Slashdot Mirror


20 Factors That Will Change PCs In 2002

bstadil writes: "CNN's tech site has posted a list of the 20 most significant factors that will change the PC in 2002. Its not very technical but it would be interesting to get the take on this from the Slashdot community plus what they think needs to be added."

12 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. Why doesn't anybody get it? Voice doesn't work. by Brento · · Score: 5, Informative

    I really got my hopes up as I read through it - I thought for once, I would see an article about The Future that didn't say the equivalent of, "This year is really the year when voice recognition will be everywhere." But noooo, they had to say that voice-driven web portals will be one of the Big Things.

    What is it about voice recognition that suckers journalists in every time? Nobody seems to get it: voice recognition is here, it's been here for a long time, it's just that the accuracy isn't good enough. You can't walk up to somebody else's installation of ViaVoice and start dictating a letter without missing a few words in each paragraph at the bare minimum.

    Now they're talking about voice navigation of web sites? Let me get this straight: half of the sites I visit are so poorly designed that it's hard to tell where to CLICK, let alone what I would say if the site was actually listening to my voice. And if I have to read instructions on how to surf a specific site, you can bet I won't bother reading it - or even clicking.

    I didn't bother reading the rest of their Big Futuristic Ideas, but if they're the kind of journalists that include voice recognition, it's not the kind of article I want to read.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  2. My wish list by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hard disks that are faster, not bigger. If I need more space, I'll add more spindles. How about giving me a disk that can push 50 or 100 MB/sec from the platters?

    Bring back those monitors-with-built-in-USB-hubs.

    Cheap SMP. I'll take my dual 550 over a single 1 GHz any day of the week. How about 8x500 MHz on the desktop, instead of 1x4GHz which is still crippled by 1 CPU hogging app?

    Less patronizing Windows UI ("My Documents", "My Computer")

    A decent NFS client for Win32.

    That's all I can think of for now. I'm not terribly interested about vapor markup languages or 1 GHz palmtops. Give me something I can use.

    dd if=/dev/coffee of=/dev/geek

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:My wish list by Brento · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bring back those monitors-with-built-in-USB-hubs.

      I'm shopping for a new LCD display, and I was pleasantly surprised to see that most of them have a USB hub. I wasn't quite so happy that many have junky built-in speakers, but of course you don't have to use 'em.

      Cheap SMP. I'll take my dual 550 over a single 1 GHz any day of the week.

      Swing by your local CompUSA. Dual CPU motherboards are now under $100, often well under $100. A quick check of Pricewatch shows that two P3-667's will cost you less than a single P3-1ghz, so the only thing stopping you from SMP heaven is - well, you.

      Less patronizing Windows UI ("My Documents", "My Computer")

      Well, I can't help you there. At least it's not Microsoft Bob.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    2. Re:My wish list by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some comments on your wish list:

      1. Hard drives are already pretty fast, especially now with ATA-100/133 IDE connections. Serial ATA will raise the data transfer rate by a factor of six. I do expect quiet 10,000-20,000 rpm Serial ATA hard drives in the next few years, though. For higher-end applications, expect the cost of Fibre Channel connections to come down, which will essentially put an end to SCSI.

      2. Why do you want monitors with built-in USB hubs? I don't find them that useful, especially nowadays most pre-built systems now have USB connectors in front of the system case.

      3. Unfortunately, not that many applications take full advantage of multi-processor boxes (or require their use). It's only with very specialized apps such as CAD/CAM and very high-end image processing that you really need multi-processor computers.

      4. If you're looking for a less patronizing Windows UI, Windows XP's Luna interface is already a step in the right direction. You'll probably see other changes in the next few years.

    3. Re:My wish list by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Less patronizing Windows UI ("My Documents", "My Computer")

      2004 prediction: "Bill Gates' Documents". "Bill Gates' Computer".

  3. They forgot software as a service by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Subscription based Software / Services (games, streaming content etc etc)

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  4. What they missed by shawkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Advanced operating systems. Defining technology as a subset of an unresponsive monopoly OS is a waste of time.

    Efficient programming tools. If four programmers could write a better Photoshop in two months and distribute it electronically, then things will change.

    Human factors driven technology. People will buy more stuff that works easily and makes them happy.

  5. 802.11x by Jaggar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that the largest change coming in the next few years, at least for laptop users, will be the increasing prevalence of pervasive, high bandwidth wireless networks based on the IEEE 802.11a-g protocols. I have the pleasure of working for one of the few companies that makes extensive use of these devices (we design them, actually), and I can't imagine working without them. When I go to a meeting, I just plug a card into my laptop and go. In the meeting I can bring up all of the relevant documents and data, check my email and stocks, and, most importantly, read Slashdot.

    These technologies will have an even larger impact in academic institutions. At this moment, I know of at least two universities (Carnegie Mellon and, interestingly, Akron University in Ohio) that have essentially omnipresent 802.11b wireless networks. Students with laptops can access the campus network as well as the internet from any point in the university, even the football field.

    I think that this will be the area of largest noticeable change because it is not incremental. We expect faster processors, greater storage capacity, faster busses, etc., but the ability to connect to the internet with a broadband connection from almost anywhere, that will be new and therefore more noticeable. However, even though it is novel, it is implemented with mature technologies that have been tried and tested for several years now, at least in the case of 802.11b.

  6. Only 512 MB of RAM in 2004? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I guess they are kidding: 512 MB DDR RAM is nothing, even by today's standards. I guess people will hit the 4 GB limit on traditional x86 desktops even before the end of 2004.

    There's a rule that today's hard disk capacities are RAM capacities in five to seven years. By this estimate, we're going to hit 4 GB during 2003, I suppose.

  7. CNN is clueless. Here's how its gonna be, kids... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    400 gigs and a cloud of dust: AFC hard drives


    Not a bad idea. As the average amount of free space per PC increases, software makers will find a way to utilize it. They always have.


    PDAs move to another level: The 1-GHz palmtop


    Doubtful. Unlike cell phones, the demographic that buys palmtops aren't made up of teenagers. The people who buy and use palmtops aren't obsessed with making them smaller. They want connectivity first, then speed, then glitz. Besides, the typical uses of a palmtop don't extend to high-end computing. Having 1 Ghz under the hood isn't going to allow you to write your term paper any faster.

    Scintillating screens: Organic-light-emitting diodes


    Vastly overhyped. The intensity of OLEDs fade with time. When compared next to TFT, they look like shit, perform like shit, and go bad far quicker than TFT. They're also more expensive to produce. It'll be a novelty, but, it wont go anywhere in the end, IMHO.

    The message is the medium: Next-generation instant messaging


    Uhhh.....Ever heard of IRC? CUSeeMe? This is hardly a new technology. Its the same paradox as the video phone. Everyone thinks that videophones would be totally cool, but no one's willing to have their hair and make-up done in order to answer the phone. Pound for pound, text remains the best medium for large groups of people to share information. What good is a teleconference if only one person at a time can talk? If more than one person starts talking, you might as well be listening to a washing machine.

    Tireless wireless: 802.11 networks


    I absolutely agree. 802.11 is the beginning of something very big. Community networks, and the death knell for wire-provided technologies like DSL, Cable, 56K modems, etc.

    In search of a common language: Markup languages for everything

    Here we go again, failing to learn from history. People, its like this -- Programmers dont think alike. Thats what makes them programmers. You'll no sooner see people using the same language for markup as you'll see people coding in Smalltalk. People gravitate towards languages based on their ability to be proficient at it. No matter how good XML is, people will still use HTML becuase it suits them better, or PHP, or Perl, or C, or Assembly, or freakin Smalltalk if they want. Name a single time in history when a programmer was considered proficient in his art, WITHOUT knowing more than one language. Get my drift?

    Getting a little hyper: Hyper-threading


    Big clue for ya, gang--99.9% of your PC's lifespan is spent waiting for your lazy human ass to tell it what to do. Hyperthreading assumes that Moore's Law will flatline. It wont. What good is greater availability of processing power when you're STILL not addressing the fact that for most of your machine's usable lifespan, it's sitting idle anyway? Its like code optimization research. As time goes on, it becomes more and more irrelevant.

    And now, my short list of what WILL take off:

    802.11 and its offspring

    Corporation-controlled P2P trading

    P2P For Programmers--Wide and seamless code-sharing environments that replace segmented environments like SourceForge, Savannah, etc. Why not search for a bunch of good 3D engine s to pick from instead of just MP3s?

    GUI optimization. Out with the old, in with the new. The need for a more intuitive interface always wins in the long run, over tradition-based designs. (cough)Scrollball(cough) :)

    User-centric computing instead of application-centric computing.

    Self-regulating and self-maintaining applications...Just picture it. Your antivirus software is eventually rendered obsolute because each of your applications, independant of one another, monitors its own structure and is aware of viruses that may attempt to exploit it. Also downloads and applies new updates, code patches, etc. Maintenance-free from a user standpoint.

    Government requirements for both OS security and application security. Possibly even a ratings system.

    Where will it end! :)

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  8. What I�m expecting to happen in 2002 by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 5, Funny

    A new bug that allows remote access will be found in Windows XP. People will be urged to install the critical update or move to a real OS.

    A new bug that allows root access will be found in the latest version of wu-ftpd. People will be urged to patch it or move to a real FTP server.

    A new bug that allows root access will be found in the latest version of Sendmail. People will be urged to patch it or move to a real MTA

    A kid will be diagnosed with cancer, and will have few days left. People will send him lots of postcards.

    Youll receive a warning about a terrible virus that can reformat your hard drive, and neither Microsoft nor the antivirus companies has the ability to fix it.

    Motorolla will fill for Chapter 11 because it spent so much money giving cellular phones to everybody who sent lots of e-mails

    Amazon will not make profit in 2002

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  9. Your desktop PC specs in 2004 by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Your desktop PC specs in 2004

    Your desktop PC in 2004: Two years from now, your desktop system will be slimmer and trimmer. Flat-panel screens will replace bulky CRTs, and rewritable-DVD drives and fast graphics subsystems will turn your PC into a movie lover's dream.

    And DVD and CD so fscked up with copy protection that you can't use any of it on your PC

    CPU and RAM: 4- to 5-GHz microprocessor with 512MB of DDR memory and a 600-MHz system bus

    Try more memory, 512 isn't that uncommon in off the shelf computers today. And as for CPU, how about mentioning 64 bits, like the Hammer, instead of yammering on about that ancient Pentium 4

    Hard disk: From 300GB to 400GB on a Serial ATA bus

    And no backup technology even close, so you'll have to have RAID standard or risk losing all those pr0n videos. Rather have SCSI, too.

    Removable storage: Rewritable DVD and -- yes -- the unsinkable 1.44MB floppy

    DVD+RW or something else, perferably without some built in copy protection lock, like HP's unit has.

    Internet connection: Cable or DSL broadband if you're lucky; 56-kbps modem if not

    If there's ANY left and IF they provide in a reasonably open service format and IF it doesn't cost $100/mo so they're profitable.

    Video: 3D graphics card with 128MB of video RAM

    And still able to play NetHack? :)

    Display: 18- to 21-inch flat-panel LCD screen capable of 1600 by 1200 resolution

    And weighs less than 20 lbs and lasts longer than 30 minutes on battery? I'd be happy with inexpensive 17", thanks.

    Ports: USB 2.0 and IEEE 1394

    Input devices: Wireless (Bluetooth) mouse and keyboard

    What? Now Eye-mouse or Gyromouse?

    Operating system: Some version of Windows (you expected Linux, perhaps?)

    Some version of Linux (you expected Windows, perhaps?)

    Other: An 802.11b wireless network designed for users with more than one PC

    Or a more up to date version of 802.11, but why not network it to more than just PC's, or did the future vision 15 watt bulb start to grow dim?

    Price: $1,500 to $2,000

    Well, ok, but only because the $900 model has that crappy P4 in it.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar