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    3. Re:Reboot... by Amokscience · · Score: 2

      Just a note but MRAM is probably going to be most used (and most useful) in embedded aplications like portable electonics and automobile parts. You'll note that Motorola got out of the general RAM business some time ago but has constant need for low power parts. RAM that doesn't require refreshing and continuous power draw is perfect for things like automobiles or PDAs or small embedded controllers. Obviously, it'll also likely be too expensive in the near term for general PC type usage until the technology is better refined.

      --
      Fsck cluebie moderators. I'll say what I want, offtopic or not. And fsck having to qualify every bloody statement just
    4. Re:Reboot... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Why do you even bother?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    5. Re:Reboot... by Salamander · · Score: 2
      And if CPUs had persistent registers... recovering from a power failure would be seamless.

      Not likely. Implementing memory this way is not at all the same as implementing real logic.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  38. Re:Stephen King, author, dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, Taco? This is the kind of thing that you get when you allow annonymous posting.

    The only reason you feel safe spewing that sort of crap is because you're hiding behind the "Annonymous Coward" tag. I bet you wouldn't be spewing such shit as a logged in user, where I could track you down and KICK YOUR ASS !

  39. Security implications by shimmin · · Score: 1
    I don't like the security implications of this. Disk access is relatively easy to monitor, and one can shred files appropriately. But having to shred memory, as would be the case in a system with persistent RAM, sounds like a management nightmare.

    I mean, as things stand, one can at least be confident that a value stored in volatile RAM is irretrievably gone if the power gets cut.

    Would it be feasible to have the OS shred all memory granted to a process when the process exits?

  40. Data Retentive Memory and Windows by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WARNING: Anti-Microsoft comment below. If you hate such commentary, stop reading now. I don't want to hear the needless whinning about all the Anti-Microsoft commentary. Guess what? This is Slashdot! It's part of the culture here. Do go preaching Atheism in church! Don't go accusing Slashdot of being unbiased! Simple right?

    ---Commentary begins---

    My knee-jerk reaction to this is that this type of RAM will not compatible with any version of Windows. Microsoft Windows, by Microsoft's explicit advice, often requires a reboot (memory clearing) of the machine upon which the operating system is loaded. Very often, powering off is used as opposed to a simply "reboot" or "reset" since memory is sometimes retained after an instantaneous restart. Cold booting is often preferred and recommended. (Interestingly, Microsoft also recommends periodic re-installation of the operating system after formatting the drive... apparently, it's not only system RAM that is prone to corruption.)

    While it can be said that this is true of all PC operating systems, it can more accurately be said
    that it's "less true" of other PC operating systems.

    Essentially, since Windows relies on the "clean machine" approach to efficient running, this memory technology is unsuitable for use with Windows without a "clear memory" switch.

    Pushing forward with the notion of "clean hard drives" wouldn't it be great if Windows Hard Drives came with an instant re-format feature?

    1. Re:Data Retentive Memory and Windows by toastyman · · Score: 2

      SDRAM is also slightly persistant. Just rebooting doesn't necessarily clear your ram. In an embedded system I'm working on now, using industry standard PC133 dimms, I can power off, wait 2 mins, power on, and the data is *mostly* still there. (a few bit errors here and there, etc)

      One kinda cool (mis?)use of this feature is with FreeBSD's 'dmesg'. 'dmesg" shows the boot up log of the system. (kernel messages, etc). If you reboot, and the pointers still look valid, dmesg will show you the log messages as far back as the buffer will allow, sometimes spanning 2-3 boots.

      Most OS's have a "zero on allocate" method, where before they hand out any RAM to any process where it matters, they zero it. This is also an important security feature - suppose on a multi-user system, I open my e-mail program and send off a nice private e-mail and close it. Do I want you to be able to malloc() 256MB, and look through it to find my e-mail still sitting around? No. Before the OS hands out ram to a process, it usually zero's it. (note, malloc followed by free followed by malloc isn't usually zero'ed, it's assumed that within the same process, you'll wipe things out yourself if you really want it secure.)

      In any case, this isn't an issue at all. When you boot up ANY pc right now, it's not all zero'ed out, and OS's don't expect it to be. Rebooting things to cure problems is fixing things you put in RAM that got corrupted, as well as logical errors (the system is confused by something, etc).

    2. Re:Data Retentive Memory and Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should be informed that "atheism" is not capitalized, no more than "thinker" or "computer" is capitalized. It's a simple proper noun, not a religion.

  41. Re:Ring of Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have not truly experienced the 'ring of fire' until you have tasted some fine New Mexican quisine! Green chilé will make you want to shove ice cream up your ass!

  42. Additional Information by an+ominous+cow+ward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A teaching assistant (grad student) at my University was hired by the National Institute of Standards after graduation to work on quantum computing methods. According to him, they have a pretty complete theory, and have obtained some fairly large grants to actually put that theory to work. Some of the things he talked about sounded really incredible.

    I found a Scientific American article from 1996 which details some of the their work, as well as the work of others, plus a lot of useful links.

    http://www.sciam.com/explorations/091696explorat io ns.html

    I remember first reading about using electron spin in quantum computing way back in 1994, in a NY times science edition.

    1. Re:Additional Information by an+ominous+cow+ward · · Score: 1

      I should have used the preview button.

      http://www.sciam.com/explorations/091696explorat io ns.html

  43. Micromem Technology by OrangeCarrot · · Score: 1

    There's a company called Micromem Technologies, Inc. that is nearly ready to produce the non-volatile memory that we're all talking about. Follow the link and read their yahoo profile.

  44. Spintantrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard that practicing spintantrics is a good way to relieve stress.

  45. Not really (well in 1982 it was neat)... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
    RAM that maintains memory after shutdown sound interesting?

    Sound interesting? Hmmmm, no, actually it sounds just like the static memory in my BBC model B (cerc. 1982), ok so I only had 32K of SRAM (and 32K of DRAM), but same idea (kind of).

    As for booting I also remember the BBC B could boot really fast. Using a trick that most slashdotter might find really interesting and have never heard of before, it's called putting the operation system on a rom. Neat yeah?

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  46. It's called hibernating.. by Destoo · · Score: 1

    And thinkpads already have that feature.

    Dumps the ram on a file.

    There is also a "safety net" mode where the memory is saved even if the battery life is exhausted. "The tasks are restored from the hibernation file as soon as the AC power or charged battery is installed"

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  47. Spintronics and Quantum Computers by SolidCore · · Score: 1

    Today's computers rely on silicon-based microchips to process data in a binary form -- which allows only for "on" and "off" states. Quantum computers, however, will be able to examine data using spins, which has can have many different states.

  48. RAM defragmentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By opening and closing programs etc. you fragment the RAM (HEAP or something?) just like your HD.

    I think I read that there are HD filesystems that do not fragment is this true?

    I'm guessing that the way this works is some kind of permanent background defragmenting.

    In any case, MRAM would need defragmenting because it would get fragmented more than normal Volatile RAM between every complete PC shutdown.

    Are there OS/utilities that defragment RAM out there? How do High-Availability servers do this?

    Also, MRAM without ECC would be useless right?

  49. You want persistent storage without disks? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    How about using an etch-a-sketch for storage? Black dots mean 0, clear spaces mean 1. If you get nailed with a virus, you can erase the storage by picking up your computer and giving it a good shake. Oh, I guess that means simply moving your computer could create some hassles. Nuts... have to works the bugs out of the idea.

  50. Re:FAST, Useful Portables - Long Lasting Battery L by ivan256 · · Score: 2
    You can instantly close the lid on it, shutting off it's power. This would preserve battery life to possibly many days at a time for a traveler.

    I already have one of those... It's called a PowerBook. Close the lid, and it goes to sleep in a fraction of a second and can remain that way for at least 2 weeks. Open it up and push any button, and 1 second later you're precisely where you left off...

  51. what's really going on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spintronics is actually old knowledge. The foundations come from the Stern-Gerlach experiment in 1923. If you guys want to know what's going on, read up on that. The whole deal is that electrons are fermions (half integer spin) particles. They therefore have a antisymmetrical permutation. This is why no two fermions can be in the same state at once and hence form singlet states. A simple magnet is the best example of how the spin of electrons play a role in our world. A magnet is composed of iron and other materials that has the magnetic moment of the electron spins all aligned in the same direction. If you heat that magnet, the spins will fall out of alignment and you'll loose your magnetism. Another important aspect is that parallell and antiparallel spins have different "resistance". What IBM and others do is use the difference in resistance due to spin alignment as a means for information. Anyway, It's much more involved than just this but I can't go into depth like this so you guys will just need to go read up on the Stern-Gerlach experiment and possibly IBM's research page on GMR (giant magnetic resistance).

  52. A new threat in memory resident viruses by The+Panther! · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it'd be nice to have suspension in ram, but getting rid of memory resident nasties could be a lot harder.

    Today (with Windows) most people are safe because they have to reboot every other day. :-)

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
  53. Hey, that sounds fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good idea! I'd like to shove some nice, cold, mushy ice cream up my ass!
    and I haven't eaten any spicy food this week!

  54. Anonymous First Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm laughing. Because you're no where near first post.

    What's so special about getting a first post, anyway? Does it make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside?

    I'd recommend you find something in life other than make vain attempts at a first post, which you will probably never acheive.

    I, personally would like to see more content-relavent and insightful posts than the crap the spews forth for other fellow anonymous cowards such as yourself.

    So, why bother wasting your time trying to get that elusive first post? Life is short. Don't waste it on first posts!

  55. (You dont know)what's really going on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Danged fool, its not that hard!
    All you need to understand this is

    Set of coupled PDE's that describe everything.
    Boundary conditions
    PDE solver

    Then just integrate the equations forward
    in "time", and all will be revealed.
    Import that data into powerpoint, and
    make animation of reality.

  56. Re:Stephen King, author, dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The irony in this is just too good to ignore!

    While you're berating an anonymous coward, you, yourself are posting as an AC..

    How ironic is that?

  57. Persistent memory? by Bostik · · Score: 1

    Can you say "memory-resident virus"? Thought so.

    Yes, there are people who are clueless or ignorant enough NOT to have up-to-date virus shields. A virus that survives major system upgrades and disk sweeps would not be an impossibility. I shiver at the thought.

    --
    There is no such thing as good luck. There is only misfortune and its occasional absence.
  58. Spindizzy, not Spintronics by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    If you don't understand look up James Blish.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  59. Re:Timing? by tomstdenis · · Score: 0

    Hi, I'm slashdot, the host of many "fight for your right mediums" that will let you post anything you want [which is good] but will mod down anything they disagree with [is wrong just on principle]

    Why do you guys even host a feedback mechanism if all you're gonna do is disagree with all competent user feedback?

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  60. I r0x0r! You 5ux0r! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FIRSTUS&nbsp POSTUS&nbsp BEEOTCHAE!!!!&nbsp
    I r #1! All others are #2 or lower!


    The irony of some overly literal nerd on slashdot feeling the need to belabor an obviously intentional joke post troll is just too delicious to withstand.


  61. passwords or keys in such ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would not want them to ever touch it. they need to be wiped after being used. no storage ever.

  62. I'm studying spintronics by wass · · Score: 2
    I'm a second-year graduate physics student, and although I haven't really embarked on any research projects as of yet (still taking the required coursework), I plan to study magnetoelectronics (also known by the catchy buzzword spintronics). I'll be working with C.L. Chien's Artificially-Structured Materials Laboratory at Johns Hopkins University . (The lab's webpage isn't that informative yet, but will be soon.)

    There are several groups working on spintronics-related research around the globe. You can check some of the research the spin-doctors are working on by looking at the Spintronics 2001 Conference webpage. Some incredible results involved researchers injecting spin-polarized current into an LED and producing Circularly Polarized Light!!! Other researchers are trying to produced spin-transistors, to switch/amplify spin-polarized currents. Many of the recent challenges involve producing spin-polarized currents, finding materials that can transport electron-spin, and injecting spin-polarized electrons into semiconductors.

    The Chien group here at JHU has been the first to demonstrate experimentally the existence of a half-metal. Crystals of CrO2 have been shown to have spin-polarization of 96%. This was measured at the superconductor/ferromagnetic interface through Point-Contact Andreev Reflection (PCAR) techniques.

    I'll explain some of the current concepts of spintronics, but pardon any errors as I haven't really begun my research yet. The manipulation of electron spin is an extra degree of freedom that novel electronic devices can exploit. Spintronics has already, since 13 years after the discovery of GMR (Giant Magnetoresistance) in 1988, penetrated the technology industries (magnetic storage). It's rare for such new technology like this to be commercially available so soon after its discovery. Transistors were one such monumental achievement, the first Ge transistors were available within years of the transistor's invention.

    GMR is an effect that occurs with a normal metal film that is sandwiched between two ferromagnetic layers. Depending on whether the spins of the ferromagnetic layer are parallel or anti-parallel, a significant change of resistance is measured across the structure. A more useful device which extrapolates off this concept is a spin-valve This is the standard GMR trilayer, with an anti-ferromagnetic layer on the bottom. This layer pins the spin of the bottom Ferromagnetic layer. The top ferromagnetic layer can then float, and have it's spin affected by the external magnetic field. This in turn creates a magnetic-field-dependent resistance across the device. Sensitive measurements of the magnetic field, obtained by measuring resistance, can be obtained in this manner .This magnetic-field-dependent resistance is known as Magnetoresistance. This concept, in a fundamental sense, is how the newer GMR-based read-heads on high-density hard drives operate.

    Another similar device is the Magnetic Tunnel Junction . This is similar to the GMR trilayer, but an insulator film is sandwiched between the ferromagnetic layers, instead of a normal metal. Current can then tunnel through the device, again dependent on whether the spins are parallel or anti-parallel in the ferromagnetic layers. The tunnel junction is the fundamental concept at the core of the MRAM's.

    Another exciting area of research with spintronics that I haven't heard anybody on slashdot mention yet is quantum computing. Electrons are spin-1/2 fermions, and hence have two distinct eigenstates of the Spin operator (the eigenstates are usually called "spin-up" and "spin-down"). This makes them perfect candidates for representation of quantum bits (qubits) for potential quantum computation. Some groups are working on this idea, by studying interactions of quantum dots for instance.

    Overall, this is a budding field that has already impacted the technology industry in it's scant 13 years of existence. Expect many more interesting and potentially groundbreaking discoveries to occur. But then again, I'm spin-biased. :-)

    --

    make world, not war

  63. My Write-Only Drive by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2

    Sounds a lot like the write-only drive I developed in the 80's while a physics student in college. It used the Pauli Exclusion and Heisenberg Uncertainty principles to store tremendous amount of information. Problem was, I couldn't get the informaton back out.

    A guy called after reading our April edition of our user's group newsletter and asked if I had patented the idea and wondered if we could send him a prototype. Shortly thereafter, he received a bakelite case with a SCSI cable coming from it. He hooked it to his Mac. Took the guy three phone calls before he understood it was all a joke.

    Can I claim prior art here?

  64. Weeks? by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2


    Uptime in weeks?

    [tim@cr660477-a tim]$ uptime
    5:15pm up 118 days, 19:01, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00

    [tim@cr660477-a tim]$ cat /etc/issue
    Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf)
    Kernel 2.4.2-2 on an i586

    </brag>

    1. Re:Weeks? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Very nice!

      I'm sure I could be up in that range also, but MacOS X is pretty young and it's had a couple of updates that made changes to the kernel and required a reboot. Once it settles down a bit I'm sure I could keep it up a similar amount of time.

      I think that I've managed to lock it completely up or get a kernel panic maybe twice in the past 9 months or so. Not bad for a brand new operating system.

  65. What is the spelling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I searched for photocanonics as spelt in this thread, but came up with nothing in /. or google.
    I think I may have inhaled yer brainfart

  66. electron spin memory...I remember when we had that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We used to call it magnetic core memory.

    :)

  67. MRAM is here now by fisternipply · · Score: 0

    Or rather, as the maker calls it, FRAM, for Ferroelectric RAM. www.ramtron.com. Only 256k right now, on a 0.5 micron process, but .35 and .25 micron is in the works and they expect the cost/density to become competitive with flash soon.

  68. Should be more news upcoming by OxideBoy · · Score: 1

    There will be a spintronics symposium at the upcoming Fall 2001 meeting of the Materials Research Society meeting. It appears that about half of the talks will be about MTJs (the type of structures used in TMR MRAM) and another really big block about these dilute magnetic semiconductors. These are not new per se, but have been strongly revived by spintronics research. Especially important is the development of III-V and Group IV magnetic semis, primarily the result of dilute manganese doping. Really exciting stuff nowadays.

  69. Measuring Quantum computers by candyuk · · Score: 1

    What i've always wondered about quantum computers is how the devil you would measure them.

    For those that don't know, nothing is ever finite in quantum mechanics, only probable. (See heisenbergs uncertainty principle).

    also by measuring the system by some method you are interfering with the system. And thus how do you know whether the result is the result or a product of your interference.

    Now if you were using a lot of electrons on a surface (don't ask me how) all in the same starting spin state, then you performed an operation on them you could then measure the macroscopic properties of your sheet of electrons. IE the bulk magnetisation (see ESR spectroscopy), but single electrons would be impossible to discover with current theory.

    The other complication is that the electron spin states are degenerate (have the same energy)in the free state and in the abscence of an external magnetic field.

    Thus to measure a change in spin state you would have to stick the quantum device in a very large amgnetic field (5 Tesla or greater). This requires a large super conducting magnetic cooled to the temperature of liquid helium.

    Therefore this whole quantum Computer thing is a fairly difficult to achieve and willnot happen over night and probably not until someone comes up with a different theory to current QM theory, which explains in more detail the actions of small particles.

    --
    Modern definition of an expert: Someone who comes from far away with a powerpoint presentation.