Slashdot Mirror


Annual NORAD Santa Tracker Up And Running

SumDeusExMachina writes: "NORAD is at it once again folks! You can track Santa as he travels across the globe via a nifty Real Media stream." Apparently, this guy has been making some changes up North, too, including stealth technology, so I hope the radar tracks.

19 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. good ol gov't by localh0st · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hooah to stealth tech

    --
    Loopback Fighters- paving the way for the revolution, one instance of linux at a time.
  2. My kid is 2 and already knows this santa stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    is fake crap. Why are we spending any money on this BS at all? Save the money and go feed some homeless and foodless people during the holidays.

  3. Bit silly, but... by mwillems · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...but the point is well taken. Nowhere do we go nowadays without being observed. England, once the most liberal country in te world, where cops could not stop you unless they had a good readon to do so, is now the most big brotherish country in the world. Orwell was British - no surprise. My kids here in Canada wil have - no, already have - significantly less freedom that I used to have. "Nothing to fear unless you are a criminal" - that argument is still heard all over the place every day. As it was in Nazi days. Dobn;t want to sound alarmist, but we really have to worry about all this.

    I would say just a *little* pushback from all of us would help greatly. Does your bank really need that social insurance number? Perhaps asking "am I really legally oliged to give you this" whenever you are asked to produce ID would be a good step?

    Peace,
    Michael

    --

    ---
    BDOS ERR ON A:>
    1. Re:Bit silly, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Holy christ lighten the fuck up and go get laid.

    2. Re:Bit silly, but... by fenix+down · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Amen, brother.

    3. Re:Bit silly, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Yah, no shit. This guy must be taking too much vallium or something.

  4. Just when you thought it wasn't possible.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ..the cynical bastards of Slashdot somehow manage to slander the concept of *Santa Claus* within 10 minutes of this article.

    Amazing.

  5. I missed it! by SumDeusExMachina · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I missed first post on my own story! Dammit!

    I'll never stop refreshing Slashdot again! I can't allow this to happen a second time!

    --

    Is your company running tools written by ma
    1. Re:I missed it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hell it's just as well, your story is inept enough without adding fps.

  6. Santa is a Al Qaeda sympathizer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Check out the Sydney footage. Al Qaeda terrorists are obviously using Santa as cover for attacks on popular landmarks.

    They flew their aircraft behind and above the sleigh to remain invisible to radar, then as Santa changed course into Sydney proper, they dived in and exploded in the Opera House.

    Santa must be stopped! Quick! Call Bun-Bun, only he can save us! Break out the Furbies! Assemble the Easter Bunny!

    astfgl@iamnota.org

  7. Why RealMedia? by citizenc · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    (This is not to be taken as flamebait or trolling or anything like that.)

    I have a HUGE problem with Real's forced marketing policies when it comes to their software -- changing startup pages, adding links everywhere, changing your program associations.. I know a large number of people who won't touch Reals stuff anymore.

    Does anybody know of a WindowsMedia stream of something like this? I want to show my niece.

    1. Re:Why RealMedia? by cscx · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      I hate Real's software. Period.

      Their software is the biggest piece of spyware around. Shoot, you have to make like 15 changes when installing just to make it not do sneaky things around your system, and disable the ads. People bash Microsoft all the time, but I think Windows Media Player has hit it home. For one thing, I remember it occasionally checking for upgrades, and telling you that an upgrade was available. Meanwhile, with Real Player, it tells you something like "There is a new version of Real Player available... Download this bloatware and use it, or you will burn in hell forever!" Real Player is a memory hog (20+ MB), yet they insist that it preloads when Windows starts (don't know bout the Linux version). In the latest versions, they have attempted to make the "SmartCenter" even harder to disable for newbie users... it's about three or four dialogs deep...

      Even better is in the installer. It asks you if you want certain "announcements" (read: ads) and let's you check them off. Of course, it's a scrolling listbox. The boxes in view are unchecked, but if you scroll down, there are checked boxes. Damn sneaky. It also likes to take over all media extensions on your PC (like I need freaking RealPlayer to play a wave file... come on) if you don't disable that.

      Steve Gibson (grc.com) has an article about the controvertial RealDownload --- Real can basically find out what you're downloading, and track your habits!!!

      Now they are touting this "RealOne" player... I guess it's they're answer to the new verions of WMP; e.g., it includes CD Burning, etc. Of course they charge $10 for their player; WMP is free with all versions of Windows. You also have to make an account with Real before you can use the player!! That's like WMP telling me I have to make a .NET passport before I can use WMP. What bullshit, RealNetworks.

      The only reason that I touched RealOne was when I tried to listen to Christmas music using RealPlayer, I was told that this version of the software didn't support the stream. So I "upgraded" only to find out that their new portal has NO Christmas music. A whole lot of the content is pay, too.

      Sorry, Real, you lost the battle.

      By the way, you can still fetch RealPlayer 8 at http://www.real.com/player/8/index.html --- there are still (unfortunately) so many sites using Real streams.

    2. Re:Why RealMedia? by damiam · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      And Windows Media is better? If you're gonna complain about one company's business practices, at least have the decency not to then recommend a product made by an even worse company.

      Until they finish Ogg Tarkin, I like my streaming video in MPEG format.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  8. Re:NORAD has better things to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    and that one pillar being deeply shoved up the infidel and pig Mohammed's ass.

  9. Re:frist pr0n post d00dz!!1!!~~~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Merry Christmas to you too.

  10. Perl Is Doomed by shoesolebomber · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Perl has served its purpose. Sad to say, but its day is done. The time has come for Perl to yield the spotlight to newer, better scripting languages. The reasons for Perl's imminent demise should be obvious to anyone with an ounce of common sense. Nevertheless, the main causes of Perl's lack of fitness deserve to be recounted here:

    Perl is emphatically not an object-oriented language. Perl's OO features were crudely hacked in after-the-fact. This unfortunate compromise is the equivalent of trying to bolt an internal-combustion engine onto a stagecoach instead of designing an automobile from the ground up.

    Too many simple tasks are pointlessly complicated. Take the simple example of creating an array whose elements are arrays. Not only does the developer need to use additional inner brackets for each element, but they must also remember to use the unique @{$a[1]} syntax when referencing. Why all the extra steps? Who knows.

    Perl is notoriously impossible read and maintain. Walk into any bar frequented after-hours by veteran developers and you'll hear story after story being swapped about having to decipher brain-crushing lines of text like :" (my @parsed =$URL =~ m@(\w+)://([^/:]+)(:\d*)?([^#]*)@) || return undef;". This unreadability is in part the result of the fact that:

    Perl attempts to be all things to all people and ends up being second-rate at everything.Perl is widely known as the "duct tape of the internet", and it performs superbly in this role. However, just as you cannot build a house out of duct tape alone, so attempting to turn a language that was originally developed for scrpiting brief, handy utilities into a do-all, be-all programming language will only result in the buggy, bloated, "write-only" mess that Perl has become.

    Subroutine signatures, orthogonals, method access, data inheritance: this list could go on and on. But there is no real need. Its is now clear that Perl is doomed. At this very moment, Perl 6.0 is being cobbled together, with bulletins about the myriad upcoming features of the new version being issued with titles referring to the Biblical Book of the Apocalypse, the favorite text of messianic streetcorner lunatics. There is no better indicator of the deranged states of mind of the developers behind Perl than this unfortunate choice of imagery. Software developers with any interest in future employment/relevance should sieze this opportunity to attain fluency in Ruby or Python and donate their Perl books to the History Department of their local University.

  11. Some Christmas Fun off Our Friend the Internet by Raffi+Spock · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    SANTA CLAUS: An Engineer's Perspective
    I. There are approximately two billion children (persons under 18) in the world. However, since Santa does not visit children of Muslim, Hindu, Jewish or Buddhist religions, this reduces the workload for Christmas night to 15% of the total, or 378 million (according to the Population Reference Bureau). At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per house hold, that comes to 108 million homes, presuming that there is at least one good child in each.

    II. Santa has about 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical). This works out to 967.7 visits per second.

    This is to say that for each Christian household with a good child, Santa has around 1/1000th of a second to park the sleigh, hop out, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left for him, get back up the chimney, jump into the sleigh and get on to the next house. Assuming that each of these 108 million stops is evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false, but will accept for the purposes of our calculations), we are now talking about 0.78 miles per household; a total trip of 75.5 million miles, not counting bathroom stops or breaks. This means Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second --- 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man-made vehicle, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second, and a conventional reindeer can run (at best) 15 miles per hour.

    III. The payload of the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium sized Lego set (two pounds), the sleigh is carrying over 500 thousand tons, not counting Santa himself. On land, a conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that the "flying" reindeer could pull ten times the normal amount, the job can't be done with eight or even nine of them --- Santa would need 360,000 of them. This increases the payload, not counting the weight of the sleigh, another 54,000 tons, or roughly seven times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth (the ship, not the monarch).

    IV. 600,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second crates enormous air resistance --- this would heat up the reindeer in the same fashion as a spacecraft re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer would absorb 14.3 quintillion joules of energy per second each. In short, they would burst into flames almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them and creating deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team would be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second, or right about the time Santa reached the fifth house on his trip. Not that it matters, however, since Santa, as a result of accelerating from a dead stop 650 m.p.s. in .001 seconds, would be subjected to centrifugal forces of 17,500 g's. A 250 pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of the sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force, instantly crushing his bones and organs and reducing him to a quivering blob of pink goo.

    V. Therefore, if Santa did exist, he's dead now.

    --
    Quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
    Anything said in Latin, sounds profound.
  12. suck it long and suck it hard bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    that's right

  13. Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Let's all hope he/she doesn't grow up to be big fucking sour puss like you, jackass.