Slashdot Mirror


AbiWord 1.0.1 Released

plam writes "After 3 years of hacking, the AbiWord team has unleashed AbiWord 1.0.1 upon the world. AbiWord is a Free cross-platform word processor which runs on Linux and Windows, MacOS X, QNX, FreeBSD, Solaris and others. AbiWord is small and compact (20 times smaller than OpenOffice!), yet contains most of the features found in larger word processors, including Word and WordPerfect import/export."

26 of 458 comments (clear)

  1. Release announcement by plam · · Score: 5, Informative
    I didn't include it in the story, but here's our AbiWord 1.0.1 release announcement.


    The AbiWord team is proud to announce the release of AbiWord version 1.0.1, a free-software Word Processing program. More than three years in the making, AbiWord is a reliable, cross-platform word processor with many powerful features.

    AbiWord aims at robust inter-operability with existing products, including Microsoft Word(R), Corel WordPerfect(R), and others. AbiWord's goal is to incorporate the most useful features of these competing applications without the fluff, bloat, or slowness that generally accompany them.

    Translations and spell checking are available for more 30 different languages. An English Language Thesaurus for use within AbiWord can also be freely downloaded.

    We have not yet implemented tables or footnotes. Tables and footnotes are the first priority for our next development phase. We have already made impressive progress toward this and other new features.

    AbiWord is available for Linux and other Unix variants, Windows, Mac OSX and QNX.
    You can learn more about AbiWord from our website at http://www.abiword.com/.
    AbiWord can be downloaded from http://www.abiword.com/download/.

    AbiWord was initially developed by SourceGear Inc.; today, AbiWord development has been continued by a worldwide team of volunteer developers. AbiWord is free software available under the GNU General Public License.

    The AbiWord team can be contacted via email at: abi@abisource.com.
    1. Re:Release announcement by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could try using Lyx. It has the best support for layout, tables, equations, code, sections, multiple output formats - and yes, footnotes, of any tool I've seen. It uses LaTeX as the engine but you don't need to know any of the syntax to get started.

      It depends what you want to do. If you're writing small pieces for immediate printing like letters, invoices or articles then Lyx is a bit over the top. But for academic papers, online (and printed) books, dissertations, code documentation and the like, it has no equal IMHO.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  2. is there anything like this coming out?? by josh+crawley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is superb, but what'd be really good is a spreadsheet that they could interuse. Perhaps, AbiSpread ?

    Then again, what is an ABI ?

    1. Re:is there anything like this coming out?? by plam · · Score: 5, Informative

      Abi is an ant. She's blue.

      As for spreadsheets, in the near future we release code which is able to embed Abiword files in Gnumeric and allows Evolution to use AbiWord to read emails.

    2. Re:is there anything like this coming out?? by quintessent · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds really cool. Just as long as Abi the Ant doesn't appear on my desktop and offer to help me type a letter.

  3. Grammar Checking... by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately, I'm a University Student (one of those eternal students actually). That means I end up doing a lot of word processing, paper writing, and the like. And its not always in English either. At the same time, having a grammar checker on hand does make proof-reading my own papers much easier, for simple stuff like subject-verb agreement, and the use of active voice instead of passive voice. In my brief experiments with both OpenOffice and AbiWord, both lacked a grammar checker to do this.

    Thus, I end up using MS Word for these things, not only because my professors only deal with MS Word format, but also because of the added feature of grammar checking. However, MS Word isn't exactly perfect in this respect. I do large amounts of my writing in the University computer labs, on their mass installs of MS Word, which only deal in English. Microsoft charges extra for increased language support in Word (last I checked it was a fairly sizable amount of money too). But I digress...

    Unfortunately, its hard to break the MS Word strangle hold not only because of the file format being so nasty to deal with, but also the fact that MS has developed a very good and useful feature in its grammar checker.

    1. Re:Grammar Checking... by great+throwdini · · Score: 4, Funny

      [C]an anybody tell me why the use of active voice is preferred over passive voice?

      I'm certain you meant to ask: Can anyone tell me why people prefer active voice to passive voice?

    2. Re:Grammar Checking... by rubinson · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thus, I end up using MS Word for these things, not only because my professors only deal with MS Word format, but also because of the added feature of grammar checking.

      You might the Unix utilities "style" and "diction." They don't do "grammar" checking per say (i.e., they don't cite passive voice or subject-verb agreement) but this is rather simple stuff that you should catch anyways.

      Diction identifies (and suggests remedies for) commonly misused phrases and lengthy sentences. Style evaluates the complexity of [sections of] your document.

      I don't think that I'm describing them very well, but, as an academic, I've found them (along with wordnet and ispell) to be indispensible. And they're probably already installed on your system. Check 'em out.

      The homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/diction/diction.html

    3. Re:Grammar Checking... by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      The passive voice is perfectly grammatical and useful in cases where you want to place emphasis on an act rather than who is doing it. It's mainly a usage bugaboo becasue it's all to easy to slip into using it habitually. Excessive use makes your writing sound evasive, wishy-washy, and wordy. A lot of bad government writing abuses the passive voice.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Grammar Checking... by Bronster · · Score: 5, Funny

      You might the Unix utilities "style" and "diction."

      You might the Unix utilities yourself, Yoda.

      Strong in this one the force is.

    5. Re:Grammar Checking... by autechre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never actually seen the grammar checker in Microsoft Office do anything useful. I think it's a bit fiddly to have a computer attempt to do such a thing in the first place (like a spell checker, it certainly won't catch all of the errors). I've often disagreed with it.

      The best method by far (IMHO) is to have someone else proofread your writing. If he is also a writer, you can trade. When proofreading your own work, errors will often slip by, because your brain knows what _should_ be on the page.

      It's also very helpful to read a lot of edited material (books, newspapers, etc.). _The_Elements_of_Style_ is a nice guide.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  4. Re:tables???? by Troodon · · Score: 5, Informative
    According to this manual section it appears to offer very basic table support.

    "This will allow you to create simple tables. More sophisticated table support is the major feature planned for AbiWord 1.2. The developers already know that it is needed, and are already working on it."

    --
    troodon.net
  5. AbiWord Rocks by PlaysWithMatches · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been following AbiWord development for a while, and I'm still amazed by this little piece of software. I use it for all my small- and medium-sized documents (anything larger and I use LyX), and I love it.

    One of the strong points of AbiWord is there's all sorts of nice "little things" features, such as the ability to import and export PalmDoc and PsionWord documents (I have both a PalmOS handheld and a Psion/EPOC/Symbian/whatever handheld). The lack of tables is a drag, but once that's added, I think this will truly be the perfect lightweight word processor. None of that useless bloat a la MS Office, just the features 99% of people need 99% of the time. Kudos to the AbiWord team.

    --

    Mozilla's a nice operating system, but it needs a better browser.
  6. Re:About time by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny
    Consider that releases of Office come every two or years--and that's improving code that already exists.

    The actual coding only takes a couple of weeks. The rest of the time is consumed by product planners trying to think of any new features compelling enough to justify the price of an upgrade.

  7. Re:Tables, Equations, Footnotes by plam · · Score: 5, Informative

    No equations in the forseeable future. But, we're accepting patches. If you just send a patch to abiword-dev[AT]abisource.com, it will most likely be committed that day.

    Tables and footnotes/endnotes will be in 1.2. We are overhauling the layout engine to support them.

    Tables are nontrivial to implement correctly. Currently, if you really want tables, you can simulate them using tabs and over/underlining.

    I started implementing endnotes[1] a while ago, but I got distracted by real life. They're not that hard, though, and once we have a new and more powerful layout engine, footnotes and endnotes should be fairly easy to implement.

    [1] Footnotes go at the bottom of each page; endnotes go at the end of each section.

  8. Re:AbiWord's size by AntiNorm · · Score: 4, Informative

    If it's true that AbiWord is 20 times smaller than OpenOffice and still provides comparable capabilities, those coders sure know what they are doing!

    Keep in mind that OpenOffice has a lot more than AbiWord does, though...like a spreadsheet program, presentation program, etc. To say that AbiWord is 20x smaller than OpenOffice is misleading; it is, but this is because it is just a word processor and not a full-fledged office suite.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  9. Re:Cool, but.. by AJWM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, have you made these doc files available to developers of AbiWord, OpenOffice, KOffice, etc? It's hard to fix what you can't reproduce.

    Come to think of it, I've got a few files like that too -- old files from MS Word for Macintosh circa 5.0 (ie about 10 years old). MS Word (Windows versions) can sometimes be coaxed and coerced into reading them, but only with the proper filters installed (which aren't by default).

    I guess by your rules even Word shouldn't claim it can import Word.

    --
    -- Alastair
  10. WordPerfect by rubinson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the WordPerfect filters are decent, this is--for me, at least--huge. WordPerfect still has a strong presence in certain industries. Law is frequently mentioned but many academics are still using WordPerfect as well. Indeed, I keep a copy of WordPerfect 8 for Linux (the native version, not that crappy Wine port) on my machine for occassional file from my colleagues (as well as for a handful of my own files from my days of using WP).

    I no longer have any need for Word thanks to OpenOffice; perhaps AbiWord will permit me to eliminate the last of my proprietary applications from my desktop.

  11. Re:AbiWord's size by mark_lybarger · · Score: 4, Informative

    abiword does not provide comparable capabilities. it's more of a lightweight editor. kate w/ font suppport maybe. i'd compare it more to wordpad than open office.

    openoffice is definately a M$ Office alternative for general document handling, unless you've got a marketing department. those guys will create stuff that m$ office doesn't handle properly.

  12. Lets hear it for table support! by Leghk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Abiword turns out to be a pretty good word processor. I plopped one of my roommates, who exclusivly had used Microsoft Windows up until this point, down infront of abiword a couple months ago. He was able to write a couple grad school application essays without any complaints, or without asking for any assistance. He even got his printer working without any assistance. That's quite a feat. I'm not sure you could plop a windows user down infront of a Mac and have them be able to to figure their way around so well.

    Unfortunately, using abiword for my work is totally useless. While abiword has attacked the home market user, it hasn't paid much attention to the business user. By far the biggest piece of functionality abiword lacks is table support. I can't think of a single document (mostly technical I guess) I've had to write for work which did not somewhere in the document contain a table. Unfortunately abiword simply doesn't support tables, and trying to import a word document with tables, the tables just get flattened with linefeeds instead of cells. I'm not even sure how you could write a lab report using abiword without table support. Maybe you could make a table in gnumeric and paste in an image.

    This is very unfortunate because everything else about abiword is quite spectacular. It is so much lighter weight then openoffice, and so much more of a pleasure to use, but, unfortunately, I'll have to continue using openoffice for a little whlie longer.

    If I could program C or C++ worth a damn, I would definately do something about this! (That and allowing gnumeric to import a tab delimited file form the commandline). Alas, these Java hands of mine are useless! I feel like I should be able to help, and not just complain it. But I really can't. Maybe I can go bake the abiword people some cookies instead.

  13. Re:tables???? by dos+equis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Table support is our most-requested-feature and our #1 priority for the next version. It's being worked on now.

    It does support Word 2000 and XP but if you find a feature for those formats that is missing, file an RFE.

  14. Re:Font Weirdness by plam · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah. It sucks. X fonts are a terrible mess. The whole sordid affair is documented in Abi bug 1030. We will use FreeType in the future, though, and I hope that this solves the problem.

    By the way, AbiWord usually stores its fonts in /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts. If you want to use system fonts, you need to symlink them from your system fonts directory to that directory and run mkfontdir/mkttfdir to create a fonts.dir in /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts. Then it'll happily use your fonts.

  15. Re:Cool, but.. by Metrol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even Word sometimes chokes and dies on them.

    Have you considered the very real possibility that the problem isn't the import filters, but some corrupted doc files? Especially earlier versions of Word did not much care for "open > edit > save > open > edit > save > rinse > repeat". Repetitive edits of the same document tend to start mucking things up.

    You might try copy and pasting your files clean. If offending document can open, copy everything outta there and paste into a new doc.

    I know it sounds like a cheap hack, but I have seen this work. With that fresh, and free of extra cruft, document you might want to try some of those import filters again. They may still not work fully, but at least they've been given a fair test.

    --
    The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
  16. Look, I don't want to spoil the party by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But I'm not going to be using word processors in the future, ever again.

    I have several hundred megabytes and several thousand files of documents written on WordStar, WordPerfect, Word 2, Word 6, Lotus (Wordpro?), Applix word and Brown Bag MindReader[1].

    The documents are essentially useless to me now, the time investment I made in writing them has not paid off. I'll have to invest significantly more time and effort to make these documents usable.

    Instead, I'm going to use bog standard vanilla HTML for all documents and letters in the future. That way, the time I invest in writing, articles, documentation and letters will not be wasted. I can use any HTML editor or text editor I wish and the documents will be viewable and printable from any web browser on any platform.

    It would be nice if there were open standards like HTML for spreadsheets and vector graphics. I'm tired of word processors and office suites.

    [1] BTW, this was a lovely DOS based word processor which guessed which word you were typing. Fantastic for technical documents using long technical terms.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Look, I don't want to spoil the party by GypC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've always written my documents in plain ascii first and then opened up a copy in a word processor for formatting, or marked up a copy with HTML or LaTeX, depending on my needs... but I've always kept those original plain text copies. This has saved my ass a few times, especially when I used to use Word 97 on Windows 98 and it would impose its 'write corrupted nonsense to disk in case of system oops' feature on me.

      The only inconvenient part is merging revisions back to the original.

  17. It's WORDPAD with spellcheck! by hatless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Three years later, I'm still mystified by the attention Abiword gets. It even gets press coverage.

    It's not even a word processor by late-1980s standards. No table support! No floating footnotes! The column support doesn't seem to allow changing the number of columns midstream--it's all or nothing.

    No merge functionality! (Oh, but there are two optional, unbundled scripting plugins you can theoretically write your own merge function with--except that there's no user-defined field support, either, so any merge fields in a document would be ad-hoc, unprotected, and would show up as spelling errors.)

    Great, so it's "lightweight" and starts up quickly, and it's cross-platform. Yipee. But I remember in 1988 it was pretty fair to expect a graphical word processor--even on the Amiga and the C64--to support tables and footnotes, mail merging and real, multiple-layouts-per-page column support.

    Don't get me wrong. It's nice of the Abiword team to put their time into writing software they obviously find and useful, and it is nice to see a solid, genuinely useful embeddable GTK+ richtext widget come out of this, but can we please stop mentioning it in the same breath as word processors?