Slashdot Mirror


Porting Debian to... Windows

mike_sucks writes: "The first step to porting Debian to the Win32 platform has been made - dpkg is compiling under Cygwin. Check out the post on debian-devel and the Debian GNU/w32 port's site." Some of the posters on the debian-devel list aren't too pleased with the idea.

8 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. At first by PigeonGB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought this was an odd idea.
    Why would anyone want to port an OS to another OS (don't start with "Windows is not an OS, please!")?
    Then I saw what this all meant.
    If people can get used to using Debian tools and programs on Windows, then they won't be nearly as nervous about using them in a GNU/Linux environment.
    Bravo! I can't wait to see how that turns out.

    --
    I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
  2. This is a good, if not fun, idea by nirvdrum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember when this was first discussed on debianplanet, and a lot of people started flipping out. There's simply some places (such as the work office), where one is forced to use a Win32 OS, and cannot dual-boot. Besides, dual-booting is a PITA. If I can "dpkg -i" a package under cygwin, and get to using the gimp VS photoshop, I'll do it in a heartbeat.

    At best, one can say that this will deter people from linux. But then again, everyone loves linux because of all the OSS available for it. And if the whole goal is to promote OSS, why neglect the largest user base? Then when people get sick of Windows, they can convert to FreeBSD or Linux or whatever without there being a huge learning curve involved.

    I don't think I really agree with the port being called w32 though. win32 is not a moniker that promotes Windows as a winner, it's just the first syllable of the word, just like a lot of nicknames are formed. I wish RMS would spend more time coding than trying to be a politician :)

    --
    If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
  3. Re:waste of time and effort... by JWhitlock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    this seems like another HUGE waste of time and effort on the part of the Linux community. Why is it that so much code has to be wasted on these "we're doing it because WE CAN" projects? If you want to use Debian tools, USE DEBIAN!! Not Debian on Win32; not Debian on OSX, just DEBIAN. Does that make TOO MUCH sense or something?

    Waste of time? It only wasted a minute of your time, and most of that was wasted by you posting a reply.

    Waste of time for the developers? They are working on what they are interested in. If you want them to work on something they are less interested in, pay them. "Silly" side projects is what makes this games work.

    Waste of time for the users? Some folks have to use Windows in a job context, because the tools they use are Windows only. Once people are used to Unix tools, it's hard to go back. Plus, what happens to the Wintel platform when:

    The user runs free office applications that freely work with Microsoft Office formats, but have an even better native format

    The user ignores the latest "vital" Microsoft operating system extensions, in favor of tools ported from the Linux / BSD environments

    The user uses non-Microsoft entertainment apps, because they are less restrictive than the "official" ones

    Core Microsoft facilities are replaced with ones that work better with the "ported" tools

    Users have the option of emulating Windows software/games, or buying a native Linux version, and start to seriously think about the Linux version

    The hardest part about moving to Linux is learning the 200 basic facts that allow you to work at all (deleting files is called "removing", user files go here, applications go here, you start X11 by typing "startx", etc.). If you can learn 100 of those facts under a Windows environment, you are half-way there.

    This is a stepping stone in a migration to the standard Debian, or it may be the start of new and interesting developments. We just have to wait and see.

    (Dammit, responded to an AC again...)

  4. The Application is King by quixotal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I use native win32 ports of gnu tools daily. Why? Because they are small and just work. The application is king. I don't really care where I run it. quixotal

  5. Re:Yes, it will by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trust me; if you can show me an OS that does everything that Windows does that I like, is more stable, AND is free / cheap, I'll switch

    By bringing the apps into your Windows PC you are not getting any proof of anything. You are just getting a better Windows machine. Why would anyone be fool enough to switch from Windows if they can have it all there?

    Lets be real, there will always be an app or two that only runs in Windows until there is a critical mass of soccer moms using Linux as a desktop. Ports like this hurt the chances that such critical mass will ever be achieved. Bill likes this.

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  6. Who is this 'we' you speak of? by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Should we be porting software from Windows to Linux(e.g., WINE) instead of from Linux to Windows?

    Really, who do you mean by 'we'? This may be a shock to you, but there are some people who actually *ghasp* like windows, myself included. The fact of the matter is, for me, A lot of things are just easier for me to deal with in windows then in Linux, even setting up and running Apache, because I'm more used to it. I have a little Linux box for playing around with, but for the most part I like windows.

    I mean, the driving force of Open source software is people doing stuff because they feel like doing it. people doing stuff because they want to. You can't just say "we should work on WINE for accomplishing our political objectives" and then have Everybody magically want to spend their time reimplementing Microsoft skank-nasty APIs

    This may bother you, but everything on Debian is Open Source. And that means that you can take it and do whatever you want to with it, including porting it to windows.

    If this is a success, there's a good chance I'll be running it.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  7. Re:Sometimes the OS doesn't matter by Syberghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The folks here who *have* to run windows, don't really, they *have* to run certain windows apps, because they are a defacto standard in the relevant application domain and the linux apps aren't quite up to par yet and WINE isn't quite ready for that app.

    That is not true of all the folks here who have to run Windows.

    Some of them indeed do have to run whatever OS their company has selected, and don't think that what OS happens to be on their computer is reason enough to quit their job.

  8. So much for OS neutrality by MouseR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of the posters on the debian-devel list aren't too pleased with the idea.

    It's interesting to note that, while porting anything TO Linux is acceptable, porting Linux to something else irritates some.

    I think this is something positive. If you can give users of other platform a taste of your own cooking, chances are they'll come for a full meal at some point.

    Or at the very least, make them taste something else and open up their minds.

    I see this as a teaser, and a pretty good way to get some free software (like Gimp), other than the OS itself, a chance to open up to a new crowd.