Slashdot Mirror


Alphanumeric Phone Keypad - Fastap

seldo writes "The illustrious BBC has a story about a new mobile phone keypad, designed by a company called Digit Wireless, headed by one Mr David Levy, who "was head of ergonomic design at Apple for five years and was influential in the layout of its Powerbook laptops," according to the article. I don't know how it is to use, but it looks really funky. There's a demo on the site (javascript popup, so no link). The sooner I don't have to deal with the stupid 3-letters-per-button interface to send SMS, the better."

160 comments

  1. Damn. by Kyeo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have enough trouble hitting the right keys already. Now they're throwing letters in there? This ain't my day.

    1. Re:Damn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What idiot modded this offtopic? It's a valid concern for some people.

  2. This is the endless battle. by Krapangor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Between a few large keys and many little micro keys.
    But the large keys always win because of the infamous "Wurstfinger" phenomena.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  3. voice recognition by 56ker · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think they should just develop voice recognition for phones and do away with the keypad for SMS messages. Then again phones already work on a voice recognition basis - it's called calling someone!

    1. Re:voice recognition by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, there is voice recognition for calling people or doing specific commands (Motorola Timeport for example)...

      However, the chance the phone will actually understand what you said is low... usually it's faster to just type in the number instead of trying to say a name 30 times... also, it will make you look stupid if it doesn't work in the first time :)

      --
      ^_^
    2. Re:voice recognition by donnacha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to researchers at the University of Maryland's Human-Computer Interaction Lab, voice-recognition will never play an important part in our interaction with Information Technology because we construct our spoken communication in the "short-term" part of our memory.

      This recent /. thread, discusses a Washington Post article, "A Visual Rather Than a Verbal Future", which details their work.

    3. Re:voice recognition by egreB · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the parent was suggesting voice recognition for SMS-typing, not only dialing. I agree that typing a number of the first letters of a name usually is faster than saying the name over and over, but talking to you phone to write SMSes would be great!

      The sad thing is that SMS holds only 160 letters - there's really not much you can say in those 160 letters. So what people does, is to write ununderstandable stuff. I dunno how this is outside Norway, but here SMS-writings from 14 year olds are generally unreadable.. And that would be hard to implement in voice recognition.

    4. Re:voice recognition by Asprin · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a great funny and subtle scene in the movie "L.A. Story" with Steve Martin where he's programming his new voice-activated telephone/answering machine....

      SM: "Dial Mom."

      Phone: ....

      SM: "Dial MOM."

      Phone: ....

      SM: "Dial... MOM!"

      Phone: bink.bonk.beep.beep.boop.beep.bonk.boop

      Phone: ring..... ring....

      Phone: "Hello, this is Domino's, would you like take out or delivery?"

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    5. Re:voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      from 14 year olds are generally unreadable


      So, you like to SMS chat with 14-year old kids...

    6. Re:voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AoC is lower in Europe than in the States. In some european countries it is 14, actually.

    7. Re:voice recognition by _marshall · · Score: 1

      That kinda defeats the purpose of text messaging though.

      SMS is really meant for those times when you want to contact someone and you can't make alot of noise.. like in the back of a lecture hall, or in the middle of a movie. (or at least this is when I've found it most useful)

    8. Re:voice recognition by xantho · · Score: 1

      "Domino's Pizza, this is Julian. Our special today is California Pizza..."

    9. Re:voice recognition by ymgve · · Score: 1

      I don't think you need to talk to one of them to know. It's a well known fact that the teenagers around here are unable to create a complete sentence without dropping some letters here and there...

    10. Re:voice recognition by egreB · · Score: 1

      Well, I do have a sister, whom I like to communicate with. Besides, who says I'm not 14 myself? (-;

    11. Re:voice recognition by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Thought-recognition?

  4. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you need letters?

    1. Re:Huh? by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 1

      The biggest use of mobile phones in Europe/Asia is for sending and receiving text messages.

  5. how is this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    this kind of keypad has been out for months. this is news?

  6. This could be handy. by Subaiku · · Score: 1

    And here i was waiting for this. But a less bulky solution will be far more welcome for me. :-)

    --
    Go you Huskies.
  7. Demo Link by TheCrunch · · Score: 4, Informative
    "There's a demo on the site (javascript popup, so no link)."

    Urm yah. The link. (Flash required)

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
    1. Re:Demo Link by 56ker · · Score: 2

      What's the matter - haven't got a flash plugin for your browser?

    2. Re:Demo Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I for one refuse to use Flash.

      If you can't make a Flash and Java free website, it's not worth browsing, really.

    3. Re:Demo Link by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2

      Their usage comparision is interesting...I don't know how they managed to pad out the number of strokes they say T9 uses as much as they did.

    4. Re:Demo Link by mberman · · Score: 1

      anyone else notice that the '@' key in the demo produces a '&' on the screen? i wonder if that's how it works on the real keypad...

      --

      This is a self-referential sig

    5. Re:Demo Link by pete_p · · Score: 1

      Shift-@ produces & in the demo. Shift, however, appears to work like caps lock - you have to press it again to turn it off. (so to type Blah you'd press shift b shift l a h)

      --
      Insert wit here.
  8. Just wondering by zome · · Score: 1

    why can't they just have a hidden keyboard like one in Sharp linux pda so I can use the keyboard when I really want to (it's phone, I only need the 0-9 buttons most of the time)

    1. Re:Just wondering by Flanders · · Score: 1

      The Nokia 7650 already has one.

  9. Japan? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Digit Wireless has also developed a version for Japan that allows the keyboard to represent the 120 characters of the country's languages."

    So this first appeared on Japanese phones. That means on another 10 years it well be the new 'latest development cutting edge' in North America's cellphone technology.

    I live in North America and I still don't have WAP or SMS on my phone ... I have to settle for a proprietary browser and text system.

    1. Re:Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SMS enables terrorism.

  10. NOKIA and dictionaries... by VEGx · · Score: 5, Funny
    The "three-letter-per-number" slows the typing, sure. Or better say it did.

    NOKIA, for example, has dictionaries in the newer mobile phones.

    Meaning, you just press each "number" just once, even if the "letter" is the last one under this "number." The dictionary does the guessing and writes the right word.

    Besides, it words as an automatic spellchecker!!! No need to be ashamed your messages now. No one's going to laugh at your bad grammar.

    1. Re:NOKIA and dictionaries... by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 1

      No-one uses english in text messages anyway - it's all abbreviated.

    2. Re:NOKIA and dictionaries... by jedrek · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not only in Nokia phones, most of the major european mobile phone players (those being: Sony/Ericsson, Nokia, Siemens and Alcatel) have this function. It's called T9, it's (like I said) available in a LOT of phones and it's pretty much a standard right now. Avalible in a couple dozen languages - including my native polish.

      I absolutely detest it, and it is switched off on my phone. On the other hand, my friend's wife uses it and he claims she's a speed demon when it comes to SMSes...

    3. Re:NOKIA and dictionaries... by rafelbev · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The dictionaries you are mentioning use T9 technology, which is not all that new. I always keep my T9 on because yes it speeds up your typing.

      Yet the issue at hand here is to totally scrap the need of a dictionary. SMS Texting is mostly popular in Japan and in Europe although its already picking up in the States. Now the problem here is language. I am Maltese, and we usually tend to use Maltese and English interchangably. Yet you can't do this for texting, because the lack of a Maltese dictionary. Also, you tend to use bad gramemr because typing out certain words STILL requires a look up in the dictionary because there would be more common words with the same combination of letters. People who send loads of SMSes would understand me.

      I am totally in favour of encouraging this button layout, so that you don't get to teach your phone your common jargon words. You notice this most when you send messages from someone elses phone. Apart from having to re-learn his/her interface for using T9, you end up discovering that he/she doesn't have the same words. Grrrrrrrr

      my 2c

      --
      Dodge this !! --Trinity, The Matrix
    4. Re:NOKIA and dictionaries... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      T9 is good but takes a bit of getting used to. I hated it at first but kept playing with it until I got my head round it.

    5. Re:NOKIA and dictionaries... by irony+nazi · · Score: 2

      Don't forget that T9 technology has nothing to do with the layout of the keys. You can use T9 in addition to having a nicely laid out keypad and that would speed you up VERY much. The layout of a number pad is bad for entering letters. Enough said.

      --

      Bringing irony to the Slash-masses
    6. Re:NOKIA and dictionaries... by brucet · · Score: 1

      It does work well and it would be painful to live without, but it really needs some smarts.

      The T9 system should be able to learn from previously entered words like proper names, foreign words and slang (my conversation is much limited by not being able to say jackass, bamboozle or hola amigo!) They should be added to the dictionary after a couple of uses.

      Also previous choices should affect the sequence of the spelling guesses. If I'm an avid saxophonist, when I press 729 'sax' should come up high on the list instead of 7th place.

      I wouldn't imagine that the new generation of phones would have much trouble storing a list of at least 500 or so commonly spelled words.

      -Bruce

    7. Re:NOKIA and dictionaries... by segfaultdot · · Score: 1

      Their website's comparison of their layout, T9, and standard is questionable. I did the "BE HOME BY 9!" test on my ericsson and it took exactly 18 taps, not 23.

  11. Good idea, only one problem... by donnacha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a great idea, I can really see it working BUT the method of entering numbers does sound a tad dodgy:

    "Numbers are typed by pressing the four letter keys surrounding each numeral."

    Surely sensing pressure centred on the actual number buttons themselves would make more sense?

    Otherwise, though, great idea, even beats the Treo.

    1. Re:Good idea, only one problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i think they meant your fingers will touch the surrounding 4 keys, but you still do press the actual number button

    2. Re:Good idea, only one problem... by hackerhue · · Score: 2

      I have no idea where the author of the article got that idea. It's the stupidest thing I've heard for a long while. If you look around the Fastap site, you'll find that you do actually hit the recessed number, and it manages to ignore hits that may be generated by accidentally hitting one of the surrounding letters.

      Incidentally, it looks like they also have a credit-card sized QWERTY keyboard, with numbers and symbols in between the letters. That might be interesting to stick onto a PDA.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

  12. _I_ need a spellcheker by VEGx · · Score: 1

    As you see I'm not writing this on a Nokia phone... I wanted to say "it works as an automatic spellchecker" but... oh well...

    1. Re:_I_ need a spellcheker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't have mattered. "Words" was spelled correctly. A grammar checker might have caught it, but a spell checker would be oblivious to little non-spelling errors like typing the wrong word.

  13. interesting concept, but can't tell w/o trying by f00zbll · · Score: 1

    Has anyone actually used this new key layout? I won't pass judgement until I've used it. The only thing I'd be concern about is the phone better have a key lock to prevent accidentally dialing a number. Most phones seem to have key lock, so other than durability I don't see other huge problems.

  14. Amazing by digitect · · Score: 2

    Every now and then, somebody breaks through with an idea that really changes how we think about things. Fastap is certainly one.

    The best part about this design is that none of us will need to relearn anything. It's easily, almost automatically integratable into our daily lives without having to change our behavior. Certainly this doesn't mean we'll all have one soon. We should, but if we don't, I'll be forever disappointed knowing it existed.

    BTW, wouldn't this concept also work on a PDA virtual keyboard? Seems like somebody could program one for my Palm without too much trouble. Any takers?

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:Amazing by base3 · · Score: 1
      Every now and then, somebody breaks through with an idea that really changes how we think about things.

      So, how long have you worked for the company?

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:Amazing by donnacha · · Score: 1

      > So, how long have you worked for the company?

      Um, I think you might have accidently replied to the wrong posting. I like their idea but I certainly never said "Every now and then, somebody breaks through with an idea that really changes how we think about things."

    3. Re:Amazing by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Um.. he replied to the correct post, not yours. If it was a reply to yours, it would both be beneath yours and to the right.

    4. Re:Amazing by donnacha · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see, thanks, I'm still getting used to actually posting as opposed to just reading /.

  15. MessagEase by twms2h · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just in case you have not seen it: Another system which I personally like better, is MessagEase. They have got a free (as in beer) software version for PalmOS and a hardware version for mobiles.

    I don't know whether there are actually any mobiles that use it, but that's just because I am one of the few backward people who don't have one. ;-)

    See EXideas' website for details.

    1. Re:MessagEase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool,

      and this one seems to work with a regular cell phone just fine!

      I am waiting for their stamp version though.

  16. Why not use a phone with QWERTY keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia makes a GSM phone with QWERTY keypad, the model 5510.
    Oh, I forgot - it's not available in the US so it probably cannot exist...

  17. What market? by Observer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Interesting approach, though I wonder what market is being addressed. The biggest casual users of text messaging these days are young people and for them a few mispellings will be understood from the context, plus as another commenter has noted more recent phones have built-in dictionaries to speed up message composition (though I've found these more a hindrance than a help - my language style perhaps).

    If you're interested in using a mobile messagingto to actually do significant work, where a mistake can cost time, money, inconvenience, hurt feelings, etc, then I suspect you'd prefer to use something PDA-sized which either has room for a real keyboard or allows you to use a stylus & touchscreen to tap out a message.

  18. They Already Have by donnacha · · Score: 1

    In effect, they already have with their demo.

    Surely, though, a virtual keyboard wouldn't need this?

  19. Getting used to... by VEGx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That is also true, you need to get used to it.

    But wouldn't it be the same for the new "keyboard"?

    Besides, the dictionary thingie is quite handy. I have to write in Spanish about half of the time. And I'm not exactly Spanish. So it helps me a lot. Although at times it messes up with the "accents." [The future (or first person) is sometimes unknowns for the dictionary.]

  20. Weeell.. What's the point? by cfelde · · Score: 1

    I don't know.. This thing sure adds a lot of new buttons to keep in order. And even thought you have direct access to each letter, I don't really se the point when you have a built-in dictionary. Kind of already gives you direct access, doesn't it?

    --
    - cfelde
  21. whats so new about this? by neitzert · · Score: 1

    For the past year and a half i've carried the Ericsson Chatboard with my t26 and now my t39m with hbh-15 bluetooth wireless headset.

    The keyboard in the phone is no new paradigm -- think back to the late 90s with the release of the Nokia 9xx0 phones. Despite their size they are still popular as mobile email/web terminals.
    I personaly prefer to the t39m to my collection of 9xx0 phones....

    ...and 12keying your message isnt really that bad, ask any guitar player...

    --
    This communication is secured using Rot-26 Encryption Algorithm, Unauthorized decryption will be subject to laughter.
  22. T9 text input by emkman · · Score: 1

    T9 text input (now owned by AOL) allows you to easily type messages in you phone. It only takes as many key presses as the word is long in most cases, so no more 3 presses per letter. They have a very informative demo on the site showing how it works. basically it guesses which of the three letters you want, based on what you have entered so far, and the best choice changes as you type more letters. If the word you want is the one it guesses, you just cycle to the next word that matches the key combo you entered.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
    1. Re:T9 text input by bdolan · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the demo on the digitwireless site is rigged. T9 claims that 95% of the time the first guess is correct- my experience and pretty good, but the digitwireless shows a 14 key entry for their method, a 23 key entry for T9, and 27 for the conventional entry with multiple taps to get a second or third letter. Also, i cannot believe that the key entry could be a quite as fast per key when the keyboard has the extra complexity.

      If T9's claim is good, digitwireless is not going to be a better solution for monoliqual western language users.

    2. Re:T9 text input by dbaigrie · · Score: 1

      I have a sony phone in the UK that uses a t9 dictionary. I tgets it right about 80% of the time which is not bad and you can select alternate words by using the scroll button. Its a bit of a pain when you have to teach it a new word but once it knows it you just type away...

  23. Cyrillic by Mikoca · · Score: 1

    I personally would love to see this made for Cyrillic. It won't be a big jump at all, there are only 30 letters there, but it will be a big hit and a nice thing to do.

  24. Chinese? by fiartruck · · Score: 1

    "Mr Levy said it reduced the number of taps needed to form Japanese characters from eight to two. Now, Digit Wireless is working on a keyboard for Chinese."

    I don't know chinese, but I know there's thousands of characters. Anybody have any ideas how they could pull this off?

    1. Re:Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Chinese input there's several differnet ways of doing it.
      The first method is normally called 'Stroke', and is based on how a character is written. Basically a Chinese Character is written using a series of strokes in a particular order, when you pick from a candidate list.
      The second major method is based on how a character is pronounced (aka phonetic input). You put together the series of sounds and then get a candidate list. Pinyin uses a latin alphabet (26 chars), and zhuyin uses BoPoMoFo (named after the first 4 letters of the 37ish characters). You can also improve the 'hit-rate' by defining the intonation (tone marks) for phonetic input.
      Phonetic input can be done either multi-tap or predictive to generate the chinese candidate list.
      Typically a phone in a chinese market will have 2 input modes (plus latin modes).

    2. Re:Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Teach 'em english!

    3. Re:Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We ah velly solly nah too noh Engrish. Prease, honorabre American, teach us how you ah smart! And prease teach our "special" students the art of education, so dat we can rebuird ah struggring country.

  25. Yeah, baby, WORK that Apple association!! by donnacha · · Score: 1

    Wow, they're really working David Levy's Apple background for all it's worth!

    From the Digital Wireless Home-page:

    "Fastap could do for wireless phones what Apple Computer's desktop did for the PC."
    -- Brad Smith
    Wireless Week ----

    Looks like the best career move any aspiring Tech billionaire could make is to go earn some bragging rights by spending a few weeks working for Apple. Seriously, if you've just graduated with your 1st in Comp Sci, go work as a toilet attendant in Cupertino, that sort of cred will make even your worst future start-ups seem like rosier prospects.

  26. Slow off the mark? by Just_Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Geeks who are still using so-called "multi-tap" input should be ashamed of themselves. Dictionary based methods, T9 (from Tegic/AOL), and iTap (Motorola's equivalent) have been standard on phones for a couple of years now, even if they do have their short-comings.

    If you're not into the legacy layout* you could go with MessagEase or this new thing, but the smart money is on a company called Eatoni, since they have two products (LetterWise and WordWise) which they back up with a big stack of research. There's also Zi Corp. who make eZiText and eZiTap for SMS input.

    If you're interested in the HCI aspect of all this you could do worse than looking at the work of I Scott Mackenzie, Poika Isokoski or Mark Dunlop.

    * 1-800-GOFEDEX anyone? Probably explains why Europe is ahead of the US in this field. That and our ridiculous txt addctn...

  27. Small devices and text input, if you're interested by jatbrowne · · Score: 2, Informative
    There are a surprising amount of input technologies available for phones - or unsurprising if you consider the potential return on something like this: look at AOL's T9, which is available in something like 180 models of phone in 15 languages...

    Anyway, a summary, if you are interested, is that of the solutions proposed so far, most of them fall into a few categories:

    Chorded keyboards: Think microwriter here, or a court reporter's typewriter. The idea is that you get around the small space available for keys by having a group of keys select each character; The microwriter only had four keys for the whole alphabet. The speed of input achievable is quite fast, but the interface is far from easy to learn.

    Full key boards: Usually the complaint is that having all of the keys on one small device is no good for anyone with adult sized fingers.

    Soft, or stylus input: This is just a touchscreen solution. You can either use a stylus - which is probably not convenient for a phone, or your fingers, where you are back to the problem of dealing with small or not enough keys.

    Reduced keyboards: Where you use some method other than chording to input characters on a keyboard with fewer keys than letters in the alphabet(e.g. T9, multi-tap...)

    This new device seems to fit in somewhere between a full keyboard and a chorded keyboard. The novel solution here is that you can fit a full keyboard on by using easy-to-learn chording to signify numbers.

  28. Nokia 5510 by magi · · Score: 2

    See Nokia 5510, it has a largeish split keyboard. Haven't tried it, but I'd imagine it's at least some good.

    And of course, the Communicator has a normal QWERTY keyboard.

    Other Nokia (and most other makers too) have a predictive system. In my 6310i, it seems to work pretty well, although it's not very useful where you need it most often, inputting text in WAP pages. For example, it can't predict your usernames or passwords for wap sites very well...

    Not that I ever send SMSs. Well, maybe one or two per cell phone I've owned, just to see how it works.

    BTW, WAP version of /. would really be cool, you could read all new things on your cell phone (with GPRS of course). The WAP/HTTP gateways don't seem to convert large html pages to wml very well.

  29. Diverge from QWERTY at your peril by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Even if it isn't possible to create a true QWERTY layout, I see no value in going with an alphabetical order.

    1. Re:Diverge from QWERTY at your peril by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Well, IANAE(I am not an Ergonomist {of whatever the term is})but I think it's because everybody already knows the order. They could rearrange it in the most efficient manner, with all the vowels near the center, followed by the most common consonants, etc. byt in order to use it the user would have to relearn how to type. With an alphabetical layout, anybody canfigure out where the letters are without any practice.

    2. Re:Diverge from QWERTY at your peril by mughi · · Score: 2
      Well, IANAE(I am not an Ergonomist {of whatever the term is})but I think it's because everybody already knows the order.

      Ahhhh. Same thing earlier designers (such as those on the early Sharp Wizards) thought. Then studies were done and it was found that due to the breaks in the sequence (not all on one line) people unfamiliar with either layout were slowed by the alphabetical layout just as much as for the QWERTY ones). Then also that the slowdown goes away once the layout was learned. So there are no real benefit from going alphabetical aside from some following incorrect intuition.

      It slowed down those who knew QWERTY, and made no difference to those who didn't

  30. TI Calculators by hyyx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I saw the layout, the first thing I thought about was the abcdef-type text input on TI calulators. I spent a lot of time in school putting _notes_ into my TI, and could never get used to the non-qwerty layout. I would not consider this as a time saver for myself.

  31. carrot top by cscx · · Score: 2

    Why, 1-800 CALL-ATT of course!

    Dial down the center; it's free for you and cheap for them!

    Also, then we'd never see any more Carrot Top commercials--wait, that might be a good thing.

  32. Fat fingers by slank · · Score: 1

    According to the interactive demo:

    Your finger will touch the letter keys nearby, but that's OK. That's how Fastap technology works... so you don't need to be careful.

    Like most new human interfaces, this will surely take some getting used to, but is this really good ergonomic design? How can you consistently avoid registering a press on nearby buttons? Even if the device is smart enough to tell the difference between intentional and accidental key-presses, every other device out there requires the user to consistently and squarely press each button involved in an input operation. People are used to that, and it's not likely to change.

    I don't know about anyone else, but it's gonna be really difficult for me to feel comfortable using an interface where fat-fingering the keypad is normal.

  33. Great idea ... but by telstar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They should add a button to raise and lower the letter keys so you get the option of bringing them up for use, or recessing them when not needed.

    1. Re:Great idea ... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yeah. That would be easy cheap to implement.

    2. Re:Great idea ... but by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      I don't think it works that way. There aren't extra buttons for the letters, the letters simply ride on the existing number buttons and the phone scans for the 'mashing' of number buttons to guess which letter you were aiming for. Like a diagnol on a digital d-pad, its UP plus LEFT, no extra button required.

      This is probably why the idea is going to fail, extra buttons can't cost *that* much more.

    3. Re:Great idea ... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only geeks would consider this a good idea.

      "Add knobs to frob!"

      All such a switch would do is make the whole contraption fragile and costly. Plus it requires way too much conscious thought on the part of the user (is it worth it to recess the numbers now? what state is the keypad in right now?).

      In short, only on Slashdot does braindamage like this get a Score 4.

    4. Re:Great idea ... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus it requires way too much conscious thought on the part of the user (is it worth it to recess the numbers now? what state is the keypad in right now?).

      The original post said "option".

  34. mod parent up ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it's funny! ;)

  35. Two devices, one service by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

    I always thought it'd be nice to have two physical devices, possibly connected to the same service and same rate plan. I'd love to just use my cellphone for talking on, and using something with a regular QWERTY keyboard for typing (like Motorola's Vbox).

    I'd really like to get a Vbox to do messaging with, but I wouldn't want to use it for a phone. I have a phone (V60), but it's awkward to do messaging with (even with T9). Of course if I did get both, I'd have to pay for both! No thanks!

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  36. Virtual Keyboards by serutan · · Score: 2

    Speaking of cool keyboards, how bout those virtual keyboards on zdnet and elsewhere. They project keyboards on any surface and use cameras to sense where your fingers are. Msn story with a photo. Different model at ananova. I know there's no tactile feedback, but think of the compactness.

    1. Re:Virtual Keyboards by Fjord · · Score: 1

      There was actually a /. article about these (actually, I think two. I recall it being reposted for some reason)

      --
      -no broken link
  37. fingers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The interactive demo shows a hand using its index finger to do the dialing... but I know for myself and many others we use the good old thumb of the hand holding the phone to hit the buttons. And by the size of those buttons, if you want to hit the number instead of any letters, when using your thumb it looks like it could be a pain in the ass. Instead of hitting the number first, your big fat thumb would hit a surrounding letter. This technology doesn't help very much if I now have to use two hands to dial.

    1. Re:fingers? by Mikoca · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, the article says that you are supposed to hit the side buttons when you are clicking on a number. I think it will work fine.

  38. I have tried it and it's GREAT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really. Read the F'ing article you morone. It is not available until the end of the year. How can anyone have tried it? I remember and miss the old Slashdote. You people ruine it for everyone.

    1. Re:I have tried it and it's GREAT!!! by f00zbll · · Score: 1

      Not really. Read the F'ing article you morone. It is not available until the end of the year. How can anyone have tried it? I remember and miss the old Slashdote. You people ruine it for everyone.

      I wasn't talking about buying it. It's possible there are folks on /. who work for nokia, ericcson, qualcomm or any of the manufacturers. Like engineers who are evaluating it. Atleast have the courage to put your name to your post.

  39. Sounds pretty small... by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    The design fits 26 letters of the alphabet, the * and #, 10 numbers, three punctuation keys, a space bar, shift and delete key into an area no larger than one-third of a business card.

    I dont think we (North) Americans could use it, with our large hands and all...
    "Your fingers are too fat to use this telephone; To order a special dialing wand, please mash the keypad with your hand now..."

  40. Re:Vanity phone numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three cheers for Major Dumbass!

  41. qwerty alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello. I have an idea on my shelf for a one-hand qwerty replacement keyboard. I thought it up back in early 2001. It resembles MessageEase in a way, but I prefer my idea to theirs. I think it has the potential to "change everything" - not to be dramatic. Problem is, I don't know how to proceed. I don't have the money or connections to get a protoype manufactured. I do, however have a half-completed prototype I've been working on out of some disassembled QWERTY keyboards. If any of you would like to take this idea and run with it, or have any ideas of how I can make this a reality, please let me know. My name is Steven Shultz I can be reached at 2e@2e.org I put up this site back in April 2001. Since then I've developed a new, more efficient (in my opinion) key layout, but the overall look is the same.

  42. Americans are so dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've never heard of T9??

  43. the QWERTY story by Mikoca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For those who don't like the alphabetical layout here, think about where QWERTY came from and that this is supposed to replace cell phone keyboards which are already alphabetical, and not computer keyboards.

    1. Re:the QWERTY story by mughi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, that article is inaccurate.

      It states that their "salesmen used this slight bit of subterfuge to impress potential customers"... However it failed to get into the typewriter "shoot-outs" that went on during that period, where manufacturers would pit their machines against each other in speed trials. QUERTY came to domminance in those. They world's first and fastest touch-typist also came from the Remingtons' machine promotions. (Look up Frank McGurrin sometime if you care).

      It also cites Navy experiments on the Dvorak layout. However... they forgot to mention that it was only one study, compared 14 Dvorak typists to 18 QWERTY typists, and that the experiments were conducted by one Lieutenant-Commander August Dvorak, the navy's top time-and-motion man, and owner of the Dvorak layout patent.

      For more (but slightly slanted against Dvorak) see "The Fable of the Keys"

      (Note that I'm not saying here that Dvorak just the same as QUERTY, but just that QWERTY is much better than some give credit for, and that Dvorak isn't that vastly ahead).

  44. Are you on crack? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Wow. Putting a button for each letter of the alphabet.. how INNOVATIVE!

    Give me a break.

    Ever tried to type stuff out letter for letter on an alphabetic setup? it's a pain in the ass.

    I bet they get a patent for this incredibly brilliant idea.

    Get real. What's wrong with the virtual keyboard on your pda? How is this any better? This is worse even. At least the virtual keyboard on a pda is arranged like a typewriter, not alphabetically, so you have some natural instinct as to where letters are (if you can type)

    Please. This is news how?

    1. Re:Are you on crack? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      So you can type with you thumb reliably, easly, using that virtual keyboard? I'm impressed. But I'm also overcome by the overpowering stench of bullshit.

      QWERTY was designed for typewiters, DOVARK is for keyboards (even though QWERTY dominates). What f'n use are these layouts on a small keyboards like a phone or PDA?

      I'm glad that some people are looking for keyboard alternatives, because QWERTY sucks for this kind of application.

    2. Re:Are you on crack? by joto · · Score: 2

      DOVARK? I guess you mean dvorak? It was designed for typewriters as well. (although it is newer, and has been quite succesfull at creating a myth of it's superiority, despite the lack of any good scientific studies to back this claim).

  45. Americans are so dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't you heard of T9???

  46. Did I miss something? by Duvzo · · Score: 1

    Why "the illustrious BBC"? Don't get me wrong - I'm not complaining - just wondering...

  47. Re:Vanity phone numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice--you changed the rank, but you used a previously used epithet. Better luck next time.

  48. I know: It's the brain that I miss... by VEGx · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I know... I'm an obsolete version that came without "brain" and now that I checked it says I'm an "non-upgradable model."

    ...so I gotta do with what I've got...

  49. T9 + keypad != speed by VEGx · · Score: 1
    I think T9 speeds up typing, OR the new keypad would speed up typing.

    However, if you have T9 AND the keypad then I don't see a speed increase beyond the max of one or the other.

    In other words, I can see the T9 speeding the normal keypad up to the full keypad. But if you have new keypad... then how is it going to speed your typing if you have the T9? I can see accuracy increase, sure... But speed?

    1. Re:T9 + keypad != speed by joto · · Score: 2
      I will help speed up your typing, if you are using an alphabet with more than 26 characters, which most languages except english do.

      Typically, in european languages, the new letters would be accented and diacriticated (is that a word?) versions of the normal letters. So T9 technology would help finding the correct version of the letter with the help of a dictionary. I imagine this would help non-latin alphabets as well, such as hebrew, cyrillic, etc...

      Also, it will reduce the number of guesses T9 would have to do. For short words, there are often several candidates, where each letter can be one of three letters (or more). So you have to scroll through a list to find the correct one. If your input is more accurate to begin with, the list of candidate words will be shorter.

  50. Fatal design flaw! by wackybrit · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    They've kept the letters in alphabetical order. They should be in QWERTY arrangement.

    When keyboards were first designed in the 80s, the QWERTY design became the most popular as it allows the user's fingers to travel a smaller distance, and to increase typing speed ten-fold over the old clumsy Dvorak systems.

    1. Re:Fatal design flaw! by athakur999 · · Score: 2

      How can they make a QWERTY keyboard when there's only five keys across? It'd just be a QWERT.

      Anyway, since there are only 5 keys across, I doubt the QWERTY arrangement will help any, as the keys will be in different places anyway.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:Fatal design flaw! by cybergibbons · · Score: 2

      Keyboards designed in the 80s? What are you on about. The QWERTY keyboard was developed in the 1860s not the 1980s, and it was a competing system to the Dvorak keyboard. Both were to slow down typists to stop the keys jamming on typewriters.

      Get a clue.

    3. Re:Fatal design flaw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ::sigh:: leave it to the clumsy admins to not notice that this post is dripping with sarcasm. Please read the following article:

      me

    4. Re:Fatal design flaw! by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      What following article?

      Anyway, nothing like spreading a little disinformation.

    5. Re:Fatal design flaw! by hackerhue · · Score: 2

      Whoa. If you're going to correct someone, at least get your facts straight. Dvorak wasn't created until the 1920s/1930s. The Dvorak was created to increase typing speed, rather than to decrease it, by putting the most commonly used letters on the home row. I forget the exact number, but It's something over 80% of the letters typed in a normal English text would be on the home row.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    6. Re:Fatal design flaw! by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      The other comments are vallid on this one, but also remember you are most likely to be using just your thumb, so the whole idea of most traditional keyboards can be scraped anyway since you loose 9 of the digits.

    7. Re:Fatal design flaw! by cybergibbons · · Score: 2

      Dvorak was still required to slow the typist dow - but it was thought that QWERTY wasn't the best way of doing it. I didn't say anything about when Dvorak was developed. And QWERTY certainly wasn't developed in the 1980s.....

    8. Re:Fatal design flaw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they already have an QWERTY arrangement. Look under PDA at their webpage !

  51. they make a qwerty also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here is a link to the qwerty version of this keyboard:

    http://www.digitwireless.com/qwerty.html

  52. Re:Vanity phone numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh man you fucked it all up!

    Three cheers for Private Cockenpuller.

  53. !llU5sTr!ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The illustrias[sic] BBC. From the Greek Ill-u (to kick the buttocks)-of a slave or non-citizen (madman, foreigner, mental-deficient). BBC (to inhale, at length, the fumes of a rich narcotic - from Byron 'Bliss, and Bliss Compounded...'). Skake'spere "ne're man did grasp a sweeter fruit". Churchill "there are bad men, there are sad men, but there are no bad, sad men!"

  54. Re:Fist Sport!!! Sweet baby Jesus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually this is true. I've been there and I know. To be honest it was one of those free-throw nights when timing made up for looks, skill and courage. I was there, I was picked, I was the last to get to sleep. It's like one of those disney movies where the faithful dawggie comes home, in the thunderstorm and saves the entire family and gets eir picture took by slavering new-yehhrk paparazzi. It's like when the meteor strikes... *WHUMP* and suddely you're the only one left to justify 250,000 years of evolution. You do your best, you know?

    Anyhow, I promised I wouldn't tell any of eir friends, ever, and I neglected to wash for a week.

    There is a god.

  55. Re:☻Not First Post but First NIGGER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the last racist dies, I'll sleep. Till then, I'll sup cold coffee, and wait... windage and elevation...

  56. "Supports CRM functions" by lohphat · · Score: 1

    (from the interactive demo) What kind of New Econmy Dot-Com bullshit marketing crap is that?

  57. Placement of Letters? by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Is it me or is the placement of the letters all wrong, shouln't the most commonly used letters be grouped together, and the most comon sequences of letters used to work out the relative locations of the other letters, only a short while ago I heard something about the worry of RSI to some people who text to much, surely they should have looked at this...

  58. Re:Vanity phone numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three cheers for Agent Assfucker

  59. phone size by michiel.h · · Score: 1

    My phone has only two extra buttons on the bottom. The * and the # next to the zero.
    It is what makes my phone this small and easy in use.

    After I read the article I drew the keys to figure out how large it would be (I didn't see the link).
    This way of integrating the alfabet will make it neccecary to make six more buttons.
    SIX more bottons.
    If they start to really use this, making phones as small as mine (a motorola V series 60) will not be an option anymore, because of the huge keypad.

  60. Predictive Text by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    Gotta Love it. Especially when you're in a club, off your trolley, eye wobbles and shakes, and you can still text "Where are you? The World is a lonely place!" to your friends so they can come and find you.

    --

    Yay me!

  61. t9 comparison a bit skewed? by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

    I just watched the usage comparison and they showed the t9 option only performing about 3 key strokes better than a multi-tap interface, and significantly worse than their system for the same phrase. So I tested it on my phone with t9, "be home by 9!" only takes 17 key strokes/presses here. Most of them being used to find the !

    hrrrmmmm

  62. Extra buttons? Use the existing ones better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A "vector" type quick input system, by Ken Perlin (of Perlin Noise fame).

    It's designed as a stroke recognition system (for use with styli) but I'm sure we are all smart enough to see how it can be used on a phone keypad, too.

    Only 2 keypresses per letter, and you could probably optimise that quite a bit with some T9-like prediction, too.

    It's been discussed here before, too. I'm suprised no-one mentioned it.

  63. Ye were trolled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aha-ha, ye were trolled.

  64. Direct link to demo by TimTipple · · Score: 1

    http://www.digitwireless.com/demos/interactive_fla sh.html