Slashdot Mirror


Making Your Room Quiet

el_flynn writes "This may be a cure for those of you with loud computers, or perhaps those who spend lots of time in NOC rooms that generate lots of noise: NewScientist.com mentions about a "Silence Machine" that gets rid of unwanted noise. I want one to quiet down my neighbour's loud dogs. " These are also being tested in cars, to make the car quieter. I've got a pair of the headphones that the article alludes to - they make airplane travel much nicer, and having something like this to cancel machine noise would be excellent.

107 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. Noise cancelling headphones by slithytove · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried out a friend's pair of Bose noise cancelling headphones with an iPod in a crouded restaurant the other day.
    I was absolutely amazed- I'd tried cheaper noise cancelling technology years ago and not really been able to tell the difference, but this time I was turning the noise cancellation on and off with glee!
    I hope they catch on so we can get some volume pricing going:)

    1. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by vandemar · · Score: 5, Funny

      The other day I let a friend of mine use my noise cancelling headphones to listen to a CD he just bought. After fiddling with his CD Walkman for a bit, he still wasn't able to hear anything on the headphones. It turned out the CD he bought was N'Sync's greatest hits album, and the headphones were actively cancelling out all the noise from it leaving only the real music (ie silence).

    2. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by delcielo · · Score: 2

      I use a David Clark noise cancelling headset when I fly (I'm an instructor, so this is quite often). It's fantastic. It blocks the low frequency noise while still allowing me to hear things like the stall warning, gear horn, etc.

      In a single-engine airplane it makes a big difference. In a multi-engine airplane or jet, it's like magic. It makes you wonder how we ever got by without them.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    3. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      22nd December 1980, Stiff Records (apparently) released an album titled 'The Wit and Wisdom of Ronald Reagan'.

      It's silent.

      http://www.vinylvulture.co.uk/pages/images/recor ds / eagan.jpg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    4. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      *£&&%£&$£ing lameness filter!

      Make that reagan.jpg and it works.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  2. Dells by rosewood · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a PC consultant / PC Builder / Small time business OEM provider / AMD Fanboy

    Anyhoo, a company I do a lot of work for recently gave all agents brand spankin new Dells. While they are the shities P4s available and they are paired up with SDR mem - they are REALLY REALLY quiet. My trick of the trade is to get 1.2 GHz Durons and take the voltage down and underclock them, then they run nice and cool and there are some quiet fans out there and I use a nice sparkle psu that has a quiet fan on it, but I can still hear them in a small office. This P4 however is damn near silent. They have not been in dusty office environment long enough for me to tell you if the fans go over time, etc.

    I know the computer lab @ my school (in the chem library at least) has a bunch of the almost same Dells (same hardware, different case) and its whisper quiet in there

    You can do quiet cases with full clocked AMD AXPs - look for the screw mountable Zalman HSF @ www.2cooltek.com - it comes with resistors to slow / quiet the fan down. Good airflow / tied down wires help a lot to keep the case quiet. Also, check out the sparkle PSUs -- lots of power, little noise.

    PPS - Silent water rigs are popular since only one fan is needed for the radiator and you can get pretty big fans that run nice and quiet

    1. Re:Dells by Danse · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm just realizing I need to get a new fan for my Athlon XP. I have a Thermalright SK-6 heatsink and a Delta fan that is loud as all hell. I want a quieter fan, but I'm a gamer and I need something that will still keep my CPU cool under heavy use. I haven't heard about any other fans that perform as well as this one, but are relatively quiet. If anyone has suggestions, then I'm open to ideas. Otherwise I may end up looking into this noise canceling thing. Though I don't think it'll help in my situation :(

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:Dells by Bnonn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The problem with watercooling, I would imagine, is not so much the cost as the weight. Water is damn heavy stuff; even a small amount will considerably add to the weight of a case. When you've already got those damn P4 heatsinks, a few hardrives, CD-RW and DVD and of course the PSU, it adds up.

      Course, I've never really hefted a water-cooled rig before, so I could be wrong, but that's always been the thing I've wondered about it. If it's as heavy as it sounds, it's no wonder I didn't see any at the last lan. Now, on the topic, I think the parent post does raise a good point. As Tim Williamson says in the article, "it probably will have some applications, [but] it would seem far easier and more sensible to avoid making noise in the first place." I have to agree. This sound dampener is really nifty, and proof-of-concept of something I've had in my book for a while because it's the kind of thing that's great for privacy in medbays etc, but it's treating the symptoms, not the cause. Obviously the cause can't always be treated, and there is surely place for these devices, but I think it's also important to try to prevent noise pollution simply by trying to create technologies etc that are quieter in the first place.

      Yeah, just shifting the cost, I know.

    3. Re:Dells by rosewood · · Score: 2

      Well, I have built me one water rig

      I used a very expensive alluminum case and w/o the radiator and fans it was very VERY light. Adding the radiator, fan, and water did not add enough weight to it where it FELT heavier then your average case. My main rig however is a meter tall full tower w/ wheels. I thought about making it water cooled since I have more then enough space in here

      However, there are a lot of the $40 newegg.com specials that if your two HDDs and CDRW + DVD are mounted in the 5.25" slots then you can removed the 3.5" hard drive bay (or dremel it out if you have to hold it there for a floppy drive) that give you pleny oh room for a radiator and fan. With proper securing mechanisms, that water rig will stay very tight during movement to LANs. Also, you can mount the Hard Drives in one of those silent holders that cushins the HDD so you wont have movement HDD issues to keep the case more protabale and even quieter.

    4. Re:Dells by Danse · · Score: 2

      Hmm. With my current setup, my temp is about 37C idle and about 42C under heavy load (i.e. playing Jedi Knight 2 for an hour). I'm comfortable with those numbers. I've seen athlons run pretty hot (65-70C) for a long time without much problem, but I'm not sure how daring I want to be in that department. I think I can probably get away with using a slightly less effective fan, but I'm going to have to do the research to figure out which one will give me the best balance between temperature and decibals.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:Dells by rosewood · · Score: 2

      That heat thing has not been debunked yet?

      Anyways - they are not designed for office work - they are designed for "The Web" crap. ALU is the P4 weak point and ALU is what regular office work is all about

  3. White noise by sparcv9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know about the rest of you guys, but I find it difficult to sleep at night without the whoosh of the fans from the handful of servers I keep in my room. What kind of geek likes quiet machines?

    --

    This is not a Fugazi .sig
    1. Re:White noise by josh+crawley · · Score: 3

      Actually, I was going to mention that. The fans put me in some sort of happy-trance.. soft of like self-hypnosis. It usually takes me about 30 minutes longer to go to sleep WITHOUT fans of some sort.

      Even the sad thing with me, is that I know the particular pitch of the fans. I can tell which devices are on just by the pitch.

    2. Re:White noise by sparcv9 · · Score: 2
      Even the sad thing with me, is that I know the particular pitch of the fans. I can tell which devices are on just by the pitch.
      Well, since mine are on 24/7, I don't have that kind of indicator. I do, however, enjoy the fact that the whooshes are not synchronous, so they produce a nice, ever-changing medly of white noise.
      --

      This is not a Fugazi .sig
    3. Re:White noise by sparcv9 · · Score: 2
      I was always worried about the computers and everytime the cron.daily would start writing to the hard drive I wouldn't hear the customary hard drive sounds and I'd panic and wake up (sleeping in the room right next to mine).
      I know what you mean. Although, ever since I got an 8:30-5 Day Job, I know that if I'm still awake when the nightly jobs kick off, it's way past my bedtime.
      --

      This is not a Fugazi .sig
    4. Re:White noise by antibryce · · Score: 5, Funny
      hahahahah


      I read that and immediately thought "Wow, sounds like my last roommate." Then I look at the userid and guess what...it *IS* my former roommate. :)

    5. Re:White noise by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

      I wasnt quite clear. I dont JUST have computers. I have miscellanous electrical equipment. Amongst these things that have fans, there are: O-scope, 3 computers, signal anaylyzer, box fan to put heat outside (I love cracking my window open even in winter), a few rackmount devices (24 port hub, 16 port switch, 1u 400mHz p2), assorted power supplies to deliver regulated current throught my room (that pesky 120 vac is too, umm, yucky ;-).

    6. Re:White noise by rark · · Score: 2

      what's even worse -- I have been known to wake up from a deep sleep in a panic because the fans suddenly go quiet (due to electrical failure).

      sad but true

    7. Re:White noise by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Who the hell leaves O-scopes and service monitors on all the time anyway?

      Oscilloscopes make patterns that are not just beautiful art, they also convey great troubleshooting information. I used to leave an oscilloscope on to watch the clock signal or an address line on an experimental overclocking project. The output of the clock must be clean and pure, because anything less than a square wave can trigger an earthquake of bad timing on the bus. A debugging must for overclockers.

      Another place to use the scope is on the address lines, where beautiful patterns can be observed. You can detect when certain subroutines are being entered. Its like watching your system's behavior in a fractal sort of way. Its the visual equivalent of leaving a floating input of an amplifier laying across the motherboard.

      I'd strongly recommend owning a scope. Unlike a voltmeter, a scope provides a detailed visual of intermittent problems. Very handy for troubleshooting hard to find problems in your car, for instance. Loose connections always show up with a characteristic noise, undetectable on a voltmeter.

    8. Re:White noise by rark · · Score: 2

      ech. been there, done that, too.

      But I try very hard not to sleep in the server rooms (I am not always sucessful, but it's been a good six or eight months since I last did)

  4. Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 5, Funny

    try breaking your eardrums, then you cant hear diddly.. and its cheaper than buying these 'quiet' solutions!

    I can say myself, I've been deaf since I was born ( I was born deaf ) so I can say that its the easiest solution since I cant hear diddly so all of my computers are supposedly "quiet" for me! Soundproof padding for my room? Nah! dont need it! :-)

    1. Re:Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 2

      :-) Yeah, and also they've got subtitles to boot. Some movie theaters also have what is called "Open captioned" movies where they put the subtitles on a few select movies so we can go watch 'em

    2. Re:Cheap solution is near! by rudedog · · Score: 2

      There's also Rear Window Captioning, which is really cool. You're given a small piece of smoked plexiglass, and a mirror image of the captions is projected and reflected in the glass. You can go to movies with your hearing friends, and they see the uncaptioned movie normally, and you can see the captioned version.

      Sadly, not all movies come with RWC (Lord of the Rings :-().

    3. Re:Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 2

      True, I've used the system, Disney uses this system for a lot of stuff in their parks. Alas its also quite an annoying system since if there's a person sitting in back of you, it will more than likely block the reflection so you have to like move around and get in a good position which is pretty goddamn rare.. since it also more than likely annoys the hell out of the person behind you and they more than likely dont understand the system so you're pretty much fighting with the person behind you..

      Its a cool system tho, but I'd prefer the subtitles to be ON the movie itself so that there's less of a chance that I'd miss something, and I've talked with a lot of hearing people that they actually LIKE to see the subtitles because some movies are so loud that you cant hear people talking and they get to see what they said because of the subtitles, and it helps older people who cant hear that well anymore to boot..

    4. Re:Cheap solution is near! by rudedog · · Score: 2

      I've never had the signal blocked by people behind me. It must be in the deployment. I've only ever gone to the Cinerama in Seattle, but I saw Episode One there in a packed theater, and I had no trouble with the device (it was the first time I ever used it).

      I agree that some hearing people would prefer to see captions even if they don't need them. I know that my wife prefers them on. However, I also know people who don't like the captions. For instance, if I have one friend who has a caption-capable TV. He knows how to turn them on, since he does it whenever I'm over there. However, once I leave, he always turns them off again, which suggests that he'd prefer not to see captions on his programs.

      I doubt that you'll ever see permanent captions at the theaters, because marketing people are notoriously scared of trying new things if they think it might alienate their existing customer base.

    5. Re:Cheap solution is near! by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      Soundproof padding for my room? Nah! dont need it! :-)
      On the other hand, anyone who would break their eardrums on purpose just to have things be quieter, definitely deserves a padded room ;)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 2

      Yeah, all this is starting to make me wonder, that if the theaters provided at least one movie with open captioning ( meaning that it had the captions/subtitles at the bottom ) and OPENLY advertised it and explained its good perks, if more people would go and enjoy it. Right now, movie theaters dont openly advertise open captioning so I'm pretty sure a large percent of the population doesnt know about it.. And I've seen large hordes of people go to foreign films and they dont have a problem with reading the subtitles and its openly advertised that it has subtitles so, makes me wonder what would happen if htey DID openly advertise it

  5. Beyond! by aznxk3vi17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I saw a similar invention used in "Batman Beyond" a while ago... I no longer watch it of course, but yeah the idea is intriguing. What worries me is the possible military uses. By cancelling sound, armies could cause mass confusion by making illusions of silence, deafness, the list goes on. I fear the day when I am sitting at home, and all of a sudden, the fan of my computer goes silent, and the clicking of my keyboard goes quiet. We wouldn't even hear the explosion.

    1. Re:Beyond! by bpowell423 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The military's "been there, done that". There's a practice B52 bombing run the goes over my parents' house. Pretty cool as a kid, we'd hear a B52 coming, and look up in time to see it disappearing just over the treetops. One night, my dad was outside looking at the sky. All of the sudden, a B52 flys over, low enough to make out the cockpit windows (that's how low they typically flew). Only thing was, there was no sound, just wind. Absolutely true. Sound cancelling technology has been around for a long time. For that matter, so have holograms. So, class, which of those silent B52's is the real one?

    2. Re:Beyond! by bpowell423 · · Score: 2

      I don't remember when that was... maybe late 80's? But seriously, if we now have sound cancelling earphones and sound cancelling equipment for server rooms, it's not too much of a stretch to think that the military's had it for a while. A B52 certainly has the space for a BIG amplifier and some really nice speakers! :)

  6. Stuff on ears? by limxdul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have 24 boxes total in my house, 2 of which are mid to high range servers... When everything is on, noise is a huge factor. My room itself has 4 comps, and when they are all on i have to have some music playing to deafen them out. THen again, i don't want to look like a eskimo with devices all around my ear...

    1. Re:Stuff on ears? by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

      I find that positioning the computers in a V format (kinda like chevrons as in a V contains two computers with the fans pointing in) helps reduce the noise. If you set them up in this fashion: >>>>>> then you get a nice breeze through the middle (air circulation) and the fans cancel each other out.

  7. this is cool! by laserjet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would love to have one of these, as I am a very light sleeper.

    That being said, the technology is the same thing as noise cancelling head phones (such as these, these, or these). These headphones simply rock if you have not tried them.

    alternatively, you can use more traditional methods to quiet things down, like insulation. Putting some dynamat in your car will really dampen the noise and make it nice.


    One thing I have always wanted to try for fun, is get a really sophisticated sound cancellation system with many microphones and many large speakers to broadcast the "anti"sound, and put it in a large area like a park or the mall.

    then, don't tell anyone about it and watch the puzzled look on people's faces when they can't hear each other.

    maybe it's not possible, but I sure do think it would be funny.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  8. bass by astafas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if this will stop bass vibrations. I work nights and during the day when I try to sleep I get my neighbor playing his music real loud. I can't hear the music, but the vibrations from the bass keep me up until I get out of bed go over and knock on his door to get him to turn it down. This would help if it could block bass vibrations, but I don't think I want to spend a four digit sum on it.

    1. Re:bass by blakestah · · Score: 2

      Bass is easy. It is a slow waveform, relatively easy to cancel, and relatively hard to keep out with thick walls.

      Geez - 4 digits sums ! This is really an undergraduate project that would involve two microphones, a low pass filter, an amplifier, an audio amp, and a speaker.

    2. Re:bass by geoswan · · Score: 2
      I wonder if this will stop bass vibrations.

      I wondered about this too, when I first read about it fifteen or twenty years ago. (I think it was an article in New Scientist then too.)

      Anyhow IANAP (I am not a physicist), but it seemed to me that for the waves to be exactly out of phase when arriving at your ear, the source of the anti-noise should be as close as possible to the noise -- or it should be right at your ear. If the anti-noise generator were 180 degrees from the source of the noise, as you approached or retreated from the noise sources, the two waves would go in and out of phase. The shorter the wavelength the more critical the location of the anti-noise generator.

      Bearing in mind IANAP, but it seems to me that this technology would work best with Bass.

    3. Re:bass by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if this will stop bass vibrations.

      I didn't realize they made that much noise. They're only fish, after all. I suggest staying out of the water. ;-)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:bass by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Chrome plated revolvers work best as they visually show effective packages of noise cancelling potential energy. You may call this noise canceling technology a catalyst since the potential energy is often not used, but triggers a desired reaction.

  9. Cancles by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    I remember at the end of the NFL season, John Madden was going on and on about cankles. They'd zoom in on some guy's cankles, and he'd circle 'em. Pretty funny stuff.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  10. Fix My Tinnitus by Boulder+Geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps these bright folks can come up with something to fix my tinnitus. I can't even stay in a truly quiet room without going half mad from the ringing in my ears.

    --
    A well-crafted lie appears unquestionable - Dama Mahaleo
    1. Re:Fix My Tinnitus by ross.w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Jaycar Electronics in Australia have a kit for a white/pink noise generator that is supposed to help with this. The thoery is that the white noise drowns out the ringing but isn't intrusive. I don't know how effective it is. Jaycar Web site

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  11. Re:Airports by laserjet · · Score: 2

    That's an interesting questions. I would guess you would need a TON of power to cancel out the sounds of a jet engine, but it would be an interesting question to ask an anti-sound engineer.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  12. The Cone of Silence! by Vic · · Score: 2

    This was already done in the Get Smart! T.V. series.

  13. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by guiding_knight · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, no no. That'll just create more noise, that of gunfire. We musn't add to the problem.

    That said, used a silenced gun. No worries! :)

    --
    LOTR: Elijah Wood is a munchkin asshat. Yes, asshat. LOL.
  14. I can't hear you!!!! by nickynicky9doors · · Score: 2

    How many early Monday morning lectures did I pray for something like this? Every teenager who reads about this is getting a read on their parent's voice(s).

    --

    heuristic algorithm seeks stochastic relationship
  15. Heard about this about ten years ago by christopherjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember hearing of this technology/idea about ten years ago on a technology show called "Beyond 2000" (anyone else remember that show?)

    The suggested uses for the noise cancelling device was actually to place the device on the actual noise-making machine, not to create a device that "cleans" the area of noise, like the device mentioned in the article or like the noise cancelling headphones.

    The idea was to create things like noiseless lawn mowers and noiseless vacuum cleaners. I always wondered why I never saw these devices.

    This unit seems useful in that it can block out certain types of noise, but considering these people expect to charge over $1400 US for this, I can see why there never was a noiseless lawn mower...

  16. In-box silencer by el_flynn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about this idea: have an extra soundcard installed in your machine, hook it up to a small mic and speaker, and put the mic and speaker inside the PC casing.

    Input from the mic would be fed to some app that could analyze the sound coming in, generate the appropriate cancellation frequencies and output via the speaker. Tada - quiet PC!

    Of course you wouldn't want the mic to be on continuously - there would be feedback when the mic accepts signals from the speakers. But we could possibly run a cron job that turns on the mic while shutting the soundcard output, and perform the analysis once every minute/5 minutes/whatever your fancy. This would be a good way to make use of your spare cycles.

    Howzat?

    --
    The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
  17. The real question by morcheeba · · Score: 2

    is what happens at the finges of this "shadow of silence". Does it start to break down such that the anti-noise and the noise become in phase again, and you get an area of double-the-noise?

    This is a lot more complicated than headphones. Headphones are relatively one-dimensional (one microphone, one speaker, one eardrum per circuit) - the only thing you have to worry about is not generating feedback.

    This seems to be a more complicated 3-dimensional solution, and it'll have much more complicated problems. Does this cancel noise effectively in corners? Will a computer monitor cast a non-noise-canceled shadow? Is there a limit to the noise source (can it be all around you, or must it be generated in one specific place?)

    questions... looking forward to the answers!

    1. Re:The real question by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      "since it can't predict the future"

      Actually, it can predict the future! The sensing microphones are closer to the noise source than the cancelation speaker, so they receive the noise before the speaker has to generate it. At 340 m/s, 1 foot is about 0.1 milliseconds "into the future"; most speakers have a decent frequency response in the range of 1 kHz (1/0.1 msec) and could easily respond in time.

      Like the poster above said, it looks like it uses 8 noise-sensing microphones, 8 speakers, and then 8 microphones in the quiet zone to measure the sucess of the speakers and automatically make adjustments.

      In a 3d world, these sense microphones are essential because they are used to compensate when the environment changes. Stand up, and it needs to compensate. Move a chair, it does, too.

      It looks like the system would try to minimize the noise at these 8 places, and not worry about everything else. I'm guessing that these 8 microphones would have to be in relatively open air (kindof like your head is when you walk around - not in corners), and not near any local noise sources (such as the fan on yuor computer). Or, they may be built into the device, on a framework attached to the speakers and the front microphones.

      The TI 320c32 is a decent floating point processor - 20-30 MIPS / 40-60 GFLOPS. But, (IHALEWD - I have a little experience with dsps), I don't think it's enough horsepower to entirely model a room and do super-sophisticated stuff, but it looks like it would generally get good results.

      Automatically adjusting filters are neat - they can be tuned relatively easily, and since a large number of coefficients, they can describe some pretty complicated behaviour without a lot of programming. Of course, AFAIK, they assume linearity; if the air conditioner vibrations rattle a coffee cup on your desk, that's non-linear and probably won't get fixed.

      And, of course, this system may require some sort of calibration -- like a firecracker that you light near the noise source. (ok, maybe just something that makes test tones or a sharp snap). The microphones can get a picture of the room by listening to all the reflections (and by knowing what the initial sound was).

  18. Save money by shepd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Build this.

    Cost? About $10 - $20 depending on how much you have lying around. Best thing? It lets you use any headphones you like instead of being stuck with the inferior quality of many noise cancelling headphones.

    I've done it and it compares well to most sub $100 noise cancelling headphones.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  19. Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by 0xB · · Score: 3, Funny


    So, there is a noise source producing sound energy and I have a so-called noise cancelling machine producing out-of-phase sound energy.

    The end result is no sound, therefore energy has been destroyed.

    This violates all the fundamental rules of nature.

    I urge you not to build this thing ... you will destroy us all in a terrible singularity of destruction.

    --
    0xB
    1. Re:Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

      Energy is not lost. Sound is a wave, the canceling sound is a mirror wave. When two sounds meet you detect both but at one point you have to measure them both. So you take the average of the two and result is 0. You aren't destroying them, you're just taking the average as that's what we detect.
      The energy still passes through. It's been studied for a long time (play with a slinky, wave from each end, you'll see parts cancel each other out but the waves still carry through)

  20. Re:Large Scale Lab Noise by laserjet · · Score: 2

    Have you ever tried noise cancelation headphones? I also work in a large lab (filled with noise hard disk arrays) and have often thought about getting some noise cancellation headphones.

    my problem is, i do not know how well they would work in that environment. I would think they would work well since the noise is constant and similar to a jet airplane, but i want to be sure before I buy some.

    so if you or anyone has tried them in a noise server room/lab, let me know how they worked.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  21. Re:Large Scale Lab Noise by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

    yes I do, headphones aren't because people will talk to you right?

    ok, you need fabrics, cloth that sort of stuff. Get cloth chairs, anything that will absorb sound. You don't want solids because they create that sound you get when you cup your ears.

    Try putting up a cork board near your desk as well, you can post stuff to it. Try getting cubicle walls that are fabricy.

  22. This only works for low frequencies by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    Noise-cancelling systems have been around for a while. Basically, they work only when the cancelling speaker is within a fraction of a wavelength of the listener. It's a speed of sound limitation. You can cancel 100Hz for several feet, but 1000Hz for only a few inches. That's why noise-cancelling headphones work well, but large-area systems don't.

    You could build a system that cancels for a small target area from a distance, but it's going to produce twice the sound in other places.

  23. Um... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want one to quiet down my neighbour's loud dogs.

    You know, they make a .45 caliber machine which performs this job adequately...been around for years.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Um... by El+Volio · · Score: 2

      My grandfather did something better: he took a signal generator and hooked it to his amplifier/stereo, then left it on all night at max volume but at "dog whistle" frequencies... sure, he had to put up with one night of dog whining, but it cured the problem after that...

      --

      "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

  24. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 3, Funny
    No, no no. That'll just create more noise, that of gunfire.

    Yes, but it'll create such noise only once... :-)

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  25. Use in a car? by Traicovn · · Score: 2

    You mention that they are being tested in a car. Personally my car runs rather quietly, so it's not a problem. Sure, it would be nice to have it even quieter, but it occured to me that it might be quite a frequency range someone would want to block out (wind through cracks, outside noise, etc.) I would find it very odd for people who are screaming about the use of cellphones in cars to support something that can block noise and lower a drivers alertness to that enviroment around him. IT's a nice idea, perhaps it would be a good idea in a bus or something like that. I know that it's designed for 'just certain frequencies' but one has to wonder if it couldn't malfunction, or somehow something else could be in a close enough frequency range that it would get blocked too by accident? Still a nice idea though...

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
  26. That's not why its expensive... by rebelcool · · Score: 2
    its expensive because it uses advanced waveform processing in deciding what to cancel out and what not to.

    For example, cancel out your neighbor's bass, but not the conversation you're having with someone in the same room.

    --

    -

  27. Car noise-cancelling by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember seeing a long time ago on the TV a system similar fitted to an exhaust on a pokey 4 cylinder Audi. The car was practically silent, and people had a lot of trouble stalling the car when pulling away from a standstill, because you had no real feedback on engine RPM.

    Best bit was that after the car was 'silent', they simply put some nice beefy speakers in the car, linked it to engine RPM and load, and added a bit of computer wizardy. Suddenly the Audi sounded a whole lot more like a Ferrari, or at the flick of a switch , a F1 car (with 12,000 rpm 'wired' to about 4500 real engine rpm), they even had (heh) a jet turbine, but it was a bit crappy, cause turbines don't quite spool up like 4 cylinder cars do :-)

    The presenter was having a ball, caning this little car around town - from the camera's position in the car it was pretty realistic.

    Pretty much the 'killer app' for noise-cancelling tech in my opinion.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  28. Hmmmm by gvonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would imagine that you hold down a button and all of the sound it hears during that time it works to cancel out but then if you talk it knows that's not what you wanted to cancel out... like synchronizing a wireless mouse with the base station by holding the down a button to get it in sync...

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  29. Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by cjsnell · · Score: 4, Informative


    Give Noise a try. It's free and it works pretty well for me.

    A little tip: I think you'll find that pink noise works best if it's being generated from a source that sits between you and the noise you're trying to block out.

    Another tip: pink noise are also good at keeping your noise masked. If you want to have a conversation with your girlfriend and don't want your roommate listening in, turn on some pink noise.

    1. Re:Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by ainsoph · · Score: 2

      is there anything like that for linux? My ears are killing me.

    2. Re:Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by ainsoph · · Score: 2

      me too.. that did not work :)

  30. Why only Apple ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Apple can make a silent machine, why can't other manufacturers?

    Because other manufacturers are not using PowerPC CPUs. One of the PowerPC's advantages over Intel/AMD is power consumption / heat generation.

    Another factor is that Apple has absolute control over the interior of those silent Macs (later model iMacs and Cubes). The location of heat sources, careful selection of components to meet design parameters, unobstructed cool air intake, unobstructed convection paths to remove hot air, and most important of all: they don't let the end user screw around with it (adding RAM is about it).

    Life is much simpler when you don't let the average clone shop "technicians" or do-it-yourself'ers pick a bad case and powersupply, block a hot component's airflow with a rats nest of cables and crap, and try to compensate for their poor work by adding a few more fans.

    As for Apple's tower configurations that more closely resemble PC's, they are very noisy.

    1. Re:Why only Apple ... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      And PowerPC CPU's are consistently slower than any of my Intel boxes. I use LINUX on both PowerPC and Intel. My Intel boxs run circles around the PowerPC.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  31. Software-based solutions? by NawBawl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm surprised there's no (insert Dr Evil) "Open Source" software solution for realtime noise cancellation. I wouldnt mind a daemon constantly feeding my stereo the inverted-phase sound of my rooms ambient noise.

    Here's a challenge, implement it in one line of Perl :)
    Record -> invert -> playback
    mmmmm,
    for() { read("/dev/mic", buf); buf = buf * (-1); write("/dev/dsp", bug);} //whatever

    Yes, I have google'd & freshmeat'ed...

  32. ANR headsets in aircraft by AlexOsadzinski · · Score: 3, Informative

    This (noise-cancelling) technology transformed flying in general aviation aircraft a few years ago. An unpressurized single-engine aircraft can be very noisy, with a big fan a few feet in front of the pilot's face pulling the 'plane along. Sound insulation material is heavy, which you don't want in today's load-challenged GA aircraft. I use cheap ($300) automatic noise reduction (ANR) headsets when flying, and the difference is amazing when you turn them on. This technology works much better at low frequencies than high, and the tiring low-frequency rumble of a big piston engine just goes away.

  33. Prevention is better than cure. by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I recall correctly, ANR involves adding sound waves together to cancel each other out (as the waves are out of phase by half). This can't be a perfect implementation as there are many frequencies of sounds that are emitted from a computer at different times.

    Would it not be better for case manufacturers to manufacutre boxes that are sealed (sound proof). No air vents. Plus a tiny air compressor (air conditioning) inside that keeps the temperature, humidity at desireable levels. It would also remove what little dust is present too.

    Current levels of technology could implement this easily and cheapily. Prevention is better than cure. This is a simple solution, not a bandage fix.

    "I would like to change the world, but Microsoft will never give away any source code!"

    1. Re:Prevention is better than cure. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      I'm curious where all the air from the air compressor goes? Seems like it would create a lot of pressure on the box. You'd also need some hefty insulation, which would make the temperature problem even worse.

      If you want a quiet computer, try an iMac. No fan = little noise. You hear the hard drive and cd drive occasionally but that's it.

      --
      What?
  34. Atlas 10k III Ultra160 hard drive is quiet by goingware · · Score: 2
    I had heard that 10,000 RPM drives were really noisy so I was anxious about ever using one since my office is already very noisy (4 computers).

    But I wanted good performance for a machine I was converting to a dedicated fileserver for my home office (finally a machine I could leave running Linux all the time, without having to reboot, running Samba, Netatalk and NFS for all my machines). So I decided to try the Atlas 10k III.

    The one I ordered was a Quantum, but I guess they got bought out by Maxtor, or something, anyway Quantum is still around but only sells tape drives now.

    I read somewhere that the 10k III's were quieter than previous 10,000 RPM drives so I was pretty hopeful.

    My first drive didn't work. I tried it at first in my mac on an adaptec 29160, but the 29160 didn't detect it. I thought it wasn't spinning up because I couldn't hear it.

    Maxtor sent me an advance RMA (secured by a credit card) and I got the new drive today. I have 30 days to return the broken drive or else they'll charge my card.

    The web page above says they are Ultra320 but the drive I have is labeled Ultra160. No matter, really, I don't think one drive can sustain a 320 MB/sec transfer rate - these high transfer rates are most useful for RAIDs.

    I was distressed when I put the new drive in my PC on an adaptec 39160, because I couldn't hear it at all! There is another drive in the box, an old 2 GB IDE drive with Windows 2000, and the old drive completely covers up any sound coming out of the 10kIII.

    I was really upset until I went into the Adaptec SCSI utility to test and format the drive, which checked out fine.

    I'm really impressed. My wife wants me to get these for all our machines.

    I'm installing just the bare essentials of Debian potato on it as I write these, and then I'm going to use debian's go-woody script to update it to woody.

    Enterprise server admins might be skeptical of running beta software on a fileserver, but I've been running unstable (sid) on my Mac for months with few problems. My only concern is which kernel is the best, I want to run a 2.4 kernel on it and I'm not sure which I should use.

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  35. Audio recording/restoration applications? by jcsehak · · Score: 2


    This would be great for recording audio direct into the computer, if you could cancel out the fan noise but still keep the full frequency range of what you're recording. Sounds unlikely though. It'd mean I can take my machine out of the closet though!

    Hmm, now that I think of it, anyone have any ideas about a way to temorarily shut off the fan? I've got a Mac G4 tower. Maybe there's a way to get to it software wise, but I'd guess I'd probably have to wind up doing a hardware mod--make a switch to turn on/off the power to the fan (this would be so I could shut off the fan, record a few minutes of audio, then turn it back on). Or is it a bad idea to shut off the fan for even a few minutes?

    I'd just about go into conniptions if this techology could be used to restore old blues recordings and get rid of the scratchiness. Some have so much scratch and hiss they're almost unlistenable, like some Skip James or Blind Lemon Jefferson tracks. You have to really listen to hear the nuances of what they're playing. But if they could take out the scratches and leave all the sound... Oooh, baby.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  36. Low budget bass removal by dattaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    Eliminating bass can be much simpler than that with just an amplifier, speakers, and a... signal generator: position the speakers against the dorm wall where the source originates. Set the amplifier for test purposes at medium volume. Slowly calibrate the signal generator to achieve resonance of the walls. This is determined when picture frames rattle off the walls. Once this point is determined, maximize amplifier output. The resonant energy building within the walls will then be transparently delivered to the client in what can be described as a non-maskable interrupt.

    What can be described after that is guaranteed to be silence. Except for breakage of items in the host's bookshelves, etc... Slight profanity may be also side effect. Use with caution and deny any knowledge when questioned.

  37. Really cool. by burtonator · · Score: 2

    This is really nice. I have actually been thinking a LOT about this recently.

    In the past my 'server' has just been a Micron PC with SCSI and 512M... The nice thing about this has been that it is cheap and quiet.

    I can always hear it in the background but it does put me to sleep and the white noise keeps the sound of the busy SF streets from waking me up.

    The problem is that chicks don't dig it. When I have a girl spend the night they always complain that they can't sleep. If they are REALLY hot sometimes I will just shutoff the machine :)

    Then I got a *really* good deal on a 5U server. The only problem is that it is LOUD AS HELL! Then I had to swap my room/office situation around.

    This made me think... I think the white noise is TOTALLY not worth it. I have started to notice s slight ringing in my ears when I am in total silence. I am just concerned that it might be this constant white noise causing the problem.

    So I might buy this thing... see if it improves the situation..

    knock on wood

  38. shotgun by joss · · Score: 2

    I find a shotgun quietens the neighbours dogs better than anything.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  39. I need noise! by Eil · · Score: 4, Funny


    Does anyone ever consider that I might *want* noise? The dorms I live in are so damn loud that I'll do anything to bring the ambient noise above the human- and stereo-created noise threshold.

    Right now I've got a non-functional AC unit and dual in-window fans going primarily for this purpose alone. The frige is right next to my bed and since I don't have any money for food, I sometimes leave the door propped open just so the compressor runs and lulls me to sleep. I'm also considering buying a monster box fan to put next to my bed so my frige doesn't have to work so hard. (Or if I actually want to put anything in it.)

    And don't get me started on my computer. I think my neighbor can tell when I shut this thing off.

    For the curious, I have tried those anti-noise machines and noise-cancelling headphones, but they don't take care of 99% of the problem for me: bass. Until I started working nights, I'd usually be up until the wee hours of the morning because some dipshit wants to have a Jurassic Park marathon with his dipshit buddies. Let me tell you how fun that is when I had to get up a 6AM for work every day.

    And yes, I have also tried earplugs, but again, they don't block out the bass... the sound has such a low frequency that it travels through your skull rather than through your ear canal.

    1. Re:I need noise! by pangur · · Score: 3, Funny
      For the curious, I have tried those anti-noise machines and noise-cancelling headphones, but they don't take care of 99% of the problem for me: bass

      Yeah, the guy in the next cubicle has the "Billy the Big-Mouthed Bass". He has it on motion-detection, and nothing is more annoying that a fish that jumps out and sings when I go to the bathroom.

    2. Re:I need noise! by Eil · · Score: 2


      Yes, but a) I'm not paying for the power (and it's not my fridge :P) b) I need ambient noise. Any human-generated noise such as talking, music, TV, or bass is what keeps me awake.

  40. Won't work. by Domini · · Score: 2

    You will only have small quiet areas unless you purchase many of these sound-damping speakers.

    NOT an alternative for just booting that AMD and getting a Pentium...

    Me.

  41. You can't remove all the noise by thogard · · Score: 2

    I've got a sony headphones. I picked them up for about US$100 at the airport in Narita (Tokyo). In the airplane, they allow you to hear the movie at the lowest setting. In a quiet room they produce a constant buzz. The $1500 Bose aviation headsets also do the same thing but they have nice ear cups that help knock off about 30 db.

  42. Random Noise Stuff by cybergibbons · · Score: 2

    This doesn't have much point really, but the kind of noises that piss people off are completely different.

    I have two computers on in my room, neither of which are quiet. I can tell which HDs out of the 4 are on, and if any of the CPU fans break. I sleep through this all fine unless some heavy disk access happens, or I hear one of the fans go off. However, if I leave the amp up high, and the speakers hiss even slightly, I can't sleep. My girlfriend also isn't too impressed with the level of noise.

    However, at hers, she only has a little laptop. I can't sleep with the high pitch hiss/whine that the HD makes, or the horrible forced air noise the tiny fan makes - and it isn't that I'm not used to it.

    Whenever we do crew things for shows, and I need to sleep during the performance so I can work afterwards, I find sleeping behind the speaker stacks is a great place... the treble is cut because it is more directional, but the base stays, and it's quite relaxing. I can even fall asleep in clubs, base is kind of relaxing. It is a different sort of sleep from usual - very hard to wake up, and you get very vivid dreams.

    So, you'd think I was fine with noise. But I can't stand working in co-lo facilities. It's not so bad in a cluster room, or somewhere all the computers are the same... but when you have 300 machines each with two fans, HD arrays, loads of raqs, then all the different noises combine, and working in there on anything more complex than running cables is impossible. I was working on a few servers for about 12 hours one day, and had a huge supply of Dr Peppers, so hadn't moved much... when I got up to leave I felt so dizzy, and I think it was a result of the noise. I tripped over a bit of cat 5 and took out a server as well...

  43. Energy conversation by anshil · · Score: 2

    What about energy conversation?

    As far I've learned wave canceling does not work globally by physics. If you have 2 waves, they may cancel each other out on some places, but double up on other places.

    If both waves would cancel each other of completely, where did their energy go???????

    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  44. Complex computer... by Bnonn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Disclaimer: ianal, but there may be a really obvious reason why this is a dumb question.

    The article states that to dampen complex noise like speech in realtime, a powerful computer must be used. I'm wondering why. If you have the speech going into the system to be cancelled, isn't there a more simple way to sample the amplitude and just amplify that sound to the right level and pump it through some kind of inversion circuit and out the speakers?

    I dunno, maybe an "inversion circuit" isn't possible, but you've already got that sound to work with; all you have to do is put it 180 out of phase. It seems like that should be fairly simple. Kind of a shame to complicate such an elegant idea with anything more than basic computer-aided sampling. Maybe I'm underestimating the difficulty though.

  45. The Fenton Silencer by wiredog · · Score: 2

    by Arthur C Clarke, in the collection "Tales From The White Hart" is exactly this scenario. Poor Fenton, blows up the concert hall. With him in it...

  46. A much better solution by HEbGb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Especially for air travelers - Sony makes some earbud noice cancelling headphones, the NC10. Their performance is much better than Bose's, and since they're so tiny, you can just slip them into you shirt pocket, rather than having to lug a huge package around with you (the Bose ones are HUGE).

    And, as I recall, Bose headphones have a pretty severe feedback problem. If you cover the port (say, by falling asleep and rolling over), you're welcomed to a delightful, ear-piercing shriek! So much for noise cancellation.

    Oh yea, the Sony's are less than half the price, too. I've been using a pair for years.

    1. Re:A much better solution by blazin · · Score: 2

      I haven't noticed any feedback problem, but I don't think I've fallen asleep on them either. I have noticed that a light tap on the outside will result is a pretty forceful sound inside the headphones.

  47. Bose and Lotus Have Done This Before by dbretton · · Score: 2

    Many years ago, Bose produced a set of noise-cancellation headphones used for aviation purposes. They're pretty damn cool, and pretty damn expensive.

    Also, about 5 years back, Lotus had actually developed technology to cancel out engine noise in the cockpit of their cars.
    Funny thing about that one was that, though they developed the technology, the chose not to deploy it on their vehicles as their signature tinny engine sound was something Lotus owners really liked about the cars.

  48. Tested in Cars? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    OK, so we all want to have a smoot, quite ride, but do we really want to have noise reducers that artificially remove sound? I don't think so. Think about it, what if you need to hear the firetruck screaming down the street headed your way. What if your engine starts making funny noises but you can't hear it well enough to know something's wrong. What will it make your stereo sound like? These kind of issues are endless, I just don't think it's a good idea.

    --

    ~ now you know
  49. One way to omit noise... by rnturn · · Score: 2

    ... (besides the obvious solution of turning the computer off and reading a book, that is) is to move it out of the room. If Larry Ellison is still selling his network computers... I'm in the market. I've moved all but one computer into a rack down in the basement and would move the remaining one if I could find an really quiet desktop device like an X-terminal that I could hang my 19-in monitor off of. I'd rather listen to my stereo than whirring disk drives and muffin fans. Any pointers on where the affordable devices like this are for sale (HDS's prices for their X-terminals are steeper than I'd like to pay)?

    Headphone? Seems stupid and, ultimately, uncomfortable for long-term wearing. (Though they might be nice -- along with some long-johns -- for those stints I sometimes spend in the data center doing upgrades. :-) )

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  50. Question for you. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    What is the sound quality of those bose headphones though? I mean, compared to, say, some standard GOOD headphones.. like...
    Grado 60's, or Sennheiser HD330 or HD570's.
    (All around $60-$150)

    I mean with the noise cancelling turned on. What is the response? I ask only because in my experience a great many of the headphones out there are utter crap when it comes to decent sound reproduction. Most Sony headphones are crap until you get into their high end ones, you get 5x the quality from sennheiser or grado for the price. Same with most other brands.
    I have no experience with Bose, other than their speakers, which, although amazing at first listen, actually butcher the crap out of your audio. It sounds good, but it's not an accurate reproduction.

    1. Re:Question for you. by Gleef · · Score: 2

      mindstrm writes:

      What is the sound quality of those bose headphones though? I mean, compared to, say, some standard GOOD headphones.. like...
      Grado 60's, or Sennheiser HD330 or HD570's.
      (All around $60-$150)

      I mean with the noise cancelling turned on. What is the response? I ask only because in my experience a great many of the headphones out there are utter crap when it comes to decent sound reproduction. Most Sony headphones are crap until you get into their high end ones, you get 5x the quality from sennheiser or grado for the price. Same with most other brands.
      I have no experience with Bose, other than their speakers, which, although amazing at first listen, actually butcher the crap out of your audio. It sounds good, but it's not an accurate reproduction.


      My understanding is you shouldn't get these headphones if you are looking for state-of-the-art sound response from your fancy stereo. You get these headphones if you want to be able to get understandable voices and/or enjoyable music while surrounded by machinery churning out 100dB of low frequency noise. They probably don't publish the response and fidelity figures because they probably compare poorly with their more traditional headphones.

      The technology was originally developed for the military. I would assume they were much more interested in a pilot being able to hear vocal orders and information come in clearly over the radio, than whether or not the timpani sounded perfect in a symphony. Under the circumstances I think a little butchery of the sound is acceptable.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
  51. A far superior solution by iotaborg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Would be to use Etymotic ER-6 or ER-4 (see etymotic's website).

    Etymotic's canalphones use passive noise cancelling to cancel around 25dB and is way more effective than most of the active units you get. Most of the active units handle low frequency noise well but the high frequencies pass. Passive noise cancellation (Etymotics use the ol fashion earplugs) blocks the entire frequency range and is more effective than the Bose or Sony units as it does not add additional circuitry that could screw things up.

    Whats even more is that the Etymotics have *amazing* sound quality (which both the Bose and Sony truly lack), they are some of the best headphones out there, although a little expensive for most (ER-6 is $130 and ER-4 is $270 at Headroom. And no I do not work for etymotic and I really didn't mean for this post to be an ad, if it came off as one :)

    1. Re:A far superior solution by HEbGb · · Score: 2

      I tried these out when I was shopping for mine.

      What it comes down to is that the etymotics do have better sound quality, but their 'cancellation' is non-existant - they're simply passive 'sound blockers'. They don't negate the sound waves at all.

      They're really just well designed earplugs. They do block sound, but they do NOT 'cancel' it. So their efficacy at lower frequencies (such as plane rumble) is not very good.

      You're right that active noise cancellation doesn't work very well for high frequencies - but passive blocking does. So the Sony's gave me the best of both worlds - solid cancellation at low frequencies, and effective blocking of sound at higher frequencies.

  52. Typical by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't that just like the typical Slashdotter, making things SOOOO much more complicated than needed? If the PCs and equipment in your room are unacceptably loud...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    wait for it
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    TURN THEM OFF.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  53. Re:Speaking of sleep... by softsign · · Score: 2
    You know, most hearing aid companies are working on stuff like this. Hearing impaired have a hell of a time at something like a cocktail party - where there's lots of noise from all different directions (it's actually called the cocktail party problem). Since most hearing aids consist of a single microphone (not communicating with the other side of your head), you lose your natural ability to determine the direction a voice is coming from (your brain is actually able to tune out background noise because your ears can tell you which direction a sound came from). So some next-gen hearing aids consist of two mics and some DSP to tune out all but sound coming from your forward "field of view". I've seen (heard) it demonstrated, it's pretty wild.

    Unfortunately, you don't always want to tune out 360 degrees of hearing... so there's some adjustment of the hearing aids required when you move into a different setting.

  54. Commercial Applications Only by Xofer+D · · Score: 2
    Like a lot of others, I was interested in this, thinking that it might be a consumer device. I went looking though, and found this article from the bombay IEEE student newsletter which talks about the device. It says " The cost according to Prof. Wright is likely to be a few thousand pounds making it practical only for commercial use."

    On the other hand, the article also has some (thin) technical details:

    For the technically inclined, this facility measures 6m x 6m x 5m; the eight channel system is based on a Texas instruments tms320c32 processor using a two tap filter and a circular buffer technique to implement the delayed version of the update algorithm. This allows easy algorithm implementation in software and significantly reduces computation time for a large number of channels a 16 - input, 8 - output. PC 16108 provides a 12-bit interface with the external equipment. This board contains three selectable levels of gain: 1,10,100.
    Does anyone know about the latency involved with using a tms320c32? It might be possible to rig a software solution to run on a PC, perhaps leading to a homebrew version.

    Has anyone had any experience doing programming of this nature? Bear in mind that response time would have to be very low to cancel noise that you didn't predict (such as low-frequency hums, fan noise, etc).

    --
    The Signal/Noise ratio can be improved in two ways. Remaining silent is the OTHER way.
  55. Re:Car noise-cancelling by Galvatron · · Score: 2

    Who else here thinks the silencing ought to be mandatory for motorcycles? God those fucking things piss me off.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  56. Why quiet in a noisy environment? by tcc · · Score: 2

    In my case, I got used to sleep with the computers turned on in the bedroom, the idea is that when everything is totally silent, I hear all the unregular noises, clicks, walking, neighbour yelling, whatever.. the computer noise is regular and after many years I guess my brain got used to that specific frequency and it doesn't stop me from sleeping at all... If I turn everything off, I wake up at any unregular sound, and I find it very irritating.

    Man that will be weird when the girlfriend will move in. I just hope that one won't do the mistake of asking me to chose between her and the computers :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  57. Dealing with noise sources by dattaway · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No one would suspect a thing!

    The power of denial is the great leverage of communication when they KNOW you have done something. Give them enough suspision, but not enough proof. The social engineering object is to use this opportunity to drive your loud argument into their weakened, desperate state.

    Intimidate by the power of denial. When they accuse, use this precious time to illustrate their vulnerability. Be mad, not just pissed off. Twist their logic into epic proportions of insanity. They will either leave you alone, or try to match wits. Always trump their argument with a more grandiose element of insanity and do not let them win. After all, they have been playing rap (or other lame noise) at unhuman levels for an inordinate amount of time. Illustrate the chaos they have created.

    But always deny knowledge. In this war, you must fight noise with noise. This is insanity at its best. Replace it with your projection how annoying they are. It will throw them off if they try to make a logical case against you. The resulting communication about noise is sure to be music to the ears of other victims.

  58. The thing is.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Bose seems to provide absolutely no standard audio information on their website about these headphones. They go on and on about noise cancelling abilities, and how great all their adapters are, but I can't find anywhere where they show a response curve, impedence, THD, etc.

  59. Re:Noise cancellation is a simple thing by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

    Never mind that there are at least 3 of these things commercially avialable RIGHT NOW. They work amazingly great. Course you can't hear your boss yelling for you or the phone ringing so maybe not so great for maintaining your job...

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  60. Re:Large Scale Lab Noise by stripes · · Score: 2
    Have you ever tried noise cancelation headphones? I also work in a large lab (filled with noise hard disk arrays) and have often thought about getting some noise cancellation headphones

    Things are far from silent in a machine room with ANR, but it is much better with them on (it sounds a little quieter, but I can stay in much much longer).

  61. Re:Car noise-cancelling by RFC959 · · Score: 2

    If you'd actually talk to some of the riders of "those fucking things", you might find out that for them, being loud is a matter of safety. Motorcycles are harder to see (particularly because most drivers aren't looking for them) and the riders are much more vulnerable in crashes. They need all the "visibility" they can get. Of course, not all of them need to be as loud as they are...

  62. Re:Car noise-cancelling by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    If they're interested in safety, then they should not be riding motorcycles. Trying to make motorcycles safe by making them loud is like driving around with your brights on to make you more visible, it's more distracting than anything.


    I have "talked to the riders of 'those fucking things,'" my father rode motorcycles in his youth, until a crash shattered his hip, putting him in a cast for most of a year (during which he lost a good 10 lbs of leg muscle), and permanently shortening one of his legs. And yes, the crash occured despite how noisy his motorcycle was.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  63. Re:Another solution by dattaway · · Score: 2

    Agreed. The object is to transfer acustic energy to an object. Resonance will fill an object to its seams. The key is locating the sweet spots with the signal generator. When you hear something rattle, its time to turn up the volume in hopes of hearing the sweet music of something dancing onto the floor.

  64. Re:Speaking of sleep... by softsign · · Score: 2

    With CDMA, you have no directional information... Your single antenna isn't capable of isolating the source of a signal. It's all a mishmash. That's why you need PN codes.

    At a cocktail party, it's a different kind of mishmash. Suppose you are standing at the centre of multiple sound sources. Person B, standing at your 4 o'clock, speaks. That sound will arrive at your right ear moments before it arrives at your left ear. Furthermore, you have other cues to indicate that the sound is coming from behind you (not sure if this is your ears or just being able to feel the vibrations in your jaw or body). Your brain basically triangulates on the source. What's more amazing is that your brain can do this for multiple simultaneous sources to the point where you can pick out a single conversation in a crowded room.

    I think the whole voice identification thing is another neat brain trick - not too familiar with that...