Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Deception, Fusion, Membership

Slashback arrives tonight with updates on the lukewarm path to cold fusion, one more update on what Microsoft claims is "the way out" (really, this time), a hopeful look at Mandrake's Club, and more -- read on below for the details.

"Congratulations! You may already own goats.cx!" King Mongo writes: "Well, well. First Verisign sent mail to trick domain owners into switching registrars ( as described earlier on Slashdot ); today I received a similar letter from Verisign asking me to renew cruel-intention.com with them. The problem is, I never bought cruel-intention.com and I've never used Verisign as a registrar. But what's this? Whois says I've owned it since September 2001? And the Technical Contact is Verisign? And it's registered for 10 years? You can bet I'll be contacting my state AG, as well as the USPS Inspectors' office; what if the domain name was offensive, or actionable (it may even be a DMCA violation)? Verisign has taken it upon themselves to hijack my identity and expose me to litigation! At least they let me know!"

Port softly, and carry a big Club. joestar writes: "Just seen in Mandrake Linux news... It seems that the recent call for Mandrake Club subscriptions had a double effect: it was a financial success for MandrakeSoft ($390,000 since the Club was first created on November 28th, 2001), and at the same time it generated lots of questions about this new approach of doing business with Free-Software. In a really interesting message, MandrakeSoft's CEO Jacques Le Marois gives all details about the Club results and why and how they are currently inventing a new business model dedicated to Free-Software oriented companies, since the traditional business models fail for these companies. Actually I'm impressed."

OK, perhaps we only have the way sideways. gh0ul writes "news.com is featuring an article regarding Microsoft and Unisys' joint venture to steer companies/individuals away from Unix and branch in to the corporate servers based on Windows2000. With all the negative impact towards 'wehavethewayout.com', im supprised they kept it going.. guess that $28 million matters.."

We've patented that way to think, sorry. An Anonymous Coward writes: "The Symantec marketing droids are on the rampage again. After patenting their definition update technology, this time they patented heuristic virus scanning. When will this insanity end? :P"

I'll believe it when it's powering my air-car. abburdlen writes: "A month ago an article in the Journal Science appeared hyping the possibility of tabletop fusion. Quick summary: Sonoluminescence in heavy acetone ... temperature of collapsing bubbles reaching temperature hotter than the Sun ... evidence of fusion. There was some excitement. There were also many initial skeptics. Looks like the doubtful win again. From the APS, 'The possibility of a major discovery has been obscured by substandard experimental techniques.' Ouch."

One day we'll all have decent bandwidth, right? Pathway writes "I know this has been looked at by slashdot before, but here's a good update comparing the Zipp Fiber to the Terabyte Triangle in Spokane at thelocalplanet.com. In the article, they compare how one prodject is so successful, while the other is foundering. It's a good read."

50 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Mirrors. by saintlupus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why and how they are currently inventing a new business model dedicated to Free-Software oriented companies, since the traditional business models fail for these companies.

    Hey, how about some dedicated FTP bandwidth for club members? I know the release of the PPC-8.2 may well flatten the public servers.

    --saint

    1. Re:Mirrors. by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Flamebait

      Hey, how about some dedicated FTP bandwidth for club members? I know the release of the PPC-
      8.2 may well flatten the public servers.


      I am sure that all 26 of you guys will be able to get your copies without too much of a problem.

      PowerPCs make up all of about 5% of the market. What percentage of PowerPC users run something other than a Mac OS? About a tenth of a percent? Yeah, that's going to be a crushing demand. I hope that the Internet backbone providers can handle the traffic. Maybe Mandrake can add a few dozen OC-3 lines to handle the traffic if they release a DEC Alpha version of Mandrake 8.2.

      Note to moderators: If you feel the need to mod this comment down, may I suggest Flamebait? "Troll" is really not right since I'm expressing my actual opinion, though in an offensive and confrontational manner. Also, since I am at 50 Karma points, I suggest first modding this up to +5 and then down to -1 to get the maximum effect (-6 karma points).

  2. Goats.cx? by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Congratulations! You may already own goats.cx!"

    I would rather own goatse.cx instead. Imagine the number of hits from losers you would get!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Goats.cx? by quantaman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just think of all the poor /. newbies who just clicked on your highly rated link to see what it was! I never saw I would see a goatse.cx higher than -1.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:Goats.cx? by s20451 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They gotta learn somehow. Come to think of it, maybe we should have some elaborate initiation ritual for newbies ... where they have to endure the trials of goatse.cx and JonKatz before earning their Slashdot membership.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    3. Re:Goats.cx? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      where they have to endure the trials of goatse.cx and JonKatz before earning their Slashdot membership

      You say that as if they're two different things... :P

  3. Check out this bullshit by 1010011010 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Both Microsoft and Unisys have declined to comment on the cause of the outage. It is unknown whether there was a technical problem at the hosting site or whether the site was merely bombarded with requests from IT managers clamoring for copies of the free papers on the site.


    Oh yeah! Spin, baby! spin!
    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    1. Re:Check out this bullshit by Toddarooski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This ain't exactly Microsoft-spin. (I think in this case they were smart enough to keep a low profile.) Note that Microsoft and Unisys refused to comment -- the sentence you're quoting was written by the news.com reporter, and not some Microsoft PR dude.

      I think instead, it's a subtle bit of sarcasm on Mr. Kanellos' part. Go back and read it again.

      --

      --

      "Do you expect me to talk?" "No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die!"

    2. Re:Check out this bullshit by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Both Microsoft and Unisys have declined to comment on the cause of the outage. It is unknown whether there was a technical problem at the hosting site or whether the site was merely bombarded with requests from IT managers clamoring for copies of the free papers on the site.

      Not to be a wet blanket, but that sentence is obviously the article author's tongue-in-cheek comment. If Microsoft and Unisys declined to comment, then how could they say anything about clamoring IT managers?

    3. Re:Check out this bullshit by elfkicker · · Score: 4, Funny

      The best part is, that after the mad dash to change from a BSD/Apache setup over to IIS is that they are still running a MySQL backend.

      This is about as embarrassing as the time I accidentally mixed up my boss's 12 year-old son's site with shemalesonline.com

    4. Re:Check out this bullshit by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
      the sentence you're quoting was written by the news.com reporter, and not some Microsoft PR dude.

      And news.com reporters *AREN'T* Microsoft PR flacks?

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  4. Very Interesting Read on Cold Fusion by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Professor David Goodstein of Caltech has a very interesting paper on the physics of cold fusion and the history of the initial "discovery". He doesn't predict Mr. Fusion reactors strapped to the backs of our DeLoreans anytime soon.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  5. Maze by phrontist · · Score: 5, Funny

    wehavethewayout.com has that image with the window at the end of a maze, and it leads off to a drop. very good analogy :-) ---------- Phrontist=Geek

    --
    T( H)GSB Apr 21-27
  6. Support alternate roots by davidu · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a way to begin to move away from Verisign
    OpenNIC :: http://www.opennic.unrated.net/

    The OpenNIC is a user owned and controlled Network Information Center offering a democratic, non-national, alternative to the traditional Top-Level Domain registries.

    Membership in the OpenNIC is open to every user of the Internet. All decisions are made either by a democratically elected administrator or through a direct ballot of the interested members and all decisions, regardless of how they are made, within OpenNIC are appealable to a vote of the general membership.

    Using their root zone will have NO adverse effects on your current websurfing but it will allow you to view alternative roots which have been democratically decided upon.

    Check it out!

    --davidu
    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
    1. Re:Support alternate roots by Pathwalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Using their root zone will have NO adverse effects on your current websurfing but it will allow you to view alternative roots which have been democratically decided upon.

      Technically, I think that this is not quite right. I believe that OpenNic does not support the icann .biz zone.
      Personally, I would have a hard time finding a way to care less than I already do about anything under .biz, so I use OpenNIC as my DNS root.

  7. Re:cool! (oh wait) by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously you're not an AMD owner...

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  8. I'm looking for "the way out" by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    so I'm writing Perl functions to serve as drop-in replacements for people porting asp applications to perl. (I'm porting an application now, unfortunately Chilisoft asp couldn't handle the traffic this site gets).

    So far I've gotten Trim, InStr, InStrRev, Left, Right, and a few others done. Having these functions really make translating the code a lot easier.

    I wonder, is this too trivial to post on sourceforge? I'd love to share.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  9. Is there a good registrar review site anywhere? by Jelloman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    domainnamebuyersguide.com was mentioned here about a year ago, but it's since been bought by a registrar (which is why I didn't make it a link).

    Since there are so many ill-behaved registrars out there (starting with the root of all DNS evil, Verisign), I would really like to see some unbiased reviews of some of them. But Googling around, I'm having a hard time finding anything.

    I'm mostly looking for a registrar whose customer agreement does not state somewhere in subparagraph J that they actually own my domain and can take it away anytime they feel like it for no good reason. I know the courts have said that they have that right anyway, at least in the US, but I'd at least prefer that they not shove it in my face.

    1. Re:Is there a good registrar review site anywhere? by Mr_Person · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gandi has worked great for me. Only 12 euros per year (about $10) and their terms of service are very good (you actually own the domain). They also do website and e-mail redirection for free.

    2. Re:Is there a good registrar review site anywhere? by Azog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, back before domainnamebuyersguide was bought out, I used it to pick Domain Discover

      Their prices have gone up a little since I originally registered arnor.net and my other site, but their domain registration agreement is still readable, clearly states that you own the domain, and they can only take it away according to ICANN policies or non-payment. The web site makes it easy to modify the configuration for your domains. The free features like email and web site forwarding are really useful. If I register more domains, I'll keep going there.

      And I should also mention Hosting-Network, Inc where I've got my site. I'm on the $60/year plan, they don't mess with your site, server is BSD/Apache with PHP,CGI and Perl, you get email addresses, lots of webspace, and your own IP address. It rocks.

      At prices like this, everyone should have their own domain, website, and set of email addresses...

      --
      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      "HTML needs a rant tag" - Alan Cox
    3. Re:Is there a good registrar review site anywhere? by washirv · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't recommend gandi (www.gandi.net) highly enough. In addition to the small and entirely pro-consumer terms of service, it's really cheap: a mere $10. And since I switched to them, the email address that I use to register domain names has stopped getting spam. (The old one that I used with netsol still gets plenty). These guys are the best.
      --
      kurukshetra all the desi news and views you could use

  10. Other instances? More Proof? by sourcehunter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Verisign has taken it upon themselves to hijack my identity and expose me to litigation! At least they let me know!"

    Has this happened to anyone else? I'm a bit skeptical of this. This could really land Verisign into some HOT HOT HOT water. It ain't like Verisign is going to target ONE person. If this has only happened to ONE person, then perhaps someone else registered the domain. What other domains does this guy have? Anything similar? Info Info info!!!! The slashback doesn't give much!

    --

    quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
  11. What DB is wehavethewayout.com? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Jumping over to The Register

    But is the site itself entirely clean? The server yesterday revealed that some interesting ports were left open. The most interesting of which is port 3306, which is used by MySQL and Postgres. Since wehavethewayout.com was a BSD/Apache combination, it was almost certainly running an open source database, too. While Unisys has switched the front-end server to Windows IIS, the most likely explanation for keeping this port open is that the back-end still interfaces to a MySQL database. MySQL is cross platform, and there's a Windows version too. This would certainly make for a rapid port, as it doesn't require a rewrite of the cgi scripts.


    Oh, will the pain never end (grin)...

    1. Re:What DB is wehavethewayout.com? by brer_rabbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      fyi-- port 3306 is typically MySQL, not PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL typically runs on 5432.

      Still, it's a fair assumption they were running MySQL. Possibly just out of the box -- does MySQL listen to a network port by default? PostgreSQL only listens on unix domain sockets by default, you actually have to edit the config to get it to listen to the network.

  12. Steps to Buying a Domain Name For Dummies(tm) by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it possible (easy?) for someone to register a domain name using someone else's information? That could be an explanation for Verisign sending you a letter about a domain you never registered...

    Uhh... yeah. I guess you've never bought a domain.

    Okay. For *.com, *.net and probably *.org:

    1. Type the name of the domain you want.
    2. Read the message that it's already been taken.
    3. Choose a new domain name.
    4. Repeat 1-4 until you hit paydirt.
    5. Type your name, country, address, telephone, e-mail address. Note: this e-mail address will be spammed, and all this other info will be visible in whois.
    6. Whip out your credit card. Pay $35/year. Make sure your browser is using HTTPS before you click the form submit button and send your credit card across 400 unsecured routers.
    7. Enter the hostnames of your nameservers. If you're hosting the site yourself, you will need to create a host record including name and IP address for each of your primary and secondary DNS.
    8. Wait for confirmation e-mail, telephone call, etc.
    9. Look your domain up in whois and find yourself!
    10. Wait an agonizing two days or so before top-level DNS servers catch up with the whois database and people can see your Apache test page.

    It's really not very difficult.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Steps to Buying a Domain Name For Dummies(tm) by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Silly -- the TTL field in TCP has a maximum value of 255, so you could only send insecure credit card data through 254 routers. And the default TTL is usually 64 on Linux and FreeBSD, though it is higher on Solaris and Windows.

      Yeah. Hyperbole.

      Realistically, however, less than 30 hops by traceroute.

      Realistically and conservatively you should only expect to be able to send your insecure data through about 60 routers. You'd need multiple routes or multicast to exceed 255 routers, so you may want to consider mass email or mass Usenet posting instead.

      Calling Mastercard: "Hi, I'd like to cancel my card. No, I didn't lose it... I accidentally spammed over 1.3 million e-mail addresses and 40,000 newsgroups with it. Yeah. I think you can expect a little activity on that number over the next few years...."

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  13. Clarification regarding "the way out" by Jayde+Stargunner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last time I checked, the site really wasn't touting IIS for web hosting, but using Windows servers for enterprise solutions. That's a pretty different situation.

    It's also quite possible that since this really isn't an "in-house" Microsoft deal, they didn't have their web developers working on it...they probably farmed it out to some starving web-heads from SF for an absurdly low price. That said, most web developers don't develop for MS boxes simply because hosting companies charge twice as much for Windows space as a general rule.

    Sure, it may seem like some mass hypocricy or something...but if the website isn't about "Use IIS for hosting two-page, temp web pages!" there really isn't much of an issue.

    Also, notice the page has at the bottom:
    "©1994-2002 Unisys Corporation. All rights reserved."
    NOT
    "©1994-2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved."

    -Jayde

    --
    What's a sig?
    1. Re:Clarification regarding "the way out" by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure, it may seem like some mass hypocricy or something...but if the website isn't about "Use IIS for hosting two-page, temp web pages!" there really isn't much of an issue.

      I agree with the sentiment that this isn't about web hosting, but then again its about business. Appearances are important and downtime just looks bad period for potential customers. It may not be logical, but if my storefront is falling apart you probably won't walk in to check out my products regardless of their merits.

      Well maybe it is logical, if a company can't properly set up a marketing site how much faith can one have in its other decisions in outsourcing. At a certain point you just have to ask yourself, "Who is making these outsourcing decisions and why do they still have a job?"

      On top of that, this is a marketing attempt against open source which has very little marketing muscle. Its just plain embarassing to see the world's wealthiest corporation falter in front of some geeks and some IBM marketing.

  14. Substandard techniques? by quantaman · · Score: 3, Funny

    reaching temperature hotter than the Sun ... evidence of fusion.

    From the APS, 'The possibility of a major discovery has been obscured by substandard experimental techniques.

    What kind of experimental technique could account for that kind of error? Oops! Maybe maybe we shouldn't have set it up in a nuclear reactor that must be where the heat is coming from!!

    --
    I stole this Sig
  15. Patents by felipeal · · Score: 5, Informative

    When will this insanity end?

    I don't know if this is the case with Symantec, but I have a friend that works for a company in the semi-conductors business, and that company has a patent-incentive policy: for each patent request filled, the author receives a US$500 bonus. If the request is approved (and the company - not the author, of course - gets the patent), he/she gets another US$2000.

    That would explain a lot of crazy/stupid/useless patents...

    1. Re:Patents by zmooc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the main reason for this bonus-system is to stimulate employees with good innovative ideas to "give" the idea to the company. most employees of most companies are required to do that by their contract anyway. This is probably just meant as an extra bonus for not keeping the idea to yourself (and making money of it yourself). This is pretty standard actually; a lot of good ideas come from education/experience you get by working at the company so they'd like to profit from that. I don't think it was meant to have as many patents as possible.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
  16. Re:cruel-intention.com by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Oh, it's very easy. My wife got a similar letter from Verisign; someone stole her identity last year and signed up for several domain addresses.

    We naturally checked out the domain and it's unused -- probably because the initial payment to Verisign bounced (we had to cancel all our credit cards and start over) -- but Verisign's still trying to get us to pay for a renewal! Gotta love their optimism; too bad we can't get 'em arrested for fraud, but then I guess Verisign itself has technically done nothing wrong here, just tried to perpetuate someone else's fraud.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  17. wehavethewayout.com FTP by silvaran · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They really did a number on this one. For a few days, while the site was down, they were running the default anonymous FTP server. It's still up, but they removed all traces of FreeBSD.

    You can still log in as anonymous, but there's just a dummy html file there. Before, you could find /bin/ls. Doing a 'file' on it revealed it was a FreeBSD binary. Hmm.. hanging around on an IIS server? Wow, imagine that.

    The PR people know their stuff. I would imagine they took plenty of courses during those several days of downtime to learn how 'cp -R *' actually works.

  18. I'm not defending them but... by DeadBugs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unisys has been in the computer buisness from the beginning long before Microsoft was around. After the fallout between Microsoft and IBM, Unisys became deeply involved with Micorsoft providing servers and direct tech support for Microsoft products. They are not as fortunate as IBM to have jumped off the boat long ago. Their siding with Microsoft because they have so much invested, if everyone went to Linux tommorow Microsoft would not be the only company to suffer.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  19. Unix is the light by Trevelyan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    look at the pic on www.wehavethewayout.com notice the light shines out from their unix represntation, in to the dark MS world.
    which way would you go, from the light into the dark or from the dark in to the light?

    thier PR ppl missed that metaphore =)

    hehe

  20. OpenNIC will never catch on by Starship+Trooper · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And there are a number of reasons why, but I can tell you the one most glaring and obvious reason: aesthetics. The original TLDs .com, .org, .net, .edu, and .mil are all short, easy to type, one syllable to pronounce (except for .edu), and most importantly look good at the end of a domain name.

    From OpenNIC's TLD list, you have chosen the TLDs .glue, .indy, .geek, .null, .oss, .parody, and .bbs. All of these are either horribly narrow-reaching and have no reason to be a TLD (.geek, .oss, .parody), sound stupid (.glue, .indy), look stupid (.geek, .oss, .bbs), or are too long (all of them except .oss and .bbs).

    These are the same reasons nobody wants a domain under .biz, .info, .museum or any of the other "official" new TLDs. Geeks seem to be naturally deficient at proper design, so I'm not blaming what is essentially a geek project for having this problem. An alternative to the monstrosity Verisign and ICANN have made of their root servers is severely needed. But, if I may, I would like to suggest you ditch these ugly TLDs and put some more thought into choosing names people actually would want on the end of their site names. Think to yourself, would you seriously consider getting a ".parody" domain? Here are some tips:

    • The TLDs must all be short. Extremely short. No more than 3 characters. Preferably monosyllabic.
    • Don't use ugly letters like 'y', 'k', or 'z', especially at the beginning or end of the domain.
    • Avoid catering to special interests. ".com", ".org" and ".net" all work because they're broad and unspecific. TLDs like ".geek" and ".oss" are just going to make nongeeks roll their eyes and look elsewhere.
    • Most importantly, before you approve a new TLD, seriously ask yourself (and preferably a few other regular people), "would I buy a domain under this TLD?" Few people are going to want a ".geek" domain, I can tell you.
    I really want to see a project like this succeed, but you have to create domains that appeal to broad ranges of people, are easy to type and remember, and look good.
    --
    Loneliness is a power that we possess to give or take away forever
    1. Re:OpenNIC will never catch on by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really what we want is to have any top-level domain you can think of. Having just .coms is stupid - it was fine at the time, but now that everybody and their dog has a site, it's like trying to find a new hotmail address - there's none left. I don't accept thisismynewwebpagenamebecausealltheothersaretaken. com as a valid solution.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    2. Re:OpenNIC will never catch on by dzero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reasons you give are interesting but sound an awful lot like the oft-mentioned FUD we hear about on Slashdot from time to time.

      You are expressing a shocking (to me) level of doubt in something which is a clearly better alternative to the ridiculous conservatism in the TLD world. The TLDs OpenNIC has chosen aren't good enough for you. Suggest some! Isn't that the point? It's a system that's open enough that everyone can help make it better, instead of something like ICANN. That's the point of OpenNIC. Open. NIC. Not ICANN.

      (For the record, I hadn't heard of OpenNIC until today)

      Someone in another thread mentioned this, and it's true: what we really want is any TLD at all. Why append three letters to a URL when it's mostly meaningless now?

      Most parties purchase .com, .org and .net of their chosen name -- effectively eliminating any meaning the TLDs were meant to have. VeriSign (admittedly, according to something I read on the OpenNIC site) no longer requests any justification for choice of TLD because they realize everybody just wants all of them.

      So how is the TLD remotely meaningful?

      And FYI there has been acceptance of the new ICANN-endorsed TLD's.

      I live in New York City and am a regular user of the MTA's (Metropolitan Transit Authority) services, most obviously and frequently the subway. Everywhere the MTA's old URL used to be on posters and signs, there is a little circle with "new" or something, and their new URL: http://www.mta.info.

      ".info" used to look stupid to me, too, but now it looks pretty darn normal.

      So, general acceptance or not, some people seem to be finding this useful. "Think outside the box" and you'll eventually realize that the TLDs can actually convey useful information about a URL.

      All it takes to make the unfamiliar familiar and the awkward comfortable is a little love and clarity. Why wait?

  21. Versign: They're Bastards! by IronTek · · Score: 4, Informative

    A friend of mine had registered a domain through Network Solutions (Verisign) and had renewed it for several years.

    Last year, when his domain was coming up to expire, he didn't want to pay Verisign's fees...so he just figured he's let it lapse and maybe go reregister it with someone else...trouble is, though its expired, Verisign hasn't released the domain!

    So my friend can't renew/reregister with anyone except Verisign b/c they won't release the domain back into the pool of available domains!

  22. No surprise about Mandrake by Richthofen80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mandrake's finacial success doesn't suprise me. People are willing to pay for the membership in the club because Mandrake linux is perhaps one of the best distributions. Easy to use, reliable, but by no means just for a novice user.
    I tried redhat at first, because thats what I heard was one of the best. But I found Mandrake to be friendlier to me, a windows user. It hasn't crashed in two months, and runs my apache server just fine. Also shares my home network connection, so I don't have to pay at&t the extra cash for extra IPs.

    And I actually paid for my copy, bought it at staples. worth every penny.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  23. Re:Yes, new TLDs are needed... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why have any restrictions at all? If somebody wants www.this-site.sucksass, why not give it to them?

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  24. Expensive Experts by Gurp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember how, according to Microsoft/Unisys, companies shouldn't need "expensive experts"?

    So far, their non-experts:

    1) Installed a system that has embarrassed the company (by using the competitor's OS)
    2) While fixing this, it was down for ages (more embarrassment)
    3) Now that it's up, it's a sitting duck (with MySQL bound to the external network interface) for crackers

    Now, tell me again about how companies shouldn't use experts?

  25. "hacking" see "Whining " by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a hacker, I felt it entirely natural to begin to attempt to encapsulate, measure, and then control reality with software. (For what I mean by the word "hack," see http://www.tuxedo.org/ ~esr/ jargon/jargon.html#hack:. To interact with a computer in a playful and exploratory rather than goal-directed way. 'Whatcha up to?' 'Oh, just hacking.' " Criminals need to get themselves another word, we had it first.)

    Wank, wank, wank.

    Well, keep that up and "hacker" will soon mean "a whinny little bitch." I'm so sick of that crap (well, thankfully it's mostly died down of late). It is entirely possible for words to have multiple meanings. The fact that a word you think sounds "cool" does not give you license to go out and try to change the English language. Sheesh.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:"hacking" see "Whining " by neo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that a word you think sounds "cool" does not give you license to go out and try to change the English language. Sheesh.

      Actually it does. English is a living language and usage dictates the meanings of words. A dictionary is not the guide to how words are spelled and what they mean, it is rather a reflection of usage.

      From Ambrose Bierce:

      "DICTIONARY, n. A malevolent literary device for cramping the growth of a language and making it hard and inelastic. "

  26. Cold Fusion story and other things by connorbd · · Score: 3, Funny

    I once pursued a woman who happened at the time to be an Allaire employee, long before the Macromedia buyout. Beautiful girl, a little short in the brains department, but I didn't figure that out until long after she crushed my heart by hitting on my boss right in front of me. But anyway. Ever since then I've always thought that there was something weirdly appropriate about the fact that someone like her -- bimbo-in-geek's-clothing -- would work for a company whose flagship product was called Cold Fusion. (I met some people a while later who had worked with her -- I got the sense that my impression of her was not far off from the impression she gave around the office.)

    As for the matter of wehavethewayout.com... Two companies that had it coming. The dinosaur and the Borg... wonder how much fingerpointing is going on right now. (Come to think of it, Rick Belluzzo... never mind.)

    /Brian

  27. More of the firestorm about that fusion experiment by sunhou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There were two more articles in Science about this "bubble fusion" stuff: one, called To publish or not to publish that explains why they published the article despite the controversy, and another one called 'Bubble Fusion' Paper Generates a Tempest in a Beaker which has some opposing viewpoints. Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure you need to be a subscriber or at a university which subscribes to access those (I access it through my university account).

    It's all very interesting, and I'll be curious to see what the final conclusions are. I'm still not sure if I think it was best to publish now, or wait for more independent confirmation. At least they didn't try to hide all the controversy (they even point out that senior science managers at Oak Ridge Lab contacted the journal and asked them to delay publishing the paper..)

  28. Re:heuristic might actually be useful... by connorbd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Er... the patent is expired. RSA is as free as it gets. You're free to remain ticked off at the idea of the patent, mind you, I think most of us here are annoyed by it, but principles aside this particular case is no longer relevant.

    /Brian

  29. wehavetheway... by Guido69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...to Adobe? Anyone else think it's odd that the only format offered for the reports is pdf? Also noticed that there aren't any FrontPage headers in the site source. Hmmm. Perhaps Linux does have a chance on the desktop. I sense a new trend starting in Redmond.

    --
    - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  30. Could Terabyte's tagline be any more obnoxious? by nobodyman · · Score: 3, Funny
    The slogan on their website reads:
    "Nothing is more important than bandwidth."

    Oh really? Well then PLEASE SHOOT ME NOW. Because I was hoping that the cure for AIDS and/or Cancer, the resolution of the Israeli/Palestine conflict, and perhaps cold fusion would be a big deal.

    I recently had DSL installed, so apparently it's all downhill from here.
  31. Sure - kick the danes, while you're at it! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't use ugly letters like 'y', 'k', or 'z', especially at the beginning or end of the domain.

    .dk is an official TLD for the "danish" part of the web.

    Thank you for telling us, that our TLD is ugly.

    Go suck on my.dk ;-)

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.