Slashdot Mirror


VP3, Open Source Video at 200kbs

Honest Man noted that intel is hyping VP3 as the first low bitrate open source video codec. 200kbs for VHS quality video sounds good to me, especially when I can apt-get it. But is DivX already to entrenched in this niche?

33 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Boosting Ego / Marketshare by CmdrPaco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    warning: not a troll, just an observation: Is this just a cheap ploy to sell P4's? This seems like Intel is just tooting their own horns about this technology, and claiming it's only for P4's.

    --
    I bet this is not "First Post."
    1. Re:Boosting Ego / Marketshare by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course! I mean, without Intel Pentium IV's how could we "enjoy the wonders of the Internet at faster than light speeds...", and I'm sitting here like a sucker missing out on the special features that one gets by using a P4 to surf the Internet.

  2. Quick Answer by theantix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is DivX ;) entrenched in the market? Well, how many non-technical people have heard of it? How many PCs is it bundled with? It has a reputation for being primarily used for pirated video (regardless of the truth). So, the answer is a resounding "no, it isn't entrenched".

    --
    501 Not Implemented
    1. Re:Quick Answer by jvj24601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It has a reputation for being primarily used for pirated video

      So did MP3. Sometimes being first is more important than being better.

    2. Re:Quick Answer by triple_c · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is DivX ;) entrenched in the market? Well, how many non-technical people have heard of it? How many PCs is it bundled with? It has a reputation for being primarily used for pirated video (regardless of the truth). So, the answer is a resounding "no, it isn't entrenched".

      I encouraged my Digital Video Professor here at the University of South Florida to institute divx as the codec standard for all of our projects. He tried it out and now he swears by it. I am pretty positive that divx will be used as the class standard for a while now..

      --
      //----(triple c)-------//
    3. Re:Quick Answer by rho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting... I assume you mean it's the standard for final output on projects? You don't edit in DivX, do you?

      Will you also archive your projects in DivX? If so, I'm glad I didn't attend U of South FL. I prefer my demo reel to be on something other people can look at easily, such as one of the established tape formats, not some unknown codec inappropriate for broadcast and not available on most desktops.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  3. Re:Will the MPAA allow Intel to do this? by steve_bryan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right, they'll sue Intel when hell freezes over. The last thing they would try is to sue anyone with the resources to defend themselves and the 'political' stature to laugh off the lies and slurs the MPAA might attempt.

  4. Don't forget about patents. by jmoffitt · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are patents on the technology, which means it is of no more use to the open source community than True Type font hinting and MP3.

    I hope that they address the patent issues, and not just brush them aside like the DivX guys have done.

    There's a reason the Xiph.org project is trying to develop a video codec too :)

  5. The **REAL** links are here... by bani · · Score: 5, Informative

    The real open source VP3 site

    The VP3 open source license

    The VP3 license claims to be MPL derived. Would be interesting to see if it still fits the open source criteria.

  6. Open source? Looks like $395 to me.... by Lawmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it may be open source, but it sure isn't cheap...

    Intel's link takes you to on2.com's website where they have this to say:

    With the VP3 for Windows codec, you can encode VP3 video and play it back through the Windows Media Player! The VP3 for Windows codec allows you to encode VP3 video using any Video for Windows compatible encoding application (such as Adobe Premiere and Virtual Dub) and play it back through the Windows Media Player. This version comes with limited email support. $395 USD"

    The free open source versions can be found at www.vp3.com, but it looks like Intel is promoting them the big bucks version.

  7. *Not* Open Source *or* Free Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Consider this pice:

    (e) Notwithstanding Sections 2.1 (a), (b), and (c) above, no license is granted to You, under any intellectual property rights including patent
    rights, to modify the code in such a way as to create or accept data that is incompatible with data produced or accepted by the Original Code.

    Yeah, that's real fucking useful -- we can view the code, but we can't improve it (incompatibly).

    This is the problem with the "Open Source" movement -- it's become such a buzzword that morons like VP3 think they can make up licenses like these.

    1. Re:*Not* Open Source *or* Free Software by cruelworld · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can improve the code, as long as your improved codec's datastream can still be decoded by a cvs co unmodified decoder.

      This is smart, and contrary to what you believe you can improve the encoder without breaking compatibility with the decoder. The datastream format is what cannot change.

  8. "Open Source"? by slashmenot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Where, pray tell, is the link to download the source?

  9. Re:well by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I went to the VP3 site to watch some movie trailers they have. When I started playing the trailer, QuickTime Player told me I didn't have the VP3 codec and offered to install it for me. I clicked OK a few times and the trailer started playing. It couldn't have been easier. It even installed the encoder, so I can encode VP3 from any QuickTime app.

  10. what about audio by Splork · · Score: 5, Interesting

    200kbit/sec for video? so what. double that if you want VHS quality sound along with it!

  11. 200 kbps... by chhamilton · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is that video *and* audio? Or is that video only? Either way, it seems too good to be true. Typically, 128kbps is the considered the bottom end for near CD quality for MP3 audio... at 200kbps for this VP3, if they have decent stereo sound encapsulated, that doesn't leave a lot of room for the video!

    Even if that figure is for video data only, that seems way too good... 200kbps is barely enough to describe audio, let alone a decent representation of video! Don't forget, DivX takes about 10Mbyte/min or 1365kbps for audio and video at decent quality...

    I wonder what the quality and resolution are truly like...

  12. VP3 as counterpart to MP3... by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 5, Interesting

    MP3 finally has a video counterpart - a file-compression algorithm that makes it possible to send large multimedia files over the Internet on demand. VP3 is the first open-source video codec to truly support VHS-quality video at bandwidths as low as 200 kbps.

    isn't MP3 a patented, non-free algorithm? isn't that why Ogg Vorbis exists? so the only reason Intel is comparing VP3 to MP3 is marketing crap, right?

    either that, or they are hoping people will compress millions of DVDs into VP3 and set up giant file-swapping services, that would be a video counterpart to MP3.

    in other news, are there any side-by-side comparisons of VP3 and DivX? and how does Ogg Tarkin fit into all of this, now that there is an 'open source' codec?

    -sam

    --
    burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
  13. Re:optimized for P4? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 5, Funny
    If it's "optimized for the P4" that means it will run twice as fast on a P3, and 2.5 times faster on AMD, right?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  14. CVS by BigDaddy · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's available from their cvs server. Look at: this page for more info on browsing the CVS tree.

    --
    You can't get a blue screen on a black and white monitor.
  15. Quality comparison? by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With all the talk lately about various Codecs (divx, sorenson, and now VP3, as well as the "mpeg-4" stuff we've heard about (that may or may not be a codec :) )), I've been wondering...

    ...has anyone put together a good test suite to compare the various codecs at various bit rates? I'm thinking something that'd have some fixed-images (test patterns), some high- and medium-intensity moving images, lots of colors, simple and complex sounds, etc. Then put that file through all the various systems, at various rates, and compare the quality somehow...

    Not that it'll really make much difference to me, as an end-user, since I'll just watch whatever someone has already encoded, but I'd be curious to see something a little more substantial and quantitative than just "sorenson's cool" sort of postings...

    1. Re:Quality comparison? by dschuetz · · Score: 4, Informative

      (yes, I suppose I should have spent a couple minutes searching on google before I posted my question).

      I just found two comparisons:

      Extreme Tech from June 18, 2001, compares Windows Media Video 3, 7 and 8, Real 8, MPEG-4, Sorenson MPEG-4, and QuickTime (Sorenson V3 and V2). Hard to get clear results, though it looks like they liked WMV and Real about the best.

      Also, Digital Video.com (looks like it's from november) compares WMV8, Real 8, QT 5, Sorenson 3, H.263, VP3, and ZyGoVideo. Like many magazine articles, he declines to pick a "best", since it's so usage-dependant. He thought you needed to get to at least 800 kbps for VP3, didn't like ZyGo, liked Sorenson V3 better than H.263 (which he liked better than SV2), but thought WMV8 was better. Also RV8 wasn't as good, in his opinion, as WMV8.

      Anyway, they might be worth a read...

    2. Re:Quality comparison? by rho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The big problem with this is that perception is individualistic. Similar to how "golden ears" can perceive compression artifacts in MP3, "golden eyes" can perceive artifacts in compressed video.

      For example, DVD compression drives me into a blind rage everytime I see those fat pixels in the shadows of dramatically lit masterpieces, I have to supress an urge to go on a murderous rampage across the desks of hundreds of idiots who thought that MPEG-2 would be "good enough".

      Now, I am forced to rent a DVD before I'll consent to purchase it, just to see if I'm going to be irritated by compression artifacts. I'm not gonna blow some $20 on a screwed up compression job.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    3. Re:Quality comparison? by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Same thing pisses me off about digital cable and satellite. They use higher mpeg2 rate for football games and ppv movies, but they lower it for my favorite tv shows. They only have so much bandwidth (they say) so the big money makers get the better quality.

      This also happens with live tv, watch a football being passed, no mpeg2 artifacts. Watch a late night kungfu movie, and you can see artifacts. Older movies are stored on tape at lower quality, they should really start re-encoding those older movies for broadcast.

  16. Dig deeper next time... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://www.vp3.com has the real goods- Had you looked at the link on the bottom of On2's website, you'd have seen the link for the Open Source release of VP3. Open Source doesn't mean that they can't still be selling the versions of the codec that are "certified" (as in supported- they're offering limited support for the open source release...).

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  17. missed info by akb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lots of missed info for a project that whose source was released in early September. Good to see it finally got noticed by /.

    -first source is available on vp3.com. You must register to download (hrm).

    -Its license is MPL derived, with some restrictions on IP for their patents. Also derivatives must always be able to play VP3.

    -Its streamable with QT hinting.

    -only currently available for Win and Mac. Port to *nix should be easy since there is code for OS X.

    -Apple and Real will be supporting it in their players

  18. Not free software by oddityfds · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'd say it is non-free software. This is cited from what they added:
    [2.1] (e) Notwithstanding Sections 2.1 (a), (b), and (c) above, no license is granted to You, under any intellectual property rights including patent rights, to modify the code in such a way as to create or accept data that is incompatible with data produced or accepted by the Original Code.
    and
    [2.2] e) Notwithstanding Sections 2.2 (a), (b), and (c) above, no license may be granted to You by Contributor, under any intellectual property rights including patent rights, to modify the code in such a way as to create or accept data that is incompatible with data produced or accepted by the Original Code.
    It is not GPL-compatible, anyway.
  19. That'd be audio as well.. by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Standard VHS quality audio is encodable in something like 40-60kbps. It's nowhere near hi-fidelity. Now, stereo hi-fi stuff would probably require something like 300-400kbps for the video and audio as it'd need an MP3-like audio stream present.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  20. Possibly... by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was some discussion on the developer lists about getting them to allow us to release an OGG video stream using their codec. Right now, they're supposedly looking at re-working their license to make it where something like that might happen.

    Otherwise, the best you can do with the current license is make a VP3 player/stream codec for Linux (Which wouldn't be a bad thing- I've seen the technology in action with RealPlayer 8 on Linux, playing some unbelievable streams from news.com.).

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  21. Why don't you look a little closer? by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    On the bottom, there is this link to the official site at www.vp3.com. The code's under a slightly modified MPL license- if you want much of anything in the way of support, you'll be paying them $395 for the "certified" version. Otherwise, it's as free and open as Mozilla is right now without the GPL license on some parts of it.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  22. Unlike DivX, the people opening it up OWN them. by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    On2 owns the patents for VP3. They're granting rights to anyone that wants to use the source and produce a codec for their platform. They're granting the rights to the patents for people that make improvements to the system so long as they don't break stream compatibility with the open source code in their CVS repository.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  23. Dont bother registering.. by josh+crawley · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found out that the 'downloading' part is register locked. Big deal. guest:guest worked for me :-) I love default passwords...(ahem, root:root)

  24. How to make VP3 truly Open Source.. by Ogerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, so the source code is available. That's a start. But it's not truly free. It's encumbered by patents and other restrictions.

    So, given a code base for reference (ala reverse engineering), all we need is for somebody outside of the US, where software patents don't apply, to develop a GPL replacement written from the ground up, but which is unofficially 100% compatible with the VP3 format. Ideally, it may even be possible to work around their patents somehow, which would free content producers from having to pay royalty fees (as with MP3).

    Of course, that's assuming that VP3 is really a format worth emulating compared to the patent-free video codec the Ogg Vorbis people are working on. But hey, even they may be able to gain some insight from looking at the VP3 code.

  25. I Compared DivX & VP3... by Port1080 · · Score: 4, Informative

    And the results - for the same file, at 910 kbps, indistinguishable quality, both had minor artifacting, etc, but looked pretty good full screen, and looked great at default res. The big difference was time to encode - divx took 6 1/2 minutes to encode the clip I selected, VP3 took 11, and size - divx was 20.7 mb, vp3 was 29 mb. All other things were equal, I used Virtual Dub for both, same video clip, and the default encoding parameters for both (Medium for speed/quality in DivX 4.0, Fast Encode for VP3). My computer's a Celeron 566, 256mb RAM, running Windows 2000 SP2.

    --
    Check out Treesandthings.com for offbeat news