Slashdot Mirror


Happy 30th Birthday, Pioneer 10

tlon writes: "Pioneer 10, the spacecraft that brought us the first pictures of Jupiter, turned 30 today. Launched in 1972, the probe is now some 7.4 billion miles away, as it cruises out towards Aldebaran, the eye of Taurus. NASA will attempt to contact the spacecraft today, (it was successfully contacted last year), but the round trip time is over 22 hours. How's that for a ping latency? See Nasa's Pioneer 10 Page for more details."

54 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Ping. by saintlupus · · Score: 4, Funny

    the round trip time is over 22 hours. How's that for a ping latency?

    Could be worse. They could be trying to get to it through @Home.

    --saint

    1. Re:Ping. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny
      Ping time don't bother me. My skillz are so 1337, I could dial in from that rocket and still rack up a couple dozen frags per game with the rail gun.

      Those poor sux0rs just wouldn't know they lost until the next day.

    2. Re:Ping. by limber · · Score: 2, Informative

      They appear to have contacted Pioneer! Here's a short article on it.

      "The signal was loud and clear and I'd like to say this contact worked like a charm," said Larry Lasher, the mission's project manager.

      A radio telescope in Spain received the response 22 hours and six minutes after the signal was sent from us on friday.

      Cool!

  2. Now that is engineering by ColGraff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they do actually manage to contact the probe, that would be very, very cool. They don't build 'em like this anymore, gentlemen - all you need to do to see that is look at the Mars probes. What's really goofy is how now, one of the farthest man-made objects from Earth is completely, mind-bogglingly obsolete from a computing standpoint.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Now that is engineering by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe that way it won't pose as much of a threat to anybody who finds it and they won't bother to come and investigate. It still amazes me how a bunch of scientific types can be so naive that they assume anyone they manage to contact will be just oh so friendly and willing to coexist. Kind of like George Adamski's "space brothers," don't you think? Have these characters all lost their blinking minds? Do we really want to advertize our existence before we have a decent sized fleet in orbit? But then again, they *are* engineers.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    2. Re:Now that is engineering by msaavedra · · Score: 3, Funny
      They don't build 'em like this anymore, gentlemen
      In fact, they rarely built 'em like that back then. My birthday is 2 March 1973, exactly one year younger than Pioneer 10, and I already feel like I'm falling apart. ;^)
      --
      "Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it."
      --Henry David Thoreau
    3. Re:Now that is engineering by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and that is another example of writing bug-free code. (something that programmers still claim cannot happen) That probe was built by some awesome engineers... with a awesome budget...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Now that is engineering by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 2

      [...]and that is another example of writing bug-free code.

      Actually, I seem to remember reading that Pioneer 10 didn't have on-board computers, as in 1969 it was impractical to build a radiation-shielded computer with the space and cost constraints of the Pioneer project.

      I couldn't find a description of the Pioneer 10 hardware, so I could be wrong, though. I did find this page, which is a sort of an interesting piece about how they replaced the PDP-11 which was used to talk to the Pioneer.

    5. Re:Now that is engineering by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, I seem to remember reading that Pioneer 10 didn't have on-board computers[...]

      Well, what do you know. According to Intel, the Pioneer 10 had a 4004 on board. Neat. So, as the old joke goes, in 1972 it took an Intel 4004 to operate a deep-space probe. In 2002, it takes a GHz PIII to run Windows. Things have gone terribly wrong.

    6. Re:Now that is engineering by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      awesome, March 2, 1982 here ^^

    7. Re:Now that is engineering by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      They don't build 'em like this anymore, gentlemen - all you need to do to see that is look at the Mars probes.

      You mean Mars Surveyor, which is doing a fantastic job and sending back detailed information... or do you mean probes like Galleo and NEAR, which lasted long past their designed missions and went on to perform many extra tasks well past their termination date?

      Landing a craft is still risky business... doing flybys is pretty simple in comparison (though still fantastically complicated).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:Now that is engineering by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2

      Engineers aren't na&ïve; scientists are. The difference between theory and practice & all that. The engineers of my acquaintance have been fairly realistic about this sort of thing; the physicists, astronomers, chemists & suchlike have tended to be rather more starry-eyed. There have been some notable exceptions, of course.

  3. Google Cache (karma whoring...) by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google Cache

    Enjoy!

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  4. google cache by SevenTowers · · Score: 5, Informative

    here
    and
    here

    --
    Imperium et libertas
    Autocracy and freedom
  5. Klingon Target Fodder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Once this sucker crosses the neutral zone, it becomes fair game

  6. Today? by cperciva · · Score: 2

    NASA will attempt to contact the spacecraft today, (it was successfully contacted last year), but the round trip time is over 22 hours

    How, exactly, is "today" defined? Do they send out a signal at 1AM and hope to get a reply back at 11PM?

    1. Re:Today? by shokk · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'd say they'd probably wait until the transmitter that is still capable of talking to the probe is 1 hour past being lined up with it, send 'PING', and wait for the earth to go around to the 1-hour-short mark. But that's just me and my illusion of a round Earth speaking.



      Wouldn't that make the signal go off at an angle that would never come close to where the probe was? Imagining that the probe is at the 0 degree mark, you would try to get this to work by blasting a signal at the 345 degree mark and then listen for it at the 15 degree mark? With the probe 7.5 billion miles away, basic trig says that you are shooting the beam 4.33 billion miles to the one side of the probe and listen for it 4.33 billion miles to the other side of it. The earth might be rotating, but the beam is taking a straight line path from where you fired it.



      I would imagine that you have one ground station send the ping fired at the 0 degree mark and 22 hours later another ground station would be listening for it while lined up at that 0 degree mark or somewhere within a cone of reception. Aren't there some communications satellites set up in places near earth to catch the transmissions of probes like this in case the right listening stations are not lined up, sort of as a relay system?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  7. That's a whole lotta time! by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm impressed that something built in 1972 is still functioning. Especially when you consider the rigors of space travel, that's quite a feat!

  8. talk about clear reception.. by supernova87a · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The amazing thing is that the satellite is sending out a signal with as much power as maybe a watch battery, and we're receiving it from over 10^9 km away...

    Of course, the receiving dish is as big as a football field, but still.

  9. IP address? by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what is the ip address of this thing so i can perform a port scan :D

    Would make a killer proxy tho :)

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  10. I have an idea by crystalplague · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if NASA sent out a space probe every year with pretty much the same trajectory. This way each probe could have modern technology, be able to probe faster/better, and if they kept launching them every year, the farthest one would only have to transmit as far as the one release the year after the first was launched so that the 2nd one would amplify and retransmit to the 3rd one and so on and so on.

    ok, now bring on the inevitable jokes about a beowolf cluster of probes.

    1. Re:I have an idea by cperciva · · Score: 5, Informative

      Two major problems:

      First, hardware fails occasionally. The probes would have to be able to send their signals back at least two hops in order to avoid having one failed probe "orphan" many others.

      Second, the trajectories rely upon a particular alignment of planets. If we sent out probes year after year, they'd end up going in completely different directions.

  11. pioneer 10. by The+Hollow+Room · · Score: 5, Funny

    why contact it? Whats it going to say? Still dark. Still dark. Still dark.

    1. Re:pioneer 10. by LadyLucky · · Score: 2
      Whats it going to say

      I think the protocol is more along the lines of

      PING? [22 hrs later] PONG!

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    2. Re:pioneer 10. by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
      More likely they want to know how far it's drifted from where it ought to be.

      -- MarkusQ

  12. Re:I know you're a troll, but... by sweatyboatman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remind me never to move next door to you. Most people I know respond to new neighbors by bringing over food and generally being nice. Your first instinct, I take it, would be to kill them.

    Sweat

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
  13. The reverse may apply, too by Rob+Cebollero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Imagine if one day we *do* see an extraterrestrial probe land here. As far advanced as it will appear to us, it may only be an ancient relic of its creating civilisation.

    --
    Decentralization: the brief interval between the decline of one centralized regime and rise of another.
  14. Re:It's going where? by toxcspdrmn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes - but we only found out about that in 1977 - 5 years after Pioneer was launched.

    --
    "E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
  15. Re:Lond distance comms by LadyLucky · · Score: 2

    Radio waves ARE light. they travel at the same speed, cuz they are the same thing.

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  16. Re:Lond distance comms by Erazmus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out The Speed of Light for a reference to the fact that light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation are the same thing, and therefore travel at the same speed.

    Now, if they're travelling through different mediums, then their speed is different. An interesting chart showing the different speeds through different mediums can be found here.

  17. Re:Lond distance comms by gilroy · · Score: 2

    To be fair to the poster, there is also an effect due to traveling through the dilute plasma of interstellar space. Honest to goodness, there is an Insterstellar Medium whose magnetic properties affect the propogation of radio waves. See, for example, this page.

  18. Re:Speed of light is too slow. by PyroMosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    DH - No, no, no, Light speed's too slow!
    CS - Light speed to slow?
    DH - That's right we'll have to go straight to Ludacrious Speed!
    CS - <shock> Ludacrious speed! Sir, we've never gone that fast before!
    DH - WHAT's THE MATTER COLONEL SANDERS?!? CHICKEN?!?
    CS - <voice cracking> Prepare ship! </voice cracking>Perpare ship for Ludacrious speed! Close all shops in the mall, secure all animals in the zoo! Cancel the three ring circus!
    DH - <grabbing microphone> Give me that you petty excuse for an officer! Now hear this! Ludacrious speed!
    CS - Sir, you better buckle up!
    DH - Awww, bucke this! Ludacrious speed! GO!
    ****************

    What's truly sad is it's all from memory...

  19. Re:Lond distance comms by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    first, as everyone here has said, in space radio = light in speed.

    second, noone has cracked quantum physics enough to discover a way to transmit using another dimension or creating or using wormholes or other FTL technology theories. AS soon as you see proof of multi-dimensional detection, or wormholes, trans-positional quarks, etc.. then I would guess that comms would be the first to follow.

    so either you need to wait about 100 years or hope that a major breakthrough in chaos mathematics or quantum physics.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  20. Say in a hundred years... by Vishniac · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...we invent faster-than-light travel. Should we go out there and collect Pioneer 10 and the Voyager probes and everything else we've launched and put them in a museum for posterity? Or should we let them continue to drift through space, humanity's silent ambassadors to the stars?

    Just a question.

    1. Re:Say in a hundred years... by scorcherer · · Score: 2

      We could probably collect them without FTL travel. They're not exactly moving at c. But to do that we'll need something much more economical than our current propulsion technology.

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

    2. Re:Say in a hundred years... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      .we invent faster-than-light travel. Should we go out there and collect Pioneer 10 and the Voyager probes and everything else we've launched and put them in a museum for posterity? Or should we let them continue to drift through space, humanity's silent ambassadors to the stars?

      We will let them drift. However, once extra-solar system travel becomes dirt cheap, these probes will become tourist traps. Whole shiploads of little brats will go to visit them on field trips. They will become surrounded by porta-potties, discarded hamburger boxes, and T-shirt stands (in all 3 dimensions).

    3. Re:Say in a hundred years... by polymath69 · · Score: 2
      No; in most cases, when galaxies collide, no stars even collide at all. The interstellar distances are great enough to make it improbable, even with the millions and billions of stars involved in such a collision.

      So the same luck of numbers probably protects Pioneer 10, and some of our other probes ...

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
  21. Re:Lond distance comms by Vishniac · · Score: 2, Informative
    The biggest kink in any method of faster-than-light travel OR communication is not the actual method of locomotion (wormholes, hyperspace, warp drive, other dimensions, pixie dust) but the problem of causality and the unsolvable paradoxes that can be created with a faster-than-light signal that carries information (or the FTL courier ship carrying a message).

    Check out the Relativity and FTL Travel FAQ for a better explanation than I can give. I for one hope that Einstein is wrong... the universe is so much more exciting in Star Wars.

  22. Re:Lond distance comms by gilroy · · Score: 2
    Actually, no. The time delay is a frequency-dependant thing. To quote this paper (or rather, its googlized text at this location),

    The ionized interstellar medium causes a dispersion ofthe pulses, such that pulses emitted at low radio frequencies arrive later than those emitted at higher frequencies

    So radio waves will travel slightly less quickly than visible light.
  23. Scene from a future alien press conference... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 4, Funny

    In what has proven to be one of the most sensational discoveries in recent times, scientists have announced that they have discovered a probe originating from a far away alien race. This probe contains a plaque containing a mysterious cryptic message. We go live to an update from the scientific team studying the probe...

    "After much careful studying of the plaque and it's contents we believe we have determined the approximate nature of the message it contains..."

    "It says: Get your free porn here!"

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:Scene from a future alien press conference... by ptbrown · · Score: 2

      So that's the kind of message we might receive from extra-terrestrials. Here I am wasting my time with SETI@home when all I've gotta do is check my inbox.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
  24. So what's in the ping? Top 10: by phloda · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Are wethere yet?
    2. Are we there yet
    3. Arewe there yet?
    4. Arewe there yet?
    5. Are we there yet?
    6. Arewe there yet?
    7. Are we there yet?
    8. Are wethere yet?
    9. Are we there yet?
    10. Are we there yet?

  25. Re:Oh, really? by orcrist · · Score: 2

    Like the American Indians who fed the Pilgrims?

    And did the pilgrims need the American Indians' help finding America? Any civilization advanced enough to wage a successful war across interstellar distances certainly won't need a roadmap from us to get here. They'll be picking up Gilligan's Island reruns LONG before they find Voyager; so put away the shotgun Wilbur.

    -chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  26. Re:Lond distance comms by alienmole · · Score: 2

    According to general relativity, gravity propagates at the speed of light. There aren't any known shortcuts, even in theory, around the problem of communicating any information whatsoever faster than lightspeed. It might be possible to do something with quantum nonlocality, but I've yet to see a credible suggestion for doing that.

  27. s/billion/million/ by Ignatius · · Score: 2

    Of corse, you already knew that (0.04c would be too good to be true).

  28. I think NASA beat everybody with this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All the wear, pitting, and erosion that Pioneer 10 has sustained are probably over now. The asteroid belt and the severe conditions of Jupiter have already been experienced. Now, Pioneer is in the vacuum of space where the average spatial density of molecules is one trillionth the density of the best vacuum we can draw on Earth. We expect Pioneer to last an indeterminate period of time, probably outlasting its home planet, the Earth. In 5 billion years, the Sun will become a red giant, expand, envelop the orbit of the Earth, and consume it. Pioneer will still be out there in interstellar space. Erosional processes in the interstellar environment are largely unknown, but are very likely less efficient than erosion within the solar system, where a characteristic erosion rate, due largely to micrometeoritic pitting, is of the order of 1 Angstrom/yr. Thus a plate etched to a depth ~ 0.01 cm should survive recognizable at least to as distance ~ 10 parsecs, and most probably to 100 parsecs. Accordingly, Pioneer 10 and any etched metal message aboard it are likely to survive for much longer periods than any of the works of Man on Earth.


    Read that last sentence again. Pioneer 10 is likely to become one of the longest lasting things that mankind has ever created. Think deeply.... that is one heavy-duty accomplishment.

  29. Gravity Mystery by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pioneer 10 is part of a Gravity Mystery that is yet to be solved. A story about it:

    http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/05/21/gravity.m ystery/

    Gravity still stumps physicists like almost nothing else. This may be a hint for a new breakthru in our understanding of gravity.

  30. Contact made! by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 5, Informative
  31. Re:If it were going the speed of light... by supermoose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're actually off by about a factor of 10.

    7.4 billion miles ~= 11.8 billion km

    Which would mean that it actually takes 11 hours to get there at the speed of light... just like the radio message sent by NASA that was mentioned in the article. =) Doh!

    Am I alone in finding the fact that there was a mistake making distance conversions in a thread about NASA rather funny?

  32. Pioneer 6 by Catmeat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I suppose I better submit the obligitory comment to a Pioneer 10 story, that is the oldest functioning spacecraft is actually Pioneer 6. This was launched on the 16th of December 1965 and orbits the sun, roughly midway between Earth and Mars. It was last contacted in 2000. Story

    Deep-space spacecraft tend to me much longer lived than Earth orbiting ones as they aren't subject to Van-Allen radiation, nasty atomic oxygen effects plus the thermal cycling stresses you get from going from sunshine into shadow and back into sunshine every obit.

  33. Pioneer 10 v. "Bare Budget" Mars Projects by BitMan · · Score: 3
    "They don't build 'em like this anymore, gentlemen - all you need to do to see that is look at the Mars probes."

    You should really compare Pioneer 10 v. Galileo, Cassini or other, similar-costing, "full QA" projects from NASA. The "better, faster, cheaper" Mars probes that gained a lot of noteriety in their failures are NOT good comparisons based on their cost and lack of equivalent QA/testing.

    Simple engineering risk analysis showed NASA that the orders of magnitude in additional cost are worth it to guarantee an over 99% chance of success, versus less than 50% in the BFC approach. NASA will no longer attempt to build probes like those three Mars BFC projects (of which, only one was a success) again.

    --
    -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith
    Independent Author, Consultant and Trainer
  34. Question by Cplus · · Score: 2

    If anyone in nearby solar systems is making as much noise in space as we are would we be able to hear it?

    How far are we detectable?

    If anyone out there is doing things similar to those that we do should we be hearing them?

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  35. UPDATE 12:05EST - CONTACT MADE by crumbz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just saw on CNN that contact was made via a radio telescope just east of Los Angeles.

  36. we should use it as a backup by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    Too bad there are no harddrives big enough on that thing to be able to backup all the earth's history as we know it. We could still do it, back up everything we can possibly think of onto non magnetic storage devices, some DVDs I guess and send all this stuff to space.

    On a lighter note, what are the taxes for running a business out of a satelite flying some 7.4 billion km away from earth in space? Could we have a beow... sorry