Slashdot Mirror


A New Low for Web Advertisers: Pop-Up Downloads

rizzmanix writes: "I thougt it was strange that I had been getting a lot of pop-up download prompts for the Gator software as I browsed around the web in the recent days. Why were all these sites requiring this Gator thing I wondered? Well I wonder no more... as apparently advertisers hit a new low by running 'pop-up downloads' instead of pop-up ads. Sneaky, underhanded, nasty and vile."

53 of 641 comments (clear)

  1. a followup link by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.scumware.com

    --
    -Styopa
  2. Pop up download by fruey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Scares the hell out of me. Whoever does this should get their sites DoSsed immediately.

    This is a major security issue, and clearly by default the only warning in MSIE is a dialog box, which you may already have set to just accept downloads automatically.

    Yet another reason to use non-standard browsers and non Windows OS, so that you even if you end up with an executable it won't execute.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Pop up download by letxa2000 · · Score: 3, Funny
      No, you mean yet another reason to use standard browsers. 99% of browsers can't run ActiveX controls.

      Unfortunately 99% of the users are using the 1% of the browsers that can...

  3. Wow, this is lame by Sc00ter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "In some cases, people are not even asked whether they want the software. It just installs on the hard drive--a particularly troublesome tactic that some have dubbed "drive-by download."

    What programs do this? I've never, ever seen a webbrowser that automatically installs stuff. At least not until you specifically specify for that site only (like MS Updates, or Station.Sony.com)

    "But those horror stories are the exception. More typically, software makers are simply using the downloads to distribute legitimate products."

    Legitimate products don't automatically download onto my computer without my concent.

    1. Re:Wow, this is lame by Violet+Null · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've never, ever seen a webbrowser that automatically installs stuff.

      IE will happily install stuff without prompting if that's the way the security is set up; eg, if you set the "Internet Zone" (or whatever) to "Low" security, it will automatically download any signed ActiveX control.

  4. why mozilla rules here by cetan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since 0.9.4, mozilla users have had the ability to block onload and unload pop-ups/unders. I've had zero problems with this. It doesn't block pop-ups you request, just the ones you don't.

    I've not seen a popup in months and months. It's fantastic.

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    1. Re:why mozilla rules here by bconway · · Score: 5, Informative

      Preferences -> Advanced -> Scripts and Windows. I uncheck all except the last 3.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    2. Re:why mozilla rules here by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Look if you don't want to view a site's ads, then don't go to the site. It is as simple as that. Blocking certain portions of a site's content because you don't personally want to see it is definitely immoral and arguably illegal

      What a load of horse pucky.

      I understand that websites have to generate revenue, and that the current method is moving more toward pop-up/under ads. That's fine. That doesn't mean I have to subject myself to it. As an informed consumer I have the right to ignore the ads in whatever way I deem fit, whether that means closing the windows as they come up or telling my computer to not allow them to render in the first place.

      Should a browser default to stopping pop-ups? Hell no. It breaks too many sites that use pop-ups for additional help/information windows, sites that load links in a new window, etc. But I should certainly have the option to kill pop-ups if I want to enable it (and preferably with a quick key to reenable them - like Popup Stopper has).

      Want to argue otherwise? Go for it. You also watch every commercial on TV, right? No getting up to go to the bathroom/kitchen. No recording it to VCR or PVR and fast forwarding/skipping through the commercials. Because if you are then, by your own definition, you are immoral. Maybe even commiting a crime!

      Oh, and do you read every ad in a magazine? Do you throw out those blown-in/tear-out cards in magazines before someone else can read them? Do you read every billboard that passes by while in a car? EVERY TIME?

      I don't think so.

      And yes, I know this was a troll. Congrats. But this kind of thinking might actually get some people that nod and drool "yes", and it's so abundantly stupid it needs to be shut down before hand.

    3. Re:why mozilla rules here by Fweeky · · Score: 4, Informative

      > What's the current status with mozilla? Is it as usable as Netscape 4.x (I hate 6.x)?

      It's been more usable than 4.x for months. Recent releases are very stable. Startup time is about on par with Opera here (~3s when cached, next to ~2s for Opera).

      4.x lacks usable CSS (and this is very important for modern sites.. the only reason most sites still work is because most sites still use techniques from 1995; I don't), and has laughable table layout code (it was made with basic HTML-for-tabular-data in mind, not triple nested layout tables); these alone make it pretty much useless to me.

      If I didn't use Opera, I'd probably use Mozilla; at least I can trust it to Do The Right Thing (usually) when I'm developing sites; then I can go add my IE5/6/NS workarounds afterwards.

      > Does it do any nasty or weird stuff on some sites?

      IE6 does nasty and weird stuff on W3.org/Style (fixed positioning isn't supported, but it still processes the position: fixed; directive, meaning you can't do "position: absolute;position: fixed;" like you're supposed to. Argh.).

      IE5 does nasty and weird stuff on every site that uses the CSS box model; it gets the sizes wrong on all boxes, meaning you need to exploit parser bugs to provide IE5 with tweaked sizes for it to work properly (and then provide Opera 5, which suffers the same parser bug, with real values).

      NS4 does nasty and weird stuff when you specify an element should float: anywhere; it makes it completely unusable to use CSS layouts on it without spending months debugging an absolutely positioned workaround-nightmare.

      Not seen Mozilla (or Opera) do anything this broken :)

  5. PR0N by rbeattie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've seen this thing before on pr0n sites... once again they're leading the way on the web. I never thought that traditional advertisers would stoop this low, though. I wonder what's next?

    -Russ

    Ooh, wait. What I meant was my FRIENDS have seen stuff like this and told me about it. Wait, I don't have friends that look at pr0n either... umm. I read about this sort of thing, yeah. That's it...

    --
    Me
    1. Re:PR0N by laserjet · · Score: 4, Funny

      You still go to pr0n sites? Man.. that is SO 90s!. Nowadays we use peer-to-peer file sharing and IRC to get our wares.
      well, we've bene using IRC forever, but it is still a good source. :)

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  6. Yet another by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another reason to browse with Mozilla or Opera with onLoad (or all) popups disabled.

    Most of these advertising techniques either rely on browsers (or users) who don't or can't disable popups easily. (read: 90% of the internet explorer population.) Or they rely on Internet Explorer specific techniques, e.g. windowless flash animations (transparent backgrounds) for shoshkeles, etc.

    I think it's time the antivirus companies step up to the plate for the average consumer, and add blocking/filtering to the AV clients. Maybe it's overkill, but if you could tag these popup downloads as a potential virus (or at least unauthorized use of your computer) the world would be a better place. Or, create some add-ons to mozilla which filter popups against a database (ala the defunct spamcop) popupcop?

    When something is sold as "advertising" but is nothing less than an attempt to trick or confuse a person into purchasing, downloading or installing your software, that's misrepresentation and/or fraud. Regardless of any 2pt fine-print at the bottom, or "user agreement" on the page. Hard to stop them, though.

    1. Re:Yet another by larien · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Some popups are actually quite good, mainly the ones on e-commerce sites where you click on a link to view an item description. Mozilla does this well by blocking "unrequested" (I think that's the word it uses) popups.

      onLoad isn't the most evil popup rule; onExit or onLeave (or whatever they're called) are worse as you can end up with something you can't leave without some fast clicking or disabling Javascript.

  7. Sounds like Nimda :) by possible · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's interesting and revealing about Gator's approach is that the well-known Nimda worm spread by injecting popup download code into IIS-served web pages, exploiting a vulnerability in Internet Explorer that caused the user NOT to be prompted before the dowloaded program executed.

  8. Underhanded Purest Evil by Cylix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This happened last night I'm afraid...

    I was completely shocked when the gator icon mysteriously appeared and greeted me. I removed the little bastard immediately. However, I let a long sigh as I realized it would come back shortly.

    So last night I decided to go with mozilla and live with whatever problems it may bring.

    The mozilla team should thank the gator software company and evil commie bastard marketing reps around the world.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  9. Really nasty variety by -brazil- · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This kind of thing has been making headlines in Germany recently.
    Many sites try to coerce users (especially kids) into installing
    "high-speed" or "priority" internet dialers that in reality just change the default internet
    connection to an extremely expensive number. By the time you
    get the phone bill, it's often in the four-figures. The telco
    doesn't want to be responsible since they just rent out the
    numbers, and the companies that rent them are also mostly resellers with
    with the final "customers" mostly being based outside Germany.

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

    1. Re:Really nasty variety by ryanwright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The telco
      doesn't want to be responsible since they just rent out the
      numbers


      Well, the telco IS responsible, and if something like that were to happen to me it'd be "Sorry, I'm not going to pay this." The telco didn't rack up those charges, they're simply passing along the third party bill to you. Since said bill was generated through deception and fraud, there is no way in hell anyone could force me to pay it.

      In the USA, at least, the telco legally can NOT disconnect your service for refusing to pay third party bills like this. You just tell them to fuck off and if they give you any hell, threaten a lawsuit, and/or call your state's consumer protection agency. People who sit there and pay that crap are insane. They need to realize that just because someone bills you for something doesn't mean you're obligated to pay for it, and there's not shit anyone can do to force you to pay it. Their only option is to convince a judge that you really owe them the money.

      I've invoked the "ain't gonna pay that" attitude many times, especially when it comes to BS medical bills. I've never had a problem: Either they justified their bill to me and I paid it, or they left me alone. None have dared to send one to collections or put it on my credit report yet.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  10. Question about Gator specifically by Carmody · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anybody actually like the software? I accidentally installed it once, before I had heard about "spyware" and "scumware" and I just found it completely annoying. Now that I think about it - I had to do a google search to find out how to remove it, and that's when I first learned about that sort of thing.

    So my question is: Is there anyone who actually WANTS the software? Or are ALL copies there because someone accidentally downloaded it and doesn't know how to remove it.

    --
    God is real unless declared integer
    1. Re:Question about Gator specifically by romkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      I started using Gator because Ebates suggested it... I like Ebates a lot and they were suggesting (not even pushing) Gator because of its form-management and password remembering functions, which weren't commonly available in browsers at that point. At that time, Gator was more of a helpful tool than a malignant advertising injector.

      As Gator has evolved it's become more and more malicious; popping up ads when I'm browsing is the most annoying, but also it's started placing its own ads over banner ads on web pages - that doesn't annoy me any more than the banner ads would but I think it's a pretty evil practice and I don't want to support it.

      The only reason I've kept using Gator is that I have a large investment in terms of the passwords I have stored in it, but there are other, better ways to take care of that problem. At this point I run Gator with it completely blocked by firewall software, so it can't update itself and it can't download ads or offers. If you delete everything in C:\PROGRAM FILES\COMMON FILES\GMT\BANNERS you'll get rid of the ads it's already downloaded.

    2. Re:Question about Gator specifically by poulbailey · · Score: 5, Informative
      The only reason I've kept using Gator is that I have a large investment in terms of the passwords

      Grab RoboForm instead. It's freeware and it doesn't have any ads nor does it contain spyware. It'll even let you import all your Gator passwords. There's absolutely no reason to keep using Gator.

  11. Coming soon on Slashdot: by Vic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pretty soon we'll see pop-ups that say:

    Do you wish to install this file? YES / NO

    If yes, please do the following:
    - Download file and save to /tmp
    - cd /tmp
    - tar xvzf slashpopup.tar.gz
    - cd slashpopup
    - ./configure (For help with options, do ./configure --help)
    - make
    - su
    - make install
    ....Finished!

    1. Re:Coming soon on Slashdot: by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Funny



      no way. Debian is much cooler. To view popup ads, you simply have to apt-get popup-ad !!! ;-)

  12. Re:Terms of Agreement by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would think that this is partially illegal to install software on a person computer without that persons consent.

    I would think that it's COMPLETELY illegal to do this. If the program that's getting installed were to wipe your hard drive, there'd be lawsuits galore and FBI people kicking down the doors of the company hosting the hostile download. Why exactly nobody's been able to convince a judge that this is the same thing is beyond me.

    I got royally flamed in a mailing list for complaining about a site that tried to force gator on me. The admin's response was "it didn't try to install gator, it asked you first." My argument was "it only asked me because it tried, and my browser said 'no.'" Naturally, we got nowhere.

    It's even worse if they find a way to install without prompting the user. Not only is that a wide-open door for serious viruses, but it ABSOLUTELY removes any semblance of authorization (and I'd argue that a user blindly clicking "yes" to simply make the damned download panel go away doesn't constitute informed consent, either).

  13. Re:Gator info by ShadeEagle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ah, DivX 5 Pro. Comes with "GAIN".

    Keep in mind, it didn't exactly sneak on, they're quite open that it will install - unless you grab the normal version.

    The Pro version has encoding-only advantages, which most end-users won't use. You either pay $30 or agree to install the adware.

    Oh, and renaming the file won't work. If GAIN isn't running, you won't be able to encode with the Pro encoder.

  14. Re:Not reading the article is lame too by Stonehand · · Score: 3, Informative

    See your own subject.


    In some cases, people are not even asked whether they want the software. It just installs on the hard drive--a particularly troublesome tactic that some have dubbed "drive-by download."

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  15. Consumers? by Stiletto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Do you accept this download?" If the consumer clicks "Yes," an application is automatically installed.

    This clutter has created a haven for pop-up downloads because consumers find it hard to determine the ad's origin.

    Gator isn't the only software maker using this tactic to add consumers.

    "Consumers want control of their PCs," Gator President Jeff McFadden said in a statement.

    Why am I a consumer just because I am accessing the Internet? The problem here is not the pop-up technology, but the unwritten assumption (perpetuated by the author of the report) that we are all just mindless "consumers of product" that need to be targeted by ads.

    Only when this mindset is abandoned will we see an end to attention grabbing and demographic gathering.

  16. Not reading the article well is even lamer by Watts+Martin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As long as you're quoting the article you read, how about:

    In some cases, people are not even asked whether they want the software. It just installs on the hard drive--a particularly troublesome tactic that some have dubbed "drive-by download."

    Why, gosh, the article you castigated the first poster for not reading says that sometimes you don't have to give your consent, just like the first poster said. So who didn't read the article?

  17. thiefware.com on Gator Auto-install/ActiveX by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 4, Informative
    Take a look at this report about Gator at http://www.thiefware.com/info/data.gator.shtml
    People are still complaining that Gator is getting installed on their computers with little advanced warning and in many instances, people do not know that Gator is being installed until the next time they turn on their computer. The user should always have the option to click on a download link but instead Gator partner sites use the automatic ActiveX download/installation program.

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

  18. Mozilla by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Informative

    To go along with the Opera folks out there, I've got to chime in and say I absolutely love being able to filter unsolicited popups. God I love that feature. It makes browsing pron sites soo much better. Also disable the window resizing shit. No longer will popup bastards resize a window beyond your screensize!

  19. "Smaller number of available applications" by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yeah, this where the "limited number of applications" available for MacOS pays off. We have Excel and Quicken and IE and Quake, but they never seem to port any of the parasite-ware that comes with your video card drivers. And I'm guessing we won't be getting this stuff, either.

    And PPC Linux binaries are probably out of the question...

  20. Re:And for those still on dialup by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, yet another "I didn't read the article, but I feel fully qualified to comment on it" response...

    For you and others like you, it specifically states that a pop-up box appears and requires the user to accept the download, and they rely on the fact that 99.999999% of the non-slashdot population immediately assumes it is something they need and click "Yes".

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  21. How to Guard Yourself and Then Strike Back... by TheLibra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, for those of us who are forced to deal with an Micro$oft environment, there is some good news. Remember Nimda? It operated in a similar way when it was spread through web-pages, by forcing a download. Internet Explorer had a weakness that allowed this to happen. Now, however, they have the fix in IE 5.5 SP2... might also want to get whatever critical updates there are from the Window$ update site. So if you have that, and the patch for Nimda you shouldn't be forced to do anything. Cancel should always be allowed.

    And honestly, people, if you set yourself to automatically accept downloads, you're just asking for a trojan.

    Now that you know the defense, let's talk about the offense. Some very respectable Hackers have already created programs designed to kill browser popups. Might I suggest as a new challenge for these ingenius few that a program be created that you can simply set an auto-cancel after a program asks you once to download it (like Gator)?

    For those of us without that level of programming ability, I recommend giving these companies that do this a flood of email complaints, expressing just how much we detest the all-time low they have reached. Since so many of us are in the IT or helpdesk field, we're in a unique position in that people believe what we say. If Gator persists in these forced-downloads, then start letting every single one of your customers know that Gator stands a chance of royally screwing up their operating system and compromising their security. If they ask for specifics, look for any bug whatsoever that has been reported, or that you can find in the program, and exploit it like a cheap tabloid. If it crashed one persons system and made them reboot, then it -always- crashes systems... etc.

    Of course, I myself would never result to any illegal means, but legal strongarm tactics are very effective when done in mass-quantity. If enough of us get together on this, and enough sand is thrown by enough people, advertisers will eventually get the hint.

    Now who's with me?

    -The Libra
    "Maybe Lisa's right about America being the land of opportunity, and maybe Adil's got a point about the machinery of capitalism being oiled with the blood of the workers." - Homer Simpson

  22. Divx 5 Maybe??? by Apreche · · Score: 3, Informative

    This Gator software you speak of is probably related to the new Divx ;-) 5. If you download the standard version, there are no ads, no nothing. The pro version however, is either A) pay for it or B) gain_trickler. If Divx pro can't find the gain trickler it wont run. The trickler sits as an idle process, but when you browse the web it watches you and throws targeted advertising at you. My solution was to use ZoneAlarm to block the gain trickler from accessing the internet, this way I get divx 5 pro for free, and no ads. adaware is also quite helpful.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  23. Re:And for those still on dialup by sphealey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wow, yet another "I didn't read the article, but I feel fully qualified to comment on it" response...

    For you and others like you, it specifically states that a pop-up box appears and requires the user to accept the download, and they rely on the fact that 99.999999% of the non-slashdot population immediately assumes it is something they need and click "Yes".
    Most human groups nowadays have this little thing called "society", which is generally formed in an attempt to mitigate the worst aspects of the "dog-eat-dog" model of life/social organization. It one of the things that are generally believed to seperate "humans" from "lower animals".

    One thing that "society" tries to do is protect the average joe from the consequences of ignorance. Why do that, you ask? Why not let Darwin take his course? Because as our wealth grows and our world becomes more complex, everyone is ignorant about some areas of life. And today, everyone is ignorant about most things that keep us alive (dug your own well lately?).

    So let's be careful here - just because Slashdotters know better than to click on that Yes doesn't mean everyone does or should.

    sPh

  24. You Are a Minority by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Most of the people on the internet are in fact consumers. The mindset will not be abandoned because more and more consumers are getting on the net every day, which means us techies are becoming an increasing minority.

    I think we'll only be able to escape the constant bombardment of advertisments (And skript kiddie attacks and all the other comparatively recent crap) by establishing our own network on top of the internet. It's easy to do and we're technically capable of doing it.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  25. Re:Popup warning dialog by shyster · · Score: 5, Informative
    Why can I ONLY see a checkbox for "Always trust downloads from this company" and NOT "Always MISTRUST downloads from this company" on the install dialog on IE?

    Add them to the Restricted Sites zone. That will (by default) keep them from running any code, including signed and unsigned ActiveX, and even cookies.

  26. Just saw this yesterday on Dad's puter by Jburkholder · · Score: 4, Informative

    My dad called to ask if I could come over and 'fix' his computer. I'm always willing to come down and see dad and untangle whatever mess exists on his PC.

    His dial-up connection was slow, he said. Indeed, every site I visited in his favorites was really slow and now wonder... everysite seemed to launch a couple of pop-unders that were consuming bandwidth downloading ads.

    "Yeah, I've been getting that ever since I installed 'gator'"

    "gator is something I got from yahoo that helps me fill in forms or something"

    That rat-bastard gator had put hooks everywere, was a real pain to uninstall ("please stop the gator program before proceeding" - except to the ordinary user the concept of stopping a taskbar icon isn't very obvious).

    The uninstaller launched a browser and loaded a page telling you why you shouldn't uninstall. Geez, go away already!

    Yeah, my dad is pretty clueless - I reminded him not to download and install stuff unless he is pretty clear on what he is getting.

    This software seems to exploit that cluelessness, posing as some innocuous, helpful utility when it's real purpose is far more invasive and it is relatively complicated to get rid of.

  27. Been happening for years now. . . . by Com2Kid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the seedier side of the web, nothing new folks. Just now its spyware instead of trojans, thats all. (oh wait there is a difference. . . .)

    A lot of japanese h-anime sites (the less artistic ones, yes there is artistic hentai, get over it and deal.) use a dial up program of some sorts that I am (assuming) dials some sort of toll number, but it only works if you have a dial up modem, negates the need for a credit card though.

    Some of the seedier US web sites I have seen actualy attempt to automaticaly do this to you (ouch) luckily enough I have a cable modem and I uninstalled my regular ol' modem quite a while ago. ^_^

    My Japanese Tutor actualy had a related problem, (didn't look at porn, damn thing managed to spread anyways, VERY annoying). One of these toll programs (one of the less respectable variety) got on the computer and refused to go away, hooked on to everything.

    Nasty stuff.

  28. Re:IE tools by poulbailey · · Score: 3, Informative
    Can somebody recommend good tools for IE 6.x that integrate well on the toolbar, sideband to prevent popUPs popUNDERS, spyware installers etc?

    I can only strongly recommend The Proxomitron. It's freeware and it allows you to block all sorts of nasties - popups included. Besides popups, it will also filter javascript, cookies and ads. If that isn't enough for you it allows you to create your own filters using regexps. The Proxomitron is very powerful.

    It's actually better than what you are looking for, because it isn't one of those stupid Browser Helper Objects. It acts as a local proxy and filters the HTML before it hits your browser. This program is a godsend to anyone who wants to browse in peace. The default look of the program is a little zany, but don't let that scare you since it can be easily turned off (Config | Visuals | Don't use textures).

    You should also look at the IE security settings. Basically you need to turn everything off in the default Internet zone.

  29. Re:And for those still on dialup by Ardax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're forgetting something about IE (and maybe Moz too?): The file is downloaded in the background while waiting for the user to accept or deny the download, so you're still wasting time and bandwidth by receiving a file you probably don't want. For broadband users, it's not such a big deal (but it does eat up more bandwidth of the scum that uses such a technique), but for modem users it will slow things to a crawl.

    --
    Pax, Ardax
  30. Re:And for those still on dialup by sqlrob · · Score: 5, Interesting
    For you and others like you, it specifically states that a pop-up box appears and requires the user to accept the download

    I've seen sites (cardcentral.net) that use JavaScript to put their own dialog over everything but the Yes/No buttons on the download box. The dialog box appeared to be something along the lines of "Security warning: You are infected with a virus. Clean?"

  31. Legitimate site designers don't use ... by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    With all this hostile code running around, legitimate site designers have to assume that many web features will be firewalled or disabled. So, if you're responsible for any web sites:
    • It has to work with JavaScript turned off.
    • You have to test with a filtering proxy, like WebWasher. Your site has to work behind such a proxy. We'll probably see more proxies and firewalls in corporate environments.
    • It has to work with cookies turned off, or at least produce useful error messages. Endlessly recycling the user to the wrong page because a cookie wasn't found is out.
    • It has to work with IE in its most restrictive security mode. Among other things, this means don't use Active-X controls. You can't even assume the user runs Flash.

    This isn't too restrictive. Big players, like Amazon, Yahoo Store, and the major search sites, all work under these restrictions. If your site doesn't, your site is broken.

    1. Re:Legitimate site designers don't use ... by ShavenYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can I have an Amen, brothers and sisters?

      There's no need for a bank's web site to require Javascript, pop-up windows, and ActiveX just so I can view my account balance. And I sure don't need all that crap to buy a CD. Tie your site to your ordering system on the server side, and send my browser plain, standard-compliant HTML. If you want to use javascript for form validation, fine, but make sure your site still works if I have it turned off (ie, validate again on the server). If you really want to display something in a pop-up, use <a href="whatever.html" target="_new">.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  32. A Wonderful Tool for Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not too sure if this has been said yet, but this is an amazing tool that will clean all the spyware from your system. You will be amazed at how much you have on there. It is called AdAware and can be downloaded free from the link below.

    http://www.lavasoftusa.com

  33. Re:And for those still on dialup by jmccay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not to mention the possible security problems! If a cracker setup a phony web-site to trick users into install some software to give them access to the system to use in DOS attacks and such. I think the site that use this type of advertising will eventually feel a backlash from the public on this because it's too dangerous.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  34. Re:Gator info by spideyct · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even more useful, you could track when these files are being called, which may help you figure out how to eliminate them entirely.

    Something like this, which just writes the path of the executable to the windows event log. (C#)

    namespace ExeSource
    {
    class Class1
    {
    [System.STAThread]
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
    System.Diagnostics.EventLog evLog = new System.Diagnostics.EventLog("Application");
    evLog.Source = "ExeSource";
    evLog.WriteEntry( System.Reflection.Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().Loca tion,System.Diagnostics.EventLogEntryType.Informat ion );
    }
    }
    }

  35. More Mozilla tips by bertilow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mozilla can get even more ad-free.

    I've added this to my personal style sheet (automatically applied to every page):

    object, embed {
    display: none;
    }

    This keeps all Flash etc. invisible. On some platforms you can just uninstall the Flash plugin, but that doesn't work in the Linux Mozilla. (The ", embed" part is probably not necessary.)

    The file to change is "userChrome.css", and can be found in the "chrome" directory wherever Mozilla keeps your personal settings, mail, etc.

    And then, whenever you see an ad that is an ordinary image, you can right click on it, and check if it comes from some server that probably only serves ads. If so, right click again, and choose "Block images from this server".

    Using all these tricks, you can get rid of a lot of ads and other annoying material.

    Most of this should work in Netscape 6 as well.

  36. You could use one or two yourself. by NFW · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is very different from pulling down a jpg. Images go away when you move on to another page. Scumware sticks around to phuc with every new web page you download. Images do not have the ability to crash your browser (barring spectacularly (and uncommonly)) bad browser code. Images have limited ability to invade your privacy by reporting personally identifying information to persons unknown. Images don't consume hard drive space, except perhaps in the cache for a day or three if you want them to.

    Most importantly, no image file ever came with a security hole that allowed a third party to hijack the computer that downloaded it. I do not have the same confidence in software written by an ad agencies out to make a buck by hijacking my computer in the first place.

    Sure, in a sense it's just another HTTP request, no different than the one that brought the HTML itself. But then again a bullet is just another projectile, no different than a tennis ball really.

    There is a world of different between downloading simple data like text or images and downloading executable code. Clue yourself in.

    --
    Build stuff. Stuff that walks, stuff that rolls, whatever.
  37. Have people forgotten Comet Cursor already? by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comet Cursor was a popup download on many sites, most annoyingly doonesbury.com. I'm sorry to see that they didn't learn their lesson back then...

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  38. Re:And for those still on dialup by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Informative
    Wow, yet another "I didn't read the article, but I feel fully qualified to comment on it" response...

    I guess you didn't read the whole article yourself. :-) Check this quote:

    In some cases, people are not even asked whether they want the software. It just installs on the hard drive--a particularly troublesome tactic that some have dubbed "drive-by download."
    Granted, anybody who has this happen automatically can only blame themselves for allowing any ActiveX program to download and run without requesting permission, but note that it *is* happening. Some of those poor dialup users are definitely getting nailed.
    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  39. Re:And for those still on dialup by Tattva · · Score: 3, Funny
    So let's be careful here - just because Slashdotters know better than to click on that Yes doesn't mean everyone does or should.

    Prediction: You're so circumspect, thoughtful, and slow to jump on the bandwagon that your extinction from Slashdot is guaranteed.

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  40. Re:Gator info by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, some balls posting C# on /.

    :-)

  41. Re:Try this Hosts file link by Eil · · Score: 3, Informative


    While a big hosts file might be simpler, something more like junkbuster is a much more elegant solution to block ads and filter cookies. You can choose what to block with regular expressions, so that you don't have to block an entire site to not get ads, nor do you have to block each and every different site that serves ads.

    This combined with Mozilla's anti-pop-up capability make browsing the web an almost enjoyable activity. I haven't changed my blocklist in many months and have yet to see a single ad.