Windows 'Longhorn' Kicks Off (On Paper)
gdeciantis writes: "NeoWin.net posted an article which outlines some of the new features that are currently planned for the the next version of Windows (codenamed Longhorn). With new features like seamless content transfer across devices, it looks like Longhorn will not just be Windows XP SE."
Nothing of interest there for me. He who agrees, mod up?
Seriously - give us something interesting to read about Microsoft, instead of some crappy forum post.
Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
If they come out with a better notepad wouldn't they be using their monopoly power to crush the competition?
VERY insightful... please mod parent up.
There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
Huh? The object "oriented file system" and device synchronization are related only in the sense that you could theoretically build sync on top of an OOFS.
And this comment is scored up to 4? You guys have been trading your mod points to the trolls for porn again, haven't you.
1. It can not handle Unix end of line characters properly.
:%s/...
So what? Unix editors can not handle DOS line endings (^M) neither. You have to run dos2unix or do
It's not basic editor functionality to support foreign OS conventions.
2. It is not "fast" to use. e.g. to search for the text "findme"
Wrong. [F3]findme[ENTER] - the same number of keystrokes
Finding the mathcing parenthesis has nothing to do with basic text editing.
You confuse Notepad.exe with programmer's editors. It's NOT a programmer's editor. It's basic text editor.
If you need programmer's editor on Windows, use Vim or MS Visual Studio or whatever, but not Notepad.exe.