Windows 'Longhorn' Kicks Off (On Paper)
gdeciantis writes: "NeoWin.net posted an article which outlines some of the new features that are currently planned for the the next version of Windows (codenamed Longhorn). With new features like seamless content transfer across devices, it looks like Longhorn will not just be Windows XP SE."
I really, really hate that they are using that name.
I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
This also includes advancing "quiet PC' goals for targeted markets. what has 'longhorn' got todo with how quiet we, or computer manufacturers, decide to build our PC's?
But now it will be XP 2.0 (dare we call it 3.11?) that will have the good stuff. I am holding my breath, I am.
sPh
Removal of the analog signal path for CD audio.
wth?
Sometimes I see this as a downfall of Linux. The software for Linux seems to always try to be everything to everyone. There is no supper basic notepad for Linux, ok gedit and i am sure that kde has one too, but windows always seems to have kind of a 3 teir application base. sort of a notepad->wordpad->msword or paint->image editor->photopaint depending on how many features you may want.
Linux seems to do well on the full featured version stuff but not so well on the very basic straight forward applications. (except for the command line. There they do it right.)
Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
Do you know what Notepad is? It's essentially the multiline edit control of MFC with a frame around it. Do you know what KEdit is? It's essentially the multiline edit widget of Qt with a frame around it. The example Visual Studio editor and the sample Qt editor are virtually indistinguishable from Notepad and KEdit but for a bit of polish.
Why doesn't KEdit qualify as a super basic text editor? You can't get much simpler than that.
A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
Just read through the requirements and the following caught my eye..
1) USB always full power. It looks like they must have shares in battery spares!?!?.. Why should they dictate how power management works. Shouldn't they be working around the hardware instead of expecting to dictate how the hardware works...
2) Memory requirements.. Why are they asking this? They should make a system that can run in 64Mb MAX so that we can use the rest of the memory for the applications. It annoys me that with every new version of windows it takes up all the base level memory (ie when XP was released 256Mb was starting to become the norm. But XP needed that as a base just to load smoothly..)
3) Win32 Flashable BIOS
oh well. got to laugh at Microsoft trying once more to try and take over the world (They may get the hint one day that they can't)..
I do wonder how many people will want this version of windows with all its anti-theft rubbish. Personally when I use my computer I want to use it the way I want not they way Billy Gates want's me to. That is why I use Linux. It is fairly simple to use, The applications I need are as good (if not better) than their windows counterparts. It allows me to experiment and learn without annoying restrictions. I know what is running on my machine, I can use what I want to access my machine, I know what the machine is logging behind the scenes, I can customise what I want without voiding my licence, I don't have to pay for bug-fixes (The patches from 95 to 98 to ME to 2k to XP cost a fortune...).
Anyway rant over...
Mark.
---- There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't
Say what you want about Microsoft but the fact is that each time they release a new operating system. They are encouraging growth in the market. Open source groups have more reasons to make something thats a free equal (or better than) to Windows, while they are also imposing higher system requirements forcing hardware companies to sell more hardware and make faster parts. The fast parts yield more complex applications do to the fact that since Windows has higher minimum requirements the software users will already have faster systems that can run the software quicker. I don't know about you guys but I can do a lot more with my PC now than I could back when it was a 486dx2 with 8 megs of ram.
Yes, only a 1/89 = 1.8% catastrophic fail rate. That's not bad at all. They teach engineering there?
From the doc:
Proposed requirements for advancing audio capabilities include:
Removal of the analog signal path for CD audio.
"Windows Desktop Guidelines
Ensure that file associations are appropriate"
ALL Audio/Video formats = Windows Media Player
ALL Web = Internet Explorer
ALL Database = MS SQL Server
So, in summary...
ALL YOUR FILE ASSOCIATIONS ARE BELONG TO US!
Push the power button and it says... Invalid Boot Sector:The OS you are trying to load is not Longhorn... Please call microsoft.
Or better yet:
Scandisk-Please wait while we verify that you own all of your digital media content...Deleting Illegal Files...
And what does this mean for those who still can't program their VCR? Good one MS!
They'll still be able to 'play their tapes' and 'record their shows.' People who want to set up to automatically 'record on a sechedule' will have to RTFM.
As opposed to (long) past OSes where they couldn't figure out how to 'insert the tape.'
Remove obvious VCR analogies and replace with something PC related.
--Jeremy
Jesus was a liberal
Actually I believe Longhorn is named after this bar in Canada at the foot of Whistler. Whistler having been the codename for Windows XP.
So instead of a cowboy, think of Ballmer dressed as a Mountie or Moose.
Kinda scarier I think.