Slashdot Mirror


China Ahead in Stem-Cell Research

Andrew writes: "New Scientist is reporting (for free) on the WSJ's China clones human embryos story: "Chinese scientists are claiming a great leap forward in human cloning - the creation of dozens of cloned embryos advanced enough to harvest embryonic stem cells."" The lengthy Wall Street Journal story is also on MSNBC.

16 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. I'd hate to be GWB. by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... But then I hate GWB.

    The poor boy is now solidly stuck between his Oh So Rightous right wing religious supporters and the need to keep the United States up with the rest of the world in genetic research. It looks like science suffers at the hands of the Morality police.

    Hasn't this happened before?... (Galileo, Darwin, ...)

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:I'd hate to be GWB. by IPFreely · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So I guess we should be thanking open-minded, understanding Chinese government for their enlightened views on humanity and science.

      I'd bet that Chinese scientest have about the same attitude as US or other scientest do about science: Learn more, Understand better.
      I'd also bet that the chinese people, scientest, and government each have different attitudes about the role of science (the same is true in the US and other places). I don't give the chinese government any credit other than being smart enough to not tromp all over the advancement of learning and understanding (something GWB and the "Morality Police" haven't been able to do).

      If you want to argue what is best for society via science, that's one thing. If you simply want to look for any reason to demean religion (let's cut to the chase...Christanity) don't expect people to give you much credence.

      Point. I do not demonize religion in general (though I did not clearify that), I demonize those individual people who use religion as an excuse to enforce their opinions on others, to supress people, to supress the truth, to glorify theirselves, and to gather personal power in the name of their religion (Plenty of history on that count in any religion).

      The "religious right" that currently influences much of the politics in the US embodies much of those qualities, and as far as I can tell embodies very little of the teachings of their namesake savior, Jesus Christ.

      Galileo suffered not because his opinions went against the teachings of the church, but because he challanged the authority of the church by claiming that his discoveries disproved a few items in the bible and therefore the bible as a whole must be considered suspect. It was a power struggle, not a religious one.
      Darwin suffered because Rightious people would not accept a less superior place in the order of life as described by evolution.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  2. Embryo cloning, abortion? by xSterbenx · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I always thought that it was interesting how the United States can allow abortion (the killing of an unborn embryo) but not embryo cloning/harvesting (the killing of an unborn embryo), especially since embryo cloning can bring some good. While I remain pro-life myself, I could never quite understand this hypocrisy.

    I find it also interesting how the one main country with whom the United States has mixed in civil rights with trade agreements is the country that may end up further along in this line of research. Of course, one could say that Hitler had learned a lot through research as well. How far can we allow our morality to stretch to further the advancement of the human race?

    1. Re:Embryo cloning, abortion? by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First off, I am decidedly pro-choice.

      Now: I believe the difference lies in intent. Cloning/harvesting is making a baby with no intent on making a person. Abortions (should) occur only when a couple has no intention of making a baby, but *oops*. US law states that embyroes in very early stages can be killed, as it cannot live outside of the mother (without assistance) and is thus 'part of the mother' and she has the right to do whatever things to herself she wants as long as she does not endanger herself, or anyone else. (the debate is wether she can further endanger someone who cannot live outside her)

      Personally I believe that abortion should be allowed, and is the worst, last option in birth control, but still far better than having a child that cannot be loved and supported as one should.

    2. Re:Embryo cloning, abortion? by ArticulateArne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I assume you mean to say your morality. Please don't presume to speak for anyone but yourself. There are plenty of people with different viewpoints than your own. These people are just as "moral" as you.

      Indeed? How does one define morality? Are all viewpoints moral, or are some more moral than others? And if some are more moral, who gets to decide why they're more moral?

      The idea that everybody gets to pick their own morality is a common and attractive one in today's intellecutal milieu. Yet, it ultimately reduces the meaning of morality to absolutely nothing. There absolutely must be some common definition that people can work from in determining what is and is not moral. It's like trying to do math where everybody gets to pick their own values for different numbers - some people might come close to each other's results when solving a few problems, but the system will break down extremely quickly. Is morality defined by consensus? How much of a consensus is necessary? Are we able to declare immoral the behavior of any group that ever had a consensus?

      I'm curious where you're coming from here, and how you make your definition of morality stand.

  3. Oddly appropriate Fortune on this page (+5 Spooky) by Pii · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When I went to look at the comments for this page, the fortune quote at the bottom read:
    The entire CHINESE WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL TEAM all share ONE personality -- and have since BIRTH!!
    Spooky!
    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  4. Re:Evil by jonbrewer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the future might turn out an ugly place.

    I believe the present is an ugly place. Read a newspaper. Look at some pictures of dead Palestinians, and think how complacent the US is in their deaths.

    And as for "evil, soulless facist governments," are you implying that the US is any better? We only ban this research because of the religious right. Get religion out of government and we'd be doing this, no question.

  5. This is news... but not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe that, if you dig into some of the KGB stuff from the early 80's, the russians were (as a military experiment) working on human body modification through genomic experimentation and gene mutation/cloning. Alot of the documents are obviously still hidden away, but there was a site I visited last year that was a clearing house for recently declassified documents from the Moscow bureau.

    While nothing specifically mentioned the cloning, analyists who had been looking for hints on space weapons, stealth bomber/fighters, and missing prisoners came to the conclusion that some of the rumors about human cloning in remote siberian research stations were not without backing evidence. This was due to a small trickle of the worst dissidents, those who had good health records and whom were fit and free from known genetic diseas in their families, were disappearing.

    These stations still remain closed to the world and heavily guarded, and there are only rumors. Rumors like men being bred from birth with extra ribs and denser/thicker muscles and bones. Men who had enhanced senses of smell or night time eyesight.

    A few of the people who went "missing" from soviet prisons for serious crimes were noted as re-appearing years later in soviet Marine Infantry brigades (spetznat) with clouded service records, but it is difficult to imagine Russia in the 80's having the technical knowhow or where with all to be able to "mutate" or modify already grown adults. I toss that one out though as an x-files kind of rumor that sure could scare the kids up around Mermansk.

    Like I said, alot of rumors... but it makes you think. You gotta wonder what the CIA paid for too... there is alot of black budget money that doesn't get tracked beyond the agency front door... they managed to produce the Blackbird that way, and U2/TR1 as well as who knows what. I wonder if the gov't has dabbled in genetic mutation or embryonic modification/cloning...

    Oh well, in direct comment to the article and posters here, let me go on the record that I think this is not a bad thing. China is not looking to increase their population (which they have difficulty controlling or feeding as is now)... they are doing research to A) Best the US and Europe at their own game, and B) come up with medical breakthrough that meet condition A and benefit their own society as well... maybe even boost their economy with something original that only they can produce, that being working genetic medicines they for once control under patent.

  6. Next man on the moon? by rufusdufus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The next man on the moon will be chinese too. They have a plan for manned mission in the near future.
    Our science fiction always assumes that space colonization and the "future" will be dominated by western ideals, but as things are trending now, the future looks brighter for asia.

  7. Re:Evil by detect · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So let me get this right: Stem cells hold the potential for good but without pondering the cliche consequences, the future might become an ugly place? Ok.

    Which Governments actually do shows signs of fascism? What countries impose bans on scientific research and raise tariffs on imported goods all while preaching on Democracy and Free Trade?

    --
    // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
  8. Picture this in court.... by kwishot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would be a step backwards in court cases that rely on DNA evidence.

    With people being truly identical in every which way (not including haircuts and stuff like that) including DNA, it would be nearly impossible to prove innocence or guilt of one of the clones in a court case that currently relies on such technologies.

    Think about it...
    "Your client was on the security camera and it was his blood on the floor"

    "No, your honor, it was his identical clone with the same DNA - my client was nowhere near the place of the incident"

    -kwishot

  9. Facism has nothing to do with Communism by HanzoSan · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Because the USA is filled with Facism as well, perhaps we arent as bad as Germany, Russia, China, but we arent as good as some other places in Europe, or NZ either.

    As far as freedom goes, Communism does have its benifits, one of them is science benifits greatly from it because scientists have complete freedom.

    The only problem China faces is the fact that they have too many people and not enough jobs for them all, their government is out of order, right now we are entering the information age, resources and man power will matter less, information will matter more, and in this situation, the bigger population shall have more producers of information.

    China and Communism benifits from this greatly, however because of their stupidity they are restricting information through censorship, if they ever allow their people to actually access the information then we'd be left in the dust.

    Then again we have problems like that here (Copyright is a form of Censorship)

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Facism has nothing to do with Communism by ponxx · · Score: 1, Interesting
      > Because the USA is filled with Facism as well, perhaps we arent as bad as Germany [...]

      I think you will find most Germans would take offense at being called fascist today... I have lived there for a while, and it is a hell of a lot "less" fascist today than most other countries, including the US. Most of the stuff the Republican party (and parts of the Democrats) come out with would be labelled "extreme-right"/"neo-nazi" if a German party dared voice such views.

      These things are slightly more acceptable in England or France, but again, no-where near like the US. (partially of course because the US can get away with it and is not as dependent on cooperation with other countries as European nations are)

      ponxx

  10. Last Super Power on Earth ? by RembrandtX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its sad to think that I will probally be the last generation in my family to have known the USA as a technological superpower.

    With increasing restrictions on scientific study, assanine patent law, and scientific monopolies - it seems everyone is out for either the buck or the moral highground. [or a political office.]

    Hobbes would be proud, since he was the first to preach that to inturrupt the 'process' of god was a sin. Apparantly cloning (as well as violent video games and open source software) falls into this catagory.

    Am i using a sweeping generality , you betchya`. Is it far from the truth ? not really as far as I would like it to be.

    While i must say .. im registered as a Republician, and fairly conservative about stuff in general. I'm ironically a futurist. I think we should be more green, use cleaner technology, and improve our life/life style. But keeping the cost to future generations in account.

    Apparantly the way the govt slid the last 8 years, was to pander to the highest voting majority, go back to our 16th centruy religious roots, and avoid change.

    change apparantly is evil. and will destroy our 'family' values. Whatever values they have 'saved' in 15 years when people are mutating horribly due to all the petrolium toxins in the air/water/soil won't matter .. its TODAY that counts.

    As the US becomes more and more self centered and less a 'world' player .. we are going to isolate ourselves from new technology .. new ideas. [fun experiment, ask your average religious right how much the yen is at .. or the euro .. and see if they know.]

    Anyone see what japan did ? Japanese as a culture are rather xenophobic. [Just watch a 6 foot tall black man walk down a street in Yokohama .. and you will understand what i mean.] When a society isolates itself socially, it stagnates. They may have been a super-power economy once, but the bubble burst - and with that loss of economy, the last 40 years of growing pains are showing.

    Incest between mother and son is common due to bonds formed from 'exam' stress. Rape and molestation is practicaly a way of life for young girls. And 12 year old prostitutes in the Tokyo/yokahama area are not only common, but ALMOST accepted. Theft and crime, once unthinkable (outside organized gangs) are becoming common place.

    Again, im being general here .. some to make a point, some to save time.

    I just wonder, how much of 'protecting our values' Japan did 10-15 years ago. Are we repeating the same social mistakes? By refusing to let our scientists to explore? When our future is being decided by people who are holding onto beliefs that were founded 2000 years ago, when the world (to them) comprised of about 1/3 of europe - is that system equiped to handle the way the world is now ?

    would you choose to program your new graphics application in C++ ? or COBOL ?

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  11. Re:What does it say when... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well, I'm definitally not a Stalinist, but I would argue that socialism under Stalin was largely effective, if not steadily antilibertarian. However, the class shall note that Stalin did to a number of things to further democratize the Soviet Union, such as ammend the constitution to have elections by anonymous ballot.

    You are deluded. Stalin wrote a really great constitution, he also had practically all the members of the Supreme Soviet that enacted it murdered. Stalin's 'secret ballots' consisted of an option to go behind a curtain to mark your ballot rather than just place it in the box and have it count automatically for the party candidate. In Stalin's time most of the people who went behind the curtain were murdered.

    Stalin's state had little to do with any political creed other than opportunism and the persuit of power. There is even evidence that Stalin originally joined the communist party as a Tsarist mole.

    As for Stalin's effect on the economy, it can only be considered positive compared to the stagnation under the Tsars. Most of the progress took place under Lenin in any case, Stalin was too busy massacring Kulacks by the million and issuing edicts that twenty plants be built when there was material for three with the result that none were completed.

    The only positive effect the communists had was they diverted the massive flows of capital that the Tsars had squandered on themselves and poured it into industrial developments, but that did not require a police state.

    However, that said, it is quite hilarious that the response of US side folk to the thought that China might surpass them scientifically is to dredge up cold war rhetoric. China has not been a Stalinist state since Mao died and the gang of four were liquidated. Today it is merely an under-developed kleptocracy. If China was not a rival to US power and did not call itself communist the GOP hawks would have no trouble at all supporting them no matter how many people the regime kills.

    If you have a billion people and a part way modernised economy you canout perform a country of a quarter your size in a few selected areas of science. There is little reason to believe that the Chinese version of communism will be any more long lasting than the Soviet one. The only difference is that in China the impetus for change is comming from economic success rather than stagnation. Nobody believes in Chinese communism, the issue for Chinas leaders is not whether they adopt a democracy but how they get from where they are to where they want to be.

    If China succeeds in a peaceful democratic transition they will inevitably outstrip US power in the same way and for the same reason that the US suceeded the UK, population size.

    China is planning to become a biotech super-power. That is not the immediate threat to the US however since it is unlikely many US scientists would move to China. Many will move and are moving to the UK and Canada however.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  12. Re:Lack of Ethics in Chinese Society by SEE · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Who are you to impose a global ethical standard on anyone? Ethics is a totally subjective ideal and there is no act that can alone be considered wrong or right,

    Who are you to object to his imposing a global ethical standard on anyone? If ethics are a totally subjective ideal, then how can his act of imposition be considered wrong or right?