Slashdot Mirror


Conductive Concrete Offers Building Security

zdburke writes: "In a slightly different spin on the electromagnet-protected server room in Stephenson's Cryptonomicon, the folks at the National Research Council have developed concrete that conducts electricity, or 'percolates,' allowing it to serve as an electromagnetic shield. Current uses lean toward heated loading docks, non-freezing bridges, and grounding large-scale electrical equipment, but the counter-espionage idea is cool. The NYTimes has a brief story, and the folks at UN Omaha have some great pictures. It's not exactly new (it won a Popular Science prize in 1997) but it's still cool stuff."

56 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Wow... by Ooblek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone remember the name of that psychologist that put dogs in a room with an electrified floor? I wonder if they'll start putting this stuff into jail cells and mental hospitals. You know, the prisoner/patient/subject mouths off they can give them a jolt. All in the name of science, of course.

    1. Re:Wow... by quantaman · · Score: 2

      And you thought a cat on a HOT sidewalk was funny!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:Wow... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Boss - "Smith, I want that report on my desk in 20 minutes. Or I press the button."

      ...19 minutes later...

      Smith - "Hey pimply-faced-youth intern! Can you just sit at my desk for a moment while I run downstairs? I have an important call coming in, thanks."

      Tsk tsk. Smith should know better than to fuck with the PFY.

  2. HERF hacks ;-) by GMontag · · Score: 2

    So, does this mean that in the future, demolition companies could just HERF a building down instead of going inside and setting explosives?

  3. Blocks Cell Phones? by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder what kind of cell phone signal I would get in a conductive-concrete building? Probably next to none...

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by crow · · Score: 3, Funny

      It looks like we may have found the perfect material for building theaters!

    2. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by sourcehunter · · Score: 2

      None (or, very very limited). I think that is the point - when the article talks of the counter-intelligence uses for this material, cell phone signals would fall under the same category as other EM signals.

      --

      quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
    3. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by IsaacW · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assuming that the conductive concrete formed a single, closed shell around the cell phone, none.

      Basic physics will tell you that a closed conductive surface subject to an external electromagnetic field will exhibit no such field inside it's perimeter. I believe that the derivation is related to Guass's and Maxwell's laws of electromagnetics.

    4. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by DrMegaVolt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its called a Farady cage. The field leakage would be related to the frequency of oscillation of that field - wavelengths on the order of and smaller than the largest hole in the cage would leak out ( or in )

  4. Cool stuff? by Vic · · Score: 2

    "...but it's still cool stuff."

    Wouldn't "hot stuff" be more appropriate? :)

  5. Cost and Uses by Digitalia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is the cost per cubic foot much greater than standard concrete? If not, then I'd be interested in the implications for using it as a residential flooring substrate. Rather than going for a standard radiant heating system, would it be more efficient to employ this?

    --
    Pax Digitalia
    1. Re:Cost and Uses by jd142 · · Score: 2

      I believe the article said it was 2-3 times the cost of regular concrete.

    2. Re:Cost and Uses by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      I'd love to know the cost of this relative to standard concrete as well... imagine being able to flip a switch when it starts snowing, to heat your driveway, steps and sidewalk so nothing accumulated on them. Now THAT would be something.

      ~Philly

    3. Re:Cost and Uses by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Electric heat costs 2-3 times as much as gas. Ok if you make 2-3 times as much money and like walking barefoot to the kitchen at night to munch Oreos without waking your wife wit "Ooh, ooh, ahh, cold floor! cold floor!"

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  6. A great big Faraday cage by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not a huge expert in the realm of physics (dammit, Jim, I'm a computer scientist!), but is this anything like a massive Faraday cage, which would prevent electromagnetic waves for entering and exiting?

    I shudder to think of the day when we will work in protective buildings like these, keeping company secdrets safe from Van Eck phreakers and war drivers, but also keeping out the mellow, smooth sounds of Office Light Jazz 94.7. :-)

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:A great big Faraday cage by CanadaDave · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is exactly the same concept. The conducting electrons in the conductor material in the concrete "shield" are all mobile, and arrange themselves with respect to the stationary atomic cores so as to set up electric fields which will cancel out the electromagnetic fields which impinge upon it. So no electric field escapes, or at least some of it will, some of it won't. The amount of attenuation is all a function of frequency. Cell phones in the GHz range are especially supceptable, whereas very long radio waves aren't attenuated as much.

      BTW, you could always just get whatever radio station you want through the internet (land-line).

  7. Pavlov by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone remember the name of that psychologist that put dogs in a room with an electrified floor?

    Pavlov. That was one of several experiments involving behaviour modification.

    1. Re:Pavlov by Ooblek · · Score: 2

      Are you sure? I thought he did bells at feeding time and it was someone else that jolted the dogs into submission. Whatever.

    2. Re:Pavlov by GMontag · · Score: 2

      The bells at feeding time was one of the other experiments. He also did the showing of shapes to mean different upcoming events. One was an oval, the other a circle. Then he gradually rounded the oval until the dog could not distinguish between them.

      At that point the dog would go nuts!

    3. Re:Pavlov by GMontag · · Score: 2

      Not so fast...

      (yes, bad for quoting myself)
      The bells at feeding time was one of the other experiments. He also did the showing of shapes to mean different upcoming events. One was an oval, the other a circle. Then he gradually rounded the oval until the dog could not distinguish between them.

      At that point the dog would go nuts!


      Shapes and Tones experiments by Pavlov

      Ref to just the bell experiments

      Pavlov shock experiments

      I do remember Skinner doing various things AFTER Pavlov, like teaching pidgeons to bowl(?) and such.

  8. Floating concrete structures?!? by MonkeyBot · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this stuff can conduct electricity, meaning it could generate a magnetic field, right? So you could theoretically generate a magnetic field to hold a concrete structure made from this stuff in the air. Does this mean that my goal of making a floating castle like all the bad guys in RPG video games have is finally within reach?

    1. Re:Floating concrete structures?!? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      So this stuff can conduct electricity, meaning it could generate a magnetic field, right? So you could theoretically generate a magnetic field to hold a concrete structure made from this stuff in the air. Does this mean that my goal of making a floating castle like all the bad guys in RPG video games have is finally within reach?

      Certainly, until the rebels cut power to or carve up the plate on the ground you're pushing against, or until your castle melts to slag from resistive heating due to the vast currents required ;).

      Thought about the same thing a while back, and concluded that the Koopa Ship method is more practical ;).

  9. Wow! by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 3, Funny

    That unomaha site has one of the worst web designs I'ver ever seen. I guess it's not that important that scientist be designers, but readability would be a good thing to strive for. I don't need every paragraph to be a different color. Is this a side effect of too much exposure to conductive concrete?

  10. music studio by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember when a friend was recording a radio theatre show, the studio had chicken wire on all the walls (behind accoustic foam in most places) to minimize inteferrence from outside signals. You don't want your microphone cable picking up radio signals when recording a performance. This material could be ideal for construction in applications like that where you want to block out outside signals.

    1. Re:music studio by swb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are they related to those dumbass, cargo-pants weaing, PDA using, Slashdot-reading, Honda-driving, 30-something, "Hey, Raj, look at us! We're geeks!" weenies who can't be bothered to turn off their cell phones, pagers, PDAs and notebooks in the movies?

    2. Re:music studio by swb · · Score: 2

      Raj was brought over on a H1B visa by Bob, who knew that he could buy a better BMW if he helped keep wages down. This also enabled Bob to drive out the now unemployed families living in the apartments he wanted to convert into his 4000 sq ft luxury city apartment.

  11. Concrete circuitry? by indole · · Score: 4, Funny


    How about drywall transistors and logic-gate carpets?

    I wont be happy till my split-level serves pr0n.

    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
  12. Heated loading docks by suso · · Score: 2

    Now there is what every trucker needs for those cold winter days.
    Brought to you by science.

    1. Re:Heated loading docks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good For The Truckers- Bad For the Homeless.

      I worked in a grocery store and there was a vent down at the bottom of our dock. Hot air came out of it so a homeless guy started sleeping down there.

      One night a truck backed down in to make a delivery while he slept....

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  13. Non-freezing bridges? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sounds like these guys have never studied thermodynamics. It takes 333kJ to melt a single kilogram of ice. To melt it in, say, 10 minutes (= 600 seconds) would require 555 watts. Not so bad? Consider the following: Conservatively estimate a bridge to be 10 meters wide by 250 meters long and having 2 centimeters of ice. That's 50 m^3 = 50,000 kg of ice. A mere 28 MegaWatts. Per ice storm. Per bridge. Assuming 100% efficiency. Oh yeah, no problem.

    Please study a little science before you post stories from similarly unclued "visionaries".

    1. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by tkrabec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But if you can keep the ice from forming the water could run off the bridge and not freeze.

      -- Tim

      --
      TKrabec Pahh
    2. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by rehannan · · Score: 2
      Well for one thing where on earth is there going to be a road & highway department (in a country that can afford heatable concrete) that's going to let an inch of ICE fully form before they decide to do something about it?
      Fortunatly, where I live in Alaska the DOT is not obsessed with keeping the roads bare. It is quite common to have an inch or two snow/ice pack on the roads in the winter. The snow plows use grooved blades, which in turn grooves the ice in the direction of travel. Your tires grip the ice grooves quite well.

      Salt isn't used because it doesn't work when it gets really cold. I think the magic temperature is 0F, since Mr. Fahrenheit used a salt & ice mixture to define 0F. (I'm not entirely sure about this.)

    3. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by gorilla · · Score: 2

      That's what Mr F tried to do, with a scale from freezing salt water to body temperature. Unfortunatly he messed up, so 100F ended up slightly above body temperature, and the temperateure of salt water depends on the concentration of salt, and also the type of salt - sodium chloride having a different point to say potassium chloride.

    4. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by NonSequor · · Score: 2

      I was told that the temperature of the salt ice mixture was the coldest temperature that Fahrenheit could find. As such, 0 degrees Fahrenheit is an overwhelmingly crude approximation of absolute 0.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  14. heating by DragonWyatt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The most obvious use is heating.

    But wouldn't it be cheaper and simpler to embed, say, a PVC 2-inch pipe in the concrete, and run warm water through that? Note that you can use this method with just about anything (dirt, asphalt, etc) and keep it from freezing.

    If you want a method to directly heat it using electricity, run stainless steel pipe instead, and use it as a load.

    I've frequently wondered why civil engineers haven't implemented either of the above techniques before. Chalked it up to "roads don't freeze enough".

    Thoughts?

    --
    Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    1. Re:heating by markmoss · · Score: 2

      The article did mention the buried pipe method, but notes that it's expensive to put the pipes in to start with, and then when they split, corrode through, or plug up, you've got to jackhammer through the concrete to fix them. The point about repairs is good, but I do wonder how a grid of buried pipes could be more costly than paying two or three times as much for conductive concrete.

      But the real reason heated pavement isn't used much is because electricity costs too much. You don't want to pay the power bill for trying to heat up the freaking outdoors! Conductive concrete won't change that. With buried pipes, you can also heat with a gas or oil furnace, which costs quite a lot less (90% efficient, compared to about 30% overall in the electric system), but it still costs too much in northern climates. And in southern climates where you'd only have to turn on the heat a few days a year, few people think snow is a big enough problem to add thousands to their initial construction cost.

    2. Re:heating by afidel · · Score: 2

      Actually one of the Universities here in Ohio has quite a few of their main walkways kept clean from snow and ice using the burried pipe method. They use excess heat from the electric plant so it is basically free. They are pretty far south so they are in the transitional area where they get enough snow to bother with it but not enough that it overworks the plant.

      p.s.
      the school is Miami of Ohio, the best public school in Ohio .

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:heating by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Do they alwo use the waste heat from the electric plant to heat the buildings? Just how much electricity does this power plant produce? I know of Michigan colleges that heat their buildings from an electric plant, but there sure isn't enough extra heat to clear the sidewalks when it stays around 10 F for weeks...

      Anyhow, note that the conductive concrete won't allow you to use the co-generated "free" heat, but requires the expensive electricity.

  15. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 4, Funny

    First day here, huh?

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  16. Question for a Civ Eng: by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    Would having conducting concrete make it easier or harder to prevent electrochemical corrosion in reinforced concrete?

    Intuition is telling me "yes to both", but I'm not a Civ...

    1. Re:Question for a Civ Eng: by big+tex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Harder.

      I am a field engineer on a bridge construction project. I do concrete and overlays.

      In most areas of bridges near water epoxy coated or galvanized rebar is used instead of black (bare) steel. The problem is that when steel rusts, it expands, popping the concrete around it.
      When you build reinforced concrete the term 'cover' refers to the minimum distance the rebar must be from the outside faces of the concrete - basically the distance between the steel and the corrosion. This 'cover' is typically between 2 - 5 inches.
      Overlay concrete (of which this conductive concrete is a type) is the riding course, or the top layer you actually ride on. It is poured seperately due in part to the large effort required to get the nice arched surface that rides so well. Overlays are typically 1 1/2 to 3 inches thick.
      So, a "thin" layer, thiner than the typical cover, with metal particles spread uniformely enough to conduct electricity is bound to corrode like a bastard.

      There are ways that you could combat this, though. Galvanize the parts, imbed a wire mesh that is plastic coated and electrficy that, apply one hell of a sealant, or put an ungodly amount of DCI (corrosion inhibiter) in the mix. DCI has a number of side effects that make it hard to place, displaces a fair amount of water, and it is really hard to finish smoothly.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
  17. Not melt, explode! by MonkeyBot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Certainly, until the rebels cut power to or carve up the plate on the ground you're pushing against, or until your castle melts to slag from resistive heating due to the vast currents required ;).

    Actually, the concrete, if it is like normal concrete, would probably explode instead of melting...the little air pockets inside it expand until they break the structure. It's neat. Hold a blowtorch to some concrete sometime---it crackles!

  18. Static Control by markmoss · · Score: 3, Informative

    It sounds like the concrete still has a pretty high resistance, so I wouldn't count on a reasonable thickness forming a good Faraday cage. With the conductive stuff costing At 2 or 3 times as much, you could likely get a better cage for less by just hanging metal mesh inside the forms and pouring regular concrete. (The mesh is part of your reinforcement, too.)

    And the suggested use of electrically heated payment leaves me wondering where they plan to get free electricity.

    But there is one good application for this. Electronics manufacturers need to control static throughout their facilities. Fixed objects are grounded by hooking up wires, but people walk around, circuit boards and parts are carried around on carts, etc., and the only way to ground these while in motion is through the floor. So we paid plenty for conductive tile, and some sort of conductive underlay. If we could have put a conductive layer in the concrete slab itself, it would have saved a bunch (even at 3x the price of regular concrete), and it would be more reliable and lower maintenance.

    1. Re:Static Control by unitron · · Score: 2
      Regular concrete is already so conductive that electrical codes require it to be tied into the grounding system of the building of which it is a part, and one of the acceptable ways to construct a building's main grounding point is to embed a length of metal pipe in the concrete of the building's foundation (assuming direct contact between the concrete and the actual planet Earth.

      If you're standing barefoot on a damp concrete floor and come into contact with a "hot" or "live" wire, you'll learn very quickly (within one/one hundred twentieth of a second, or one/one hundredth for 50Hz locations) how conductive concrete can be, assuming, of course, that you survive the lesson.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  19. Re:No more salt by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
    Ever notice around bridges, along the edge of the roadway that there is no grass, only dirt? Even from a bridge that's been there 20 years. That's what salt does to the environment.

    Most places only put as much salt as is necessary (Edmonton for example puts 6-12% salt in sand for the roads) as it's expensive and doesn't work below a certain temp.

    As for slugs - I don't know what they do for the environment, but they sure are tasty!

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  20. Wireless Guitars by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    SpinalTap could have really used this technology when Niles was wielding his wireless guitar...

    "These go to eleven."

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  21. Heated Runways by MikeyNg · · Score: 2

    I thought a big use for these were going to be for heated runways - so you don't have to worry about de-icing them anymore. (I just hope they don't heat them too much and then you have a bunch of lizards just hanging out on the runway warming themselves.)

    --
    Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
  22. Don't throw your wood stoves out yet by Bollux · · Score: 2, Informative

    This conductive concrete has some interesting properties. The number one use that leaps to mind is EMI protection.

    But for heating? Forget it! Two replies to this article mentioned something about how much energy it would require to melt ice. Now add the energy required to heat up the concrete. And know, that while electricity works quickly, it is just about the most expensive way to heat your home/whatever.

    You might consider also, that while an abode of conductive material might be a great way to absorb stray radio signals coming your way, what are is your dwelling going to be emitting if you are hooking up AC voltage to it? If a micro-watt cell phone freaks you out, consider thousands of watts pumping through your house :) (I don't think anyone has proven that non-ionizing radiation causes cancer yet, so no worries...)

    Radiant heating systems are the way to imbed a heat source in concrete. The technology is gaining in popularity all the time, as it deserves.

    Read more about it for yourself at: http://www.radiantcompany.com/ They are for profit, but the prices seem reasonable. They advocate do-it-yourself and lots of good info on the website.

    It would be great to hear from an HVAC engineer on this, but I don't think they will tell you much different.

    Bollux (a BSME)

    1. Re:Don't throw your wood stoves out yet by gordguide · · Score: 2

      You use one or the other depending on what you want. A key point with conductive concrete is it's best used as an outdoor slab (not heating an enclosed space) and it only has to keep the thermal mass at about 33 degrees F when it's snowing (and never warmer). When your temp differential is high (ie it's -10F or colder) it rarely snows (atmosphere can't hold much moisture, so the weather system dumps it's snow somewhere warmer before it got to you. Remember the Arctic is technically a desert), so it's OK if the slab is only +20F or colder, with a simple non-feedback system. So you're only trying to heat at about 30 degrees above ambient you can incorporate feedback (temperature measuring and control) to reduce input energy even more.

      Radiant heating works best when you're trying to heat an enclosed space. Consider the envornment and pick the appropriate technology. Where I live, radiant (hot water in concrete) is pretty common, but you wouldn't try to heat the driveway that way, because you would have to maintain probably about +40F even when it's -40F outdoors (an 80 degree differential). You need some amount of overheating as a way of preventing failure, if you heating system freezes it is totally useless and needs almost complete rebuilding. Certain antifreeze systems can be employed but they have other problems; in general you should build it with enough BTUs and backups to keep it above freezing at all envisioned temperatures and power outages. Electic hot water boilers are common but natural gas is readily available here so most people use a gas over electric (for backup) system.

      Since radiant can be electically heated and it's slightly less efficent than thermal (electricity to water to concrete to objects vs electricity to concrete) it's not a given that it would be more efficent.

  23. RF Nightmare - buildings as antennas by Vortran · · Score: 2

    If large structures are made with conductive concrete, it could create a broad spectrum RF nightmare in cities.

    Today, large buildings reflect radio signals, creating interference for many signals in the shorter wavelength (6m to 30cm) bands. Imagine how much worse this would be if the buildings them selves had strong electromagnetic fields, or worse yet, emitted AC fields?

    Also, these structures will convert radio signals and other EMF into electric current. Theoretically, it is possible that such current could be in the tens of milliamps or even higher, making for passive RF radiators.

    I know we already use a lot of steel in buildings, but this is usually grounded and steel is a really poor conductor compared to something like copper or silver. I'm assuming this conductive concrete has much better electric conductivity than steel.

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
    1. Re:RF Nightmare - buildings as antennas by unitron · · Score: 2

      In addition imagine how much charge would be induced by any lightning in the general area.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  24. voltage by ocie · · Score: 3

    Something I discovered with a neon transformer is that most things are conductive to some degree if you apply enough voltage :) concrete included.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  25. Re:What about... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

    Or even the toilet seat. Low level current should be enough to keep it nice and toasty. Really would only need a few degrees above room temp to be MUCH more comfortable

    There are heated toilet seats purchasable.

    The problem, as with all great inventions, is the idiot factor. Joe Schmoe cracks the toilet seat or busts the wires with wear. One dark night he stumbles into the bathroom, whizzes on the seat, salty urine hits electric current, and it's "Don't Whizz on the Electric Fence" time. And then we get another lawyer-flinging spurious lawsuit or Darwin Awards candidate.

    Don't underestimate the Idiot Factor. $cientogi$t$ would be a long extinct class of vicious nutball without it.

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  26. Re:NYT Random Login Generator by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    I love you.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  27. cool! by Khopesh · · Score: 2

    *throws snowshovel out window*

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  28. The web site by Animats · · Score: 2
    Agreed. Somebody went to a lot of trouble to make it suck that much. Take a look at the HTML; some pages were authored with Microsoft Word 9, others with Microsoft PowerPoint.

    The bridge-deicing idea isn't unreasonable. From their numbers, for $500 per storm, you could de-ice a bridge 200' long and 4 lanes wide. That compares favorably with sending out snowplows, salt trucks, and such.