Slashdot Mirror


April 1, 1972: Write Only Memory

Embedded Geek writes "While digging around Jack Ganssle's site, I came across an amusing prank from days gone by. In 1972 Signetics recognized April Fools day by printing a full color datasheet (scanned sheet 1 and sheet 2 here) for a Write-Only Memory (which accepts data but never reads it back), a considerable effort when documents were made via literal "cut and paste". Packed with jokes both obvious (a graph of "number of pins left versus number of insertions") and subtle ("Vdd = 0V +/- 2%") it's worth a chuckle."

80 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Essential For... by geoffsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Writing perl code! Write once, read never.

    Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    1. Re:Essential For... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny

      $what($are_you)->$talking("about") . "you" . $technophobe.
      @PERL."is"->$the_easiest->$language->$Eva r

      # As with all other perl code
      # I find documenting this unnecessary

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  2. shhhs... by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought I just had to avoid reading slashdot one day a year to avoid April Fools crap.

    1. Re:shhhs... by gazbo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aye. But don't worry, It's one of the most linked to April Fools, and from the seventies, so there is no chance that we haven't heard of it before.

    2. Re:shhhs... by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2

      ohhh, the old "not!" comment. Well, sir of the great 1989, I commend you on pointing out my lame statement and hope it didn't keep you from rewatching your 'Whanes World' video cassette over again for the 314th time.

  3. Holy cow by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    You people ARE nerds! Jebus. I thought everyone was just faking it!

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  4. This is perfect for my project. by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    I get a lot of spam, so I've been working on a hardware accelleration card for /dev/null. This'll save me having to develop my own design in an expensive FPGA.

    1. Re:This is perfect for my project. by Hellkitten · · Score: 2, Funny

      a true WOM (data get stored, but can't be read), or is it a "fake" optimized WOM (data never gets stored,

      Interesting point. So to be true Write Only Memory the data has to be there, but impossible to read.

      My proposal for a true WOM with infinite storage capacity: A poverful laser poining into space, turn the laser on and off to encode 1 and 0. With enough power and careful aim to not hit a black hole or anything the data will be there forever, but nobody will be able to read it back

      Potential problem are: If faster than light travel becomes available we could race past the beam and read the data. Aliens could read the data if they fly into the beam. Even in space the beam could hit a few atoms, and the light could be 'reflected' back at earth and read

      And in case anyone wonders: Yes I'm a nerd, and thyis stuff matters.

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    2. Re:This is perfect for my project. by phil+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I get a lot of spam, so I've been working on a hardware accelleration card for /dev/null.


      Many years ago, I used to go to DEC Users Group meetings. In the evenings, we'd have "sessions" where the operating system developers would come around and tell war stories. I remember one time that one of the RSX-11 (one of the PDP-11 operating systems) developers was telling us that writes to the Null device (NUL:) was found to be considerable slower than writes to real hardware. Therefore, they had begun development of a null hardware device to be plugged into the system. It was to be called the NUL-11 board, and they had developed quite a bit of specification material for it, unfortunately lost (this was in the early '80s). Very fun stuff.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    3. Re:This is perfect for my project. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > What if the alien already had your random number sequence? They could subtract the numbers from every byte. You had better make sure it's a secure random number generator! Presumably though, if you're only sending spam to /dev/null you'll be alright.

      That's what the FPGA-accelerated /dev/null is for.

      It's a cover story for a faster random number generator.

      Any mathematician will tell you that if the alien has a sufficiently large string of random numbers, or even enough digits of pi, he does have your random number sequence.

      You just have to make sure you can build your strings of random numbers faster than he can.

      Random-numbers-arms-race, anyone? :)

  5. Just what the MPAA and RIAA ordered by Brynath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something they can sell that has Perfect Copy Protection!

  6. There are a few applications for write-only memory by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are circuits in use that are essentially a write-only memory like this (but without the need for a 6 foot fan!), combined with a comparator and possibly a one-way encrypter. You can store an encrypted password in there, which then can never be read back in its encrypted form. Plaintext phrases can be encrypted and compared against the stored password.

    One existing application is on debit cards (cards that are charged with a cash amount on the card itself).

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  7. In the Jargon Lexicon by Raedwald · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been in The Jargon Lexicon for ages. Don't all slashdotters know of it?

    --
    Ne mæg werig mod wyrde wiðstondan, ne se hreo hyge helpe gefremman.
    1. Re:In the Jargon Lexicon by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

      This has been in The Jargon Lexicon [tuxedo.org] for ages. Don't all slashdotters know of it?

      I must have missed the part on this site where it says, "YOU MUST READ THE ENTIRE JARGON LEXICON BEFORE READING SLASHDOT."

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    2. Re:In the Jargon Lexicon by HermDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shocking oversight. Here, I'll fix it:

      You must read the ENTIRE jargon lexicon before reading Slashdot

      --
      JADBP
    3. Re:In the Jargon Lexicon by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I must have missed the part on this site where it says, "YOU MUST READ THE ENTIRE JARGON LEXICON BEFORE READING SLASHDOT."

      Actually, since the published versions of the Jargon file are called the Hacker's Dictionary (the latest being the New Hacker's Dictionary), a dictionary is a compendium of language common to a group, and the Slashdot readership are hackers, for the given definition of hacker in the dictionary, then the Dictionary *is* required reading - or at least reference.

      Sort of like how knowing english for www.slashdot.org or knowing japanese for www.slashdot.jp are requirements.

      --
      Evan (Don't take this post too seriously - I'm justifying for justifications sake)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:In the Jargon Lexicon by majcher · · Score: 3, Funny

      I must have missed the part on this site where it says, "YOU MUST READ THE ENTIRE JARGON LEXICON BEFORE READING SLASHDOT."

      Even if us lowly posters haven't (although you should), it would be nice if our nerd-overlord editors who put the story on the front page have given the jargon file a quick skim.

      "Breaking news on Slashdot! Some programmers use funny words like 'foo' and 'bar' in their code, instead of *real* variable names!"

      zzzzzzz....

    5. Re:In the Jargon Lexicon by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      You know how to write English. Have you ever read an entire dictionary?

      Yup. That's basic schooling, my friend, at least in the schools I went to. I also had to learn the fundimentals of latin and greek. Reading the encyclopedia (finished the World Book, easy reading, and got 2/3rd of the way through the Britannica) was my idea.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    6. Re:In the Jargon Lexicon by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      fundimentals

      latin

      greek

      What schools did you go to? =)

      IHBT. IHL. HAND.

  8. Write only memory? by vidnet · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean like the windows registry?

    Crap goes in, but doesn't seem to go out until you have to reinstall a month later :)

    1. Re:Write only memory? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > You mean like the windows registry?
      >
      > Crap goes in, but doesn't seem to go out until you have to reinstall a month later :)

      Or the abuse department at any Chinese ISP, the difference being that crap comes out.

  9. Re:wow by Ted+Maul · · Score: 4, Funny

    First posts are write only.

    --

    The Day Today - Game Warden to the Events Rhino
  10. Re:Lost memory by Quazion · · Score: 2

    I wasn't born yet, i do remember :)

  11. 'Read protection' by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the BBC Micro you could add 16Kbyte banks of 'sideways RAM'. I remember that some upgrades had a 'read protect' switch, which sounded very odd. I think it was for compatibility; read protect made the upgrade effectively invisible.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:'Read protection' by BdosError · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And that led to a bunch of weird (to the uninitiated) code like:
      for i=49152 to 51200: poke i, peek(i):next i

      But if you wanted to turn of the ROMs to use the underlying stuff in RAM, this is what you had to do, if you wanted access to some of that ROMs code. Weird, but interesting.

      Ah the creativity of limited resources.

      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
    2. Re:'Read protection' by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      It's not because of limited memory but limited address space. The switching between ROMs and RAM needs to happen because there is more than 64Kbyte of total (ROM+RAM) memory in the system, but the 6502 processor has only 16-bit addressing. If memory had been a bit more limited, there wouldn't have been any need for these tricks :-P.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  12. Advances in cooling by rhysweatherley · · Score: 5, Funny
    It took Intel 30 years to acheive a chip that has the same cooling requirements:
    The 25120 is easily cooled by employment of a six-foot fan, 1/2" from the package. If the device fails, you have exceeded the ratings. In such cases, more air is recommended.
    Signetics were way ahead of their time.
  13. How's this for speed? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The 25120 will provide 50% higher speed than you will obtain".

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  14. Huh? by jnievele · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't know that DAT backup tapes were invented in 1972... ;-)

  15. Latex slip-ons!!! by pawlie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Brilliant: slip-on latex protectors for preventage of VD!! (Voltage Destruction) Pill packaged devices do not require protection!

  16. Favorite WOM feature by octalman · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite feature of this device is that typical bit capacity is 35% to 75% of "guaranteed" bit capacity.

  17. Write many, read never... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd rather thought that /dev/null was the most elegant WOM out there...

    Heck, they even coded it such that it has infinite capacity, or a very high capacity in any case.

    Could someone dedicate a machine for a few years with a shell script running an infinite loop writing data to /dev/null? I personally think it's about time we found out how much you can stash in there.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:Write many, read never... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
      I personally think it's about time we found out how much you can stash in there.

      Do you think /dev/null is a /dev of holding? Will the data all disappear when it reaches capacity?

      Speaking of 'of holding', one of the funniest references I recall was on the Twin Peaks mailing list way back when. Someone pointed out that a Laura said she kept some casette tapes in her bedpost, but that her bedpost was too small. The author suggested that she must have 'a bedpost of holding'.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:Write many, read never... by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Make dev/null an append only file someday and just see all the wonderful information being collected.

      There really is a ton of stuff. Append only to prevent that cronjob from wiping it out when it only has > instead of >>.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    3. Re:Write many, read never... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Ever have /dev/null deleted by accident? Interesting things happen, and it's not easy to track down.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Write many, read never... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

      I'm flabbergasted that the parent is at +4 _insightful_ as I type this... C'mon people, an infinite loop writing to /dev/null to see how much you can cram in there?

      :-) Oh well, it's your party :-)

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    5. Re:Write many, read never... by cybermage · · Score: 2

      Ever have /dev/null deleted by accident? Interesting things happen, and it's not easy to track down.

      Actually, yes. While running an ISP back in 1996, I had a support tech who managed to overwrite /dev/null on a UnixWare box without root access.

      All I can say is thank God he realized he did it. I can't even begin to guess how long it would have taken me to find it.

      We never did figure out how he managed to do that and could not duplicate the problem after we fixed it. I think we gave him a raise.

      The incident even inspired us to start a contest for our support techs. We offered a cash prize to the first one who could root our shell server. The only restriction was that they weren't allowed to access console or sniff packets. Sadly, no one collected the prize, although one managed a nearly perfect forgery of an email from root (an actual email from root was their goal.)

    6. Re:Write many, read never... by topham · · Score: 2

      An ex-coworker of mine deleted the parent directory while in a subdirectory of said-parent. (under a version of SCO).

      Boom.
      System stayed running for about 5 seconds and then crashed hard. couldn't duplicate the problem.

    7. Re:Write many, read never... by topham · · Score: 2


      In Dos 5 you couldn't send more than 32megabytes to \dev\null, it would crash.

  18. Later that day... by robolemon · · Score: 3, Funny
    After writing up the paper and printing it in color (back in the day before cheap color printing), the Signetics engineers retire to the local bar.

    After laughing it up for a bit, their boss walks in. He is visibly angry.

    Boss: "Miller! Wilson! Did you waste our money again? I found the Write-Only Memory specs! That's it! The six-foot fan was one thing, but now you guys have crossed the line. How are you going to explain yourselves?"

    Miller: (angrily to Wilson) "I thought you said he wouldn't be able to read it!"

    Slashdot Readers: (groan)

    --

    I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

  19. Re:wow by malkman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real question is, why would someone make a first post in the first place?

    However, through the use of simple mathematics I've deducted a formula that explains this habit-
    sP + aF / P = Need of being the first poster
    You see, the persons small penis (sP) factor is added to his annoyance factor (aF) and divided by any real personality this poster may have (P), creates the probability of having a first post, as well as the need to be the first poster.
    Therefore, the average first poster believes that by being the first poster, he will enlarge his penis size. Unfortunately, this is most opposite of what *really* occurs.
    fP = P / sP - wFOP = First poster's penis size.
    As you can see, the first post has the effect of actually *shrinking* his penis, as the personality factor is divided by his existing small penis, minus an additional amount based on the annoyance factor of the first post itself. So, in reality, these people are causing long-lasting damaging effects to their genitals.

    And to answer your question, no, I DON'T have anything better to do than post nonsensical, offtopic garbage on a message board.

    --

    Robort knows all.
  20. My favorite quote.. in 'Special Features' by forged · · Score: 2
    • Special features

      Because of the employment of the signetics' proprietary Sanderson-Rabbet Channel the 25120 will provide 50% higher speed than you will obtain.

    Err .. mmmkay ??!?!?

  21. The original Bill Gates Quote: by Bazman · · Score: 4, Funny

    "640k of Write-Only Memory ought to be enough for anybody".

    Baz

  22. many companies have done this... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    I remember a datasheet from Phillips on the DED.(Dark Emitting Diode) and a Texas instruments publication on a spec for the FUDGE gate.

    It isnt new, but that one is obviousally old enough to possibly be the first....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. Re:There are a few applications for write-only mem by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    but you are wrong.... cash cards/chips CAN be read. you have to know how much is left on it. and a password storage as you say ALSO can be read as you have to have an indication if the match was positive.

    so in fact if you get ANYTHING out of a device it does in fact have a read capability.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  24. Now I really do feel old ... by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 3, Funny
    I remember this one when it first appeared. Does that make me "venerable"?

    On a similar line, somewhere at home I have a spoof datasheet from Nominal Semidestructors giving information about the new Polish Operational Amplifier.

    What I'm missing, however, is my copy of the table of variation of pi with temperature and pressure, which I believe was given to all engineering freshmen at Cambridge at one time. If anyone can help me to locate a new copy I'd be grateful. Please reply here or email me (see homepage).

    --
    Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
  25. Footnote 6... by markmoss · · Score: 4, Informative

    They even planned far ahead. In 1972, "VFF = 6.3VAC" was obvious in itself, but for you youngsters that don't know about vacuum tubes they added the footnote "6. For the filament heater, of course."

    Yes, it's now a very old joke, but it's been fun watching a new "generation" rediscover it every five years or so.

  26. Re:I want to know... by RatOmeter · · Score: 2

    Did you see the "SEX[7]" note at the bottom of page 1? it says "[7] You have a dirty mind..."

    If I recall correctly, both Signetics and National Semiconductor managed to sneak a few bogus datasheets into their released databooks from time to time. I first saw of this particular one a couple three years ago; I think someone posted a link to it on sci.electronics.design or a similar newsgroup.

  27. MPAA is interested... by dinotrac · · Score: 2

    If this technology could be incorporated into a CD or DVD, all of their "piracy" concerns go away.

    Sure, there are some pesky customer satisfaction issues, but let's keep our priorities straight. OK?

  28. Funny, this seems familiar by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    I had used this very chip as an example of the problems of searching with Google in a prevous /. post - I was trying to find electronic forms of the datasheet, and was using it as an example of why I felt Google needed boolean searches.

    The really funny thing is, that while this created a bit of a message thread on /., I can find that thread with neither /.'s built-in search nor with Google.

    Making fake releases is a tradition many organizations (and /. ;>) follow - go read QST, for example. Why, I even heard Microsoft is getting into the act - they released a fake news release about focusing on security and reviewing their code, but I think they jumped the gun by a couple of months....

  29. Another write-only tech by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, my hand-writing is write-only, or so everyone tells me...

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  30. Re:There are a few applications for write-only mem by Zocalo · · Score: 2
    You are assuming a 4 digit numeric PIN and no detection of three repeated failures resulting in a timed lockout of 15 minutes, a la car radios. I've simplified things a bit and the card does more than this, but the technical details for the interested are upto 8 characters presented to the WOM and hashed prior to storage/comparison (ie. 64 bits; 2^64 permutations.) Plus the lockout. That equates to 2^64/12 hours to try every combination which is just a little more daunting.

    If you got hold of a card (and had the resources) you could still read and brute force the hash of course, or force a valid response at the appropriate point. However, that leaves the physical problem of reassembly of an IC with onboard EEPROM, and even if the card can still be made to fit into the readers it's probably going to be unreadable. All of which needs to be done before the card is cancelled. Quite an elegant solution for those "ultra-paranoid locations" really. ;)

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  31. JEDEC compliant? by Beliskner · · Score: 2

    I protest, this chip is obviously not JEDEC compliant and is therefore prone to silent failure. RMS and EFF ought to kick their asses.

    --
    A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
  32. So this is essentially the same as... by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 2

    ... dev/null, in hardware ?

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  33. Re:Signetics was not ALWAYS joking! by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Write only registers are still around (at least they were when I was involved with embedded devices a couple of years ago). They are used to cause something to happen as output on the pins of the device that isn't very interesting for the host controller to read. For example, you could write all you wanted to the TX FIFO devices we used but you couldn't read the data (it was being clocked out as output). The only thing you COULD read from them as a microprocessor was whether the device was full or half-full (as our hardware was setup anyway). Once the device was full, you could still happily write data to the device but the data sure wasn't going anywhere.

    OTOH, I've never encounterd a write-only memory before. The Amiga had a write-once memory (kind-of silly really) but that's not the same.

    BTW: Great post C.T., it sure brought back a lot of memories digging through hardware specs. from my embedded days! : )

  34. In case anyone cares by overshoot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Friends who work at Philips (which bought Signetics years ago) tell me that the 25120 datasheet may be updated and reissued. Keep an eye out for it once Philips gets a usable website.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  35. 1Z2Z vacumn tube by wa1hco · · Score: 2, Funny

    The data sheet for the 1Z2Z vacuum tube (circa 1966) contained items like a "urinated tungsten filament" and a monode structure (one less than diode), IIRC.

    If humor exists prior to the Google...can anyone laugh?

  36. Next week on /. by Diamon · · Score: 2

    Man discovers fire.

  37. An oldy but goodie by rnturn · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know people who have copies of that data sheet.

    Another one that was good for a laugh was the ``Damn Fast Op-Amp'' that appeared in a normal device catalog from one of the major electronics device manufacturers (like Signetics, Fairchild, National, or maybe even AMD -- I'm leaning toward the latter but I can't remember any more. Darned cobwebs.) I used to enjoy asking interns to look up some information for me in the catalog and wait to see if they noticed it. You could tell if they did from the laughter.

    Another one from the same time frame (1980-ish) was the announcement -- on official IBM product sheets -- of a Galactic Edition' of the VM/CP (or was it VM/CMS?) operating system. This included advanced features like the one that allowed users to create and destroy their own planetary systems and such.

    Oh those were the days. Bet you don't see stuff like this appearing in official company literature any more. Hell, there'd probably be someone suing the company after they'd been traumatized upon seeing such offensive material (like `damn') or claiming fraud when their personal solar system didn't appear.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:An oldy but goodie by tdrury · · Score: 2
      Another one that was good for a laugh was the ``Damn Fast Op-Amp'' that appeared in a normal device catalog...
      That actually was not a joke. Those op-amp were damn fast. Seriously. They were an extension to the line of fast op-amps from (I believe) National Semiconductor.

      -tim
    2. Re:An oldy but goodie by rnturn · · Score: 2

      Geez, I hate to reply to my own post but here's a link to a page with the text of the fictional IBM operating system -> http://www.bixoft.nl/english/humor.htm. The product was an improvement over the virtual machine concept in which one could now have a virtual universe. You'll have to read it to appreciate it (or not).

      Later...

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  38. I've seen 'em. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    Back in the days before memory came on SIMMs, a few shady PC hardware manufacturers included "write-only memory" on their motherboards. These devices made the system look like there was an impressive amount of memory on the motherboard, but in actuality they were just molded plastic with unconnected IC pins, filling the spots one would put real RAM chips.

  39. Re:There are a few applications for write-only mem by Zocalo · · Score: 2

    On board battery? Think of a SecureID card on steroids and you'll get the general idea.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  40. write once, read never by connorbd · · Score: 2

    Back when WORM drives were all the rage, some engineers at Atari actually implemented a worn: (Write Once, Read Never) device in Atari BASIC. I don't remember how it was done (it's buried in an old issue of Compute! that I probably threw out years ago) but I actually got to try it out on a computer at the school I was going to (back in the day when everyone had Apple ][s, this school was using Atari 800s).

    It was just an Easter Egg; I suppose some Unix geek at Atari just decided it needed its own equivalent of /dev/null.

    /Brian

  41. press release by trb · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was an amusing press release that accompanied the Signetics WOM.

  42. Re:Lost memory by Frying+Ferret · · Score: 2, Funny

    Umm wouldn't 668 be the next door to the beast seeing as 667 would across the street?

  43. Re:wow by jquirke · · Score: 2

    Take his advice seriously people. He would know about this.

  44. I thought... by happyclam · · Score: 2

    I thought write-only memory was Microsoft's solution to the problem of memory protection in Windows.

    You know, misbehaving applications accidentally used to scribble on other apps' memory spaces. When Microsoft forced the PC industry to install banks of WOM, suddenly every crash became an application error--those applications were not conforming to the Windows API. Instead of scribbling on another application's memory, the app should have been scribbling to the WOM.

    It was brilliant because overnight Microsoft foisted millions of dollars in OS support expenses on to application vendors.

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  45. DAT tape by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2
    no, you have it all wrong.

    DAT is MORM (mangle-on-read memory). or maybe TORM (tangle-on-read memory).

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  46. Actually there are good uses for WOM by Kjella · · Score: 2

    ...partcularly in hardware encryption (Debit cards, PVRs, Access control systems, whatever. The point is that a chip has basicly two functions: SetKey(key) and Decode/Encode(data). You set the key, but you can never read the key. Of course the chip will use the key internally to come from plaintext to chipertext or vice versa, but as long as the encryption is strong it doesn't matter. (Def. of strong: Having plain & ciphertext doesn't help to find the key, most algorithms today are strong, the zip encryption is weak though).

    Of course this means you need a specialized chip, and not a general CPU, which is overkill in many cases..

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  47. the real write-only memory (well, sorta) by techstep · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From what I remember, there actually was a form of write-only memory at one point. Some of the sound registers on the Commodore 64 were "write only" in the sense that you could poke any value (well, from 0-255) into the memory location and it would change the nature of the sounds generated. However, if you tried to peek into the address, it returned with zero no matter what. Can anyone verify this? It's been a good bunch of years since I've had one of those to program.

    Not truly write-only memory (in the sense that you could get a value, albeit a painfully useless one), but it seems to come close to the spirit.

  48. I remember this! by Spinality · · Score: 2

    This was a pants-wetter back in 1972. Though I remember some different tearsheets -- they had marketing material as well, I think. One showed a "modified TO-5 case" that was in fact a photo of a water tower. The WOM campaign became a bit of cult humor for a generation of engineers and hobbyists.

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  49. Nice to see this come up again!!!! by farrellj · · Score: 2

    I enjoyed it muchly back in the '80s when I first saw it, and now I will have a computer version...much better than the photcopied version that was many generations old...

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  50. I remember this! by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

    My old man was an eletrical engineer at Control Data for many years. He brought home doezens of things like this. I remember specifcations for the Write-Only Memory. I remember the FED (Flame-Emitting Diode; a cover photo from EDN magazine), the NED (Noise-Emitting Diode), alternative logic gates like the "DON'T" gate (no matter what two bits are input, the output is zero). I remeber even linear components like the IN-OP AMP. I loved this stuff. My dad was also a radio amateur and he and friend wrote an article proposing solving the spectrum shortage by using the negative freqeuncy spectrum. They included diagrams showing you how to bury your antenna and stick the ground rod up in the air.

    Who says engineers aren't funny (at least to each other)?

  51. works great for backing up, not restoring... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    This reminds me of a friend of mine who had a DAT drive for his Mac. He would do weekly backups of his entire (500meg or so) hard drive on this same tape. He was basically rewriting over the same stuff all the time. Apparently these tapes (I don't know anything about tape drive storage) degrade after repeated writings. So one day his system is hosed and he goes to the tape to recover. Nothing will read.

    He called me on the phone to discuss the situation. As we concluded our conversation, I remember him sort of defending the reputation of the device by saying in a very sincere voice, "It works great for backups, it just doesn't work too well for restoration." And he was serious.
  52. Re:Funny schematics by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

    Way back in the day (1981), one of my friends had a EE textbook with a "black box" circuit. No big deal, except that Snoopy(tm) was lying down on the black box as if it were his doghouse.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  53. Re:wow by wedg · · Score: 2

    Be careful applying this formula. For many first posters, you will get a "divide by zero" error.

    Are you saying many first posters are women?

    --
    Jake
    Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
  54. Re:There are a few applications for write-only mem by Technician · · Score: 2

    FYI, This data sheet made it into the Signetics IC handbook, which is where I first saw it back in my PDP 11/35 days. I liked the Drain pin. It was properly placed over the Bit Bucket to prevent spilling data.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  55. I can one up that. . by Bastian · · Score: 2

    A couple of weeks ago, I destroyed the swap partition on my linux box without any prior preparations, just to see what would happen. The machine had been up and running for weeeks. . .

    Sadly, nothing happened. I guess that's what I get for putting 1/2 gig of RAM in a machine that's primarily used for surfing the web . . .

  56. That's great. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    "read protect made the upgrade effectively invisible."

    I know I love buying new hardware, sticking it in my machine, and never hearing from it again.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.