Slashdot Mirror


Hardware Review: Rio Central

My ongoing quest to find the perfect MP3 playing stereo component continues this week with the Rio Central. This is a $1500 box with a 40 gig hard drive that aims to do everything audio, from feeding reciever units, burning CDs, and populating portables, and of course, providing an interface to manage your tunes and play them on your stereo. And it's built on Linux- a USB keyboard is all you need to get to a command line!

I'll be frank- I was excited to see this box. A 40 gig drive makes this thing on the right side of the space curve since it means I can store a large enough portion of my CDs to make it useful. Of course as anyone who has designed or even used a large scale MP3 player knows, with great gobs of disk space comes the burden of attempting to create a UI to do manage great gobs of music.

What's the first thing you do with a 40 gig MP3 player? You plug it in and start ripping CDs. The unit is physically nice looking- it seems a bit big, but most of that is the large screen (which is unfortunately kind of dim). It has USB ports on the front and back. Optical audio connection is available but I tested it with standard RCAs plugged into the stereo in my office since I was familiar with the audio quality of this system having been listening to both CDs and MP3s for a long time here.

The box has a copy of a big chunk of CDDB on it, so it doesn't really need net access to rip a lot of CDs. However it does have a modem port, and an HPNA network connection for people using phone lines in their house as a sort of poor mans ethernet. I'm seeing a lot of consumer electronics with HPNA connections and it looks like a good compromise. Unfortunately the unit doesn't have a built in ethernet adapter, and it only supports a handful of USB ethernet adapters, so I had to order one in order to get this thing on my office network (to review the Rio Reciever which is a seperate device: review forthcoming).

Allright with all of that out of the way, it was time to rip a CD. The drive tray is white which is a minor nitpick, but it really is a sore thumb on the smooth looking black case. But hey, thats just my anal retentive side. Ripping CDs is trivially easy: stick it in and confirm the title. I ripped several discs without trouble (Gorillaz, Daft Punk, Ben Folds), but one had a problem (Blink 182's Dude Ranch). It just hung and there wasn't much I could do about it except eject.

Playback and navigation is a mixed bag. Doing common operations is pretty easy but constructing elaborate playlists is obviously going to be more work. Several nifty random options exist, like playing your most played tracks, or your least played tracks instead of going purely random. Very cool. I will say that this has the best UI of any stereo component MP3 player I've seen, but you need to get up close to do complicated stuff just to read the screen.

The audiotron allows a web interface. The ZapStation lets you use the TV to control playlists. Both devices have shortcomings, but at least there are ways to control your playlist without pulling your ass out of the recliner. The Rio's Remote and screen just don't cut it from more than 6-8 feet away.

The gee whiz stuff that is worth mentioning- having a hard drive in your stereo adds that plesant whirring sound. I'm sure that bugs people besides me. You probably won't notice it at a reasonable distance, but its there. The audio fidelity on the whole is as good as can be expected. We all know what MP3 encoding does to your tunes if you have a reasonable speakers. There are also silly little visualization things on the screen if you are into that. Its fun, but obviously its not the reason someone would buy this thing ;) But I know people who buy an EQ just to have the fancy lights in their stereo, so obviously some people dig it.

For those of you who are interested in getting under the hood, throwing in larger hard drives should be relatively easy. And with 100 gig drives at $200, you could really make this thing sing. If you plug a USB keyboard in, you can ease navigation in the UI... or hit ctrl-alt-delete, and suddenly the Rio Central's screen gives you an honest to god Linux Shell Prompt. There are a few games too, but thats just a nifty bonus, you won't be spending any quality time on them.

Getting audio onto the box through methods other than ripping CDs (or letting it read MP3s off a CDR) is tougher. The box has FTP, so getting MP3s onto the hard drive is easy... a little command line program to import a directory of MP3s would be swell. There's also an open source java application under development called jempeg which should eventually support the Central since it is based on the Empeg car player. That will Greatly ease the annoying process of getting your gigs of existing tracks onto the box.

There are a few other features that I didnt' really test. You can burn CDs or feed a few different MP3 portables. The UI to do this is pretty simple but I didn't have any CDRs or a portable MP3 player to test it out with.

Summary: Ethernet should be built in. Buying a $40 adapter for a $1500 unit is just silly considering the target audience for this thing. At $500-$750 the Rio Central would be a much easier recommendation. Maybe $500, and you add your own hard drive. But I know full well that such a thing currently isn't economically possible for a vendor. I still feel like the home MP3 player is over priced and can't imagine it catching on until it gets a bit closer to the price of big CD changer. But in terms of usability, this is the best one I've tested yet, and the standard 40G hard drive is probably enough for most people.

Coming Soon: the review of the Rio Reciever- this little baby connects over your network to the Rio Central and brings audio to any room you have an ethernet connection. This is what makes the Rio Central stand out. But you'll have to wait a few days to read about it here ;)

53 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. Bad reviewer, no doughnut by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    C'mon, it's a review of a $1500 piece of hardware that does what an $800 computer can do if you give it a good sound card and a burner. Give me reasons why it should be bought!

    1. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by Loligo · · Score: 4, Informative

      >Give me reasons why it should be bought!

      Because some people don't want a big ugly beige box sitting next to their stereo rack?

      Because some people have $1500 but not the skills to assemble, configure, and install their own components, OS, and software?

      Because some people want a single person to call when the box up and dies, instead of having to diagnose whether to call Asus, Creative Labs, Micron, PC Power & Cooling, or Nvidia?

      I dunno. Why should a lawyer buy one of these to put into his office when he can simply take a slew of billable hours out of his time to save $700 building a Frankenclone box that doesn't match his decor?

      I just can't come up with anything.

      -l

    2. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because some people have $1500 but not the skills to assemble, configure, and install their own components, OS, and software?

      Good thing it was reviewed on Slashdot then.

      --

      It hurts when I pee.
    3. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by Loligo · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Good thing it was reviewed on Slashdot then.

      I'd suggest reading at -1 for a while and then coming back here to tell me that you honestly think more than 75% of Slashdot's readerbase has the skills to tie their own shoes or feed themselves, much less build a computer.

      -l

    4. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by batkiwi · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think this IS way overprices.

      I bought the sonic blue reciever for 99$, and felt it was a great deal.

      This is not aimed at someone who would dream of having a computer with their REAL audio equipment. This is for an audio junkie who wants a nice looking, nice sounding, high quality mp3 storage/playback/burning station to go with their other components.

      But for a concrete list of reasons:

      -it's already set up. No cobbling together hardware/software with a remote listner to try to get it to do stuff. This already does it OOTB

      -it will feed rio recievers. Sure you could hack apache to do it (i have it running at home) but it REALLY is a chore if you're not computer inclined. audio junkies can rip there, and listen anywhere in their house that they have a rio reciever.

      -it looks nice. Your computer would not fit in with audio equipment, This does. It has a nice lcd screen, a nice remote, and a nice looking (non computer looking) case. You can get those tiny shuttle cases, or other plastic cases, or make your own, but they still look like a computer.

      -it has high quality audio parts. Your soundblaster live/etc can not compare to solid state parts. It's the same reason that professional musicians buy a 1000$ audio input card that "does the same thing" your 90$ sb-audigy does.

      It's like the tivo debate... sure you can hack something together that does it all, but a tivo looks nice, works nice, and is already set up for you.

    5. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by beckett · · Score: 2

      the thing is, i've tried everything, and i'm looking at stuff like this now. why? i've done the computer by the reciever. i've done the 2.4ghz video tranmitters. i've tried the long ass cords. these are the things that upset me with "brew your own"

      1) i've got a 2000 stereo system, and i'm still relying on headphone jacks to get my sound out.

      2) i'm the only person in the house that knows how to play a DVD through my system

      3) the fan is loud. the box is clunky.

      so in a nutshell, the computer will do you fine. so will using a set of slip-joint pliers instead of a sledge hammer to pound in a nail. when you buy a stereo system, you want everything easy to use as a remote control, easier if possible.

      I'm looking for a sleek box that does all the functions i want from your computer as a media center. I'd pay more for ease of use and usability, and that's why i'd be interested in buying something like this.

      however, IMHO i'll keep looking, becauuse this overpriced RIO box is just dang ugly. clunky too.

    6. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      >Give me reasons why it should be bought!

      Because some people don't want a big ugly beige box sitting next to their stereo rack?

      A can of Krylon will fix that.

      Because some people have $1500 but not the skills to assemble, configure, and install their own components, OS, and software?

      I'd think that the number of /.ers who fall into that category is fairly small. As for the blinking-12:00 crowd, I don't think they've even heard of MP3s.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    7. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      It's like the tivo debate... sure you can hack something together that does it all, but a tivo looks nice, works nice, and is already set up for you.

      Your analogy is slightly flawed...a TiVo does considerably more than you would likely bother to hack together. Anybody can throw an All-In-Wonder into a computer and tell it to record a certain channel at a certain time of the week. It takes a bit more ingenuity to get it to track down every episode of Star Trek wherever/whenever it might be showing and record all of them. It takes more still for it to figure out what stuff you might like, record it without any intervention on your part, and make it available.

      I've heard of PVR software that works with your TV-tuner card to provide basic recording functionality, but they usually do little more than turn your computer into a VCR. I haven't heard of PVR software that can do what a TiVo does.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Bad reviewer, no doughnut by boopus · · Score: 2

      Well, your criticism of his anology is slightly flawed. If you replace every mention of TiVo with "rio reciver" your comment is still valid. The rio reciver lets you have a CD jukebox that holds more CDs that would probably fit in the space, all available at the touch of a few buttons.

      The software the empeg guys("sonicblue guys" doesn't work for me) have created is far more advanced than what you would come up with by yourself. I've never actualy used a rio reciver, but I've got two empegs/RioCars and the hardware is great but the software makes it usuable while driving. You can't pick up a mouse and scroll through your mp3 collection while driving on the freeway, but with the empeg is takes 5 secconds to add the song that you just thought of to the current playlist. Are you listening on random and want to hear another song by that artist that just played? One button on the remote. Are you listening on random and don't want to hear more from the artist/album/year that's playing? That's just one button press away. This software is essentialy the same on the reciver, except that you can rip CDs.

      Criticising the software without having used it is sort of off base...

  2. Rio hardware is nice stuff... by tgd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't particularly like Sonic Blue as a company -- they seem to have gobbled up and ruined a lot of good product lines, but I've used the Empeg before (which they bought), and own two Rio Receivers. (Which seem to be based on the Empeg technology, from the looks of the software running on them).

    I love the Rio Receivers. I have two of them -- one in the living room, and one in my bedroom, streaming music from a Linux server running JReceiver. I can access all my MP3's, as well as listen to streaming music sources over the net on my stereo with a minimum of hassle.

    Although a lot of the college students on here (or unemployed ex dot com people) have time to build one off solutions, for $1500, these are a good buy for those of us who unfortunately don't have time available to custom build solutions. For $99, the Rio Receivers were a no-brainer, I just wish I had bought a couple more.

  3. Audiotron? by dimer0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still don't understand why people would buy these things. You already (well, should!) have plenty of space on a PC in your home. You can already rip mp3s. The only thing is you can't cue them up on a stereo component.

    Get an Audiotron for $199 or so, and you're done. Use your existing collection. Why waste money..

    1. Re:Audiotron? by GlobalEcho · · Score: 2

      I have to concur. The Atron is really *more* functional than this monstrosity because it plays so nicely with a network share (from OSX in my case).

      I don't understand why all these manufacturers are putting HD's (at premium prices) in MP3 hardware. It's chaos! I'm annoyed enough just syncing my iPod. Owning 2 or 3 of these things and keeping them in sync would be a $3000+ headache I *don't* need...

      ...especially since I have 2 Audiotrons. They rock. And yes, they have digital out so I can use a real DAC.

      /me sells 100 shares of SonicBlue short

    2. Re:Audiotron? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      you can.

      802.11 accesspoint.
      audiotron.

      connect the two with a crossover 10baseT cable.

      voila wireless audiotron.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. cool box by laserjet · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are the features of the box:

    * Digitally records and stores your entire music collection in a single location.
    * Powerful 40 GB hard drive can store more than 650 CDs or 6,500 individual songs.
    * Write standard audio CDs or MP3 data CDs using the integrated CD-RW drive.
    * Move your MP3 music collection off of the PC and into the living room (use either a network connection or USB to transfer MP3's from your PC to your Rio Central).
    * Create an unlimited number of customized playlists based on personal style, taste, or mood. Or, let the Rio Audio Center determine what you want to hear based on your listening habits.
    * Large display, intuitive interface and advanced search features make it easy to find the music you want instantly.
    * Frees your home of bulky CD collections and saves you from the hassle of searching through stacks of CDs to find a favorite song or album.
    * Shares music with Rio portables via convenient USB ports in front and back of unit.
    * Encodes at a bitrate of up to 320 kbps for high-performance digital sound quality. Provides an optional, lower bitrate encoding option for downloading to portables.
    * Quickly record digital audio files from your personal CD collection. Just load a disc and Rio does the rest.
    * CDs are automatically cataloged as they are recorded. Artist, album, song title, and other relevant information is instantly assigned to each file to make future searches quick & easy. Built-in 56 kbps modem will dial out to retrieve information from the Internet if necessary.
    * Built in 10 mbps home PNA connection for streaming music to one or more Rio Receivers.
    * Supports common audio formats like MP3 and WMA, and can be upgraded to emerging digital standards so your home audio system is always up-to-date.
    * Engineered to the highest quality standards with stereo RCA and optical outputs.

    now, here is what the comments will be:

    1) I can do the same thing for $xxx with xxx hardware and linux

    2) this is cool, but no one will buy it

    3) how long will it be till it runs linux...

    4) etc. use your imagination.

    I for one, think it is a very nice looking box. People buying this probably are not too concerned with money, and it would be a VERY nice looking addition to my home stereo. I myself can not afford it, but it looks like they put a lot of effort into making it look nice and fit in with the rest of your stereo equipment.

    true, you can do the same thing with a computer, but sometimes that just doesn't matter.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    1. Re:cool box by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Apparently you didn't understand me. I DID read the article. I am saying what the COMMENTS will be. You have forgotten that most people don't even read the entire summary, thus it will be a common comment because people failed to read it.

      I know it runs linux. But I also know many /. readers read nothing before posting.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  5. For the masses sure, but for geeks by baptiste · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This geek just wants a front end to my own MP3 server. The audiotron is sweet because it gives you teh slick interface and DAC on top of an Ethernet port. That way I can maintain my stuff on my server that will house other stuff as well. I'd rather have all my home files (MP3s, movies, etc included) one one central server instead of having to maintain a bunch of smaller servers throughout. Maybe thats just me, but that is why teh Audiotron or units like it win me over everytime.

    1. Re:For the masses sure, but for geeks by mcspock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In some strange twist, it's actually not just you; it's also the company you mention in your sig. Centralized storage and intelligence will be the future of home computing, and instead of trying to make expensive, do-everything boxes, people will make simple cheap devices that hook into the PC.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
  6. an AI 'taste' module, too? by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 2, Funny

    > but one had a problem (Blink 182's Dude Ranch).

    there you go -

  7. the cost of iBook, iMac w/ iTunes by stego · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is exactly what hit me as I got through this article - does the same stuff, with a better interface and ethernet built-in. You could probably play games on 'em, too.

  8. Integrated LCD - why? by mblase · · Score: 2

    Surely it would be more economical and practical to connect a video output to one's television, like the Kenwood Entré does. You could program/navigate it using the remote control instead of having to stand right in front of it, and the box would be half the height to boot.

  9. Re:Coffee PC at Thinkgeek... by Splat · · Score: 2

    Then you have to deal with putting together a good UI for it - which is no trivial task.

    It's like TiVO - sure you can hack together some perl scripts in linux to turn on your capture card every tuesday at 8:00 on channel 9 but it's just not as aethstically pleasing.

    I for one would rather pay for a nice interface and design then spend nearly the same amount for a hacked-together solution.

  10. Home PNA? by mblase · · Score: 2

    The device offers, according to the linked page, "Built in 10 mbps homePNA connection for streaming music to one or more Rio Receivers."

    Nice, but practically speaking a waste. Better to replace the Ethernet card with a low-power FM transmitter, like most car CD jukeboxes do, so that you can pick it up from any radio in your house. The only use for homePNA would be to sell the Rio Receivers, but this $1500 device would be infinitely more valuable if I didn't have to spend more money to get remote listening.

    1. Re:Home PNA? by boopus · · Score: 2

      Actualy when I was back in high school there was talk of an unliscened radio station on campus. The people who did the reasearch found that whatever the maximum legal power would have covered most of the school. Now, the transmitter would cost money for something no one really wants, seeing as FM would kill the sound quality in a $1600 stereo component.

  11. Re:Couple of things by pdh11 · · Score: 2, Informative
    What kind of security is this thing running on its FTP server?

    It doesn't, in fact, have an FTP server. There is a Windows program supplied for storing existing MP3s onto it; this access can be password-protected.

    What bitrate does it rip at?

    You get to choose, off a menu. By default it rips twice, once at high bit-rate for playback, once at low bit-rate for downloading to portables.

    Peter

  12. Hey now! by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can feed my own shoes and tie myself!

  13. Deal running now by Mr.Intel · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you click the link and look at the ad in the lower left corner it says, "Free RioReciever plus $100 off when you buy the RioCentral". Since the reciever rocks more than the Central (it has ethernet) then this deal might actually make it worth getting. I get the whole enchilada for $1400. Need to cash in 401k... ;)

    --
    ASCII tastes bad dude.
    Binary it is then.
  14. Subscriptions Alreday Working by dthable · · Score: 3, Funny

    See. The /. subscriptions do work. Taco has enough money to get married and still purchase a $1500 toy.

  15. Operating system. by saintlupus · · Score: 2

    And it's built on Linux- a USB keyboard is all you need to get to a command line!

    Well, hey, I had reservations about dropping twice the current price of my iMac on something with less expandability, less functionality, less drive space, and no real network connection - but if it runs Linux, well, that changes everything.

    *cough*

    Yes, I'm being sarcastic. If it's not something designed as a general purpose computer, I don't even _want_ to know what OS is on it.

    --saint

  16. "Supports common audio formats" by lightspawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it play .mid files? You know how many months of .mid files fit inside 40GB?

    Kids today, it's MP3 this, MP3 that. Back in my day, we downloaded .mid, .mod, .xm, and .s3m files, 2400 BPS upstream both ways...

    And we liked it!

    And you try and tell the young people today that... and they won't believe ya'.

    1. Re:"Supports common audio formats" by nolife · · Score: 2

      I still listen to my collection of over 5000 midi and mods, granted I did get most of them years ago in the 2x uphill manner you stated above. I havent made any tracker files since wavetable MIDI came about though. Even with a low price combination of a SB Live and a second Yamaha chipset soundcard, with some instrument changes and effects you can get very good quality midi files which can then be recorded as standard .wav files and burned to CD. I have about 200 midi files that I've converted this way over the years and have since compressed them to MP3 and added them to my local file/MP3 server.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  17. Re:No source code !!! by pdh11 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The source is available but the link is wrong. Try ftp://ftp.diamondmm.com/pub/rio/radac/

    Peter

  18. Re:Couple of things by pdh11 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do you have any idea what underlying protocol this software uses?

    It's more-or-less the same as the empeg-car synchronise protocol, for which GPL source is available (search for "emptool"). There is already a rather nifty Java re-implementation (www.jempeg.org), which I believe can (or soon will) synchronise to Rio Centrals just as well as to empeg-cars.

    Peter

  19. My setup by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 2

    Here's what I've got going at home:

    Beside the TV/entertainment centre/etc. is a PII-300, running Win2K, picked up from a surplus shop locally for under $100. It is headless--there's no monitor or keyboard. There's an SB Live 128 in there with the line-level output signal going to the stereo system and the line-level ins coming from the TV's extra line-level audio outs. Of course, it has a network card in it and I administer it with VNC.

    I can play MP3s from any machine on the home network. Furthermore, I run the ShoutCast server on the box so I can listen to TV from other rooms in the house (handy when I have to be on the dev machine in the bedroom but a game is on). With the addition of a bit more technology (a AllInWonder card or somesuch), I could have some snazzy video caps too.

    Now all of this, including the cards, cost just under $200. Please tell me, a geek, why I could go buy the item costing over seven times what I put together my box for? I'm not dissing it; I'm just saying that on my own, I can get a much more flexible system that I control and configure. Sorry, Rio, nice idea, but a little too expensive for this humble driver writer.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
  20. We don't need no stinkin' CDRs by room101 · · Score: 2

    So you are willing to order a $40 network adapter, but you don't want to go out and buy a few CDRs to test the burning function?

    hmph.

    --
    room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
    (they always break you eventually)
  21. Price by dimer0 · · Score: 2

    Look for them on clearance.. I bought mine from Best Buy for $149 about 6 months ago.

  22. $1500 ain't so bad... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For a new component? Hell no. Think about it: you're paying as much for the service and the software as you are for the box itself. And though you can say very easily that you could find quality ripping, encoding and navigation software and add that to your $800 box, the fact is it still won't have the correct footprint, decent enough optical out, clean enough analogue out, a nice resolution mini monitor or a decent controller.

    What a lot of people don't understand is that any idiot can toss together a cheap computer. Making a cheap computer into a great machine takes good software and an eye for detail -- what will cause a problem where, what will be unreliable and unsupportable in three months, what will cause dependencies that aren't intuitive. Shit, when I went Athlon I found out after installing the mobo and chip that both my NIC and my sound card were incompatible...meaning three hours of downtime while I shlepped to the local hardware emporium. That's why people buy boxes from Apple, SGI, Sun Cobalt, Snap, F5 and RADware...you don't have to hack anything to get them to work.

    I figure the software that went into this machine took at least as much care as my Sun Cobalt webserver ($1900 for similar power), plus it's got that sweet little display. $1500 may be a lot for a computer -- but for this device, it's worth it and when the price drops in two or three months it'll be even more worth it.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
    1. Re:$1500 ain't so bad... by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 4, Insightful
      For a new component? Hell no. Think about it: you're paying as much for the service and the software as you are for the box itself.

      The software that, apparently, prevents you from doing most operations more than 6-8 feet away. You want me to spend $1500 on that?

      And though you can say very easily that you could find quality ripping, encoding and navigation software and add that to your $800 box, the fact is it still won't have the correct footprint, decent enough optical out, clean enough analogue out, a nice resolution mini monitor or a decent controller.

      Why add it to an $800 box? For $500 you can buy a cheap computer that does nothing but serve files (hell, you can probably find an IPX for $50, throw some more at it for disk space), and an Audiotron.

      No optical out, though - is an optical out worth $1000 and a worse interface to you?

      No great mini-monitor either - you'll have to make do with a web interface that provides more functionality at a greater distance (sorry).

      Clean enough audio out? Heh. Clean enough so that you can hear the difference between 128k and 192k mp3s, I wager.

      I figure the software that went into this machine took at least as much care as my Sun Cobalt webserver ($1900 for similar power), plus it's got that sweet little display. $1500 may be a lot for a computer -- but for this device, it's worth it and when the price drops in two or three months it'll be even more worth it.

      That's wishful thinking. If care went into it, it would have ethernet, not HPNA. It would have a web interface, not a tiny little LCD. This is exactly what I would expect from SonicBlue, who seems to specialize in failing to add value for the money. That's why I have an iPod instead of a Rio... just because it's expensive doesn't mean it's worth it.

      --
      --Matthew
    2. Re:$1500 ain't so bad... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      I sit about six feet from my speakers...any further away, and you start to lose what little soundstage you have left after MP3. A web interface for a stereo component is totally worthless -- my stereo does not have anything to do with the web, and for most users of home audio the web is another kludgey interface.

      My Adcom has about eight functions: Play, Pause, Stop, Eject, Skip Track (up and down) and Scan FF/Rwnd. For many home audio enthusiasts, simple is better. For components like this to sell, they have to be all inclusive, have a simple interface, and yet not be critically crippled. It is possible to perform all three of these with good design, and I feel SonicBlue has done this.

      I'm not buying it or anything, but I respect the unit. This is exactly what I'd be looking for if I hadn't sworn off MP3s for good when I sold my Rio Volt.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:$1500 ain't so bad... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      I wonder why you respond to them...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:$1500 ain't so bad... by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

      You are misinformed. The presence of a web interface for complex functions does not preclude the existance of a simple RC interface for simple functions.

      Further, of course, it is unreasonable to expect that all listening of music - and hence manipulation of what is playing - occur within a radius of six feet, even if your misinformed claim about the soundstage of mp3s were correct.

      But, as you point out, anyon who would think that it was a good unit for mp3s probably isn't being consistent with their misinformed beliefs unless they swear off mp3s entirely.

      This unit is a piece of crap catering to people who think that expensive is good, and haven't seen a good interface to a large library of music.

      --
      --Matthew
  23. Re:No source code !!! by phrenzy · · Score: 4, Informative

    *DOH* I've asked the web guys to fix this ASAP.

    The source also ships with the product on CD, and our stuff is passed back into the ARM Linux chain from time to time so most of it is in the standard distribution by now.

    --
    -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
  24. How 'bout serious fidelity testing??? by morgue-ann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The audio fidelity on the whole is as good as can be expected. We all know what MP3 encoding does to your tunes if you have a reasonable speakers

    All mp3 decoders are not created equal and I sure wish reviewers would dig a little deeper. If they go beyond navigation and I/O features and cover audio quality, it's typically only to mention background hum or hiss or a wimpy headphone amplifier.

    mp3 at high bitrates created with a competent encoder (LAME is one) can sound pretty good. Decoding with cheap 16 bit DSPs such as the TMS320C54x used in the Rio One is hard to do-- you have to watch out for error accumulation (e.g. please round to zero instead of simply truncating).

    If you don't believe me that decoders differ, consider these tests of PC decoders. Unfortunately, no one seems to do such detailed testing on embedded decoders.

    I'm giving my Rio One to my nephew who will be so thrilled to have it that if he hears the high-frequency errors on playback of middlin' bitrates (192kbps), he probably won't mind.

    I don't know what I'm going to replace it with, though. I know I shouldn't expect much out of a $80 player powered from on AA cell, but there's no guarantee that a $400 Rio Riot or iPod will be glitch-free: they might have spent the whole power and cost budget on LCDs, hard drives and amortizing development.

    A StrongARM-based PocketPC might be the answer- plenty of horsepower to run less compromised 16 bit decoder or even a 24 bit or floating point one. It should also be able to decode ogg vorbis....

    By the way, instead of reasonable speakers, I'm using a good pair of headphones. Much more bang for the buck when it comes to revealing audio defects, though the Sonys tend to be a bit shrill (well the older V6s that I have) for long-term listening. These are the same model we used when I was at E-mu for all normal testing. The only thing more revealing was the elements from a good pair of Sennheisers in a set of noise protection muffs to cut background noise by 23dB. Also, some of the ATC guys have Grado electrostatics.

  25. Cmdr Taco Needs Help! by filbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    This "MP3 stereo component" obsession has gotten out of hand. I know someone who specializes in OCD. Please, for the sake of the /. community, I think Cmdr Taco needs to seek help dealing with this issue.

  26. In Canada... by Dorf_of_Eleven · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's the first thing you do with a 40 gig MP3 player?

    In Canada, you pay $840 extra. :)

    --
    WhatEVA
  27. Nice try, but no dice by Patman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Turtle Beach is not only still producing the Audiotron, but still supporting it via addition of new features.
    The last month has seen the addition of a full API to go with the web interface and Shoutcast streaming ability. AT users also can join a mailing list that enables them to help Turtle Beach develop new features. In short, it's probably the BEST supported piece of hardware I've got.

  28. SonicBlue - My Hero! by eples · · Score: 2


    It's like they build this equipment just so they can get it on the streets before Congress passes legislation to ban it.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  29. My choice by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

    An Emerson CD/MP3 player. A little portable unit that is only slightly larger than a standard portable CD player, has line out to connect to external speakers/stereo systems, reads Mp3s from a CD and handles subdirectories quite well, programmable playback sequence, all the standard functions of portable CD players. It may not have all the cool features of the mentioned box, but at 85 bucks you get a good solid hand held CD/Mp3 player that can be plugged into the wall with the included AC adapter, and plugged into your stereo system with the line out jack. Far better price/performance ratio than just about any Mp3 player, and more than enough for the average persons needs. It even comes with decent(though not outstanging) headphones, a first in all the portable cd player purchases I've made. For general use, I wouldn't recommend a different model Mp3 or portable CD player. Especially if you have a CD burner... its wonderful. Only failing is it chews through batteries pretty quickly, especially when playing Mp3s. Even so, the versatility it offers over a normal flash memory Mp3 player, or a portable CD player, and plug in the wall stay put units, makes it WELL worth the 85 dollars US I paid for it at my local Kmart(MILFORD IS STAYING OPEN!!!! YAYYY!!!!)

  30. Re:No source code !!! by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

    So, just grab the source and we can build our own for $500! Then market ot for $800. Sounds like a plan.

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  31. Re:Coffee PC at Thinkgeek... by saintlupus · · Score: 2

    why pay that much for something so small?

    Aesthetics are worth paying for to some people. I'm planning on moving the lion's share of my computer gear either into the attic or the basement when I buy a house, and just keeping one of those new iMacs around (or maybe a laptop) to tap into it via a wireless network.

    The main advantage? I don't have to look at piles of beige metal in the spare bedroom, which is the situation I'm in now.

    --saint

  32. Replay TV by Joe+U · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My question is, why didn't they merge this with their ReplayTV line?

    How much more could it have cost to combine the TV and music?

  33. For $200 less.. by jcr · · Score: 2

    You can get an iMac with 40 gigs and a CD-RW drive.

    For $1500, you can get an iMac with 40 gigs and a CD-RW/DVD drive.

    The Macs include 10Mhz/100Mhz ethernet, USB, Firewire, iTunes, iMovie, and iPhoto software.

    Sorry, this device just doesn't flip my switch.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  34. Re:Software to do this with commodity PCs? by ryanwright · · Score: 2

    My question is, does anyone have any suggestions for *software* to do something like this?

    Sure. Download uICE. It supports various infrared controllers such as the IRMan. You can use any infrared remote to control it (your VCR's remote, whatever). Just teach the IR codes to the software and tell it what you want it to do. I use it with an AMX touchscreen linked to an AMX master controller. The master controller sends 6 character strings out one of it's 6 serial ports into one of my server's 10 serial ports. uICE receives those strings and passes control on to Winamp. End result? I can control all functions of Winamp from my living room. The AMX equipment also powers up my audio equipment and switches to the right input when I fire up Winamp from the touchscreen...

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  35. slashdot world history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    2.5 million B.C.: OOG the Open Source Caveman develops the axe and releases it under the GPL. The axe quickly gains popularity as a means of crushing moderators heads.
    100,000 B.C.: Man domesticates the AIBO.
    10,000 B.C.: Civilization begins when early farmers first learn to cultivate hot grits.
    3000 B.C.: Sumerians develop a primitive cuneiform Perl script.
    2920 B.C.: A legendary flood sweeps Slashdot, filling up a Borland/Inprise story with hundreds of offtopic posts.
    1750 B.C.: Hammurabi, a Mesopotamian king, codifies the first EULA.
    490 B.C.: Greek city-states unite to defeat the Persians. ESR triumphantly proclaims that the Greeks get it.
    399 B.C.: Socrates is convicted of impiety. Despite the efforts of freesocrates.com, he is forced to kill himself by drinking hemlock.
    336 B.C.: Fat-Time Charlie becomes King of Macedonia and conquers Persia.
    4 B.C.: Following the Star (as in hot young actress) of Bethelem, wise men travel from far away to troll for baby Jesus.
    A.D. 476: The Roman Empire BSODs.
    A.D. 610: The Glorious MEEPT!! founds Islam after receiving a revelation from God. Following his disappearance from Slashdot in 632, a succession dispute results in the emergence of two troll factions: the Pythonni and the Perliites.
    A.D. 800: Charlemagne conquers nearly all of Germany, only to be acquired by Andover.net.
    A.D. 874: Linus the Red discovers Iceland.
    A.D. 1000: The epic of the Beowulf Cluster is written down. It is the first English epic poem.
    A.D. 1095: Pope Bruce II calls for a crusade against the Turks when it is revealed they are violating the GPL. Later investigation reveals that Pope Bruce II had not yet contacted the Turks before calling for the crusade.
    A.D. 1215: Bowing to pressure to open-source the British government, King John signs the Magna Carta, limiting the British monarchys power. ESR triumphantly proclaims that the British monarchy gets it.
    A.D. 1348: The ILOVEYOU virus kills over half the population of Europe. (The other half was not using Outlook.)
    A.D. 1420: Johann Gutenberg invents the printing press. He is immediately sued by monks claiming that the technology will promote the copying of hand-transcribed books, thus violating the churchs intellectual property.
    A.D. 1429: Natalie Portman of Arc gathers an army of Slashdot trolls to do battle with the moderators. She is eventually tried as a heretic and stoned (as in petrified).
    A.D. 1478: The Catholic Church partners with doubleclick.net to launch the Spanish Inquisition.
    A.D. 1492: Christopher Columbus arrives in what he believes to be India, but which RMS informs him is actually GNU/India.
    A.D. 150812 Michaelengelo attempts to paint the Sistine Chapel ceiling with ASCII art, only to have his plan thwarted by the Lameness Filter.
    A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
    A.D. 1553: Bloody Mary ascends the throne of England and begins an infamous crusade against Protestants. ESR eats his words.
    A.D. 1588: The IF I EVER MEET YOU, I WILL KICK YOUR ASS guy meets the Spanish Armada.
    A.D. 1603: Tokugawa Ieyasu unites the feuding pancake-eating ninjas of Japan.
    A.D. 1611: Mattel adds Galileo Galilei to its CyberPatrol block list for proposing that the Earth revolves around the sun.
    A.D. 1688: In the so-called Glorious Revolution, King James II is bloodlessly forced out of power and flees to France. ESR again triumphantly proclaims that the British monarchy gets it.
    A.D. 1692: Anti-GIF hysteria in the New World comes to a head in the infamous Salem GIF Trials, in which twenty alleged GIFs are burned at the stake. Later investigation reveals that many of the supposed GIFs were actually PNGs.
    A.D. 1769: James Watt patents the one-click steam engine.
    A.D. 1776: Trolls, angered by CmdrTacos passage of the Moderation Act, rebel. After a several-year flame war, the trolls succeed in seceding from Slashdot and forming the United Coalition of Trolls.
    A.D. 1789: The French Revolution begins with a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on the Bastille.
    A.D. 1799: Attempts at discovering Egyptian hieroglyphs receive a major boost when Napoleons troops discover the Rosetta stone. Sadly, the stone is quickly outlawed under the DMCA as an illegal means of circumventing encryption.
    A.D. 1844: Samuel Morse invents Morse code. Cryptography export restrictions prevent the telegraphs use outside the U.S. and Canada.
    A.D. 1853: United States Commodore Matthew C. Perry arrives in Japan and forces the xenophobic nation to open its doors to foreign trade. ESR triumphantly proclaims that Japan finally gets it.
    A.D. 1865: President Lincoln is bitchslapped. The nation mourns.
    A.D. 1901: Italian inventor Guglielmo Marcoli first demonstrates the radio. Metallica drummer Lars Ulrich immediately delivers to Marcoli a list of 335,435 suspected radio users.
    A.D. 1911: Facing a break-up by the United States Supreme Court, Standard Oil Co. defends its freedom to innovate and proposes numerous rejected settlements. Slashbots mock the company as Standa~1 and depict John D. Rockefeller as a member of the Borg.
    A.D. 1929: V.A. Linuxs stock drops over 200 dollars on Black Tuesday, October 29th.
    A.D. 1945: In the secret Manhattan Project, scientists working in Los Alamos, New Mexico, construct a nuclear bomb from Star Wars Legos.
    A.D. 1948: Slashdot runs the infamous headline DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN. Shamefaced, the site quickly retracts the story when numerous readers point out that it is not news for nerds, stuff that matters.
    A.D. 1965: Jon Katz delivers his famous I Have A Post-Hellmouth Dream speech, which stated: I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the geeks of former slaves and the geeks of former slave geeks will be able to sit down together at the table of geeks... I have a dream that my geek little geeks will one geek live in a nation where they will not be geeked by the geek of their geek but by the geek of their geek.
    A.D. 1969: Neil Armstrong becomes the first man to set foot on the moon. His immortal words: First moonwalk!!!
    A.D. 1970: Ohio National Guardsmen shoot four students at Kent State University for Internet theft.
    A.D. 1989: The United States invades Panama to capture renowned hacker Manual Noriega, who is suspected of writing the DeCSS utility.
    A.D. 1990: West Germany and East Germany reunite after 45 years of separation. ESR triumphantly proclaims that Germany gets it.
    A.D. 1994: As years of apartheid rule finally end, Nelson Mandela is elected president of South Africa. ESR is sick, and sadly misses his chance to triumphantly proclaim that South Africa gets it.
    A.D. 1997: Slashdot reports that Scottish scientists have succeeded in cloning a female sheep named Dolly. Numerous readers complain that if they had wanted information on the latest sheep releases, they would have just gone to freshsheep.net.
    A.D. 1999: Miramax announces Don Knotts to play hacker Emmanuel Goldstein in upcoming movie Takedown.

    (you're not the only one who is into cut and paste)