Slashdot Mirror


Generate AM Radio Broadcasts With Your Monitor

tessellation writes: "Tempest for Eliza is a program that uses your computer monitor to send out AM radio signals. You can then hear computer generated music in your radio." Here is your big chance to disrupt free thinking radio programs in your neighborhood.

99 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Done it... by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It really worked... it took more work than the instructions portrayed to get it working, but it's pretty nifty.

    Can't do MP3s yet... at least, not the version I tried.

    first post?

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Done it... by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Informative

      With a crappy radio, it had to be fairly close 5 feet to make it out... my monitor doesn't put out that much rf... it's a low-rad type.

      Now, putting my ham radio at 5 watts about 10 feet away does interesting things to my monitor, I can tell you that!

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    2. Re:Done it... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2
      I remember getting the same crappy performance from a $20 Radio Shack AM Broadcasting kit back in '77.

      It figures that I had to wait 25 years to be able to do the same thing with $1000 worth of computer hardware.

      Still, I wonder if I can use this technique to calibrate an HF tranceiver.

  2. weird, its not working by ddent · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if it has something to do with how thin my monitor is... now wait a second, does this work on LCDs? :) Oh, maybe thats why...

    1. Re:weird, its not working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, but it _is_ working. It's not your monitor that is emitting the signal - it's the cable between your computer and the monitor.
      Be afraid, big brother is watching you :-)

  3. stream mp3s? by stonecoldt · · Score: 5, Funny

    .ogg files would sound so much better out of that AM radio. :-P

  4. This isn't the first by recursiv · · Score: 5, Informative

    This isn't the first time something like this has appeared on slashdot. Way back in the day ('99) there was an article about a guy who was using the radio interference from his motherboard to do the same sort of thing.

    --
    I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    1. Re:This isn't the first by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Way back in the real "way back in the day", around 1980 or 1981 or so, before the FCC got into the act, I was using the RFI from my TRS-80 to generate music. The cool part was that any code to generate sound out the cassette port was sufficient to have the sound show up on an AM radio via RFI.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  5. Back in ancient times by ynotds · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is really testing my memory, but I think it was after we upgraded from our IBM 1440 to an early System/360 that our operators discovered they could tune an AM radio to a certain frequency and thereby listen to the puter.

    Maybe somebody with a better memory might know a few more details.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
    1. Re:Back in ancient times by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Our local computer museum has got a PDP-8 which can broadcast polyphonic music using its main CPU, running a specially crafted sequences of instructions. Actually, operators used the AM radio effect to monitor the machine activity. With some experience, you can here if the CPU is idle or spinning in some kind of endless loop. If you are familiar with a longer job, you can guess which part is currently running, and estimate the remaining time.

      At home, my computer has a similar feature: if the CPU is loaded, the sound of the fans changes, so I can tell if the computing-intense job is still running or not.

    2. Re:Back in ancient times by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      You can hot swap fans, it's really not dangerous. Unless it's your CPU fan. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  6. this reminds me... by anotherone · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This reminds me of a game I used to have for my TI-82. As I recall it was a dumb game, but it was the first (and as far as I know, the only) calculator game with music.

    I think it worked by twiggling the link port's connection really fast or something, but if you held it near an untuned radio, it'd play really poor music. Really, really bad music. But, hey; what do you expect from a damn calculator?

    Anyway, this is one of those completly useless, yet incredibly cool things that I like to see. Very neat.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:this reminds me... by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, quite a few of the games for the TI-86 have music. Mario does, and I believe Tetris does also. (at least the versions I had). I've since gone to the TI-92+, and haven't tried it with that. On the 86, I heard rumors that you could tune it with an AM radio, but you could also plug headphones straight into the data port (with an adapter to go from the 2mm to the 3mm plug) and hear the sound great. Someone actually wrote a program to play music that way, though you can't fit much music into the memory on the 86. Pretty crappy quality too. You can probably still find the programs and info on ticalc.org or somewhere. It's been a couple years, so I don't remember where I first found out about it.

    2. Re:this reminds me... by ameoba · · Score: 2

      but there's no speaker in the machine, so what good is it?

      or are you saying that the CPU has radio tranmission opcodes? Something says the FCC would look poorly on that.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    3. Re:this reminds me... by Barbarian · · Score: 2

      Back when the Hp-48G or GX was new, there were lots of games released with music...

  7. Eliza? by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Huh? Does the program use your monitor to produce a radio program about psychotherapy? How do you describe your problems to it?

    1. Re:Eliza? by x136 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ]Hello Eliza.
      Hello.
      ]I don't feel very good.
      Why is it that you don't feel very good?
      ]Well, my monitor is talking to my radio.
      Are you concerned about your monitor talking to your radio?
      ]Well, yes. It's not supposed to work that way.
      Why isn't it supposed to work that way?
      ]Shut up Eliza.
      Why do you want me to shut up?
      ]Because you are a stupid worthless computer program.
      I sense much anger in you. Perhaps you should seek medical help.
      ]Oh, what do you know?
      What is it about what I know that interests you?
      ]ARRRRRRGGGHHH!!!
      I don't understand what you mean by ARRRRRRGGGHHH!!!. Please try again.
      ]quit
      OK. Goodbye.
      ]

      --
      SIGFEH
  8. Van Eck phreaking by jasonzzz · · Score: 5, Informative


    For many years during the cold war, the NSA had
    been nervous about natural radiations emanating/broadcasted by VDTs and electrical wiring. So much so that many government sites were constructed with TEMPEST safeguards with thick concrete walls, wiremesh shielding and isolated electrical works. Even then, VDTs, type writers, phones, and other electrical devices were never placed close to walls adjacent to the outside of the enclosed space.

    Read the Van Eck document.
    http://www.shmoo.com/tempest/emr.pdf

    Read the TEMPEST page
    http://www.eskimo.com/~joelm/tempest.html

    1. Re:Van Eck phreaking by Incongruity · · Score: 2
      I suppose it's mechanically easier to shield an LCD and it won't overheat as much as a CRT (air vents leak radiation).

      Actually, you can built shielding in the form of a Faraday Cage, which need be nothing more than a metal screen or a sheet of metal...indeed, a screen like material will work just fine, so long as the open spaces aren't more than about a wavelength (or the minimum wavelength you're hoping to block) in any of their dimensions. If you don't believe me, grab a college (or even a high school) physics book...or see an online resource such as physlink.com

  9. legality? by rootofevil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesnt every piece of electronic equiptment i own have that little FCC sticker that says it must accept any undesired interference, but not cause any of its own? wouldnt this fall under that exact category?

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    1. Re:legality? by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is perfectly legal. All electronic equipment is spec'ed to a certain amount of interference it can radiate. What this hack is working on is the fact that a monitor should be sending out a pretty fixed frequency that can be picked up by an AM radio, similar to how you can hear a repetitive beeping sound if you hold a remote next to an AM receiver in just the right spot. The FCC doesn't care because unless you do some heavy tweaking to your monitor, this isn't going to affect more than the 10-15 foot radius a monitor would normally slightly affect. You're allowed to microbroadcast that amount of distance.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  10. kernel? by ameoba · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering that the 2.5 kernel development cycle hasn't begun yet, is there still time to get the Monitro Sound device driver put in?

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  11. Next thing ya know... by WyldOne · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone will use an optical mouse as a laser radar jammer.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  12. subliminal messages by elizard2k · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is your chance to send out the many subliminal messages to the poor listeners at your work/neighborhood. *snicker*

    *crackle* this program has been interrupted by your next door geek .. buy him computer parts *crackle*

    --
    - mescaline - its the only way to fly -
  13. for the lazy by swagr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put an AM tuner near your box, and you'll easily find a frequency (many in fact) that let you hear your PC.

    Type some keys... move your mouse, open a window...

    Not only are you broadcasting... you're composing...

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
  14. A better way to tell the eavesdropping feds... by i22y · · Score: 3, Funny

    "All your base are belong to us!"

    --
    Mike
  15. Re:Weird. by Andux · · Score: 5, Funny
    it could be your own personal radio station

    Great. We could piss off the RIAA and the FCC, all at once.

    Seriously, though, I doubt you could get a strong enough signal out of it for a decent broadcast (and if you can, you're probably glowing in the dark already). You'd be better off just bolting a big chunk of metal to the roof and doing things the old-fashioned way.

    --
    (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
  16. FWIW by adolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While the instructions say to use a shortwave radio tuned to 10MHz, I found that a regular broadcast-band AM radio worked fine. Just chop a zero off of the frequency, and tune in somewhere around 1000. (1030 was what my tuner said, at the point where the "music" was most plainly heard).

    Spooky stuff, this.

    1. Re:FWIW by rnd() · · Score: 2

      at 1000 KHz you are listening to a harmonic of the 10MHz frequency. Same signal, less amplitude.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    2. Re:FWIW by rnd() · · Score: 2

      you are correct. since 1000KHz is 1/10 of 10MHz, then 10MHz must not be the fundamental frequency of the 'music' generated. Perhaps the monitor also produces some energy at 1MHz. It would be interesting to compare the 'music' at 1MHz and 10MHz.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  17. Wireless LAN by cra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, basically, by hooking up some old AM radios ("slightly" modified, of course) to every computer in my home, and by installing some sofisticated software (Will I need a "slightly" upgraded version of the mentioned software, I wonder?), I can actually have a wireless LAN in my home, right?

    --
    This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
  18. Laptops? by krokodil · · Score: 2

    This is first time I am sorry I have a laptop!

  19. Can this be used for transmitting voice? by dhanav · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Code a picture that will produce a voice and we have an encrypted speech. Sounds interesting. I am going to display all those pics in my collection and listen for hidden messages :).

  20. The Fabulous Altair Connection by foqn1bo · · Score: 5, Funny



    I recall hearing something once about the homebrew computer club @ Cal back in the 70's doing something like this using an Altair and a radio to play The Beatles' classic, "Fool on the Hill". It was judged the most interesting and useful thing anyone had managed to do with an Altair yet. I am glad that over 20 years later programmers are dedicated to making our computers just as useful and practical.

    1. Re:The Fabulous Altair Connection by cthugha · · Score: 2

      IIRC, the first time this modulated RF interference was used to create music utilized the services of a PDP-7. (Was there such a machine? It was a PDP-something, at any rate.) There was a demonstration using an Altair at a homebrew meeting, although I think it played something like "Greensleeves". Definitely not The Beatles, tho'.

      BTW, if you want to find out about probably the first ever attempt to make music with a computer (although it didn't utilize this technique), check out the music of CSIRAC.

    2. Re:The Fabulous Altair Connection by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      I recall hearing something once about the homebrew computer club @ Cal back in the 70's doing something like this using an Altair and a radio to play The Beatles' classic, "Fool on the Hill".

      And if they did it today, they'd get sued by the RIAA. :)

    3. Re:The Fabulous Altair Connection by darkonc · · Score: 2

      There was a similar program for the Radio Shack Model I. It worked using basic Language loops called as subroutines (GOSUB statement). Each loop was slightly different, producing a different tone on the radio.. The loop count variable determined how long the loop ran for. It was called a jukebox because there was a whole menu of tunes you could play with it.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  21. Why it's called Eliza by dido · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, it didn't immediately click because the Beethoven song he used to test the program is better known by its German name: "Für Elise" (well, that's what the book of piano pieces I used to have calls that tune). Trouble is, everyone's associations to the name 'Eliza' is the 'AI' program by Joseph Weizenbaum...

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
  22. All your funny are belong to six months ago! by ebbomega · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone set up us the dead horse!

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  23. Geek history by pacc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It all began somewhere in California when a student didn't think that pulling a few switches to get a few red lamps to produce the answer was good enough.

    With a bit of experimentation he produced a program that did nothing, but when he tuned in the radio next to the old monster a small tune was heard when his program was run.

    Other Examples: One of the highlights of our open day display was a music program running on the DS300. This machine has no loudspeaker - the four-part harmonies are picked up by an AM radio tuned to the rf interference generated by the core driver circuits. For best results, pull your PDP-8 processor cabinet right out and place the radio immediately above the core stack.
    Resurrection, some kind of antique computer society

    Can't find the correct reference, try yourself to search the net for computer, music etc

  24. Re:Privacy Issues? by Graymalkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that's called van Eck phreaking and has been around for a while now. With a sophisticated enough antenna array you can get basically a screen dump from someone's CRT monitor. With even better equipment and the right processing you can monitor closed circuit signals just by listening to the EMR they give off when current in run through them. Radioshack has the parts to build a toy that can tap a telephone line without splicing wire or having access to cables or trunks.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  25. Re:Weird. (OT) by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

    Err.. that movie did noo bring ricer culture here... rice rockets have been around for many years, unfortunately...

    The movie just highlighted how horribly pathetic most of them are. Granted, there are some that are worthy of being called sports cars, but a stock Civic w/ 5 inch exhaust tip and 2 foot spoiler... hell, that stuff's only going to weigh it down.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  26. Only Radio? by AtrN · · Score: 2

    I programmed an Imlac and used to get audible sound out of the monitor when my lines got redrawn too fast. I always thought it was going to blow up.

    1. Re:Only Radio? by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 2

      I recall hearing tales in the 80s of a trojan that would cycle the horizontal and/or vertical hold so fast that some cheapo monitors would actually explode. Not sure if there was any truth to it or not.

      --

      -
      Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

    2. Re:Only Radio? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      There was a POKE for a particular model of Commodore PET which would kill the monitor.
      Can't remember what it was, but I'm sure someone out there will...!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:Only Radio? by jacklf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since you brought it up... [from the CBM-PET FAQ]:

      WHAT IS THE 'KILLER POKE' AND SHOULD I WORRY ABOUT IT?

      This is THE POKE of computer lore, the command that WILL physically break a
      computer! Of course other commands and methods are known that can
      potentially cause damage (usually to disks, hard drives or other mechanical
      units), but this is the most notable mainly because it was a command somewhat
      commonly used and it affects solid-state circuitry.

      History of 'the killer poke'
      When the first PETs (small 9" screen) models came out, the display wasnt all
      that fast.

      The old PETs were slow because the print character ROM routine
      waited for the interval between screen scans before updating the screen
      memory. This reduced conflicts over the screen RAM which would have resulted
      in random pixels (snow) being illuminated on the screen. There was an input
      on one of the I/O chips which was hooked up to the video circuitry and told
      the routine when to access the video RAM.

      It wasn't too long before someone learned they could impove the
      character display speed via a poke to location 59458; which would set the
      video controller to update more readily. It was a noticible improvement of
      speed on programs using PRINT often, it was kind of like a free upgrade.
      It was mentioned in a few publications and used in many programs that relied
      on printing to the screen. I had learned of the poke through Cursor Magazine,
      a monthly tape-based publication. They printed the command in one of the
      'newsletter' flyers included with an issue which you could insert into their
      game "joust" to make it play faster.

      Later on, when Commodore released the larger display (14") PETs, they had
      improved the display controller which made that POKE unnecessary. An
      unfortunate side effect was that the POKE to 59458 affected a different
      register which adjusts one of the newer screen display capabilities, which
      could result in damaging the PETs video curcuitry when left running. I
      discovered it by accident after our school received some large-screen 4016s.
      When active, the screen starts to warp after about the third line and the
      display stops around the fifth, the keyboard is also unresponsive. When a PET
      is in this mode, the only solution is to turn it off, FAST! Fortunately none
      of the school's PETs were damaged due to this POKE. Later Cursor Magazine
      published a 'fix' that would allow older PETs to use the poke and keep the
      large-screen units from frying. Unfortunately there are still many programs
      that do not have this fix.

  27. what about a beowulf? by Barbarian · · Score: 2, Funny
    Seriously, though, I doubt you could get a strong enough signal out of it for a decent broadcast (and if you can, you're probably glowing in the dark already). You'd be better off just bolting a big chunk of metal to the roof and doing things the old-fashioned way.

    Imagine a beowulf of these, though...

  28. Legal issues by Pat__ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know the range of this thing :)
    But correct me if I am wrong ... Isn't it illegal to broadcast on AM frequencies without a licence in most parts of the world?

    1. Re:Legal issues by dattaway · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, there are a few ways to increase the output of your monitor by many watts too. These require the case to be taken off and willingness to turn your screwdriver on parts connected to the B+ chassis (about 2000 volts.) Uplugging the computer during this process is optional. Voiding your monitor's warranty and making it a potential fire hazard is your destiny with this procedure.

      Brightness is one good way. Want to vaporize some phosphor off the screen? Well, look at that funny transformer with the thick red wire going to the picture tube's top. No, don't put your fingers under that red cap as you'll discharge 30,000 volts. The capacitance stores enough current that it may jump start your heart into transporter mode to a higher (or lower) place in the heavens. Anyways, look back on the transformer where one or two or more small screwdriver adjustments are provided. One should be the focusing voltage for the electron voltage. All this adjustment will do is make your picture tube require prescription glasses when things get fuzzy. The other adjustment dangerously raises the drive voltages of your homebrew particle accelerator into x-ray producing levels. Enjoy.

      The other tasty method to injure personal health is to max out horizontal drive voltage. Your adjustment of choice is on the main circuit board that is a minefield of tempting adjustments. The one I am talking about is an adjustable inductor, when tinkered with will lose the monitor's calibration for the horizontal picture width. Its the one adjustable inductor that stands taller than the rest and its frequency is so high, its design require the turns of wire to be a bundle of stranded wire. Yes, remove the powdered ferrite slug out of this coil. Current will now saturate the picture tube's yoke coils. Electronic devices and radios around the house will now bow to your monitor's new elite status.

      There you go. Not only have you voided your monitor's warranty, you have just demonstrated why picture tubes are evil particle accelerators. They should be banned.

    2. Re:Legal issues by Tycho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't tempt me. Also to produce X-rays like that you would somehow have to defeat the X-ray protection circuit. Not impossible just harder to do. Another great thing to concentrate those X-rays would be to unplug or remove the vertical and horizontal deflection coils and fix some of the other components so there is no more vertical or horizintal deflection that occurs in the monitor. The electron beam would then come out as a point on the screen. Which would be great fun as long as you were at least a half mile away when you turned the monitor on.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  29. Old News... My TRS-80 does this already :) by Chmarr · · Score: 3, Informative
    Eh... old news. My TRS-80 Model I had a game who's instructions read:

    For sound effects, place an AM radio next to your monitor

    It was a car racing game... the sound effects made a kind of sense... except they didnt stop when you crashed the car :)

    1. Re:Old News... My TRS-80 does this already :) by jheinen · · Score: 2
      Yeah, I remember that. There were a number of games for the TRS-80 that used a radio for sound. One of my favorites was a space invaders clone. This was back in, oh about '77 I guess.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    2. Re:Old News... My TRS-80 does this already :) by j-beda · · Score: 2
      Heck, the TRS-80 Model 1 was forced off the market because of its radio noisemaking. If I recall correctly, the FCC had let it be sold initially because they didn't think it would be popular but after it sold however many million units they realized that these computer-things would require similar regulation to other common office equipment.

      I had a BASIC program that would play arbitrary music over the radio. It had various subroutines that would calculate something or another and thus generate a specific radio tone. The main program simply read in the musical data and called the appropriate subroutine to make each note.

      Most games and the like however used the cassette-tape output to make sound effects, or even pretty good voices. "Robot Attack!"

      Now where did I put that emulator?

    3. Re:Old News... My TRS-80 does this already :) by hawk · · Score: 2
      >Heck, the TRS-80 Model 1 was forced off the market because of its
      > radio noisemaking.


      uh, no. It was superceded by a newer model (the III) which was less expensive to build in the configurations people would buy.


      > If I recall correctly, the FCC had let it be sold
      > initially because they didn't think it would be popular but after it
      > sold however many million units they realized that these
      > computer-things would require similar regulation to other commo
      > office equipment.


      it went on the market before the regulation changes, but not by enough to have caused them. It came out, what, Fall of 77? Spring? (hey, give me a break. I'm doing this from remembering my childhoold, not looking it up :). The Atari 800 (late 80? early 81?) was caught in the regulations.


      hawk

    4. Re:Old News... My TRS-80 does this already :) by Chmarr · · Score: 2
      Most games and the like however used the cassette-tape output to make sound effects, or even pretty good voices. "Robot Attack!"


      Well, that's a sight better than using the cassette relay for sound. BzzzBZZZZBzzzz...

      "Bandit Got Away!"
  30. Wireless by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 2

    What I want to know is if you can use this as a means of wireless networking on the AM band. Now it wouldn't do any good for my laptop but I could use it for my two desktops to comunicate with. Anyone know where I can buy a AM reciver wireless network card?

  31. Floppy Drive Music by kotku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A guy at school years ago used to get his kicks by getting various computer peripherals to play music. The best was a 5 1/4 " floppy drive playing yankee doodle dandy. I think he just drove the head on the drive back and forwards in time with a sound input file. Dot matrix printers could also pump out a pretty tune.

    Unfortunately I know longer know this person and a cursory google search turned up nothing on floppy drive music. If anybody has a program to do the same then please post. I don't recommend running this on your own computer though :)

    --
    The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
    1. Re:Floppy Drive Music by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      The BBC Micro had a built-in UHF-PAL output so you could view the display on your television. But it didn't include sound; that came out of the computer's built-in speaker. If you did turn the volume up on your TV you'd just hear noise, presumably it was caused as a byproduct of the picture generation and nobody bothered to filter it out. I remember generating lots of different buzzes and sqeaks from the television by poking random bytes into the video controller's registers and turning up the TV volume.

      I also read that the Sinclair ZX80 - a machine with no sound hardware whatsoever - could be made to play notes. There was a program listing in some magazine (ZX User, I think) to do it. Not having a ZX80 (the predecessor to the ZX81) I couldn't try it out, and I never checked whether the magazine's date was April.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  32. Old hat by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    There was a game for the Tangerine Microtan 65 (British 6502 system from 1980, started as a single board, expanded by adding cards) which generated sound effects like this, just tune your radio to 750Khz (the clock speed) and listen...

    Of course most people by then had hacked the main board to boost CPU speed to 1.5Mhz!

    Kids today with their surround sound and subwoofers, they don't know they're born...

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  33. Re:weird, its not working - but it does! :)) by leibnitz27 · · Score: 3, Informative

    But I've been in one of Ross Andersons lectures where him and Markus demonstrated tempest working against a laptop. Just using LCD won't protect you, see Here (google cache - page seems to be missing) and Here

  34. Good description of van Eck by English+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good description of van Eck phreaking in Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson or in this article (which is quite a large pdf)

  35. Great! Thanks! by perlprog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, soon, we will not be able to use our laptops in flight. Woo!

  36. Um you guys will probably kill me for this ... by jstockdale · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but will someone port this thing to Windows so the less 31337 :P members of /. can have a play with it.

    Not that I don't run linux ... but ... um ... oh just think of the children and port the damn thing ;)

    *cough* xp *cough*

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  37. Neighbourhood Prirate Radio by spiro_killglance · · Score: 2


    and not a damn thing the FCC can do about it,
    since the equipment (the Monitor/Computers) has already be licensed by the FCC. You'd probably need a whole lot of boxes, though. And to make
    sure they were all in phase would not be easy.

  38. Alaire by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 2

    I heard about an Alaire presentation to a computer group back in the early 70's that consisted enirely of music generated by placing an AM radio next to the Alaire computer. Maybe someone here knows more about that event. I know it has been written about before.

    The more things change, the more they seem to stay the same.

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  39. Sweetcode had ya beat! by TheLocustNMI · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SweetCode had you beat on this one! It's a great little site. Imagine, if you will, Freshmeat with all the chaff removed.

  40. Ahh... the TRS-80 by TopShelf · · Score: 2

    I can't recall the game, but way back in the days of yore there was a game for the TRS-80 that created sound effects via a radio that you'd set up near the box. Anybody else recall classics like that?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  41. Talking about ancient times... by hey! · · Score: 2

    I have a vague recollection of reading about something like this in an old IEEE Annals of the History of Computing an article on EDSAC, the first stored program general purpose computer (ca. 1950, used mercury delay lines to store data acoustically). They used a radio to listen to the interference generated by the computer; a crash sounded different from normal operations. I believe this was not uncommon in the days of behemoth computers and no government emissions regs.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Talking about ancient times... by GTMcD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      About 1965 Richard Smiley, a student at Carleton College in Minnesota, wrote a program that could play music (sort of) on an IBM 1620. You could listen to it on an AM radio placed near the machine. The 1620 was a variable word length machine, and the word length affected the time it would take to accomplish a task, thus changing the radio signal. Smiley exploited this variation to generate musical tones. IBM included this in the contributed program library that was available to all 1620 users.

  42. Yes, yes, yes! Finally! by linuxrunner · · Score: 2

    Now we can get online and give Dr. Laura some REAL competition!

    Don't forget to listen tonight at 9.....
    Just make sure you're within a 20 foot radius to hear me!

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  43. Re:Just one little detail by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2, Informative

    All this program is doing is modulating the EXISTING rf that's coming out of your monitor in a more useful way by calculating and displaying an image that will cause the modulation to be at a particular musical frequency. It ISN'T causing your monitor to emit any more radiation than it already was, it's just "un-randomizing" it.

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  44. ZX-81 by ThierryD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, back in 1983, I had a Sinclair ZX-81 (also resold in the US by Timex, I believe) with a whopping 1K or RAM.

    I purchased a program that did exactly that, but wihth the mother board.

    Put a radio next to the ZX and you could hear Jingle Bells. Not great quality, but pretty neat (in those days).

    Almost 20 years later, today's computers still can not beat the power of a ZX-81!

  45. Interference by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    Because I'm a cheap bastard I don't have cable tevelsion (cable internet tho). If I turn on my laptop anywhere near the TV, VHF channel 3 gets scrambled. Same thing if a big truck goes by. Another wierd thing is that if I leave my speakers turned on I can hear entire CB conversations broadcast from the speakers -with the computer turned off. I'm pretty sure the speaker thing is the CB transmission inducing through the powerline.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Interference by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2

      Back in '78-'79, I had to turn off my TRS-80 whenever the family wanted to watch channel 12. The computer was in a far corner room, at least 30 feet from the antenna.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Interference by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      The CB problem is because those truckers are pushing 100-300 watts or more. I think 4 watts or so is legal for CB, but probably 95% of truckers use a amp of some sort.

      AM will rectify when it gets picked up on your speaker cables, sort of like the old crystal radio, it doesn't take much to create a simple AM radio.

      There are some measures you can take to reduce the interference (even though you shouldn't have to legally, it's them that is breaking the law).

      Try ferrites everywhere, especially on cables that have a grounding sheath. This will choke off current from the ground sheath.

      Keep cord lengths as short as possible. Move the equipment to the other side of the room and see if that helps.

      You can also wrap your whole house in chicken wire. Just make sure the chicken wire has a good RF ground, and also make sure your neighbors don't call any mental health organizations. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Interference by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      They don't need to be pushing that much power at all.

      I had a CB a few years back, that was just a tiny bit "tweaked". Instead of 4 watts on main and 12 on sideband, it pushed around 6 and 16.

      Once, I was sitting in my truck in front of my parents house, chatting with some CB friends. I came back in, and my parents had heard the whole thing! It turned out that the length of the SPEAKER CABLE was an exact match for the wavelength of one of the channels (or a multiple thereof, not positive which).

      The amp was on, but not playing anything, and somehow it picked up this signal off the speaker wire and spat it back out, amplified slightly, just enough for my folks to hear it.

      A 300W rig (which I never saw, people would get ridiculous power from a simple 30W amp) would let me do that from two klicks away, easy.

    4. Re:Interference by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      The CB problem is because those truckers are pushing 100-300 watts or more. I think 4 watts or so is legal for CB, but probably 95% of truckers use a amp of some sort.

      Yup. When I was a teenager, the people down the street were pushing x hundred watts out of a home CB setup. Every time they would key up, the speakers connected to my Amiga 3000 would amplify their voices at annoyingly high volume levels. Scared the hell out of me the first time it happened. A quick conversation with them solved the problem for good. :)

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  46. Magic Lantern by 3seas · · Score: 2

    Hmmm, works on all systems... watch ... uh..errr hear them keystrokes. A lantern that you can hear as well as see?

  47. Diamond FireGL 1000 Pro & FM by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    My girlfriend used to get pretty pissed because when my video card would start doing anything 3D, it would cause a hum on the FM station she used to listen to. I think it was in the 100-105 range. The faster it performed 3D ops, the higher the pitch of the hum.

    I made an openGL app that simply resized a spinnging sphere to random sizes. The smaller it got, the faster it moved, the higher the pitch. I never tried making it play music though.

  48. Re:Huh? by MadAhab · · Score: 2

    Well, that was obtuse. I thought he was implying that both things make you want to wear a tin foil hat

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  49. harumph. Another Johnny-Come-Lately by hawk · · Score: 3, Informative
    While remembering the 8bits and their tricks is impressive, it was hardly new. This was done on IBM's and others at least in the 60's, and possibly the late 50's.


    Additionally, line printerss played Jingle Bells . . .


    hawk

  50. PDP-7 by hawk · · Score: 2
    Yes, there was such a beast. And the PDP-6, which was the predecessor to the 10. PDP 1-11 were all designed, but not all were built.


    However, these are still later than the playing of such tunes on mainframes in the 60s


    hawk

  51. Re:harumph. Another Johnny-Come-Lately by dattaway · · Score: 3, Funny

    This was done on IBM's and others at least in the 60's, and possibly the late 50's.

    This still won't stop some talented individual who is handy with patent applications from filing today. Be warned...

  52. Beeping remote? by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 2

    Why would I hear beeping over AM on a remote? They are all infrared (and the original ones were ultrasonic). I've never heard of an RF remote...

    --
    324006
    1. Re:Beeping remote? by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I know most remotes are IR. However, the phenomena I'm talking about is fairly well documented; there are several faqs floating around on the internet discussing the subject. Because of how AM radios work, any localized source of radiation of sufficient strength, no matter what the frequency, will cause interference. Its similar to how a thunderstorm will cause pops when listening to the radio.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  53. May be illegal in the US by uslinux.net · · Score: 2
    In the US, the FCC allows anyone to broadcast an AM signal under Part 15 of the FCC rules, so long as it doesn't exceed something like 47 microvolts at 100 meters from the property line. Unfortunately, most AM receivers need at least 300 microvolts to detect a signal and the signal degrades logrithmically, so unless you have a very large piece of property, AM broadcast will probably be illegal for you.



    Disclaimer: I'm not an RF engineer, but I have worked with several in attempting to obtain an AM broadcast license for our college radio station a few years back. Take it for what you will, and understand that the FCC *probably* won't come after you unless people complain. But, if people complain, you can expect them to triangulate your position, take your equipment, and fine you heavily.

  54. linux.... by guinsu · · Score: 2

    Well, the software only works on Linux, which I assume means that Windows isn't suceptable to tempest eavesdropping at all.

  55. Re:Weird. by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

    Could you extract the stupidity and take it with you (in a shielded container)? Or would you have to take the stupid person with you in the car?

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  56. HAL 9000 by Mignon · · Score: 2

    Here's what I'll listen to first when I get this working.

  57. Tenpest by darkonc · · Score: 2
    For those who don't know, "tempest" was the unclassified name for a project (and specifications) designed to allow/prevent the capturing of intelligence information using the EMI from computers... As quoted from the top of the referenced page:
    Across the darkened street, a windowless van is parked. Inside, an antenna is pointed out through a fiberglass panel. It's aimed at an office window on the third floor. As the CEO works on a word processing document, outlining his strategy for a hostile take-over of a competitor, he never knows what appears on his monitor is being captured, displayed, and recorded in the van below.
    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  58. *sniff* by hawk · · Score: 2
    > I stand corrected, but let's face it, after the ~72 model year, the
    > car wasn't the same, much like the rest of the American auto industry.


    *sniff*


    That was the end, yes. 71 might even be a better cutoff--72 was the year GM emasculated the big cars, dropping down to two barrels. I had a '72 Impala 400, and wish I still had it. The '71, thought, with the 4bbl, was rated at about 50% higher horsepower. And it went down from there. After the carb barrels, they started lopping of cylinders.


    Should detroit ever ship a 3 ton vehicle with a 400cid engine again, I'll be the guy you see on the news standing at the front of the line at the factory gates . . .


    hawk

    1. Re:*sniff* by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      This will probably make both of you feel bad, but about a year and a half ago I was lucky enough to be able to buy a 70 Trans Am (400) Ram Air III, with plenty of engine/suspension work done.

      In response to your unasked question, yes, it seriously kicks ass.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  59. troll??? huh? by hawk · · Score: 2
    uhh, hello? Put the crack pipe away. You do have me baffled, though, as to how anyone could *possibly* call it a troll . . .


    hawk

  60. Floppy drive music by infinite9 · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of a program I had for my Amiga. It would play Greensleeves by moving the seek head in the floppy drive at varying frequencies. There was one for the c64 also, and I'm sure it works on PCs too. Anyone know if such a thing exists for a PC?

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  61. Re:harumph. Another Johnny-Come-Lately by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    And my commodore floppy drives and 300 baud modem played Jingle Bells also.

  62. What's That Song? by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    I've got it on a Ventures disc somewhere...Besame Mucho perhaps?

    --
    **>>BELCH
  63. Musical smashing disk heads on an Apple II by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A long time ago I had written a 6502 assembler program on my Apple II that tried to seek track -1 on the floppy drive, then paused a set amount of milliseconds, then did it again.
    I got it so I could play songs by the vibration of the drive from the read head banging into the end of it's arm.

    This did, however, void my warantee.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  64. FCC ID Number Search by Black+Acid · · Score: 2

    On a related note, be sure to check out the FCC-ID Number Search page. I used it to find out my Logitech Cordless mouse operates on 27.045MHz. Could be great for van Ecking arbitrary devices.

  65. Re:Info on TEMPEST, van Eck, HERF, etc by Black+Acid · · Score: 2

    HERF is an interesting weapon. The best web site about it I've found is http://www.codexdatasystems.com/herf.html , which is now unavailable, although you can view the entire archive of it at http://web.archive.org/web/20010814122813/http://w ww.codexdatasystems.com/herf.html.