Slashdot Mirror


Questions to Ask University CS Departments?

egarrido16 asks: "I will be visiting numerous undergraduate colleges over the next several months and meeting with the chairpeople of the computer science departments. I need to come up with some questions to ask them so that I can evaluate their methods of teaching CS (i.e. 'Does this college believe programming is a fundamental or is it more of a tool?'). Reflecting upon your experience, what questions do you think would be necessary to ask to decide what the educators feel is important in a CS curriculum?"

36 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Simple question by sydb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can I see a copy of your curriculum please?

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    1. Re:Simple question by neilb78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean there was curriculum??? Doh!

      --
      © 2004 The SCO Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    2. Re: Simple question by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > Can I see a copy of your curriculum please?

      Yes. Better yet, visit their Web sites first and find out what their curriculum is in advance. Also find out things like what their lab facilities are, what their graduation rates are, what campus crime rates are, etc. (Some states require their schools to publish those last two items, though the schools don't always make it easy to find.)

      You may also be able to find the results of course surveys, and surveys of graduating students that will tell what kind of jobs they're getting and even how much their starting pay is.

      But the main point is, use the Web to research the programs thoroughly before you go, and then you can as a customized question set based on what you have found out (or been unable to find out) about each specific university.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Simple question by morgajel · · Score: 2

      this is not as great as you think it would be.

      my school's(gvsu) professors openly admit that they do not follow the guidelines and that the classes names misleading.

      your best be would be gather up a handful of seniors and ask THEM specific questions. not the honor students either, the guys in the back of the room. ask them, what do you think of Professor so-and-so? is this class about artificial intelligence REALLY ABOUT artificial intelligence? is it the depth you were hoping for?

      NEVER EVER EVER EVER E V E R believe/listen to the school. I'd trust satan himself over a college recruiter.

      (one discontented student)

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    4. Re:Simple question by foeclan · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favorite was 'Hmm, you need an elective. Here, take Fortran, it'll come in handy someday.'

      I have yet to be in a situation where only my one quarter of experience in Fortran would come in handy. Apparently, he envisioned me being stranded on a desert island with only a Cray to keep me company, and it's instrumental in saving the Earth. Sadly, I'd probably screw up a loop and it'd end up infinitely saving the Earth from the same threat until it crashed, taking the Earth with it.

  2. The most imporant question by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 3, Informative

    The most important question you can ask is:

    "Does your school have different curriculum tracks for software engineering and computer science"

    Learning the basics of how to program will be the same for both tracks, but the 3rd and 4th year classes should be very different. Computer science, is a SCIENCE, while software system development is something else entirely. Schools that don't recognize the difference are so out of touch that the knowledge they teach you will not be applicable in the real world.

    Software is no longer just a tool for mathmaticians to solve complex equations. Unfortunatly, I think many CS professors are still locked into the scientific mindset when it comes to computers.

    1. Re: The most imporant question by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > Computer science, is a SCIENCE, while software system development is something else entirely. Schools that don't recognize the difference are so out of touch that the knowledge they teach you will not be applicable in the real world.

      You do well to raise the distinction between SE and CS, but IMO the point above is overstated.

      At my alma there is no SE program and many of the CS professors are interested in CS qua science, but IMO almost every required course in the curriculum contributes to making a better general-purpose ITer out of you. And that includes the rather lightweight "theory" classes usually required of undergraduates, such as discrete math, data structures, and algorithms.

      Granted, there were still people who whinged "I just want to be a programmer" when faced with a class on hardware organization or OS design. Frankly I have no sympathy for them unless what they really meant was "I just want to be a third-rate programmer".

      Also notice that the classes that provoke the most whinges are not generally the science classes.

      > Software is no longer just a tool for mathmaticians to solve complex equations. Unfortunatly, I think many CS professors are still locked into the scientific mindset when it comes to computers.

      That is not, by and large, what CS professors have in mind when they talk about the "science" in CS. For the most part they mean "theory", though in some sub-fields there is a very strong empiricism as well.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  3. Future by D.A.+Zollinger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Make sure you ask some questions about your future, is it possible to get a sysadmin job on one of the comp. sci. computers to get real world experience? How good is their placement after graduation? How quickly do their graduates advance in their positions after finding employment? What projects is the department involved in that will bring prestiege to the university? What projects can I as a student get involved in that I could put on my resume? What is your stance on extra-curricular projects?

    I put that last one in because I started a MUD at my university, which was a great learning project programming wise. I never got very many people visiting my mud, but I did enlist a lot of developers to help put the project together. My school shut me down when the university administrator did a port scan of every IP under his control and found it. He considered it a security breach and dangerous, no matter how beneficial the experience was to me in learning C, C++, Linux, registering my own domain (this was before they had the nice web interface), and administering a Red Hat box.

    How can you get real world computer experience while spending 4 fine years at their institution? And how will they provide you a better chance at getting a well paying position after school?

    --
    I haven't lost my mind!
    It is backed up on disk...somewhere...
  4. Well-rounded education by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2
    This is desperately needed in CS courses. Here at SFU, they don't force you take a first year english course. The core computing science courses are great. That is the reputation of the school. Great technical expertise, weak communication skills. The reputation is well deserved.

    These kinds of skills would help tremendously in the work force and in graduate school. You always here complaining about coders not knowing how to comment code. Not being able to stick to schedules. Not being able to write good documentation. Not being able to attain correct specifications from the customer. Etc, etc, etc.

    1. Re:Well-rounded education by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2

      Woops, did I mention bad proof-reading skills. The correct link is: SFU

    2. Re:Well-rounded education by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2

      ... they don't force you take a first year english course.

      ...they don't force you to take a first-year English course.
      You forgot the preposition on the infinitive; probably a typo.
      In English, all noun and adjective forms of the word English are always capitalized.

      The reputation is well deserved.

      The reputation is well-deserved.
      When you form a single, inseparable adjective out of more than one word, you must hyphenate the words; eg, well-deserved reputation, first-year course, thirty-year-old professor, etc.

      You always here complaining about coders not knowing how to comment code. Not being able to stick to schedules. Not being able to write good documentation. Not being able to attain correct specifications from the customer. Etc, etc, etc.

      You always hear complaints about coders not knowing how to comment code, not sticking to schedules, lacking communication skills, not attaining correct specifications from customers, etc.
      "Hear" and "here" are completely different words.
      Avoid the passive voice.
      Avoid sentence fragments.
      Etc, etc, etc is a cliché; it was funny in The King and I but shouldn't be over-used.

      Normally, I don't go off correcting other people's grammar (it's fast way to piss off people - watch my karma drop to 47 for a demonstration), but when you preach the importance of good English skills while at the same time displaying poor grammar, you are, as they say, "asking for it."

      If you are a non-native speaker, your English is excellent (much better than my foreign languages); I would recommend picking up The Chicago Manual of Style which speaks about some of the finer points of formal, idiomatic English. However, if you are a native speaker, please don't preach about the importance of good English as it only discourages those who had to learn it as a second language.

    3. Re:Well-rounded education by jnana · · Score: 2
      Normally, I don't go off correcting other people's grammar (it's fast way to piss off people - watch my karma drop to 47 for a demonstration)...

      Regarding your parenthetical: it's not good way to express your thought. Nine out of ten snobs love 'em.

      I would recommend picking up The Chicago Manual of Style which speaks about some of the finer points of formal, idiomatic English.

      Are you being sarcastic here? This flacid prose makes the passive sound like Hemingway. It speaks about?! 'Speak to' would be much more idiomatic here, in keeping with your naive, pedantic, i-believe-everything-i-learned-in-3rd-grade-gramma r-class attitude.

      Perhaps you are a grammar teacher. They always are the worst writers. If only slavish obedience to rule conduced to good writing...!

  5. Be wary of computer counts by Sits · · Score: 3, Informative
    One things that I noticed when I was looking about for a place to study was that departments were keen to point out the sheer number of computers they had. If you are not planning on doing all your work on your home machine (and why should you?) it far more helpful to know the number of useful computers. Talk to the students in the room. Ok one of them might have an axe to grind or they may have all been specially selected but if the room is busy this is less likely. Whatever you do don't just stand there like a lemon when you can talk to real students - after all that's going to be you in a year. Many students are willing to talk but won't volunteer information. It leaves an impression of you too (someone willing to ask irritating questions or someone who genuinely interested in the department)...

    Some of the things that make a computer unuseful:
    1. It's broken. This happens an awful lot and can happen in non obvious ways. Ranges from it doesn't power on to it doesn't see the printer.
    2. The network is too slow. This one is a killer at busy times of the year and doesn't just apply to logging in. If your uni/college's connection is unreliable and you are trying to fetch something from home it doesn't matter that it's fast...
    3. The computer doesn't have the software you need on it. It's all very well having a library of hundreds of computers but if the software you need is only in the Compsci lab your options are limited.


    Most important of all computer counts really mean very little in terms of your education. Theory doesn't always need you to be sat a keyboard to understand it.
  6. Not just the course, but what else goes with it by gagravarr · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sure, the course is important, but you'll likely find that half the places have virtually identical courses.

    So, start asking about related things. Are you going to want some work experience? If so, does the department have industry links, and with who? How about on campus work - do they have openings for students to do some tech support? My college has a couple of student computer reps, who do some websites, maintain a few machines, help out the paid staff with admining etc. The experience I've got with doing this was looked upon very favourably by the company that are employing me this summer. No matter which area of IT you want to go into, experience is a big help, so does this place help you get it?

    Finally, ask about the facilities. How many computer rooms do they have, and what stuff do they have on them? What centralised 'Nix facilities do they offer? Ethernet to you room is very nice, so do they offer that, and if so what restrictions are placed on it (no webservers? low bandwidth limits?). What about their central web hosting, can you do much with that? If not, are there any other boxes you can use for any dynamic content you want to play with?

    Oh, and while you're on campus, go look round the other facilities too. Places to hang out are important, as are sports facilities, on campus shops etc. Also, speak to the students as well as the tutors, find out all you can

    --
    This post will enter the public domain 70 years after my death, unless Disney buys another extension.
  7. Not that simple by Bastian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ask whether the course is theory or application oriented. In my experience, there are two approaches to teaching computer science out there.
    The first is what I call the "academic" method. You're going to learn lots of theory under this method, but are left up to your own means to figure out specific tools such as the Windows API.

    The second I like to call the Trade School approach - it's probably what's being taught at your local community college, and it's pretty much the opposite. You'll be an expert at VB by the time you get out, but (from what I can see) will probably also be left without any concept of things like functional programming or automata theory or what have you.

    A catalog can tell you without a doubt whether or not you're going to get the Trade School approach - there will be a separate class for every programming language the department ever uses, and most every class will look like it's trained towards giving you job skills. However, there are a lot of CS departments that look like they are academically oriented when they really aren't. You'll sign up for a course called Computer Graphics that claims in the catalog to go through the basics of how to really do graphics programming, but when you finish the course, you'll realize that everything you just learned over the past four months you could have just as easily picked up with a few days of free time and a copy of "Teach Yourself OpenGL Game Programming In [lessons | ]" and don't have a clue what the math behind perspective projection looks like. (My experience.)

    Decide whether you're looking to be a grunt coder, a software engineer, an academic or researcher, or a Web Developer/NTadmin/networking guy/etc. If you're looking for the latter, don't even waste your time with college unless you really honestly want a bachelor's degree or a liberal arts education or what have you, because with most of those a trade school and some certifications will give you every bit as good of a preparation for your carreer as a BS, and you'll probably still have to get the certificates after you have your BS anyway. For a software engineer or academic, go for the academic approach. If you want to be a grunt coder, you can probably get away with any of the above, so pick which one looks more fun.

    1. Re:Not that simple by David+Price · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A good undergraduate computer science program should leave you flexible enough to go be a grunt coder somewhere, or (if your grades and motivation are good enough) proceed on to grad school, or really anything along the technical spectrum.

      Prospective undergrads should look for programs with an emphasis on broad study - a few theory courses, a strong course of programming-oriented project classes to develop you as a programmer, and interesting forays into areas like math and electrical engineering. Especially look for programs that allow upperclassmen to begin choosing their own path - my own degree requires a four-course concentration group agreed on between me and my advisor.

      One thing to look for is a program with no slavish devotion to any one language. By the time you've gotten out of a good undergrad program, you should have been thoroughly exposed to functional programming (Lisp/Scheme/ML/Haskell), OOP (Java's pretty much it in academia - nothing wrong with that), and imperative/systems programming (C/C++/assembly). The idea is that learning the languages should be a side project that comes along with learning the actual material. You should learn all the major paradigms in place today, and know when to use them, and know when to apply lessons from one when programming in another.

      The most important thing, by far, though, isn't what you'll find in the classroom - it's what you'll find outside it. Does the university have student organizations or programs for the type of stuff that meets your interest? Is the undergraduate culture an engaging and interesting one, with opportunities for developing your social life?

      How's the dorm life? How's the food? (This is actually really important, or seems that way at times.) Go down the hall of a dorm after classes are over, or during an evening: a good sign is lots of propped-open doors - it indicates an open, friendly floor culture.

      How does the administration treat the students, faculty, and staff? Ask around: if there have been any major controversies within the past couple years, people will talk about them. Remember that a school administration doesn't directly impact your learning, but they do have a tremendous amount of influence over your life while you're at school.

      Is the curriculum broad beyond just computer science? (Remember, theoretically, the reason you're going to a university is to improve your mind and learn about the world and discover yourself - not just to code all the time.) Ask people there. Did they like it? If they think it's a hellhole after three years, chances are you will too. A tech-factory isn't where you want to be if you're really out for a real education.

      One thing *not* to worry about as much as many people do: Don't overconcern yourself with money. Higher-tier schools know that they need to attract students who can hack it, and so many give generous need- and merit-based scholarships. Take the supplied tuition figures with a grain of salt, apply anyway, and wait for the financial aid offers to come in before ruling out a more expensive university. You might be surprised.

    2. Re:Not that simple by Bastian · · Score: 2

      One thing to look for is a program with no slavish devotion to any one language

      SO true. For example, I've been working in perl recently, and have discovered the falsity of the statement that just about the only difference between most languages is syntax. It's amazing how minor changes in how a programming language handles variable scopes can fuck you up if you aren't expecting it. . .

  8. Requirements and Design by eap · · Score: 2

    I could not agree with this more. As a recent entrant in the SW Engineering field, I would also say that one of the most important things the curriculum should stress is all of the parts PRIOR to actual coding

    I know this horse has been beat to death, but so many courses do not even focus on requirements analysis. For a Software Engineer, this is the foundation of all work you will do. You want to be sure they give you hands on experience in breaking requirements down to the atomic level. Don't forget, these requirements are a contract between you and your employer, so make sure they are sane.

    Next, you want them to teach current methods of design -- the part where you integrate your many, hopefully simple by now, requirements and turn them into a working concept.

    Be sure you get experience in creating all types of design artifacts: sequence diagrams, detailed design documents, and requirements to design mapping. This is the stuff you will be expected to do in your career. It's best to know as much as possible about it before you enter the workplace.

    The other phases (implementation, testing) are important too, but I've found that a little understanding in the early phases will count for a lot later on.

  9. Re:Some thoughts by Zeio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try telling Linus Torvalds ANSI C is lame.

    I second vsync's notion that those who use higher level languages can never use them properly because they do not know what these higher level languages *DO* for them

    I have run into it time and time again. Decades have gone by and still the most rigorous CS departments do some of the very same things. Like, write a language and a compiler for that language. People who know how to write their own language and then a compiler for that made up language often find it very easy to pick up new things.

    I can't believe for a moment that one learns "lame ANIS C," for real, then goes on to find Java difficult to master. I mean, by no means is it simple, and the strategy for using that is different, but Jesus - grab a few books and crank out some code if you want a Java job.

    If I had to assign aspiring students to do something it would be this: Write a patch for a Linux kernel (or any Open kernel), write a user land utility to interface with whatever you patched into the kernel, the write a daemon to interface with the kernel hack you just wrote and then manage that daemon remotely from the said user land utility. Man, if every "programmer" did that as an exercise, we would reduce sucktitude 90%.

    Then try to control the said daemon from a Java project - just for fun, to learn it.

    One thing about "LAME C" versus C++ or Java, at least C doesn't change forms every 5 minutes. Much less with C++ now, but Java has had a myriad of APIs since its birth and it really get annoying after a while.

    Good luck man, because if your C didn't teach you C well enough (as exemplified by referring to it as 'Lame,' you need to take it upon yourself to make sure you know systems, bottom to top, because when and if you do learn Java, chances are you wont be very good at using it. For all the rigors or my own education, most of your usefulness in corporate America will come from things you taught yourself or pickup from a mentor. School apparently doesn't do much for your starting salary, as freshly gradated students usually get paid less than everyone else. It's experience and aptitude that changes that - not "I TEWK A KEWL KLASS A THE UNIVEHRCITY AND TEHY TEECHED ME JAVA AND MI SI BETTAR!"

    --
    Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
  10. What are the capstone courses in your program? by nadador · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For whatever else I learned in college, I learned the most from the capstone courses I took my senior year. I was an ECE at CMU, but took a capstone in ECE and the equivalent in CS. Both were big project courses (Real Time Computer Controlled System Design in ECE and Operating Systems in CS) and both nearly killed me. But I can honestly say that I learned so much by being forced to work on a semester length project.

    If you go somewhere and ask about a capstone course, and they look at you funny, ask if there's a course that you take that your whole academic career has been preparing you for, or some sort of big final project where you have to creatively use your skills as a scientist and as an engineer. That's what people do out in industry, anyway, so it should be part of the curriculum.

    I'd also ask about what faculty research that the department head is particularly proud of. If its something that interests you, this place would probably be a good fit. If not, you might want to look elsewhere.

    --

    Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside a dog, its too dark to read.
  11. Re:Suggestions by sconeu · · Score: 2

    What I have noticed here is that there is much emphasis on theory,

    What is old is new again... We had this debate in '83 and '84 at UC Santa Cruz. The administration was theory oriented, the students wanted some more practical classes. I was one of the leaders of the student movement at the time.

    Of course, the department was correct.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  12. Re:Ethic? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    Most ppl graduating don't know how to use emacs.

    well there's a refief.

    acme & wily == the future

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  13. Re:Some thoughts by shoppa · · Score: 2
    I know in my case I was extremely pissed to find out that an internship at Computer Associates, one of the world's largest software companies (which I didn't even get, btw) is worthless in their eyes.

    There's a lot more to life than semester-hours of credit, dude. I hope you valued the time that you spent at your internships and that you got some personal satisfaction out of the work you did, because in the end that's what really matters.

    OK, you probably want your future employers to value your internships too. But IMHO that's secondary to you enjoying them. Because if you don't enjoy that kind of work, you gotta wonder why you took the internship or why you're even taking CS classes. The money?

  14. Remember to ask... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    (if you already have a decent amount of experience)

    FOR CHRISSAKES CAN I SKIP THE INTRO COURSES?

    be ready to provide documentation of prior experience. If you make the appeal to the dean and it is not some asshole college just after your money, this might work.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  15. What languages do you teach? by battjt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they answer with a list, run away.

    Don't go to a school that teaches languages, go to a school that teaches concepts. You can learn the languages from a book.

    I am very happy with the education I received at Rose-Hulman, and recommend that you check it out.

    Joe

    --
    Joe Batt Solid Design
    1. Re:What languages do you teach? by zerOnIne · · Score: 2

      heh cool ... i know someone who graduated from st. mary of the woods, right next door to your alma-mater

      --
      09
    2. Re:What languages do you teach? by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      I understand where you are coming from and fully agree with you that they should teach the concepts, not a language. I do disagree that you should automatically run just because they give you an answer. I think that it is kind of a loaded question. The majority of students that would ask this question are just asking to see if they are modern. I know I did when I entered my college. Up until 5 years ago, they were still teaching Ada as the intro language. My first semester was the first semester for Java.

      Most colleges are going to stick with a main language at least in the first couple semesters of college if for no other reason so that the student doesn't have to start over with a new language. They need to have something to apply the concepts that they learn. Once you get a grasp at one, the others can come quicker (via a book, labs, etc).

      At my university, if I were to ask the question, it would have been Java. Was all 5 years of my college career Java only...no. The first 3 semesters relied on it, but after that, it was generally up to the student to program in what ever they wanted to...within reason. I did projects in C++, Java, C, Lisp (Scheme), Cobol, Ada, VB, and Assembly and a few others that I probably forgot about. All of these could be considered languages that they taught, but it was mainly the concepts, construction, and design of these languages that were taught, not necessarly just the language.

    3. Re:What languages do you teach? by battjt · · Score: 2

      [I think we agree, but you said "I do disagree...", so I'm obligated to defend.]

      Rose didn't offer any language courses. Languages were expected to be learned on the side.

      OK. Rose taught two languages, PASCAL to freshman in CS100 and a subset of Ada in datastructures. The rest of the classes were taught in a language that you were expected to pickup. AI was taught in a variety of lagages, lisp, scheme, SML-NJ. Programming Language Concepts was taught in lisp and scheme. Compilers was write a compiler in its own language. Many classes like numerical analysis only required that the language you used run on the prof's machine. Graphics had to link with a home grown graphics primatives library.

      As close as they got to language instruction was System Programming in C, but that really taught POSIX, not C. Knowlege of C was a prereq.

      CS is not an applied study; CS is a science.

      Joe

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
  16. Why? by ameoba · · Score: 2

    What is the purpose of talking to these educators? Are you a prospective student or are you interested in finding the current state of CS education so you can draw up some best practices docs?

    As a potential student, I'd look and see what kinda output the students are producing, particularly in 300 tests are generally the closest to 'reality'

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  17. Re:Undergrad focus when Graduate is present by CFN · · Score: 2
    So, I would say the opposite, that having a graduate program is beneficial for undergraduates. Here are my reasons:
    • Opportunity to take graduate classes. Grad classes are going to be more advanced and more detailed that the UG ones. It is also likely that there will be more grad classes in a particular area (2 or 3 architecture classes, as opposed to just one UG class). Therefore, when you find a particular sub-area that you like (eg. graphics), you have the chance to take a few cool/advanced classes in that subject.
    • Research opportunities. Schools with graduate programs are usually research oriented (those that offer PhDs are by their very nature -those that just offer the MS aren't necessarily research oriented, it depends on the program). This means that there will be multiple opportunities for you to participate on a research project, either working in a professor's research group, or doing "sponsored" undergraduate research. If you might consider graduate school, doing UG research will give you good insight into the process. Additionally, the professors at a research school will be active researchers, they will know what projects are going on at other schools, what are current "hot topics" etc. At a non-research school, a professor is probably not really doing active research anymore.

    Given those arguments, I think some important questions to ask are a) Do you allow UGs to take grad classes? b)What are the opportunities to do research as an undergrad? c)(Especially if you might consider grad school)What percentage of your UGs go on to grad school, and where do they get accepted?

    Good luck.
  18. Re:C++, SQL, Unix and C are key skills - still by Zeio · · Score: 2

    Reinforcing the notion Java isn't everything:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25380.html
    C++, SQL, Unix and C are key skills - still
    By John Leyden
    Posted: 21/05/2002 at 18:35 GMT


    Fewer IT jobs were advertised last quarter than a year ago but programmers with key software skills are still very much in demand.

    That's the conclusion of a study of the UK IT recruitment market by CWJobs, The Register's recruitment partner.

    CWJobs compiled a very big list of all the software skills asked for in job ads, published online and in print IT rags, and the broadsheet nationals, in Q1.

    Experience in C++ (mentioned in almost 24,844 ads in Q1 2002), SQL (23,134), Unix (21,079) and C (20,532) were highly prized.

    Requirement for C skills is holding up but mentions of other once sought-after skills was down 50 per cent from Q1 2001. This reflects an overall slowdown in the IT sector, CWJobs reckons.

    Oracle, Win NT, Visual Basic and Java were each mentioned in more than 10,000 ads. However, demand for Java skills has slipped markedly from 40,681 mentions in Q1 2001 to 14,566, a decline of 64 per cent.

    The number of jobs advertised last quarter is lower than that advertised in Q4 2001, but this may be affected by seasonal factors in the job market.

    Online ads account for the vast majority of ads in Q1, reflecting a long-term trend in the UK IT jobs market. Which is nice. For CWJobs. For Computer Weekly, from whence it spawned, it's crap.

    --
    Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
  19. Re:Some thoughts by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    and I was left not knowing Java, only lame ANSI C. I got turned down for several internships for simply not knowing Java.

    If you have taken CS classes and learned C (enough to know it), you must be able to easily learn any procedural or object-oriented language. If you can't, you are stupid and this is your problem.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  20. Re:If I don't use EMACS.. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    I completely agree with people that ridiculed you.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  21. Re:Ethic? by cduffy · · Score: 2

    Funny, 'cuz my University's computer science department is also commercially funded (CSU Chico; funded in particular by HP and Sun, among others), and we don't have the problems you discuss -- in very few cases do any classes require anything not included in the Linux systems CSLUG puts together.

    I don't think it's a problem with corporate funding, but rather with how your department is run.

    (For that matter, though, I disagree with your first point -- I don't go to class to be yammered at about ethics; rather, I go to class to learn about OO design, or whatever the course happens to be about. I think that having an "emphasis on ethics" is bullshit -- you can't train ethics into 30 people at a time; people are ethical or they aren't, and classes or tests will have no effect on it whatsoever other than wasting students' valuable time).

  22. Re:Another suggestion... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* however it should be noted, while we have one of the best known nursing schools in the US, our CS PROGRAM SUCKS. 2 or 3 good professors, the rest are hacks(not in a good way). *)

    Oh so what. Go for the babes alone. It will improve your social skills, and maybe other skills in the process. "Soft" skills are just as important, if not more, as skills in Reverse Integral Recursive Multi-Linked B-trees blah blah.

  23. My Two Cents by lkaos · · Score: 2

    Let me get my word in before this disappears from the front page into the archives.

    If your looking to learn CS, then ask all the questions posed here. If you already know anything about CS (above programming with data structures), then no university is likely going to stimulate you academically.

    What you then want to look for are the connections that schools have with various Internship programs and/or research assistantships. There are some amazing undergrad internships (IBM's Extreme Blue, Microsoft's Internship, FBI Honors Intern, NSA Intern, etc.). This is what will take you to the next level.

    BTW: Lots of people will say partying is important, and well, that's only partially true. I would recommend staying away from overly technical places (unless it's something like MIT) so that you can meet a wider variety of people (especially women since CS women are, well, let's not go there [with the exception of any CS woman who may possibly reading this of course :)]). It's also nice to get some good liberal arts courses too.

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));