Slashdot Mirror


An Interview with JRR Tolkien and Other Tomfoolery

Lord of the Links writes: "These wackjobs pretend to interview JRR Tolkien with a ouija board as well as slapping together other nonsense, like photoshopped Ringwraiths from the movie doing bizarre things. I laughed once or twice, especially the diary by Gollum. The girls side left something to be desired, but the script revisions were kinda funny. If you feel like feeding into the Lord of the Rings hype, check it out."

104 comments

  1. Pretended? by Flarners · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Hey now, ouija boards are serious business. I wouldn't go calling this "pretending".

    --
    "The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for 'entrepeneur'." -George W. Bush
  2. I Conjured Elvis in the Toilet !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    what did you expect somthing profound ??

  3. Maybe he'd do an interview for slashdot... by Urthpaw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdotite: What distribution of Linux do you use?

    JRR: Crazy Web folk...

  4. About the movie... by Leeji · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how they're going to deal with the transition between the first two books (at the end of the first movie.)

    I had a mild feeling of resolution at the end of the first book, but it felt a little more like a pause in the tension, not an end of it.

    When it comes to a movie, however, we'll have to see if they gimmick it up to make it more bite-sized.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
    1. Re:About the movie... by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Informative

      What i want to know is what are they going to do about Tom Bombadill...
      I mean i understand them having to leave him out for the sake of time, etc, but without the scene from the barrow downs, where does Merry get his sword from? That sword is important later in the 3rd book where he uses it to kill the leader of the Ringwraiths... That's what i'm worried about... Tolkien's writing was so interwoven that everything tied in with something else.

      ~z

      --
      sig?
    2. Re:About the movie... by goonies · · Score: 1

      maybe they'll equipt at Rivendell... so they all get elvish gear... or later on together w/ the cloaks

      --
      .sigh
    3. Re:About the movie... by Skipio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I did find the ending to be quite good (yes, I've seen the movie). The ending is very similar to the one in the book but some material from the beginning of the Two Towers has been moved to the first movie. The ending is still a bit of a non ending but I found it to be done most tastefully.
      My friend, who hasn't read the books, found the ending to be a very much of a cliffhanger and he couldn't wait to find out what would happen next.

    4. Re:About the movie... by Skipio · · Score: 1

      No, we don't see the fellowship equipping in Rivendell (though we do get to see when Bilbo gives Frodo his armor) and there is no scene in the movie involving the cloaks.
      However, I hear that the scene where the Fellowship is given their cloaks will be included on the DVD.

    5. Re:About the movie... by dimator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dude, if they can give Arwen a major role in the movie, I don't think they're too worried about a sword appearing in the wrong place...

      This movie has always been an interpretation of the books, one man's point of view. As far as I'm concerned, the only things that will ever do the books justice ARE the books. I feel bad for the folks who havent read the books and are going to see the films...

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    6. Re:About the movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, having gone back and reading the books
      again, I don't think the shifting material is a problem.
      In the introduction (this is the Houghton-Mifflin 50th Anniversary version)
      that the story is one book, and the three volumes were
      published separately for convenience. Tolkein actually had it
      planned out as six books at one point.

    7. Re:About the movie... by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      I have heard that the death of Boromir (chapter 1 of book 2) will be the end of the first movie.

  5. Why make it up? by Oily+Tuna · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why bother faking an inteview with JRR?

    Plenty of people claim to know what he thinks about the file.

    Peter Jackson reckons he'd like it.
    JRR's biographer reckons he'd have ignored it.
    His son, Christopher Tolkien reckons he'd have hated it.

    So there you have it ....

    --
    Mmmmmmm ... sushi.
  6. Check that on http://www.efun.nu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.efun.nu has something about that.

  7. "phtoshopped" by TheFrood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mod me down for being OT if you must, but...

    ...other nonsense, like photoshopped Ringwraiths...

    Is "photoshop" falling into common usage as a word meaning "to digitally modify [an image]" similar to the way "xerox" is now synonymous with "photocopy"? (Even if you're using, say, a Canon copier.)

    Personally I'd rather hear them referred to as "gimped Ringwraiths".

    TheFrood

    --
    If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
    1. Re:"phtoshopped" by JabberWokky · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Personally I'd rather hear them referred to as "gimped Ringwraiths".

      Write something as good as photoshop and call it "gimp".

      You sir, are either completely new here, or an utterly amazing troll.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:"phtoshopped" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Write something as good as photoshop and call it "gimp".


      You sir, are either completely new here, or an utterly amazing troll


      Have you ever tried to do multi-layered selective color masks in the gimp?


      It's nice that the gimp is free, but for most serious production, you get what you pay for.

    3. Re:"phtoshopped" by Bud+Dwyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is "photoshop" falling into common usage as a word meaning "to digitally modify [an image]" similar to the way "xerox" is now synonymous with "photocopy"?

      Indeed. This usage has existed for a good 5 years, anyway.

      Personally I'd rather hear them referred to as "gimped Ringwraiths".

      If I heard "gimped Ringwraiths", my first thought would be of Ringwraiths who'd had their ankles broken, or perhaps had had polio as children.

      Anyway, "gimped" won't be replacing "photoshopped" any time soon. Gimp will have to break out of the Open Source ghetto first, and I don't see that happening. The serious graphics professional accepts no imitation for Photoshp. Period.

    4. Re:"phtoshopped" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is getting what you pay for:

      sleep 999999d

    5. Re:"phtoshopped" by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 2, Funny

      The serious graphics professional accepts no imitation for Photoshp. Period.

      (emphasis added)

      Except, of course, Photoshop.

      --
      Everything is mainstream now.
    6. Re:"phtoshopped" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's alright.. I don't think a day goes by where
      I don't question exactly what good it is in having
      michael around; much less what good it is in
      paying him to *stay* around.

    7. Re:"phtoshopped" by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

      I'd rather hear them referred to as "JASC Software Paint Shop Pro 7.04, saved in JPG format Ringwraiths"

    8. Re:"phtoshopped" by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Personally I'd rather hear them referred to as "gimped Ringwraiths".

      Especially when they actually are using GIMP in the film industry =)

      "Rig and wire removal..." hmm, maybe Matrix postproduction folks could try this =)

  8. Not at all. by Thingily · · Score: 2, Informative

    Peter Jackson does NOT reckon Tolkien would like the movie adaptations of his works. In an interview he gave to the BBC, Jackson said that he thought that Tolkien would be 'upset with the liberties he'd taken with the script' but that Tolkien 'would probably be glad Jackson had interpreted the major themes correctly.' A two-year old could interpret the major themes correctly. I personally think that Tolkien would come after Jackson with a spoon and a white-hot hazelnut for cutting out important characters and inserting clichéd catchphrases into the greatest fantasy epic ever written.

    1. Re:Not at all. by Raleel · · Score: 2

      so don't go see the movie

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    2. Re:Not at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thank you, Adolf Stallman.

    3. Re:Not at all. by pkaral · · Score: 1

      Then again, Tolkien didn't think what he wrote would ever appeal to anyone and needed tremendous push from his family and the editor in order to ever publish the thing. He wasn't really a great judge of his audience, was he?

      My personal guess is that if he got to see the joy and excitement the film is inevitably going to spread to kids and adults alike, he would feel it is a good thing. Of course he would still grumble about characters and plot details lost - all writers do.

  9. Hah! by mESSDan · · Score: 0
    I do think there was an oversight not casting any prominent African-Americans. I think Orlando Jones would have made a great elf.
    Well, all humor in the article aside, there's a problem with this statement. Tolkien was British! This makes me wonder, what do The Britians (Monty Python accenting) call African Americans?
    --

    -- Dan
    1. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      African Americans are called African Americans.

    2. Re:Hah! by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking of which, you have to wonder what Tolkien would have said about the recent criticism of the LoTR movie that it is a way for Americans to act out racist tendencies in a politically correct way. Given current events, this might be a very satisfying and even cathartic outlet for such feelings, but it is no replacement for introspection.

      All in all the whole "Tolkien as a web-saavy ghost" schtick was pretty funny, and definitely worth the link.

      --
      If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    3. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This makes me wonder, what do The Britians (Monty Python accenting) call African Americans?

      It depends on what their names are.

    4. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have found that black people abroad are annoyed by "african" americans. Why cannot black people just call themselves americans?

    5. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orcs.

    6. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wogs

    7. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >what do The Britians (Monty Python accenting)
      >call African Americans?

      We call them Americans.

      But if we're talking about black people as a group, then that's what we call them.

    8. Re:Hah! by Gilmoure · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I knew a guy of Indian decent who'd been born in Kenya. When he heard of the African-American group on campus, he went to join up. He was surprised to find that he was the only one there from Africa.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:Hah! by glasser · · Score: 1

      The fact that the author of this article thinks Harry Potter is racist because the wizards are shown as superior to the muggles just shows that he hasn't read the books, which make it pretty clear that only the "bad guys" think that the pure-blooded wizards are superior to others.

    10. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine was south african. He went to try to get an African-american scholarship, and being non-black, got threatened will all sorts of nasty stuff.

    11. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has it occured to any of you geniuses that The Lord of the Rings was written in the 1920's, and there WEREN'T ANY BLACK PEOPLE IN ENGLAND!!!!! None!

      JRR Tolkien would have been fortunate to have even seen a Black person, much less socialised with them. All discussions of racism in Tolkien's work are self serving bullshit, and should be treated as such.

    12. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if the "African American" was born in the USA we would call them American and if born in the UK we would call him/her British.

    13. Re:Hah! by Grab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Black", usually.

      Trouble with adding "token blacks" is that LotR is set in a medieval-type world. So there's not going to be a multi-ethnic Shire, any more than Britain in the Middle Ages was. The only way to cover this would be to make one of the major tribes black - elves, Riders of Rohan, whatever. But then note that black skin serves the single purpose of protection against sun, and the whole of LotR takes place in a cold-temperate area. For the sequel "Sauron does Africa", blacks certainly would feature. But for LotR, the only place they appear is amongst Sauron's crew (the Haradrim, IIRC).

      Grab.

  10. The actual LOTR ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    some of you will need babblefish, be alas here it is:

    on ebay now

    1. Re:The actual LOTR ring by Oily+Tuna · · Score: 1

      And if you can't afford that then there will be replicas

      --
      Mmmmmmm ... sushi.
  11. I have a better idea by nusuth · · Score: 1

    Why not interview Tolkien by method of infinite monkeys? We would have a dead accurate interview with Tolkien and as an added bonus, not raise sceptics' concerns.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  12. If a real interview did occur... by JurassicJoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...Tolkien probably wouldn't be a very happy man, apparently the notion of movies didn't appeal to him at all. He was disgusted by the idea that people would see the scenes and not develop them in their own imaginations, a far better idea he believed! I believe the film rights were sold to his son? or someone... does anyone know more about that...? Joe xxx

    1. Re:If a real interview did occur... by Oily+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Most reports (for example, this one) says they were sold outside the family for $20000 to settle a tax bill

      --
      Mmmmmmm ... sushi.
    2. Re:If a real interview did occur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolkein almost definitely would not have liked any form of remake...theatrical or otherwise. Tolkein was a very authentic Christian, and his writings have VERY Christian meanings (like it or not). I'm sure Tolkein would have had problems with Hollywood bastardizing his work.

    3. Re:If a real interview did occur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolkein wrote a small book called Tree and Leaf.

      The tree part is an essay inwhich he exlains why imagery developed from reading a book is better than from a film and so why there would be little point in making a film from LoR. Leaf is a rather nice little story in the second half of the book.

  13. Tolkien was a genocidal maniac (PC LOTR) by pyramid+termite · · Score: 5, Funny

    A long time ago, the Orcish race was minding its own business in the mountains, playing with rocks and peacefully eating grubs and scorpions as is our wont. Without even the pretense of giving us beads or a piece of paper called a treaty, first the Dwarves, then the Elves and Men, invaded our caves and forced us out by swordpoint, all for the pretty little rocks they called gold and silver and mithril, none of which we ever cared about. Ever since then, our legitimate claims on our birthright have been ignored, while our people have been forced to stay in the reservations of Moria and Mordor, when once they claimed all of the Misty Mountains as their home. We are branded terrorists and evil by the Wise and their scrolls of wisdom while our true story goes untold. Tolkien, master propagandist for our oppressors, has told several blatant lies about our kind, leading the average LOTR reader to conclude that we were spontaneously generated out of Sauron's refuse heap somehow, and never have such things as women, children and families. He accuses us of senselss massacres and cannabilism, all the while ignoring the genocide and oppression our folk have suffered. The movie compounds the error by making us look green and slimy with mummified eyes, a gross racial stereotyping that would have the NAACP up in arms were it applied to people of color. Don't fall for the Elvish propaganda of Peter Jackson and J.R.R. Tolkien, but discover the truth for yourselves. We, like other 3rd Middle Earth peoples like the Trolls, the Balrogs, the Werewolves (Wargs, indeed - not once do you find in LOTR our Warg comrades being described as anything but howling animals), and the Great Spiders have been maligned by a baseless libel and demand that the record of history be set straight.

    Sincerely,
    Gorbag,
    The Orc Liberation Front

    1. Re:Tolkien was a genocidal maniac (PC LOTR) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The experiment WAS A FAILURE.

    2. Re:Tolkien was a genocidal maniac (PC LOTR) by discogravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      you know what they say: history is written by those not hacked to tiny bits by
      vicious in-fighting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H winners.

  14. They're not wackjobs... by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 1

    they're UGO!

    Wait a second....

    --
    Everything is mainstream now.
  15. Re:Avoid LOTR -- it is RACIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What bollocks.

    All stories have baddies that can be distinguished in someway from the protagonist. It's human nature, not racism. Racism is when this is taken to extremes.

  16. This page breaks in Netscape 4.x... by JessieLeah · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This page breaks in Netscape 4.x (for Windows; I have to purge Windows from this new laptop and install Debian. Else I'd report for both Linux and Windows..) Maybe add an "IE or Mozilla only" note to the main story. :)

    --
    ------------------------------------------- Just Say no to Windows!
  17. They left out the usual warning by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 0

    Thinking of seeing LOTR ?

    Remember if you see the film....

    Even one read of LOTR or one viewing of the film can be dangerous.

    LOTR can be hobbit forming, just ask Saruman... all that pipeweed got to his head he'd tell you how addictive it was.

  18. Sounds like Screwtape is up to his usual tricks?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Tolkien was a devout Christian. Actually, he was the person who brought C.S.Lewis to Christ. As such, he's probably in Heaven right now, and not likely to be reached via Ouiji Board. Instead, it may well be that C.S.Lewis's "friend", the demon Screwtape, may be up to his infernal tricks. Kind of like "on the Internet, No one know's you're a Dog!"

  19. Re:I know what I call them by Glytch · · Score: 2

    There's a "Goatsex Giver" joke in there somewhere, but for the life of me I just can't think of one at the moment.

  20. Good Tolkein Books by namespan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You may not get to find out what Tolkein would have thought about any film version of his works, but two good books for getting a feel of Tolkein are:

    The Inklings

    and

    The Personal Letters of J.R.R. Tolkein

    both by Humphrey Carpenter. I read Inklings this summer and found it fascinating (includes stuff about C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams, too). Letters is a bit harder to plow through, but good sampling reading.

    Incidentally, anyone know when those animated "Hobbit" and LOTR films were made? (late 70's? Early 80's?) I'll bet people had some bad things to say about those. I remember orcs singing cheesy songs like "Where there's a whip ! There's a way !"

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    1. Re:Good Tolkein Books by jonerik · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, anyone know when those animated "Hobbit" and LOTR films were made? (late 70's? Early 80's?) I'll bet people had some bad things to say about those. I remember orcs singing cheesy songs like "Where there's a whip ! There's a way !"

      Ralph Bakshi's rotoscoped "The Lord of the Rings" (which covered "Fellowship..." and the first half of "The Two Towers") came out in 1978; the same year as Rankin-Bass' made-for-TV version of "The Hobbit." Finally, "The Return of the King" (also made by Rankin-Bass) came out in 1980

  21. Re:Avoid LOTR -- it is RACIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not feed the trolls.

  22. that was terrible by sv0f · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "interview" with Tolkien and the other Ring-related stories on that site were dreadfully boring. The funniest thing I saw was a smallish picture of Gary Coleman as "Merry".

    1. Re:that was terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was amused by most of it; I don't expect Shakespeare from a website, but it certainly was better than most of the drivel out on the web these days. Heck, this was better than most of the crap on TV these days.

  23. Re:need Heidi Wall pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heidi Wall:
    There's more than one way to do it.
    Yes, Heidi, there certainly is.

  24. All your base are belong to GIMP by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Is "photoshop" falling into common usage as a word meaning "to digitally modify [an image]" similar to the way "xerox" is now synonymous with "photocopy"?

    This has been true at least since the All Your Base photoshopping craze. Read More: A Google search for "photoshopped"

    Yes, I say "gimped" instead.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  25. Hype? by heptapod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lord of the Rings is just about hype but Star Wars is nowhere near being hype? IMO talking about "hype" for LotR is tantamount to saying this is a flash in the pan bereft of any aesthetic merit.
    George Lucas promised to film the prequels back to back and release one each year for three years. What's fat minivan dad up to now? Five years until he does another prequel? What? Lucas doesn't want to produce a piece of shit and needs to take his time creating special effects and developing plot which still falls far short? Effects in TPM were no better than what was seen in Harry Potter, the plot was non-existent despite Lucas' PR making spoof posters of "Plot Does Matter". Peter Jackson has created an awe inspiring movie with a richly textured plot which effectively conveys themes of friendship and sacrifice incorporating fantastic visuals and effects which enhance the movie without taking center stage or obviously being computer generated.
    Lord of the Rings is news for nerds, whether on film or paper, and it still doesn't have a topic devoted entirely to this phenomenon. Lord of the Rings is highly deserving of this, and in light of 1999, moreso than Star Wars.

    1. Re:Hype? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you`ve actually seen the movie then ?

  26. Re:I know what I call them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elves are fair skinned, thin, and tall. So by your statement a black person in this film would have worked well if they put enough makeup on them to make them fair skinned. That would go over well.

  27. Boycott the MPAA! by msm1th · · Score: 5, Funny

    (after you see this movie. Oh, and star wars episode 2. and terminator 3. thanks.)

    1. Re:Boycott the MPAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh... that is SO last year

    2. Re:Boycott the MPAA! by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      (after you see this movie. Oh, and star wars episode 2. and terminator 3. thanks.)

      Okay - this *is* on topic because a movie story is the only place this thread makes sense.

      I'm just going to point out that I *will* gladly boycott the MPAA... but not WETA, Peter Jackson (whise "Meet the Feebles" is great), Iam Holm, Cate Blanchett or even that windbag (gotta love 'im) Ian McKellen. I am *not* a studio, and thus I cannot boycott the MPAA. I *am* a musician with one album from a prior band - my next one (which is admittadly an "if" prospect) will *not* be associated with the RIAA, but I will continue to buy albums... I like James Taylor, and I'll pay him... I like Lords of Acid, and I'll pay them. I know that some (even a good chunk) is going to a orginization that I think is neigh organized crime, but it's their problem, and they are bound in contracts. Same for movies - I have an even worse view of the MPAA, since I've followed and read the actual subpoenas of Valenti vs. 2600 and read transcripts of several interviews. They guy really is both a prick and a crimelord operating just on the inside of the law, quite possibly by buying the law.

      But that dosen't mean I won't support Peter Jackson and his cast and crew's effort to bring one of my favorite books to screen. I know that part of that ticket is going to a crappy originization... hell, for all I know, one of the actors is a Scientologist (a group that I personally abhor) and will tithe some of his income, but that does not mean that the work as a whole is not to be supported.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  28. Tom Bombadil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already seen the LOTR movie and Tom Bombadil didn't appear... Err, by the way.. that wasn't thw worst change in the story.

  29. Re:I know what I call them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about dark elves?

  30. OT: Boromir casting by Alakaboo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Someone mentioned in a reply to an earlier article that the casting for Boromir was poorly done, because the actor really wanted the role of Aragorn.

    Well, having just finished reading Two Towers, I'd like to point out that Boromir himself was jealous of Aragorn's status.

    The casting seems appropriate then, doesn't it? :)

  31. Movie is better than the Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book doesn't delve into the mysterious relationship between THE ONE RING and THE ONE BURGER KING like the movie does.

  32. Re:I know what I call them by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

    Yuck, I suddenly had the image of Micheal Jackson in mind.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  33. Hell, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harry Potter was a *much* better movie than Ep I. All around, and not just as a kid's movie.

  34. "inserting clich�d catchphrases" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, another Dungeons and Dragons.

  35. Re:I know what I call them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dark elves are fair skinned, thin, and tall.

    They just happen to listent to goth music and write bad poetry...

  36. damn pop-ups by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I couldn't get passed the first part, the damn pop-ups kept, well, popping up even after I closed them.
    How many time do I need to tell them I don't want to go to tas vegas.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:damn pop-ups by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      try downloading opera from www.opera.com. takes care of pop-ups quite nicely

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  37. LotR by rifkin · · Score: 1

    I think that LotR is gonna become uber-mainstream now, become all commercialized and all that gooooood stuff. Kinda like Star Wars.... heh