Slashdot Mirror


Bokks Linux Based AV Component

Here is an article about a new linux based AV stereo componenent. This one is from Bokks and it has a lot going for it: Plays your MP3s, MPEGs, VOBs, and soon Divx. Has standard audio and video ports, a sleek form factor, and what looks to be a sexxy interface. Its ethernet interface can take input from NFS or Samba, or the net. The only downside I see is that it has no DVD drive for built in ripping, and it has only a 20G drive. But at $400, this is pushing the line of reasonable for this type of device. Should be available in Feb.

39 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Expandable hard drive? by mjed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will they be putting out a bigger, optional hard drive? 20 gigs isn't too much when yuo consider the average file size of mp3s and mpegs.

    --
    I'm a repairman in an imperfect world.
  2. It's about time by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hopefully in the future stereos will move away from plain uncompressed stuff and towards things like MP3s. It will be nice to be able to fit a huge bunch of music on a single CD, called "Peter's Favorite Music" in my case, that you can play on good audio hardware, not just old Sound Blaster speakers.

    1. Re:It's about time by Tet · · Score: 2
      Hopefully in the future stereos will move away from plain uncompressed stuff and towards things like MP3s.

      Lets hope not. Some of us actually care about sound quality. As a friend of mine said, high fidelity and lossy compression can't exist in the same sentence. There's plenty of scope for lossless compression in the future, but lossless compression works by removing redundancy, which in turn narrows the scope for error correction. It's always a trade off, and IMHO, we should be aiming somewhere in the middle -- modest lossless compression, while still retaining a degree of error correction.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  3. 266 Mhz + DivX? by ajna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will a 266 Mhz x86 processor be able to play DivX smoothly? I ask because my 333 Mhz laptop has trouble keeping audio sync...

    1. Re:266 Mhz + DivX? by reverius · · Score: 2

      I seriously doubt a hardware decoder would help DivX at all, because DivX is not exactly MPEG compliant. It's kinda... rogue. That's about the best way to describe it (it's a hacked-up Microsoft MPEG-4 codec). My bet is that the software has no support for hardware decoding anyway.

      On another note, 266 mhz is probably enough to decode DivX movies fine. I was doing it in Linux on a 400 mhz Celeron 6 months ago, with about 40% cpu usage...

      You -definitely- need hardware video overlay, though.

  4. Ogg? by NewbieSpaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No Ogg Vorbis support though. .ogg's have better compression than mp3's and is OSS. If they get it to work on there, it'd make it even more attractive...

    --
    ------
    Random, useless fact: I type in startx entirely with my left hand.
    1. Re:Ogg? by ikeleib · · Score: 2, Informative
      Stop whining and write a fixed point CODEC!

      That is the single thing that keeps vorbis from being included in various appliance devices.

      Coders of the world: Write a CODEC that can decode on a 74Mhz ARM 720T using less than 30KB of data space.

  5. Got a screwdriver and an inadequacy complex... by Cheese+Metal+Rulez!! · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm certain someone will have posted a similar comment by the time I hit submit but...

    BEGIN WHINE:

    Can you replace the drive with because...
    Multiple choice:
    a)My mp3 collection is HUGE, I mean it's SO much bigger than yours you should be turning green with envy.
    b)You can only fit hours of on this drive according to my calculations which I will now list in order to invite ridicule on my crap math skills.
    c)the clever sales person told me you have to have at least 80GB of memory these days and he wouldn't lie to me he was really clevar.

    END WHINE.

    That should save everyone else lots of typing.

    1. Re:Got a screwdriver and an inadequacy complex... by Cheetah86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      a)My mp3 collection is HUGE, I mean it's SO much bigger than yours you should be turning green with envy.

      Hey, its not the size of your mp3 collection, but how you use it!

  6. First reasonable device by amorsen · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is the first reasonable digital audio/tv device I have seen. The ones before have been tied to proprietary formats, ridiculously expensive, or limited in capacity or quality. Of course the hard drive is too small at 20GB, but that can be remedied by putting a file server in another room (so you don't have to listen to the noise). It would have been nice to have a DVD drive, but again, it's just a matter of copying the DVD to the file server.

    If they added a VideoLan Client, it would be practically perfect. VLC by itself probably doesn't support the hardware MPEG decoder, and the CPU isn't fast enough to do DVD decoding in software.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  7. i built something similar recently... by kejadlen · · Score: 2, Informative

    there's a handy little mobo/case called the SV24, made by shuttle. it has:

    RCA/S-video out
    normal audio out
    ethernet
    4 usb ports
    2 firewire
    etc... (standard mobo parts, ps2 ports etc etc)

    put together a nice multimedia system for only $490 some, plus it's actually useable as a computer!

    i mean, that's a nifty box and all, but you can build a better one for not that much more. it does everything that the unit above does, and much more besides.

    1. Re:i built something similar recently... by unitron · · Score: 2

      NewEgg seems to be selling it right now for $250.00 with a stick of ram and a floppy.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  8. Why a hard drive? by Stiletto · · Score: 3, Insightful


    This would be perfect without the hard drive. If the box has network access, why do you need it? It's just an extra component that could fail.

  9. A Start by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This product is, IMO, not something worth buying, but it is a step in the direction of a cool new concept for a set-top box that archives nearly all your media in one place. One major problem I see is that DIVX is not a useable technology for archiving your movies in the way that high quality MP3s are. MP3s, along with bigger and cheaper storage, have reached the point where they are the only format 99.5% of people need: a good VBR MP3 (averaging 200-240kbps) sounds extremely close to the uncompressed song, but even an extremely large DIVX looks downright crappy compared to the original, and a good Sorenson 3 encoded movie would be huge, require processing power in excess of what a cheap set-top box would use to decode, still have some quality problems in high-motion scenes, and will not receive the kind of adoption as MP3 due licensing costs.

    There is also less need to keep all your 1.5-3 hour movies in one device that can play them all without switching media as there is for your 2-15 minute songs; I see DIVX more as the result of the fact that most computers don't have DVD burners.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    1. Re:A Start by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2
      I get really disapointed when people critique the divx codac saying it looks crapy but that is probably because you have been download lowres interlaced, 550b/s crap off of p2p networks or other sorces that don't have any level of quality contorl

      I typically watch 700MB-1GB DIVX files, as that is about what is practical for me to store, but I have also played with short high-bitrate clips. I can honestly say that they look terrible. I think DIVX is a good technology, and yes it does have potential, but it is completely unsuitable for storing movies; it can't handle motion and you end up with too many compression artifacts. MPEG-4 will probably become a good alternative for streaming video (why the hell does anyone still use the Real and Windows Media formats?), and is great for producing very small files, but Sorenson still has the best codec when you need very clean video without artifacts, although even it doesn't do a very elegant job hadlind motion; many companies still use the original QuickTime video codec for that.

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  10. Q: Why is the hard drive only 20 gig? by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A: They thought it would be a nice middle ground between nothing and more.

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    1. Re:Q: Why is the hard drive only 20 gig? by hoggoth · · Score: 2

      It's the perfect size for a simple reason:
      The device is meant to play movies off your mounted LAN monster hard drive, but have enough storage to download a small selection and take the box with you for to view elsewhere, or to TRADE/copy videos on another LAN, like your office LAN or your friends LAN, or a LAN party...

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:Q: Why is the hard drive only 20 gig? by unitron · · Score: 2
      Why is the hard drive only 20G's ?

      Because that's the size Staples and Circuit City and such were offering on sale with a rebate last week. :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  11. Re:not reasonable by FallLine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So that's about 288 USD parts, if we accept your quoted prices as being market. But you're ignoring ethernet and probably a few other things (e.g., wireless remote). Plus labor to assemble it and install software. Plus support. Plus software development for their UI. Plus profit (god forbid anyone take a little risk and expect that). Sounds like a pretty good deal to me.

  12. Re:Data permanence by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 3, Insightful
    DVDs, which, while they don't suffer from hard-drive style crashes, still get scratches and also deteriorate over time

    A scratch does not damage the information on a piece of optical media, only the clear plastic that is protcting the information; that is why the plastic is there, you can get a scratch kit to fix it. If you need to record something for extremely long term archival, you can get silver, gold, or platinum CDs. Most commercial DVDs are burned on silver or gold, so unlike your VHSs, they should be usable many generations from now.

    When he says hard drives are not a permanent medium he is referring more to the fact that they have moving parts and are prone to data corruption than their archival value. Overall, I think we should be glad we are moving from extremely short lived products, i.e. magnetic tape, and short lived products, i.e. film, to store our multimedia art on.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  13. Re:not reasonable by milkmandan9 · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's reasonable if you factor in:
    • The small VCResque formfactor
    • The fact that it's designed to work out-of-the-box right from the start--no incompatibilities or driver problems
    • The amount of time it would take you to set up all your hardware and software to get this thing running

    It is unreasonable if you're willing to spend the time to put something like this together--but that's how it goes for pretty much everything these days. If you do it yourself, then you're going to save cash.

    The point is that not everybody has the tools (remember, Joe Average is the target audience and he's not going to know how to assemble said box or even come close to getting all the required software running--even with Ye Olde Simple MS Product) nor the time (Joe Average again--even if he had the tools to get this job done, I'd sure he'd rather spend it at his kids' T-ball game) to assemble this thing.

    True--it doesn't make sense for your the "technical elite," but that's not who it's marketed to. This is a product just like a Dell computer or an internet appliance--it's got some cool technology bits but it's sold as a package so that Mr. and Mrs. Average don't have to get their hands dirty with the details. I'm sure there are a fair number of geeks that will be interested in this product based solely on its technical merits, but the intended audience is not someone who could do this on their own--that person has already done it, and for half the price.
  14. Legality by DaSyonic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is a great product, Don't get me wrong, I want one.

    But the marketing/advertising they are receiving, at least from that review, aims directly towards illegal uses. Take the following examples:

    The first step is to download and install your favorite P2P program that offers a Linux version. Once you have that, you can begin trading movies direct from the box.
    This implies you will TRADE the movies, not just watch them for your own personal fair use.

    For those without a broadband connection at home, the Bokks can utilize the T1 connection at work this way where movies and music can be saved and watched at home later.
    Here it suggests hooking up external equipment to your companies LAN and use their bandwidth for your own (likely) illegal use. Not good either.

    If this product hopes to succeed, it must be presented in fair use. The Rio almost got nailed by the RIAA, but the Rio presented itself as legal fair use, and set a good precedent. This could set a NEGATIVE precedent if done incorrectly. They need to improve their image quick.

    --

    Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
    James Brents
    1. Re:Legality by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 3

      The company itself unfortunately agrees with the tone of that review:

      Connect it to your TV and view movies youve downloaded from the Internet.

      I don't want one for a variety of reasons. Part is that I don't want moving components, part is that I don't want an electrically noisy PC (face it, that's what this is) with unknown sound output doing the conversion; part is that I'm not going to use something like this for copyright infringement and I don't care to have the seller saying "nudge nudge, wink wink" when I say that.

      There is a legitimate market for archiving libraries of music and movies; there is a legitimate market for wanting to easily listen to a CD you own in the car, at your computer, and at your stereo.

      --
      --Matthew
    2. Re:Legality by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

      That's not what I'm saying. First, the Bokks is just a tool, and I don't think there is anything illegal with it (or should be illegal, if we assume the DMCA is a load of crap and doesn't apply).

      Second, I think it is unethical to emphasize copyright infringement use, which - be honest - is what they are emphasizing. Like I said, it has nothing to do with how it could be used perfectly legally - I don't care to have the manufacturer nudging and winking as I buy it. They are a crock if they think that is ethical.

      --
      --Matthew
  15. Re:not reasonable by pbryan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ATI AIW TV edition, 100$
    motherboard, 100$
    lots of ram, 50$
    40gig harddrive, 150$
    duron 850 processor, 80$


    Not paying heating bills because your collection of computers keep your home toasty warm ... priceless. There are things money can't buy, for everything else there's an innovative hacker.

    --

    My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

  16. Software & Codecs? by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    What software and codecs are being used for playback? Are they something that's already public domain or are they being developed specifically for this box? Much media playback software for Linux currently is "OKay", but with frequent crashes, poor features, and artifacts, it's got a long way to go. If this is going to be a consumer product, I imagine the software will be a little more polished, or at the very least, provide decent functionality in the form of front-ends that users of other platforms have expected. Is this software to be available to us or will it have to be hacked mercilessly out of the box and liberated from a restrictive license?

    --
    Why bother.
  17. Great by rjkm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see that many people here are complaining about the capabilities and price of the box. For me it is just the kind of STB I was looking for.

    Sure, you can build a PC with MPEG2 playback, networking etc. cheaper or for about the same price. But thats not what this device tries to replace, at least I would not buy it for doing this. When I saw the older TV Bokks (you can see it on their web page) I thought this would be great as an STB to stream files and live DVB streams from a server in the basement to other TVs here at home. But, although we have one of those at work to play with, I never saw it being offered for sale anywhere.

    The old Bokks has a Geode chip as processor/graphics chip/etc. and a Sigma Designs EM8400 for decoding. I guess the new Bokks is based on the same design. They only added some hardware (like the hard drive) and changed the shape to a brick. The EM8400 is a nice decoder chip. We developed our own driver which is API compatible to our DVB drivers. So, I would not mind playing with one of those Bokkses. Also, if you consider the price of an EM8400 card (e.g. the Netstream 2000), the Bokks does not seem that expensive anymore.

    Sure, I would also not mind if the Bokks were a little cheaper. With VAT (AFAIK 25% in Sweden which I guess I will have to pay when ordering from Germany) its over 1100 German Marks + shipping. Maybe they decide to also sell the old version for a lower price. I at least would be interested in it. On the other hand, the disk and nice brick shape makes the new system really portable. And I think the specs mention only 10W power usage. No noise, little heat, sounds good.

    Now please everybody buy it so that the price goes down and I can get one :-)

  18. I've got something better by leereyno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Imagine this.....

    1) 1.2 Ghz athlon with 512 megs of memory

    2) ATI all in wonder radeon that provides not only a TV tuner but svideo/composite A/V inputs and outputs and the ability to do audio/video capture at 720x384 at 30 fps on any of the inputs

    3) Sound blaster Live platinum 5.1 for surround sound playback of DVD's etc.

    4) four 100 gig hard drives on an IDE raid controller. Total capacity of 400 gigs

    5) DVD-R burner, preferably SCSI

    6) CD burner, preferably SCSI

    7) It will be connected to the internet via a switched 100base-T network connected to a NAT gateway that is itself connected through DSL.

    This is the system I'm building right now. Its purpose is much the same as the Bokks device. With it I will be able to play DVD's, vobs, mp3, avi's, mpegs, vcd, divx, etc all on my TV thanks to the all in wonder. Additionally I'll be able to do tivo style recording thanks to that all in wonder. I can rip all my DVD's, encode them to divx, and store them on the raid array or burn them to CD. Or I can just rip them and burn them back to DVD in regionless format with no macrovision. I've got friends overseas that might appreciate that.

    By the time this Bokks device becomes available I'll have this system up and running. I haven't decided whether to use Linux or Windows2000 yet. Which one I use will greatly depend upon device support for the all in wonder and SB Live. We've got an HK A/V reciever with dolby surround sound support. If the SB Live drivers for linux support all the features, and the support for the All in wonder is there, then I'd rather use Linux. But if this is not the case I'll use windows instead.

    Unfortunately this system is going to cost me a fair bit more than $400. I've already got the MB, CPU, and memory. All I'll need is a good case/PS, the hard drives, the video card, the sound card, and of course the SCSI adapter and burners. Total cost will be upwards of $2000 dollars US.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  19. Re:not reasonable by FallLine · · Score: 2

    Well I am not a nerd, nor do I reguard it as something to be proud of. That said, whether it has built in LAN or not is practically irrelevant. If you're an employed nerd, you might realize that your time is actually worth something. If I have to spend a couple hours putting this thing together to match its quality, then I've lost a significant amount of money.

  20. Re:not reasonable by FallLine · · Score: 2
    labor? that's like a couple of hours max (including installation of Win98SE with a good speed CD drive) which is fuck all. Sure, if you go by major dealer rates it's a lot, but anyone can build their own machine really. You, sir, are a fucking retard
    hahaha nice troll. While it is true that I can build my own machine like this and write my own software, it takes both time and money. While the money required to purchase the parts is significantly less than the amount they're charging for it, I would lose much more of my money by spending time putting it all together.

    Your time clearly is worth nothing. Troll for the Troll.
  21. To fix DivX on TV, tweak your gamma by yerricde · · Score: 2

    [Xbox and PS2] will make for a good convergence device, once it gets hacked and opend up.

    Hacked? Yeah right. Xbox is locked up tight; apparently, all binaries must bear Microsoft's digital signature. Watch for Microsoft to use its vast re$ources to sue any modchip makers into oblivion.

    for some reason divx movies look identical to the DVD on the monitor but not so identical to the DVD when played on TV out compared to DVD played on DVD player.

    This may be a gamma issue. Try tweaking your TV-out device's settings.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  22. Re:not reasonable by swb · · Score: 2

    Lots of people just say build a PC, but what software on the PC lets you run the thing with a remote control and has a built-in set of menus for timer-recording and other features without fscking around with a keyboard (even a wireless one is too much if *manditory*).

    PCs seem to be able to all the multimedia stuff independantly but they lack a common, simple IR-compatible way of tying it all together.

    If you can make all the bits work together, that's got be worth something.

  23. No ripping DVD drive? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The only downside I see is that it has no DVD drive for built in ripping

    It's not to surprising, considering that they wanted to sell the device, rather then just getting lawyered the fuck out of :P

    Once they're successful they might be able to do things like throw in a DVD burner a-la recent Macs, but don't except a home DeCSS machine on store shelves anytime soon :)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  24. Re:Short lived products? I think not. by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2
    Film is not short lived. Check out the pictures at

    http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/

    Those images were not taken on film! Please read the site. Film begins getting discolored after a decade or so and must be stored in a room with excellent climate control to prevent degradation; Universal stores all it's negatives in a stone vault carved into Mount Weather, and they still need massive restoration when brought out.

    The others who replied already dealt with your other points.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  25. Video output not compatible for North America? by Jobe_br · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those who are electrical engineers correct me if I'm wrong, but this device appears to be centric to Europe in its video output. Its listed as having SCART, S-Video, and Composite (PAL) output. From what I know, the Composite signal isn't the only thing that is PAL/NTSC specific - S-Video is as well! If that is in fact the case, I don't believe any North American television will be of much use with this device. Too bad, in my opinion.

    1. Re:Video output not compatible for North America? by Jahf · · Score: 2

      The makers have committed to a US version that supports NTSC output instead of PAL and a US power supply. It's pushing the US release out a month or two but should answer the needs of US users.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  26. Ugh, "composite audio out"? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

    Without composite audio out, I guarantee you that the noise level of the outputs makes them totally worthless for even the less picky audio enthusiasts like myself. If I pause the machine and get a buzz through my otherwise totally clean Sherwood and MC500 pair, then the box isn't worth a ten dollar gift certificate.

    Come on, for the love of christ somebody had to have a decent stereo on the team that developed this! Nobody in their right mind uses analog anymore for anything other than vinyl or magnetic tape, it is impossible to clean the signal even over the three feet between components. And when your signal is already digital (as it is before the cheap DAC on the sound card gets ahold of it and messes it up), why the hell not supply it as digital, so that $300 DAC in the sherwood isn't just twiddling it's thumbs. Coaxial outputs are basically free, and even optical out is hardly prohibitive anymore.

    Keep it digital, folks, analog is the useless buzzing child of the past.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
    1. Re:Ugh, "composite audio out"? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      This is a crock of shit. MP3 compresses better than AC3, and yet audiophiles everywhere are going whack for DVD. The problem is not MP3, it's TRADED MP3s, which are encoded under strange circumstances at low low bitrates. A set top mp3 box is designed to be used with a component stereo, not the boom boxes and all-in-one crap of the average MP3 trader. So if you've got the pricepoint for audiophiles, a form factor for audiophiles and so forth, then why curse it by making a machine that sounds like a clock radio.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  27. Re:20gb - no storage problem. by unitron · · Score: 2
    "...perhaps a pII?..."

    They probably got a quantity deal on a bunch of old PII laptop chips from the same place they picked up those closeout 20 G drives.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.