Star Ballz Trumps Lucas
baby_head_rush writes: "The company that created pr0n cartoon Star Ballz won in court. George Lucas and company lost their first bid to stop its sale.
A judge with some common sense. There is 'little likelihood of confusion' between Star Wars and Star Ballz." Not for young eyes.
I sense a grave disturbance in the force.
He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
"Luke, I am your father."
"You're never ready, just less unprepared."
did Judge Claudia Wilken have to watch both movies to determine that there was little chance of confusion?
because whatever it is that "Star Ballz" is gonna be, from the looks of things, it's going to be better than Episode 2!
This is the NFL, which stands for "Not For Long" if you keep making those bulls*** calls.
'I got a NAUGHTY feeling about this.'
Star Ballz: The plot, dialogue and characterization are no better than Episode 1, but at least the chicks get naked.
-------------------------------------------------
charlton heston is more of a man than yo
...and have Natalie Portman in a sex scene so all these damn /. trolls will finally shut up!
At least one sale :)
I sense a grave disturbance in the force.
The disturbance you're referring to is George Lucas.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
I wonder if Mel Brooks have an arguement then.
:-)
"I bet she give GREAT helmet."
You CAN here that in a pr0n flick, after all...
I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
How Wude.
Am I the only one?
Probably. Next question?
Yes, its unsuitable, and its inappropriate and unthinkable and unconscionable and and wont somebody please think of the children!?!?
Liberty in your lifetime
Not everybody's grasp of English is extensive enough to understand what pr0n or "not for young eyes" might mean.
That's why it's in the dictionary...
pr0nI didn't think star wars was that bad.