Slashdot Mirror


Bdale Garbee elected Debian Project Leader

Daniel Stone writes "In results released by Project Secretary Manoj Srivastava today, Bdale Garbee was elected Project Leader ahead of Raphael Hertzog and Branden Robinson. Congratulations Bdale! And no CmdrTaco, the debs are not (quite) yet ready, but they *are* very close." The elections page has more information.

42 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. BDale by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Is that like fucking G'Kar?

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  2. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    That's right, first post!

  3. Frist FRist Frist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    i got frist poast i got fristy prithy rost haha haha ya'll suk ass

  4. Comeon Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Other people, Other Names!

  5. meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    CowboyNeal was elected to

  6. Mod This Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I kindly request that the parent be modded down(way down!)

  7. No one asked you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    bGeorge W won the election.

    1. Re:No one asked you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

      thi sis alskd;f asdfoi 1240

  8. freebsd security holes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    TWO days, TWO kernel security issues, TWO recompiles and reboots. And the second in the list, despite the claim that it was corrected two months ago, was only notified yesterday.

    Dear FreeBSD team, I had higher hopes than this...

    Topic: routing table memory leak

    Category: core
    Module: net
    Announced: 2002-04-17
    Credits: Jayanth Vijayaraghavan
    Ruslan Ermilov
    Affects: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE
    FreeBSD 4-STABLE after 2001-12-07 09:23:11 UTC
    and prior to the correction date
    Corrected: 2002-03-22 16:54:19 UTC (RELENG_4)
    2002-04-15 17:12:08 UTC (RELENG_4_5)
    FreeBSD only: YES

    Topic: syncache/syncookies denial of service

    Category: core
    Module: net
    Announced: 2002-04-16
    Credits: Alan Judge
    Dima Ruban
    Affects: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE
    FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE after 2001-12-14 19:53:01 UTC
    FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE prior to the correction date
    Corrected: 2002-02-20 16:48:49 UTC (RELENG_4)
    2002-02-21 16:38:39 UTC (RELENG_4_5, 4.5-RELEASE-p1)
    FreeBSD only: YES

    1. Re:freebsd security holes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      ha.

      if these were reports for microsoft, they'd be front page news on slashdot.

      but since theyre for SUPERIOR FREE SOFTWARE you will be marked off topic and ignored.

  9. Re:I demand a recount! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    looks its Al Gore still bitching about ballots!

  10. ....elected to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What was Cowboy Neil elected to?

  11. Re:Maybe Woody will be released soon... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    As someone who knows nothing about Debian... perhaps they should use a different method for deciding their release schedule. OpenBSD has a regular release every six months, LaTeX every twelve months. Both of these have in common with Debian that they are a collection of packages from different sources. There's no way that Debian can plan and organize XFree86, Linux, gcc, Apache etc etc to all work to a single release cycle - they are completely out of phase with each other. Nothing wrong with that. But given this situation, the best release strategy is surely to pick an arbitrary date and go with whatever is available at that time. Debian does put a lot of effort into finishing each distribution once the deadline is known, but IMHO the release date should be known right from the start, as in 'it's always the fifteenth of August'.

    Or even every week - 'It's Friday, it's six o'clock, and it's Debian New Release Time!'. That might be taking it a bit far.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  12. Is this why Pat Buchanan won? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    They had to input the source code using paper punch cards. More chads that way.

  13. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What make this "stuff that matters"? Who the fuck cares?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I am the originator of the subsequent thread, and wow, you posted exactly what I said at exactly the same time I did! Apparently great minds think alike. Wanna fuck?

  14. Tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Who the fuck cares?

  15. Re:ALL YOUR EFF PEES, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hey, I resemble that remark

  16. bdale garbee? by gTsiros · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Try saying his name many times fast!

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
  17. Porky Pig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just tried this. After about the 8th time, I sounded just like Porky Pig.

    1. Re:Porky Pig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      bdale, bdale, bdale, bd,bd,bdbdbdbthat's all, folks!

  18. How the heck do you pronounce it?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Bdale?!?

  19. Supreme Court by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    No. the florida voters decided that election. All the Supreme Court did was shut off an attempt by one side to tamper with the ballots.

    1. Re:Supreme Court by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      There was no attempt to "tamper" with the ballots. There was only an attempt to count them.
      (And if a loose chad falls off, it means the count just became more accurate.)

      Personally, I think Florida's electoral votes should have been split or thrown out completely. Either way, it would have brought the real winner in line with the one that won the popular vote. No contesting that, is there?

  20. Smack in the face with Jisms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Now we are in trouble

  21. They'd already been counted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    There was no attempt to "tamper" with the ballots

    Yes there was. Party hacks were caught stealing vote-punching machines during the process. Votes were being "created" each time, as well. Remember the chads littering the floor?

    They'd already been counted a few times. And were counted a few times afterwards.

    in line with the one that won the popular vote. No contesting that, is there?

    The electoral process is the law of the land. Gore campaigned on it. He never objected until he lost by the electoral process. It was then he ordered his attorneys to lie in the courtroom in an attempt to take by frivolous lawsuit that which he lost at the ballot box.

    By the way, see the ol' liar on teevee last weekend? The man has invented the razor!

    1. Re:They'd already been counted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Gore, a liar? Gore is more honest than Bush.(Well, if you can call any politician honest) The whole "invented" thing was made up by Wired News and spread like wildfire through the media and Republican gab. The whole "Gore is a liar" is usually another thing taken out of context. Remember "Union Label"? A joke. A simple joke. The audience laughed. Republicans cheered -- another opportunity to enhance a myth.

      You'll need to give a reference on the "stealing machines" by "party hacks". Some may have been stolen, but not by party members. Because of their attention they had a lot of value. So state your source. And no, a Republican news source won't do.

      Gore *did* play a large part in "creating" the internet we know today. He got the government to get off of its ass and merge the large networks into one. Even the people who did create the first networking have stood up for Gore about this.

      Lies, lies, Republicans and lies...

  22. Re:HEADLINE CORRECTION! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Bdale explains the reason for his name:

    Bdale is a contraction of Barksdale, and I pronounce it "Bee-Dale".


    He's lying. The real reason for his name is that his parents wanted to ensure he came home bloody from school every day.

    "Hello, Mr Garbee? This is Bdale's teacher. I'm afraid Bdale got beaten up at school again today. I'm sorry, I just don't know what came over me."

  23. Re:Weird Harold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    "Scoobe, doobe, doobe. Wherbe arbe yoube?"

    My god, you sound like Jar-Jar Binks!

  24. Names! by sean23007 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In results released by Project Secretary Manoj Srivastava today, Bdale Garbee was elected Project Leader ahead of Raphael Hertzog and Branden Robinson. Congratulations Bdale!

    Manoj Srivastava? Bdale Garbee? Raphael Hertzog? Those are some kind of names! Maybe when they went to the court to have their names changed from John Doe, the judge did not have the foresight to just give them each the one name they actually spelled out correctly: Max Power.

    Note to self: go to court today to have name changed. Any of the following will be acceptable: Hercules Rockefeller, Rembrandt Q. Einstein... and so on.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  25. A dangerous precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It would set a very dangerous precedent to allow one side to "contest" an election and get it tossed out on a state by state basis. Bedtime for democracy! The votes won't matter anymore, just hire the best attorneys.

    Watch the election get decided on whether or not the legal briefs filed by Democrat Party lawyers to toss out Texas voting results are better than the Republican Party filings to toss out the New York State election.

    Not that it matters anyway. There is a current push to get rid of any idea of an accurate census by allowing statisticians to make up people to use in the congressional districting process ("statistical sampling", etc.). Then the political parties will be able to conjure up votes without bothering to leave the office and go to court.

    The most important thing then will be which party will appoint and oversee the statistician who use their imagination to create the voters in the districts.

    1. Re:A dangerous precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The votes won't matter anymore, just hire the best attorneys.

      And it isn't this way now?

  26. Re:Uhhhhhh.... by egreB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fine. But how do you pronounce it?

    Bee-dale, I guess..

    Here in Norway, it's natural to pronounce Linux just the way it's supposed to. Maybe our "i" is a bit narrower than the native english one (like in the word "Interesting"). To pronounce Linux the way it should be according to english dictionary rules just sounds.. wrong (-8 I remember when I installed my first Linux distro (I beleive it was RedHat 4 or 5), and the sound configurator played a test, where Linux Torvalds stated how to pronounce the name of his OS.. I thought I would die from laughter. (-8

  27. Re:Democracy. by plank_like · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  28. Re:Bdale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    What's so weird about "Manoj Srivastava"?

    -- Krishnasrutis Rajesridarshan

  29. Testing wil still have bugs, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Testing is that, testing. It will still have bugs in it, unstable is just worse.

    If you want something absolutely stable with no bugs, then go for the Debian stable release (currently potato). I realize potato is rather old, but that's just kinda how it works. If you want a proven stable release with more recent software, then sadly, maybe Debian isn't for you.

  30. Re:Maybe Woody will be released soon... by Mr+Links · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Granted I can not resist apt-get update every few weeks but there is nothing stopping people installing from testing and then leaving it alone. Most people don't need the latest version of bash,one from a few months ago is fine for them.

  31. Re:Running Debian may be a bad idea altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Beautiful. But it needs to be toned down slightly and posted with a +1 bonus.

  32. go go gentoo cd :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    dont you just hate poletics?

  33. Re:Running Debian may be a bad idea altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    You're an obvious troll. You just took something and s/Linux/Debian/g-ed it. But I will give my rebuttal.
    ReiserFS is still in beta stage
    Not now it isn't.
    All the drawbacks of the ancient EXT2FS file system remain in EXT3FS,
    You call ext2 "ancient", and yet defend the BSD filesystem, UFS, which is several decades older.
    for the sake of 'forward- and backward compatibility'. This is interesting, considering that the DOS heritage in the Windows 9x/ME series was considered a very bad thing by the Debian community, even though it provided what could be called one of the best examples of compatibility, ever.
    You defend DOS and criticize its approach at the same time. By extension, you defend Linux and criticize it at the same time. Which side are you on?
    Instead, they have frequent "hardware problems".
    So Linux should be blamed for hardware that doesn't meet the spec? Hardware companies provide proprietary drivers that work around their own mistakes, but Linux kernel hackers can't afford to do that, nor is it easy for them to find other companies' undocumented faults.
    The system is a mix of features from all kinds of unices, but not one of them is implemented right. A Debian user has to live with badly coded tools which have low performance, mangle data seemingly at random and are not in line with their specification.
    That may have been more accurate years ago, but these days GNU, and in particular glibc, is more reliable and standards compliant than most Unices out there. It supports most POSIX, BSD, SysV, and SuS functions. More than I can say about HP-UX, AIX, or Solaris. Or {Free|Net|Open}BSD.
  34. Heh, no Prez is even better than G Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    That guy is going to get the Americans into a real pickle. It's become clear that he is bound and determined to do _something_ at any cost to Human life, suffering, environment and all nations other than the (lately not so) venerable USA.

  35. So fucking what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Now get back to making software, and stop giving yourselves boners with these unimportant "elections".