Slashdot Mirror


Episode II Surpasses $116 Million at Box Office

Domasi writes "The Force is with George Lucas again as the fifth installment of the Star Wars saga, 'Attack of the Clones,' took in $116.3 million in its first four days and to become the second-fastest film behind only "Spider-Man"." Spider-man is better. But I plan to see both of them again.

16 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. Screens by lemonk · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is worthwhile to mention that Spider-Man is being shown on over 1000 screens more than AOTC, etc.

    --
    You are only popular on the Internet.
    1. Re:Screens by peter_goathead · · Score: 2, Informative

      it isn't.
      Spider-Man: 3615 Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones: 3161

      from here [boxofficeprophets.com].
      500 less screens.

    2. Re:Screens by big.ears · · Score: 5, Informative

      All this box-office gamesmanship is kinda silly. If you want to assess the human value or impact of a film (or a movie), I can assure you that the just about the worst way to do it is to count how much money it reportedly took in in ticket sales. Ever wonder why nobody records the number of ticket sales (which are already adjusted for inflation), but rather calculates raw sales $$? It is mainly to build hype for a film, because even a moderate success this year is bound to beat the blockbuster from two years ago. "Box Office Records" are laughable, because they are guaranteed to fall.

      By making these arguments about total gross/per theater gross/screens/etc., we are just playing into the Hollywood money machine's hand. But, myself a victim to this game, I believe the 3615/3161 number indicates venues or physical locations where the film is played, whereas the number of actual "Prints" is something like 7500 vs. 6000, which is what the parent was apparently quoting. I don't know if anyone has actually recorded the number of screenings anywhere. Given that AOTC was a little longer than Spidey, this translates into fewer screenings per venue, as well as fewer per print: The difference between 2 hours and 2 hours 20 minutes is enough to reduce the number of screenings at some little theaters from 2 to 1 or from 3 to 2 per day; at multiplexes, it may reduce the number of showings from 15 to 12.

    3. Re:Screens by cuyler · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out the-numbers.com. They have plenty of stats on movies. Most notably is the gross per theatre a record that is held by Spider-Man.

      Even though Spider-Man opened with more screens than AOTC it is still making more per screen than AOTC.

    4. Re:Screens by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd heard that there were somewhere around 7000 screens for Spider-Man and 3500 theaters. From what I've heard in the past, figures are only given out about how many theaters are playing movies, not the number of screens. Therefore, the screen number is just an estimate. However, since both of these movies are generally playing on at least two screens per theater, and there are approximately 500 more theaters, you'd expect at least 1000 more screens to be showing Spider-Man.

      But, I might have been misinformed.

    5. Re:Screens by tsiar · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's really annoying, is that those numbers you quoted are THEATERS, not SCREENS.

      Clones opened up playing on approximately 6,100 screens at 3,161 theaters across North America

      Spider-man Swinging into 3,615 theaters ... with an estimated 7,500 prints


      The math still works out that spiderman made more per screen, but of course the Thursday opening isn't taken into account.

  2. Re:No one saw this. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Informative

    look again...it is a 4 day total. for 3 days, it raked in 86 million.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  3. $183M International by rosewood · · Score: 3, Informative
    Reuters says:
    Ticket sales for the new "Star Wars" movie were out of this world, racking up $183 million at box offices worldwide in the first four days of release. According to studio estimates issued on Sunday, "Star Wars: Episode II -- Attack of the Clones," grossed an estimated $116.3 million across the United States and Canada.
  4. Only about 86 million when compared to Spider-Man by thaigan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Spider-Man did it in three days without a mid-night opening.

    Here's a snippet from hollywood.com: 20th Century Fox and Lucasfilm's PG rated franchise installment Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones exploded in first place with an ESTIMATED $86.15 million at 3,161 theaters ($27,254 per theater).

    After opening to $30,141,417 for Wednesday midnight screenings and Thursday, its four day cume is approximately $116.29 million. By comparison, Spider-Man's record setting opening was $114.8 million for a normal three day weekend (May 3-5).

    Star Wars' average per theater was the highest for any film playing this weekend.

    Directed by George Lucas, it stars Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen.

    "That's the third best three day regular weekend opening ever after Spider-Man's $114 million and $90 million for Harry Potter," Fox distribution president Bruce Snyder said Sunday morning.

    "It's the second fastest to $100 million. Of course, Spider-Man did it in three days and this is four. The previous record was Star Wars: Episode I in five days. It opened on a Wednesday (May 19, 1999). Its five day number was $105.659 million. So we've kind of blown past that in four days with $116.291 million on this one. It's just terrific and we're delighted."

    Looking back at Episode I -- The Phantom Menace, Snyder noted, "Its Wednesday, the opening day, was $28.5 million. That was the high water mark for the run. The next best day was $24.4 million on Saturday (of weekend one). In this case, we opened to $30.1 million, went to $25.2 million on Friday and Saturday looks like $32.25 million, so it's actually above the opening day and the opening day, remember, had the Midnight shows (from Wednesday) folded in. So this is really a spectacular performance."

    Phantom Menace wound up grossing $431.1 million in domestic theaters. Its worldwide total (domestic plus international) was $923 million. Asked about reports that Clones' Wednesday midnight shows had ticket sales of approximately $6 million, Snyder replied, "Something in that area. It depends on how they got folded into (the total for Thursday), but I think that's a fair estimate."

    Here's the breakdown of box office report

    --

    42
  5. Re:No one saw this. by MrAl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lucas himself saw this. He limited the number of theatres AOTC was playing in - something like 1,500 theatres less than Spider-Man. In an interview he said that he knew he wasn't going to break any records, but been-there-done-that. He just wanted it to play in theatres that were up to par technically.

  6. Re:These statistics seem meaningless... by ciurana · · Score: 3, Informative

    Adjusted for inflation, the best selling movie ever was Gone With The Wind, with Star Wars being a close second. I think Ben-Hur is among the top ten.

    Cheers!

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  7. Re:These statistics seem meaningless... by oopy_-_ · · Score: 5, Informative
    Someone in fact has done this math:

    Top 100 Ever Adjusted

    The list makes a lot more sense with this math, though Titanic still gets ranked too highly. Unfortunately, this is only adjusted with the Consumer Price Index. I think someone should adjust for population growth as well.

  8. Per Theater avg: by holysin · · Score: 2, Informative

    for the WEEKEND (not the first day in star wars ep 2's case)
    it was shown in 3,161 theaters, for an avg of $27,254 PT.

    For opening weekend of spiderman:
    3,615 $31,769 (yes, the difference in theaters was 454.... screens might have been 1500 but theaters wasn't THAT different it seems)

    all numbers from www.the-numbers.com

  9. Re:No one saw this. by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Despite that, StarWars-II was doing much brisker business on it's 4th day of release than SpiderMan was doing on it's 2nd. I would expect that StarWars-II was much closer to the theoretical maximum per screen than SpiderMan was.

    However, it will be interesting to see what the "2nd week falloff" is like...

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  10. At Seattle Cinerama, not digitally projected... by ZhangFei · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a small note to warn fellow Slashdotters in Seattle. I had the disappointing experience of getting up at 6:30 a.m. on Sunday to catch the 8:00 digital showing of Episode II downtown at the Cinerama, only to find that it wasn't digital. Funny, because it's on the list. Don't waste your money on this theatre expecting digital. (Sad that we don't have any other digital theatres here.)

    Cheers!

  11. I don't think that's the whole story... by koganuts · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to CNN, "[In Quebec, Canada,] Fox is believed to be demanding 70 percent of box office receipts for the first three weeks and insisting that 'Attack of the Clones' stay in the biggest hall for 12 weeks. The studio-theater revenue split is more commonly 70-30 in favor of the studio for only the first week, dropping to 60-40 the second week, 50-50 the third week and 40-60 by the fourth week." That's why most of Quebec's independent theater owners refused to book AotC in their theaters. If Fox's demands were similar here in the States, it may also explain why fewer theaters are showing it vs. Spider-Man... regardless of how Fox tries to spin (no pun intended) the numbers in their favor.