Slashdot Mirror


Recycle Fee For Each PC?

UncleJosh writes: "The New York Times (free reg rq'd) has a story about a $25-30 fee to be added to the price of a new PC to cover the cost of recycling it. Sort of like a bottle deposit, but you don't get the money back." What if I just want to buy the case?

29 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Strange. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

    Politicians don't have to pay a recycle tax for each stupid piece of boneheaded legislation they keep recycling from election year to election year.

    1. Re:Strange. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Funny

      The sad part is, there is no need to recycle. I'll take em all ;)

      6 dozen and counting....

  2. Send it to Michigan? by hij · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean I can take my machine to Michigan and get my $25 deposit back?

    --
    Believe nothing -- Buddha
    1. Re:Send it to Michigan? by rmohr02 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but in order to make a profit you'd have to get a free truck from your neighborhood mailman.

  3. freegeek it by ftide · · Score: 3, Informative

    why not goto FreeGeek if you're in portland, ore. area

    1. Re:freegeek it by AnarchySoftware · · Score: 5, Informative

      OK. I work at FREE GEEK and we reuse and recycle a lot of these gizmos.

      Monitors are the worst

      Here's what currently has to happen to a monitor to dispose of it safely and responsibly (without shipping it to Asia). Note: We're on the west coast, USA:

      • Drop monitor off at FREE GEEK
      • We gather and test the monitors. It's far more efficient to re-use when possible. But some are broken or so obsolete that no one will touch them.
      • Those that can't be re-used get palletized and shipped to somewhere in Washington State where they are disassembled. This costs us $8.00 / CRT, plus shipping.
      • From Washington State, the leaded glass gets shipped off to a smelter in Pennsylvania. That's the closest place to domestically handle this kind of glass. This requires a trainload of glass to make it worth the while.

      Now, we could try to cut costs by doing some of the work ourselves. (We already do the testing.) But:

      • Wanna disassemble a monitor? Their innards are coated with a fire retardant that you can absorb into your blood stream through the skin. Their capacitors can electrocute you. This is not a minimum wage type job here.
      • Wanna have a lead smeltering operation in your neighborhood? (I didn't think so.)

      Same story goes for TVs, BTW.

      There's a lot of stuff in the computer that's worth pulling out (gold, paladium, tantalum). There's some stuff that's break even (most of the other metals). But a lot of it is just expensive to deal with.

      These proposed deposits are not hidden costs. The real hidden cost (from the consumer's point of view) is the tax that he'll have to pay a decade down the line to clean up the water supply, etc.

      ...

  4. recycle? by rastachops · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean people throw PCs away?!?

    1. Re:recycle? by yobbo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm as surprised as you.

      I just thought they got banished to geek's basements where they spend the rest of their lives running sendmail.

    2. Re:recycle? by Servo5678 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I have an old 486 with Windows 3.1 sitting under my bed just waiting for the day that I call it back into action.

      Patience, my dear, patience...

  5. The only way... by Alea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good idea. The recycling is good idea and the only way to get it done is for it to be paid up front. If we legislated recycling but allowed aftermarket payment, we'd find the roadsides littered with abandoned PC's. The EU is trying (rather unsuccessfully) to do the same thing with cars.

  6. Why put the fee up front? by krugdm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I pay a fee for oil disposal when it gets changed. I pay a fee for tire disposal, when I change my tires.

    Personally, since I've never had to dispose of a computer (I still have all but one that I've ever bought, the other one I sold) Why should I get stuck with a disposal fee that I may never use?

    Why not just make it illegal to throw away monitors, etc. in the regular trash, then have a collection point with a fee for disposal, just like oil and tires?

    1. Re:Why put the fee up front? by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because then you'd have people running underground computer junkyards.

      There's one down the street from me. It's called Grateway County, or something like that.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  7. Gee, another tax. by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let's see, the $25-35 per "computer" (CRT? Case? Motherboard? Individual card?) tax goes to funding a recycling programme.

    If that meant I could plunk my old box on the sidewalk and let it be picked up by the recyclers (garbage crew, because it ain't recyclable), sure.

    But what do you want to bet that "since there's a recycling programme, we can ban picking it up at the curbside", the way they have in California?

    In other words, I pay the tax, and I still can't throw away the boat anchor? The only difference I can see here is that some preferred contractor gets a cushy pork-barrel project.

    1. Re:Gee, another tax. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's hazardous waste!

      8 Pounds of lead in a CRT, for starters! The stuff can not go into landfills (or into the sea if that is what you prefer)!

      This is perfectly reasonable. The alternative is for people to just mothball everything in their homes and offices, similar to the program for dealing with waste from nuke power plants.

      No, it isn't recycling (for the most part); this is about internalizing the costs.

      Unfortunately, the computer (and consumer electronics as a whole) industry lives on a product cycle of a few years, and the products are a little bit harder on the environment than styrofoam cups.

    2. Re:Gee, another tax. by wirefarm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where I live, if you want to throw away a PC or a monitor, you have to buy special stamps that say that you've paid your "disposal fee" or whatever.
      Then you can just put it on the curb once a month.
      The trash guys see the stamps on the stuff and know that it's ok to pick up - otherwise you get a visit from the local police and a fine, I think.

      (So, if you find a PC on the curb in Tokyo, leave the stamps on - that way you save a few bucks if you ever decide to pitch it later...)

      Cheers,
      Jim

      --
      -- My Weblog.
  8. Shouldn't be a problem... by tongue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I have no problem with this, as long as recycling centers are widely and easily available. I have half a dozen cases and a few boxes worth of broken parts I can't do anything with (and yes, I've tried donating them to a school or non-profit--they are even less able to use them than me) but I can't throw away because its unsafe for the environment. I would gladly pay an extra 20-30 dollars to finance being able to take this crap somewhere and forget about it and not have to worry about poisoning drinking water or wildlife. Look at it this way: at least microsoft (probably) won't see the money.

  9. Re:Styrofoam by /dev/trash · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Really, computer cases are the least of our environmental worries...

    Given a choice between styrofoam or mercury and cadium, I'd take styrofoam

  10. Because you are disincentivizing people by mikosullivan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Motor oil is a perfect example of why pay-for-disposal doesn't work. If you have to pay to throw away the oil properly, people will just dunmp it in the sewer and let it get into everyone's ground water. I'd prefer a system where you pay a deposit when you buy the oil, then get it back when you dispose of it properly.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  11. Garage sale by jafac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every old machine I've ever gotten rid of, I've done so at a garage sale or swap meet. I don't think I've ever thrown a piece of hardware away into the garbage. Working or non-working.

    Although I have some old ISA SCSI cards and 48-pin 4-meg simms I'm thinking of tossing. . .

    (Ironically, I've got about 250 megs worth of RAM in the form of 48-pin simms that are probably all perfectly working, but obsolete to the point of useless. I think they'd make good secondary storage if there was some sort of PCI card to plug em all into - they'd make a great RAM drive - they'd outperform disk).

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  12. Re:never recycle by GunFodder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we try to charge extra at collection then most people will find some way around the approved collection points. Not everyone collects old computers; many people think 1 computer is too many :) If I had the choice of paying $25 to recycle or paying nothing to leave my old stuff in a college dorm parking lot then I would probably do the wrong thing.

    Collecting for recycling at the point of purchase makes sense from that perspective. But if we could get some cash back when we recycle then there would be added incentive to recycle computer parts properly.

    Does this sound just like our current recycling system? It sure does! Making folks pay for recycling up front and giving them a cash incentive to follow through is the best way to make recycling work.

  13. This is a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It makes people say "The environment is expensive to keep. Stuff it!".

    Trust me, anyone who goes through _forced_ environmentalism _hates_ it. A city local to me (Guelph, Ontario) has forced garbage separation. I avoid even eating in the food courts there. I refuse to go trash picking. I ain't no hobo! After asking others outside that city what they think about that rule they usually say "Huh?", then "Oh yeah, that stupid city where I have to pick through my trash. Ugh!".

    Same thing here. I'd gladly pay a few extra dollars of tax money for the option of putting the old computer beside the blue box, or even pay a few dollars to get it taken away knowing its going to be reused.

    But if you _force_ me to pay directly, without any direct benefit to me (and not seeing my computer in a landfill is not a tangible benefit to most anybody), you've made me your enemy. I don't take being forced to do anything very well when it doesn't harm anyone else, and neither should you!

    I believe this is the reason the EU is having a hard time applying this idea to cars? Because people are tired of paying hidden taxes to support a bunch of soft-hearted-and-headed green thumbs?

    Oh, there's also the little problem of the fact that recycling certain materials is actually more harmful to the environment (energy usage and byproduct wise) than making them in the first place (eg: Can recycling plan hooked up to a coal/gas power station).

    And no, we wouldn't find the roadsides littered with cases at all. Very few people throw anything out like that (speaking from personal experience). Example: Most everywhere you have to dispose of old paint specially. As someone living in the country (which is usually a popular dumping ground) the worst I've EVER seen around here is a set of tires. Never any paint cans. Why? Because the paint cans can usually be left at the curb for pickup, unlike tires. I've never once seen an old computer tossed out randomly here because these can either be left beside your garbage or at a dump.

    The answer is to make recyling paletable and easy, never _force_. _Force_ is exactly why you don't get voted in and is exactly why you never get into government in the first place. (ever seen someone choose to vote for someone by choice in a democracy? :-)

    1. Re:This is a bad idea by Alea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's funny... I actually live in Guelph, the city with the "stupid" garbage separation. It's no problem in my household and I don't go picking through garbage. In fact, on the rare occasions when one has accidentally thrown something away it's much nicer because you probably threw it in the dry and don't have to navigate around coffee grounds, etc.

      "I don't take being forced to do anything very well when it doesn't harm anyone else, and neither should you!"

      What, like paying taxes for roads and fuel? You're forced to do that because it's part of your public responsibility. Why should the environment be any different? The fact is that very few people will voluntarily pay for environmental benefits using the same short-sighted "doesn't harm anyone" reasoning you've applied.

    2. Re:This is a bad idea by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't take being forced to do anything very well when it doesn't harm anyone else, and neither should you!


      If you think spreading lead and other poisons around the countryside isn't hurting anyone else, then you haven't thought things through.


      Oh, there's also the little problem of the fact that recycling certain materials is actually more harmful to the environment (energy usage and byproduct wise) than making them in the first place


      That is debatable, but somewhat orthogonal to the issue at hand -- the important thing is that the computer parts don't end up spread all over the country, leaking into the ground water, or being burned into the air in China. So the goal here is to make sure they are collected and dealt with safely; whether that means recycling them or just sequestering them in a safe location is a separate issue.


      The answer is to make recyling paletable and easy, never _force_.


      Nobody is proposing forcing anyone to recycle anything here. On the other hand, when you choose to recycle your old PC, under this plan, you won't be charged to do so. An improvement on this plan would be to charge $10 more on top of the recycling cost, and give that back to the consumer when s/he recycles their computer; this would be a further incentive to bring the computers in instead of just dumping them somewhere.


      Note how well a similar system works for income taxes... by giving people a refund check every year, the IRS encourages everyone to send in their tax forms on time. Even though people were charged more up front, and thus aren't really getting any money, they feel like they are getting something out of doing the right thing.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:This is a bad idea by Mike_K · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree.

      You bring up Guelph as an example. While I haven't been in Guelph lately (I'm from Toronto), I agree that getting people to separate their garbage is a bad idea, because they won't do it (or at least won't like it). The difference between that and this is that garbage separation is done after the fact and not up front. If you had to pay an extra quarter and they had somebody else separate the garbage for you, you'd do it and be glad that your quarter is being spent responsibly (to help the environment).

      Secondly, you bring up EU. While I don't know anything about EU recycling cars, I believe that in Germany the manufacturers had to guarantee recycling of major appliances. This caused manufacturers to redesign their products so they contained less materials and were easier to recycle. The result were CHEAPER appliances that were more environmentally friendly.

      You see, the problem with this legislation is not that it's up front and doesn't rely on people's good will and knowledge of the system. The problem is that it's not up front enough. This is more of an end-of-pipe approach than a solution to the real problem.

      The government should make every manufacturer and importer pay out of their pocket a fee for transporting the equipment to their recycling facilities and make them recycle it. The result would be that the recycling fee would become included in the cost of the equipment, but it would be up to the manufacturer's ingenuity to reduce the cost and thus make their products cheaper. Creating a flat fee only allows the manufacturers to continue producing products that are not friendly and point their finger at the government and say "But they will recycle it!".

      Remember, necessity is a mother of all inventions.

      m

  14. Automatic Response = Balk by dewboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Choosing my words carefully to avoid becoming flamebait:

    Why is it that when something like this comes along, the first thing we geeks do is complain about how stupid it is? We are a minority, we who keep machines long past their prime, using them to their full capacity as web servers, mail servers, firewalls, gateways, etc... The majority of computer waste comes from major corporations, who dispose of these machines after they have passed the point of obsolescence. The cheapest method of disposal right now is to have it "taken care of" (i.e. put in a landfill in China). See this site for real info.

    Giving major corporations an incentive to recycle computers is an incredible step towards changing the way we deal with computer waste. Who knows, maybe the next step will be to device a whole new model for computer sales that generates less waste by creating more interchangable parts; rather than throwing out the whole machine every 1.5 years, companies can purchase core processing units that all machines use... distributed computing... but i digress.

  15. environmental hazards by happyclam · · Score: 5, Informative
    Computer disposal has attracted public attention because of a recent report by environmental groups that 50 to 80 percent of American high-technology trash was exported to developing countries. The report described the hazards experienced by residents of China, India and Pakistan who are exposed to the hazards of electronic recycling.

    This is the single most important piece of information, and they nearly swept it under the rug in the article. I saw a program about three months ago on one of those TV "news" magazine shows covering this problem.

    The used PCs being "recycled" are essentially shipped to third world countries. Peasants there then melt down the boards to "recycle" them. They essentially grab the parts that have resale value and let the other parts seep into the environment.

    The video on this program was disturbing, to say the least. A huge junkpile of cases and monitors, everything covered by the soot of the burning fires melting the boards... and the people doing all this completely unprotected in any way. Not even masks. The ground around the entire site had been poisoned beyond any possible near-term use.

    This program interviewed a clean recycler in the SF Bay area that said the costs of recycling locally in accordance with California environmental laws was very expensive but that this particular outfit never shipped anything overseas.

    Basically, this has to be paid for somehow. Right now we're paying in environmental capital in third world countries. If we want to recover that, then the payment needs to come from the profit margin of the machines, the consumers' payments, or the government (taxes). Your choice.

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  16. Re:Styrofoam by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given a choice between styrofoam or mercury and cadium, I'd take styrofoam

    Yeah, Minimata disease (mercury) and "itai-itai (cadmium) are horrible diseases.

    Don't forget the lead either - the glass in monitors is up to 40% lead.

    Spent computers really are bad news environmentally.

  17. The idea behind the recycling deposit for PCs... by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is to encourage manufacturers to develop PCs that can be efficiently recycled. If someone figures out how to build a PC that can be recycled for less than the deposit amount and makes a profit, cool, the system works.

    Same idea behind the European car recycling deposits. It's more-or-less the same market principle behind the pollution credits program President Bush announced today, which is based on an existing successful program.

  18. Don't recycle....have fun by thumbtack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's what you do...take your old system, the one totally devoid of anything you may possibly ever use. After dark, set it outside beside your car near the trunk. Arrange it to look like you just took it out of the trunk, set it down and forgot to carry it in. It will most likely be gone in the morning. If not, just leave it there a day or two, eventually someone will make it disappear.

    A while back there was a story on The Screensavers,(I looked I can't find it) where someone took a case filled it with concrete, and set it on their front porch. As I recall it sat on his porch for about 3 days, then it disappeared during the night. They found it about 3 blocks away, in a ditch.