Slashdot Mirror


Trouble at Stargate SG-1

jonerik writes "Salon has this article today about the troubles behind the scenes for Showtime's "Stargate SG-1." Since Michael Shanks left the show in October (a result of his unhappiness with the show's change in focus to "X-Files"-influenced government conspiracy plotlines), women have been abandoning the show in droves. The problems come at a bad time. MGM, which produces the show, is looking to be bought out by a sugar daddy. And the Sci-Fi Channel, which is taking the program over from Showtime for its sixth and final season, can't be happy at the prospect of ending up with a troubled show with plummeting ratings and a fanbase in revolt. " I have yet to see the more recent episodes, but several of the episodes I have seen have been quite excellent (and some others well... weren't) but I know a lot of people who consider SG1 among the best SciFi on TV. Personally I'll take Lexx & Farscape over it, but its not bad.

9 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Kill your television by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's light entertainment, people. Get a grip.

  2. That sucks... by TechnoLust · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stargate SG1 was a great series. I can't understand why everytime they get a great thing going, they try to imitate something else and end up a failed ripoff of another show's concept. Seems like everytime I find a show I like, they change it or cancel it. Meanwhile usless garbage like Crossing Over with John Edward is STILL on. I didn't buy it the first season. Who is watching that con man?

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
    1. Re:That sucks... by nomadic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Head over to the Skeptics Society's web page if you want to read a good debunking of John Edwards.

  3. a true alpha geek. by re-Verse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Taco proposes marriage on valentines day, 12 hours later, hes posting stories on slashdot, rather than out spening a romantic evening with his new fiancee.

    This, my frineds, is the alpha geek. Aspire to this, and learn from the master.

  4. No!!! by ekrout · · Score: 5, Funny

    No!!!

    CmdrTaco: I have yet to see the more recent episodes, but several of the episodes I have seen have been quite excellent...

    She's gotten to you already! And you just officially became non-single at, like, 9:45am this morning!

    First, it's "No, honey, instead of watching Stargate or X-Files or whatever TV show that is, let's go to the new arts & crafts show at the mall".

    Next, it'll be "Oh, Robby, could you be a doll and clean up the entire house? I'm not feeling too good this week. Don't forget the toilet and the shower."

    Then, she'll be saying "Hey sweetie, don't go with Hemos to that Linux show again. You go every single year and I grow so lonely when you're away. Abandon your friends and let's go rent another movie from Blockbuster!

    Finally, it may come to "Rob, quit it with that damn Slashdot crap already. And why haven't you changed your vulgar and perverted username yet?!"

    ;-)

    My Slashdot Research

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  5. In Hollywood, Wearing Glasses=Smart and Sensitive by Badam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was amused that the Salon article makes such a big deal about women liking Michael Shanks's character (the archeologist) because of his intelligence and sensitivity.

    Really, this is just an example of the old stick-glasses-on-a-really-good-looking-guy routine, and then tell the audience that the guy is unpopular/sensitive/etc. When Michelle Pfeiffer plays dowdy characters, they stick glasses on her too, and the audience is supposed to believe that no one in the movie notices how beautiful she is.

    So, Salon spends pages concocting a complicated explanation for why women find an attractive man attractive. Nice.

    --

    Check out my blog: My Galaxy is Milky Way Adjacent
  6. Re:Are women really that shallow?? by coyote-san · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not just women who are pissed at the change in the series, and it's not just because a character was killed off.

    The conspiracy angle has seriously polluted most of the recent shows. As an exercise on another board we've been reframing some of the recent "non-conspiracy" stories without the adolescent confrontation that's become so common recently. Without exception, everyone agreed that these modified story lines were better drama and closer to the original feel of the episode.

    To be blunt, the series was interesting to adults. But now, dude, you diss'd my man and I gotta cut you! There's nothing wrong with shows directed at teenage males who want to see a righteous ass-kicking, but that's not what Stargate SG-1 has been. This change is as unwanted as if ER became a horror story with at least one vampire victim every week, or the Friends storyline suddenly focused on Monica beating the crap out of Chandler every week and all of his friends abandoned him because they couldn't deal with the spousal abuse.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  7. Jackpot by quantaman · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dr. Daniel Jackson speaks 23 languages, wears glasses, suffers from allergies, and occasionally launches into tedious Spock-like discourses on obscure academic subjects. But women have decided that the quirky character, and the actor who plays him, are all the more appealing for it.

    more than 1,000 protests had been phoned into Cohen's office.

    I knew these women were out there! CmdrTaco won't be the only one!!!

    I wonder if Cohen kept any phone numbers...

    --
    I stole this Sig
  8. Rumored Changes to Show by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Showtime may change one or two things about the show before passing it on to the Sci-Fi Channel, as evidenced by this recently leaked image.

    ---
    "Sic 'em up, little buddy."