Slashdot Mirror


China Plans Manned Space Launch By 2005

cosyne writes: "CNN.COM has this article on China's space program planning to send a man to the moon. 'The mission is part of Beijing's plans to create a space industry and earn the prestige of joining the United States and Russia as the only nations to have sent humans into space.' I wonder if they'll make it before the recently mentioned amateurs."

9 of 211 comments (clear)

  1. New product labels by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    So will most consumer products soon start bearing the label: "Made in Space" ?

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  2. Our Space Program by gillbates · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of the Cold War that stimulated our space program. There's nothing that can stimulate a space program better than a military advantage. Perhaps this little bit of competition will encourage Congress to give NASA the funding they need to do more than just crash probes into distant planets.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  3. Exciting but... by pigeonhk · · Score: 3, Insightful


    How much resource and money would be spent on sending people onto the moon? Should they be spending on something else to solve other problems in China?

    --
    If you have the source, you have the whole world...
  4. Spending by InnovativeCX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me that China really has no other reason to do this other than to say that they have done it, and they are spending giant amounts of money in the process. Think of what else that could be used for! Even if they succeed, that does not take care of their other problems such as hunger, poverty, etc. This whole plan is reminiscent of Orwell's 1984; It's all just to boost military morale.

  5. Moon Landing by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Informative
    There were earlier reports from the middle of the week that China was planning to eventually go to the moon. Later Reports showed that this was not correct, at least not yet.

    They just want to get their feet wet, for now.

    New Scientist has a good story on this. And there is this page with links on the chinese space program from U.S. Embassy Beijing Environment, Science and Technology Section.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  6. Those were the days by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How well does this translate into Mandarin?:

    "We choose to go to the moon, and to do these other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard."

    Cynical old bastard that I am, those words actually choke me up every time I hear them. Space exploration (not arsing about in low earth orbit) exemplifies everything that is great about the human spirit. Our reach should exceed our grasp.

    We in the west have forgotten that, and now it's all about the bottom line. Sounds like China still gets it. Good luck to them, I reckon.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  7. They still have a long way to go by LibertarianCrackSmok · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article: A monkey, a dog, a rabbit and snails were sent into orbit aboard the second Shenzou launch but scientists say that more unmanned tests will be necessary.

    Translation: The monkey, dog and rabbit died together or one of the animals died. China isn't ready to go to space.

  8. Slashdot Hypocrisy by Knunov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If any post mentions the U.S. govt's plan to build a missle defense system, it gets modded down into oblivion, usually with associated comments dismissing the threat as being unlikely or impossible.

    But China is getting ready to put men in space, and it is widely cheered as a Good Thing.

    How so many people miss the correlation is beyond me.

    A rocket is far more complicated than a missle, and the technologies are remarkably parallel.

    You see a country that doesn't like the U.S. developing technology that can easily be used to deliver a nuclear payload and you cheer, while simultaneously objecting to the very plan that can protect us from the developing threat.

    If the idea of another cold war appeals to you, by all means, cheer on.

    Now, go ahead and mod me into oblivion as 'Flamebait' or 'Offtopic'. What /. really needs is a 'Doesn't Buy Into Liberal Utopian Ideologies' or 'I Don't Like The Way You Think' negative mod option. It would be closer to the truth.

    Knunov

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
    1. Re:Slashdot Hypocrisy by Knunov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll respond in reverse.

      "Human Rights have been proven to be a Good Thing for Western cultures. What makes us so sure they work for cultures which are not in any way comparable to ours?"

      I've thought about this, as well. What I always come up with is this: Why doesn't China have an immigration problem?

      Ask Asians in America if they want to move to China. You'll get a resounding "no". Ask Asians living in China if they want to live in the U.S. I suspect the answer will be different.

      Another experiment would be to temporarily transplant people into the opposite culture. This is done already in the form of exchange students. The people visiting the U.S. and living like an American will probably want to stay. The people visiting China and living like the average Chinese citizen will be counting the days to get home.

      I think if people are exposed both to cultures that grant or restrict human rights, they will choose overwhelmingly to live in the culture that promotes individual freedom.

      "I don't think China wants to actually attack the U.S."

      I don't either, actually. But it's still a better feeling to be the only kid on the block with a gun. It's nice to not worry. I'd rather see no one have nukes than see everyone have them.

      This being said, the same argument won't hold up for all countries. If Iraq had ICBMs, I don't doubt for a second they would use them.

      Knunov

      --
      Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?