Slashdot Mirror


Bootleg Star Wars AotC Debuts on Internet

Arctic Fox writes "Matt Drudge is reporting that bootleg copies of the new Star Wars movie have been appearing on the internet one week before the movie's big screeen debut. The article says that they have used a tripod mounted camera at a pre-screening to tape it. Not known is if anyone is seen walking in front of the camera." I gotta admit, I find this amusing, although I'd never bother downloading it: I've had 12:01 tickets ready to go and there is no way I'm gonna spoil it watching a low quality divx.

29 of 571 comments (clear)

  1. Neat trick... by Yoda2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah but to watch it now and then go to the first screening and ruin all the good parts for those sitting near you might be a kick.

    1. Re:Neat trick... by ct · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pssstttt. Darth Vader is Luke's father.

      //ct

  2. I downloaded LOTR, what a mistake by dstanley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I downloaded a bootleg version of LOTR when it came out. It realy spoils the awe that accompanies seeing the film on the big screen for the first time. Having made the mistake once, I won't do it again. After all, the wait is just like waiting for Christmas as a little kid.

    Thats what I think, anyway.

  3. The guy who spoiled the x-files "the lone gunmen" by RedCard · · Score: 5, Funny


    Now, I forget exactly which slashdot editor it was that posted "the lone gunmen are dead" several hours early...
    ... but whoever they are they should be forced to watch the divx BEFORE being allowed to see the movie.
    And the divx should be as grainy, low quality, and stuttery as possible.

    Poetic justice.

  4. Bootlegs are a Way of Life in Asia by nemesisj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having lived in Asia for 15+ years, I can say that this is the way that almost all new movies makes if over there.

    Somebody sneaks into a screaning with a camcorder and films the movie. It's always fun to see whether the guy will use a tripod (most don't for fear of getting caught), who's going to stand up during the movie, whether the dude will be eating popcorn (always a little hard to hear the dialogue), and what the audience finds funny.

    These bootlegs are almost always sold as VCDs instead of DVDs and they are so low quality that if you have a prayer of seeing the movie at the theater, you don't touch them. Sometimes you get the ultimate surprise of watching "It's a Bug's Life" instead of "Jurrasic Park III", but it's all part of the experience.

    P.S. to the MPAA - if you actually sold movies in China that were legal, this sort of thing would never fly with the public.

    1. Re:Bootlegs are a Way of Life in Asia by mh_tang · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is not exactly the case of someone sneaking a Sony HandyCam into a theater and taping among the audience. According to VCD Quality, the FTF release of AToC is a TELESYNC, which basically means that it's a high-end camera pointed at a screen, with audio recorded from the source (to eliminate audience noise). So it's better than most Cam recordings that you're alluding to. Check here for definitions of how movies are bootlegged.

      That said, it's still a pretty crappy release in terms of quality. I'm sure that within a week, they'll have at least SVCD screeners or workprints available for downloads.

  5. Re:For those who haven't caught on... by Havokmon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For those who haven't caught on yet, this is why the MPAA and RIAA dislike technology so strongly.

    Oh yeah, these 'perfect' copies remind me of trying to watch softporn through static on TMC.

    "Standard" piracy isn't any better, or more widespread, than it was in the 80's.

    Sure there's high quality stuff out there, but there's high quality drugs out there too.. Which do you think you'll get a hold of?

    I think of it like Fort Knox:
    Where do you find pirated movies? The Internet.
    Where do you find Gold bars? Fort Knox.
    Where CAN you get pirated movies. The internet, sort of, if you know the FTP site, or manage to have a complete news server, then MAYBE..
    Where CAN you get gold? Fort Knox, if you have a small army with you..

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  6. will have no effect on box office by dioscaido · · Score: 5, Informative

    Will this have any impact on ticket sales? Obviously not! I would dare anyone who would trade a grainy 320x200 shot of the movie for the real thing in the movie theaters.

    LOTRs was out on Morpheus before the movie came it, and it still had amazing revenues.

    1. Re:will have no effect on box office by Nehemiah+S. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it sucks as bad as TPM did, then it might. I dl'd TPM and didn't bother seeing it on dvd or in the theater, and I will probably do the same here.

      By the same token, I dl'd matrix and saw it afterwards in the theater 4 times. Same with LOTR (I only saw it at the theater twice though).

      The point being that P2P services are hollywoods worst nightmare- because if everyone has easy access to free movies, they will only pay to see good ones at the theater. Lucas doesn't want to be forced to make a good movie, but he wants to make $200M anyway--so he will fight KaZaA etc. with everything he has.

      --
      ... and there is no doubt, that one day he will be
      where the eye of his telescope has already been
    2. Re:will have no effect on box office by Sodium+Attack · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Will this have any impact on ticket sales? Obviously not!

      Here's a post from someone who admits he won't see AOTC in the theaters, now having seen it on the internet. Obviously, it will have an effect on ticket sales. (How much is debateable, but it's clearly a non-zero amount.)

      --

      Never take moderation advice from sigs, including this one.

  7. The ending doesn't make any sense... by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wouldn't waste my time if I were you. The ending doesn't make any sense, it's just some crazy lady dancing.

  8. Re:Not worth downloading... by soap.xml · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you give the DMCA any place to work, even with something like this, you are validating it as a law. The DMCA is not the solution here. It is simply copyright infringment. Plain, old fashioned copyright infringment. Its illegal, period. We don't need some stupid new law to tell us that. But my personal take on it is simply this. If you want to dl it.... go ahead. I won't, I'm watching it the day it comes out. Then I'll buy the dvd when it comes out, after lucas releases all of the dvd's Ill have a big star wars party and we will watch them in high quality, legally.

    Those with the low-qual divx may see it frist, but nothing beats the "big screen" :)

  9. No Harm, No Foul by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, to see these you need to incur a gig of download and all you get to see is two crappy VCD's of a movie that's coming out next week.

    These are obsessed people, my friends. Nobody is doing this to avoid paying $8 at the box office. The people who download this will probably be first in line, dressed up as their favorite StarWars character. And they'll probably see it 6 times, even if it sucks.

    Noone is loosing money here.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:No Harm, No Foul by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful
      • [The people who download films] are obsessed people, my friends. Nobody is doing this to avoid paying $8 at the box office.

      Hmm. Sounds reasonable, until you consider the guy sitting right behind me. He's currently downloading four films to his home machine over his cable modem (using VNC to drive it from work) and has just started looking for AOTC (based on me telling him that it's out there). He basically downloads everything, just because it's free, and it's there. He's getting megabits per second that he's not paying for, he's got a 120GB hard drive, and CD's are dirt cheap. Downloading a film involves half a dozen keypresses, two mouse clicks, and bingo, it's waiting for him when he gets home.

      Would he have spent money at theatres to see all of those films? Probably not, but he's damn sure not going to now. The main point is that he's not a hard core Star Wars fan (he's too young), so it's not just the obsessives who are doing this. Remember, original Star Wars fans are all 30+ now, there's a whole new generation coming up who are seeing films not so much as something you go and watch as something you download to see if it sucks.

      I can quite honestly see why the movie industry is worried. However, I think that the solution is to make fewer and better quality films, and (personal gripe) to show them in theatres with a strict "Shut the hell up and don't bring your damn chattering hyperactive kids, you morons" policy, rather than doing what they're doing, which is dumbing down, going for quantity over quality, and shrieking for legislation to protect their profits.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:No Harm, No Foul by 3ryon · · Score: 5, Funny
      The people who download this will probably be first in line, dressed up as their favorite StarWars character. And they'll probably see it 6 times, even if it sucks.


      You clearly have no idea how the market works. The MPAA will lose a tremendous amount of money due to this. Here are some quick numbers. There are 200 Million people on the Internet, MPAA gets $3/ticket sold, the average viewer will watch the movie 3 times, thus the MPAA will lose at least 1.8 Trillion dollars. You obviously need to read the news more closely.

  10. Anyone remember... by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those guys who have been waiting outside since february?

    Are they still there?
    Maybe we could give them a laptop and a DivX...

  11. Coding Films? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm wondering why they haven't resorted to putting some coding, some object or image that is digitally dubbed into a few frames in an inconspicuious position to identify which of the films this was so they could simply deny that party furture access to preview or any other films. The power to police this doesn't require the DMCA or courts, but some very minor effort on the part of producers/distributors. In case anyone wasn't aware, film distribution is a cartel; films which they don't like, don't get distributed or they apply various pressures and threats to get their desired results.

    Other news, more digital theaters, unfortunately shy on details, but there's a listing of some on DLP.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  12. The problem is also the solution by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Damn this digital copying technology!" cries the MPAA. "It makes it really easy for a single copy to be rapidly distributed to many sites!"

    Which is true, but these early copies are all taken from pre-release showings of celluloid. Given that the studios clearly can't keep control of the celluloid, it's no longer giving them any benefit. In fact, they're a bloody liability, as it takes time to make many celluloid copies and to distribute them, worldwide in this case. Consider the problems of trying to make and ship thousands of celluloid copies all around the world, weeks before the first screenings, while trying to keep an eye on them and stop reviewers filming the showings (or people in the distribution chain just pocketing copies).

    Hey, here's a solution that I can think of. Give up on it. Keep a single digital master, say "FUCK the reviewers" ('cause half of them don't watch the damn film anyway before writing their review, and some of those who do are filming it!), transmit digital copies the day before showing start, and only start your celluloid printing there and then. Digital copying technology makes it really easy for a single copy to be rapidly distributed to many sites, remember? Hey, we can figure that out.

    George wants to encourage more digital screens, right? Great, do something about it. (Assuming Episode 2 doesn't suck), then consider if Episode 3 screen times were:

    • 16th May 2005 (Digital screens only)
    • 23rd May 2005 (other screens)

    Get the point? The digital genie is out of the bottle, and it can't be put back. Celluloid is a security liability. Distributors might as well get with the 21st century and start using digital technology rather than weeping over how much it's costing them.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  13. Link to quality of bootleg by mh_tang · · Score: 5, Informative
    It looks like the article got the Drudge Report got their screen capture images from VCD Quality, a website that reports release news for pirated movies in VCD, SVCD, and DivX formats. Drudge even snipped out VCD Quality's URL from the image... Pretty shady reporting.

    But from the reviews, it looks like this bootleg of ATOC isn't worth your download time. It's currently polling at 5.7 out of 10 for image quality, and 6.2 out of 10 for sound. Even for a VCD, that's pretty low. And of course, the JPG screen cap looks like a blurry mess. However bad the quality is, it is impressive that FTF was able to release SW Ep2 so early. Check out the comments forum to see what people (well, if you consider "5kR1p7 k1DDi3z" to be actual people) are saying about this bootleg.

  14. When Will The Movie Industry Catch On... by John_Booty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...that they're selling the movie theater experience as much as the actual movie? Like Taco said, even if somebody plunked a DIVX copy of AOTC in my hands right now, there's no way I'm gonna watch some shitty DIVX when I can pay 8 dollars for to watch it on a screen that's bigger than my apartment, in a comfy chair, with booming digital sound.

    In any business, you think about what you're offering that's UNIQUE, whether it be price, quality, features, or convenience. What do theaters have that's unique? Certainly not the movies, since they're freely available via the Internet, or cheaply available via rental several months later. It's the theaters themselves (and the associated trip-to-the-movies-with-friends experience) that are unique. Now, this experience SUCKS in some ways (lines, rude employees, partially-chewed Goobers under your feet in the theater) but that's all the more reason to improve it.

    Theaters ARE starting to catch on, with features like comfy stadium seating. I'd like to see them take it a little further. A lot of art-house movie theaters have nice interiors and lounges, with food that's nicer than the usual horrid crap at large theaters, and it often costs less. It would be nice to see slightly more upscale mainstream theaters. Also, they should sell beer. :) I'd pay a few extra dollars for a ticket to a more upscale theater.

    Sure, lots of people are gonna download this flick off the net, but I really don't think many of those people were gonna PAY to see the movie in the first place.

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  15. Re:Prove it ... Where is it ... by ocbwilg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually though electronic device scanners could detect all cell phones and force people to either put them on vibrate or store tehm, and that would be a very good thing.

    I wish they would. Ever since I first had a cellphone or pager (10 years ago) I would always turn it off when I went to the movies so as not to disturb my fellow viewers. Nowdays not only do people not turn their phones off, but they let them ring for a minute or more and then they answer them and proceed to have a conversation during the movie. I was about ready to choke this one bitch to death because her phone rang, her husband answered it, passed it to her, she argued with someone on the other end, and then they passed it back and forth for close to 10 minutes.

    I have lost any sense of civility when it comes to that anymore. Usually I yell out something like "Would whichever fuckbrain has the ringing phone turn it off or get the hell out?" Or "What kind of shit-for-brains parent brings a crying baby to a 9PM movie? Get that whining kid outta here!"

  16. Upon Analysis of the Sample Video by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is either a prerelease screener for review or for movie theater employees (I'm guessing the latter)... It's good quality, not fantastic, obviously made from a quick and dirty optical print dubbed to VHS... Not shot in a theater or with a camera...

    If you look at the sample MPEG, you'll note a fuzzy edge to the bottom and right side of the video, which indicates masking that normally occurs in a film to video direct transfer- They usually invest more effort in making retail versions cleaner...

    A camera captured version would usually be a little off kilter, chop off a significant portion of the screen, and as was mentioned, occasionally have another audience member either walking through a shot, or coughing, or their cel phone would be going off here and there...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  17. Fan boy alert - much sadness here... by ClockworkPlanet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Films are constructed. Every element is precisely inserted for greatest effect. Find out what it's like, drop the $9 and get your ass in line."
    Hilarious! You believe that, and you call me an idiot! Rich!

    Lucas makes it up as he goes along! He "inserts" things to appease his daughters and his bank balance, that's why every film after the first has been aimed at a younger and younger audience, and that's why his re-released versions took out the parts that made Han seem like a guy who sometimes did bad things.

    After the nice lady at your Anger Management Therapy slips you the pink pills, get her to read my comment to you.

    I said nothing that was an "attempt to legitimize crap presentation" I merely told how I enjoyed watching my crappy looking VCD copy, and explained how it, in TPM's case, looked appropriate, in my opinion.

    If you find that "offensive", too bad. It's only a film, not a religion.

    And try to chill out a bit, eh?

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  18. Re:The more they tighten their grip... by NeuroManson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do not be too proud of this technological terror you have downloaded. The ability to burn VCDs is nothing compared to the power of Lucasfilm lawyers.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  19. Oh, NO! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Somewhere on Sepulveda Drive in L.A.)

    RED ALERT! RED ALERT!

    "Boss! We've got a problem! There is a crappy copy of the new Star Wars out a week early on the internet! And people who have cable modems or better, underground internet connections, an interest in seeing it, the understanding of what an alternative media player codec is, big enough hard drive space left, a file sharing app that still works, the knowhow to get it to run, and the interest of watching it early on a computer monitor are STEALING OUR MOVIE!"

    "So how much of our movie audience is that?"

    "Well, probably .02% of the American population, sir!"

    "Oh. HEY! Look at this! We just made all the papers across the country. Man you just can't buy advertising this good! Get my clubs. We're going golfing lackey."

    "Right on it, sir!"

  20. Idiots... by stubear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who pirate movies like SpiderMan and Star Wars: Episode II (to name tow recent ones) only undermine the efforts of the EFF and groups like them to reign in copyright protection. Even if copyright were returned to 14/14 like the copyright act of 1902, these would still be gross violations of intellectual property rights. Think before you download this movie REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE GOING TO SEE IT IN THE THEATERS!!! By downloading this movie or engaging in file sharing of copyrighted material you are spitting in the face of those in the EFF who are trying to protect our rights.

  21. I am the MPAA's worst nightmare by adam613 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't have any desire to see Blow. Then I got a shitty bootleg from gnutella. It looked like a very good movie. So I paid the NYC theater mafia $9.50 to see it on the big screen. So they actually profitted from me downloading a bottleg. I may even buy the DVD one of these days.

    But the MPAA doesn't want you to know about people like me.

  22. Re:You know, I find it highly ironic... by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that nowhere in any of the existing StarWars movies (don't know about Episode II yet) does there appear a "marketing droid".

    It's in Episode III, I just downloaded it and watched.

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  23. Re:The guy who spoiled the x-files "the lone gunme by jdavidb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, that's smart: show it early to the one person in the country most likely to give it all away for the rest of us. :)