Jaguar Reviewed
Anonymous Coward writes "A review with a lot of screenshots of the latest beta seed (6C37) has been posted. The latest advancements look pretty promising. I, like everyone else, am itching for a release." I don't know if it is more pretty, or more promising, but it does look cool. Dock improvements, iChat, search the disk from Finder windows, QuickTime 6, Digital Hub section of System Preferences, Firewall preferences, major Speech improvements ...
How much $$ is this gonna set me back?
a friend of mine has a copy of the developer release (via his dad) and said friend loves it... iChat is cool, Finder does some REALLY cool things (if you have the horsepower) besides the spring-loaded folders, and all I can say is is that I want Jaguar SO bad now.
Steve has finally put function over form...
It'd be nice if this release runs fast. God knows it's pretty, but I'm ready for fast!
Anyone care to post the text as the site seems /.'d.
If Apple continues to name their releases after failed video game consoles, then by the time they get to 3DO, we're screwed.
Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.
Is Avaliable at http://www.apple.com/macosx/
Apparently not. Even though Apple made a big deal about ushering the press out after the WWDC keynote, they never signed NDA's. Developers, on the other hand, did. It is part of being an ADC member, if I remember correctly. So I can neither confirm nor deny that the screenshots at the macthis.org site look just exactly like Jaguar. With all those screenshots, that site is going down in a heartbeat... reload...... already flatlined. :)
http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
Someone hurry up and post it to Usenet already.
Then i'd buy Jaguar immediately for the Quartz Extreme!
It is mega-arousing/droolworthy.
Pi
Supported hardware for Quartz extreme:
"nVidia: GeForce2MX, GeForce3, GeForce4 Ti, GeForce4 or GeForce4MX. ATI: any AGP Radeon card. 32MB VRAM recommended for optimum performance"
Would the ATI Mobility Radeon (found in PowerBook G4) be included in this? is it AGP?
reech bee-yond ur clip-0n
1. macthis.org has no dns entry
2. google has no idea who "mac this", mac.this, or macthis is/are.
3. Do the editors even click on the links before posting?
Burn Hollywood Burn
The next version of Windows is codenamed "Longhorn". It is a kind of cow.
.NET Server. See, it all makes sense..
Longhorn is a bar at the Whistler ski resort north of Vancouver, BC (just a few hours drive from Microsoft's Redmond campus). The two mountains there are Whistler and Blackcomb. Whistler was the codename for Windows XP and Blackcomb is/was the codename for Windows
cpeterso
Spymac has lots of screenshots of Jaguar from the WWDC here. Guess NDAs don't bother some people ;)
From what I've gleaned so far we know the following:
- QE is said to need a "nVidia: GeForce2MX, GeForce3, GeForce4 Ti, GeForce4 or GeForce4MX. ATI: any AGP Radeon card. 32MB VRAM recommended for optimum performance."
- The wording on the above statement may or may not be read as "requires", depending on whom you ask.
- The tech involved in such a feat described (single pipeline of composited video) is really advanced and interesting, and raises questions; i.e. what does it mean for OS X when the entire drawing system is offloaded to custom chips? (or on a completely side note: what does it mean when you have standardized hardware-accel. video for your OS, and the Finder is now utterly replaceable? Things like this?)
- The tech involved in QE may have come from Raycer, a company Apple acquired in early 2000. Raycer developed high-performance 3D visualization solutions using OpenGL. Apple consequently has a patent (lost the #, sorry) on vague things like 'large-scale grid transformations' (paraphrasing).
- A lot of us iBook owners, and other Rage128-based Mac owners, would like to know if QE will work partially, or at all, on this hardware.
So who can comment intelligently on what's happening here?
If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
Likely one that will be answered easily here.
There was mention that Jaguar would require a 32mb video card. Being the owner of the crt iMac I obviously do not have one (16mb ATI). Does anyone know if the higher end video card would be required to update to 10.2 and just have some features turned off (the hand writting software for instance could be completely disabled).
I can see why I would need to have a 32mb 3d video card just so I can finally be able to print to a CUPS printer. Thanks.
Registrant:
macthis.org
2371 Purdue Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626
US
Domain Name: MACTHIS.ORG
Created on: 24-AUG-01
Expires on: 24-AUG-02
Last Updated on: 24-AUG-01
about 6 years ago I remember using some software called ichat.... oh here it is:
http://www.ichat.com/
ichat®
Surely they Apple couldn't have overlooked this.
...folder is.
-- SIGFPE
I'm wondering if Apple has gotten everything worked out with Core Audio, and if Jaguar will be the release that makes it possible for major audio software makers to finally start releasing OS X ports.
As I understand it, audio and MIDI are there in 10.1 but not yet robust enough for the pro apps. Any info on this?
How can I tell if my TiBook is a rev 'b' or 'c'?
TIA
There's a DVD playing. The teacups are floating around from a different application. They are chrome.
They are reflecting in real time what the movie is playing.
(probably why it won't work on my Rage 128)
Well, I saw info about CUPS. But I'm not getting the feeling that that will enable me to print to a USB printer connected to one Mac, from another Mac. WTF!
I mean, for the home user, it's rediculous to not be able to print to my printer from all machines, having the printer being shared by one. Bah!
I've seen several hacks to get around this, but none do I consider acceptable. It should just WORK! And it's all because of the rediculously stupid choices made in terms of interfaces and responsibilities of the printer driver. SOOO stupid that it is responsible for the physical location of printing, and not JUST the data formatting for the printer (via any deliverable means). That certainly doesn't encourage vendors to update drivers often either. Why? Because it's a pain in the ass with all that it has to do.
*sigh*
Just my gripe. Something I would LIKE to see in 10.2, personally.
-Alex
Okay, suddenly the whole "32MB GPU RAM, 2X AGP required" thing makes a whole lot more sense. Dear god in heaven that's badass...
News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.