Slashdot Mirror


Linus Does Not Scale

EmilEifrem writes: "Seems like everybody's getting more and more frustrated by Linus' (in-) ability to handle patches. Rob Landley just wrote an "RFC on Penguin Patch Management" wherein he proposes a "Penguin Patch Lieutenant" system that he believes would scale better. The full discussion can be found on the Linux kernel mailing list. Linus seems to dislike it, as usual, source code maintenance tools/organization are for wimps!, but a lot of others find it a good idea. Anyway, it's a very good read."

18 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Submit to The Hurd! by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Funny

    After all, that's what you get with a monolithic kernel and it is only going to get worse. The writing is on the wall and the solution is over here.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  2. OK, it needs top be said... by Your_Mom · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know... If we had a Beowulf Cluster of Linuses...
    *rimshot*
    How about a RAIKA? A redundant array of Kernel Admins? Maybe keep them hot-swapable? That way, if one goes out to the pub, the other one can keep things going....

    OK, I'll just shut up now...

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    1. Re:OK, it needs top be said... by julesh · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about a RAIKA? A redundant array of Kernel Admins


      No, no that would be a RAKA. You're talking about a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Kernel Admins, which would essentially mean that we couldn't have anyone who was being payed to do the job, because that would be too expensive... has to be an array of volunteers, really.

  3. Re:Yeah, but... by JimPooley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who is Linus?

    That kid with the blanket out of Peanuts cartoons. Everyone knows that!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  4. Linux needs a "centralized clearinghouse" by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think this problem points out the biggest issue in regards to Linux--its almost anarchist style of code development.

    I think the folks at IBM and Oracle ought to seriously have a LONG talk with Linux Torvalds himself and convince him to create a true clearinghouse where every improvement is approved by a committee. That way, Linux improvements happen in an organized fashion, which makes things way easier for developers and IT managers.

  5. Linus doesn't scale NOW by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny
    But thanks to the open source licensing involved, developers think these problems can be resolved. Work is being done in the development tree to improve the scheduler, for example. It is reccommended that average users avoid the development tree for the time being, as it frightens easily and still has some bugs to work out (Potty training etc.) Developers are confident that these issues can be resolved fairly quickly.

    If it becomes necessary, we can always fork and branch the development tree further though that will further burden the main development branch so we'd like to avoid it if at all possible.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  6. Re:first post! by lupetto · · Score: 5, Funny


    CVS... does not check for quality or if it breaks anything.

    If you've been following Linux kernel development the last year or so, you could say the same about Linus.

  7. Re:Linus' Reply by NeoTron · · Score: 2, Funny

    "or maybe help grow new ones"....

    So if I, in the future, teach my currently 4-week old son C programming and show him the Linux Kernel source, then......?

    ;)

  8. Re:And why did mankind invent computers? by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny
    What do you think, that Microsoft used Bill Gates' brain to organise the 35 million lines of sourcecode of Windows 2000?

    Apparently they do. Have you got a better explanation? (this is Slashdot, right?)

    No, wait.. now this makes it sound like Linus and BillG work the same way.. mmm...conspiracy..

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  9. Listen to yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I'm no kernel hacker, but I do think the current system could use some improvement.

    So, you have no knowledge or experience with the subject at hand, yet you are eager to offer direction and implement changes. I see a bright future for you as a clueless PHB at any major corporation.

  10. to CVS or not to CVS by YakumoFuji · · Score: 2, Funny

    its easy to see why there will be no consolidated cvs tree for linux. that would make it too bsdish in developmental terms. shock horror gasp! we cant go against the gnu dogma! having subsystem maintainers (aka 'core') commit patches, well we cant move from a 'bazaar' to a 'cathedral' can we? that'd be sleeping with the enemy.

    --

    no sig for you
  11. The Linux Fund? by ansible · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about we set up a fund so that Linus can work on Linux full-time, instead of needing a day job? That's not a permanent fix, but it would help for a while.

  12. Thank God Linus doesn't scale by kramer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine the terror of a 50 foot tall Finnish programmer wandering the streets.

    Now let's just hope RMS doesn't scale either.

    1. Re:Thank God Linus doesn't scale by BasharTeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Thank God Linus doesn't scale
      >Imagine the terror of a 50 foot tall Finnish programmer wandering the streets.

      Programmers scale on the waistline, not in height.

  13. Re:Neither did Moses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damn christians...

    ... you know the BSD devil is just tempting you with CVS.

    bite the fruit of the tree of knowledge, c'mon.

  14. Re:Linux CVS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    In fact it is working quite well for those hacking off of Russell King's arm
    What interesting phrasing. Poor bastard...
  15. Linus does not know CVS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Linus doesn't use CVS or any source control system because he doesn't have a clue about how it works, and how cooperative software development should be done. Please stop giving him points for his ignorance. Period.

    BSD people have been doing very productive and cooperative software for years being based on CVS. It's interesting how they have created more stable and better quality code than the Linux community have achieved, even using the impossible-to-imagine decentralized structure.

    I really wonder why someone in the Linux community who actually have a clue on software management don't setup a CVS tree, give the right permissions to the maintainers and deprecate the dumb Linus centralized model. May it happen that guys as Alan Cox and Marcelo Tosatti are clueless about CVS as well?

    (sorry for the flamebait, it's just that this whole situation is too disgusting)

  16. Re:Neither did Moses by landley · · Score: 3, Funny

    The really amusing part is that I'm an agnostic. :)

    Rob