Slashdot Mirror


Apple Introduces Xserve Rackmount Servers

2nd Post! writes "MacCentral is reporting the announcement of 1U Apple rackmount hardware. The Xserve, despite its cheesy name, seems quite powerful: dual G4/1GHz with 4MB DDR L3 cache, up to 2GB DDR (yes!) SDRAM, 4 ATA drive bays (up to 480GB), 2 Gb Ethernet ports, 2 64/66 PCI slots (one of which may be taken up by one Gb Ethernet card), and, of course, FireWire. Pricing starts at $2,999 for a single 60GB disk and 256MB RAM." Yahoo! has posted the press release; Doc Searls is writing about Jobs' speech. Update: 05/14 18:14 GMT by M : Apple's page about the Xserve is now live.

6 of 692 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Problems with XServe hardware. by frankie · · Score: 5, Informative

    1000$ for an extra 256megs of Apple blessed DDR

    Apple's RAM is always overpriced, just like most OEMs. So you buy extra RAM 3rd party, as usual.

    IDE just as fast as SCSI my ass

    True, but Ultra3 is an obvious expansion option.

    No expansion slots. The second gigabit network card takes up the only PCI slot

    I'm not sure where you got that idea. The press release says: "three PCI slots, two of which are 64-bit, 66 MHz". I have no clue how they fit 3 PCIs and 4 bays into a 1U box, but I sure am glad.

  2. Re:Did They Fix the Filename Problem Yet? by bbum · · Score: 5, Informative

    - If you want a pure Unix experience at the command line, install OS X on UFS. Trivial. Works. Breaks some third party apps that are Carbon based, but you'll likely not care (I don't).

    - porting: Most packages compile out of the bag or with very little in the way of patching (a lot only require a couple of command line arguments. Fink.sourceforge.net currently has 1100 packages 'ported' to OS X, all fully managed by the debian package manager.

    Fink has certainly grown in size since your purchase, but not much else has changed.

    As James Gosling recently said: "OS X is like Linux, only with Q/A [Quality Assurance] and taste!".

  3. Re:Problems with XServe hardware. by Tide · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well the dell *looked* good, but lets see:

    Windows 2000 Advanced Server with 25 Client Licenses [add $3295]
    VersaRails for Non-Dell 4-Post Rack [add $129]
    Dell Remote Assistant Card Version 3 without Modem [add $499]
    73GB 10K RPM Ultra 160 SCSI Hard Drive [add $550]
    Intel Pro 1000XT Gigabit NIC-Copper [add $189]

    Total cost - $6,459.00
    But maybe you wanted Linux - $3,323.00

    I won't really get into the who SCSI/IDE debate, suffice to say Apple announced a Fibre Raid with 400MB through put, it you really want it. Shipping in Q4 with 1.48 TB of space in a 3U, all hot swappable. The Apple prices are spot on for all the features they bring. IMHO of course.

    --

    People think Microsoft is the answer. Microsoft is just the question, "No" is the answer.
  4. 10.1.5 by paradesign · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://www.apple.com/xserve/management.html

    its in the management graphic. i want that too

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  5. Apple's defense of ATA by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Informative
    Take it or leave it. From their site:

    The ATA drive subsystem has a high-bandwidth I/O bus that minimizes bottlenecks, even when all four drives are engaged at once. That's how Xserve can achieve a theoretical peak performance of up to 266 megabytes per second, compared to a 160MB/s theoretical performance with SCSI Ultra160 disk drives -- at a significantly lower cost, and while generating less heat than SCSI drives.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  6. Re:power usage - rule of thumb by victim · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a ballpark figure, 1 watt turned on all year costs you $1. Maybe double that if you are in a continuously air conditioned environment like a machine room.

    The savings may not be too large. I checked an Athlon system with an ammeter recently. It came in at 120W with one drive in it while doing its server tasks. So, they at least are in the same ballpark. (The measurement techniques are surely different, I would not claim one was higher than the other based on this data. Just that they are near each other.)

    Power is one of the reasons I suggest people not use that crappy old 486 or pentium as a NAT/firewall box in their house unless they are doing it for joy. In about a year or so of electricity savings you can pay for one of the new integrated appliances and enjoy increased reliablity and savings in the following years.