All I have to say is see my domain name. Throught that I've collected a number of other peoples complaints, but I'm too lazy to post them. But Someday(tm).
But, as this article said, this weakness does not let you choose the hash value to create a collision with. It only allows you to create 2 sets of data that have a hash collision, so that won't help you with tampering with evidence unless you produced both sets of data originally.
That's what I've been expecting for next year, as it's the 50th anniversary of the publishing of the first book. Maybe the year after for the 50th anniversary of the publishing of the last. My original guess, before the FotR extended edition came out, was 14 discs. Clearly, that's a misunderestimation so now I predict 148 discs, and instead of some weak bookshelf sized Argonath, you get fullsized ones, which are the sides of the shelf to hold all the discs.
This will be fine if/when everyone upgrades their DNS & MTA software to accept and use those standards. In addition, there are competing standards/proposals too, so which is the right one to choose?
As an aside, I don't think that making it an RFC necessarily makes it patent free.
Yes, I ordered through openbsd.org. I'm pretty sure my receipt said that too. Maybe I'm just lucky. Maybe it's because I'm in the same province, I couldn't say.
I've ordered the last 3 releases at least a month in advance (when the "pre-orders now available" shows up on the web site) and always received it at least 1 week before it was downloadable.
And like so many gun owners/supporters, you seem to miss the important part: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State". Perhaps that was important before the U.S. had a standing professional army, but it hardly applies now.
This stops them from getting the information without due process. Didn't this already happen to the RIAA? (I think, maybe it was in Canada) I don't think they can get the information without actually filing a lawsuit now.
Depends who you ask. Some think that in English, they should be 3-5-3 instead. For example, this one or this one. Or perhaps the form is not so rigid about syllables at all, like they claim in this one.
Having the "trick" known is not a defense for violating a patent. In fact once the patent is granted, the trick is known because the patent is published. Having the information known to others is only a valid (legal) reason for disallowing protection of a trade secret.
Putting "the genie back in the bottle" is not something the patent holder is requried to do, it's simply a practical measure, but that's where the lawsuits come in.</IANAL>
Or perhaps that's another application: Modify the wing shape also to enhance control. Certainly the gist of the article seems to not concentrate on control changes (in place of ailerons and flaps) as much as improving performance for different situations.
Here's a new trick for you: read the article. They aren't talking about wing warping for flight control, they're talking about changing the wing shape (e.g. from swept back narrow to wide and short) to be optimal for different situations. A more flexible (literally) version of the variable geometry "swing wings" used on F-14s, F-111s, etc.
I'm with you on that one. My favourite, possibly apocryphal, quote on the subject is from Majel (Barrett) Roddenberry. When asked what she thought the next Star Trek project (or series?) should be, she replied "Hiatus".
When there are other, non-Star Trek series out there that are at least as good (probably way better), like "Firefly", "Farscape" etc., getting cancelled, it makes me want to petition Majel to allow them to put Gene's name on them, just to keep them on the air. Seriously, I swear that turds like "Andromeda" and "Earth: Final Conflict" only stayed on the air as long as they did because of his name.
According to the linked Wiki page, the talk was with regard to Oberon 1, which did not support inheritance or polymorphism. Oberon 2, they claim, does support those features.
Slashdot Mirror
I must be getting old, no-one else thinks of this when they hear "bug bounty"?
https://dilbert.com/strip/1995...
All I have to say is see my domain name. Throught that I've collected a number of other peoples complaints, but I'm too lazy to post them. But Someday(tm).
Yes, a decade. See this WikiPedia entry: the lawsuit started in 1992
Nice troll. Plenty of bites, no moderators seemed to notice. +10.
But, as this article said, this weakness does not let you choose the hash value to create a collision with. It only allows you to create 2 sets of data that have a hash collision, so that won't help you with tampering with evidence unless you produced both sets of data originally.
They are in legal in Alberta, BC and Saskatchewan, the 3 westernmost provinces, accoring to this radar deterctor/jammer site.
Flash is completely inaccessible to the visually disabled (who do go to movies, believe it or not). That is not a good solution.
Then both of you should go back on your meds.
That's what I've been expecting for next year, as it's the 50th anniversary of the publishing of the first book. Maybe the year after for the 50th anniversary of the publishing of the last. My original guess, before the FotR extended edition came out, was 14 discs. Clearly, that's a misunderestimation so now I predict 148 discs, and instead of some weak bookshelf sized Argonath, you get fullsized ones, which are the sides of the shelf to hold all the discs.
Proofreading, anyone? 42 [1]
[1]: You're new here, aren't you? [2]
[2]: Much like the joke about the prisoners who've been locked up so long they call out jokes by number.
This will be fine if/when everyone upgrades their DNS & MTA software to accept and use those standards. In addition, there are competing standards/proposals too, so which is the right one to choose?
As an aside, I don't think that making it an RFC necessarily makes it patent free.
apple.slashdot.org ain't great either.
Yes, I ordered through openbsd.org. I'm pretty sure my receipt said that too. Maybe I'm just lucky. Maybe it's because I'm in the same province, I couldn't say.
I've ordered the last 3 releases at least a month in advance (when the "pre-orders now available" shows up on the web site) and always received it at least 1 week before it was downloadable.
Just my data point.
And like so many gun owners/supporters, you seem to miss the important part: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State". Perhaps that was important before the U.S. had a standing professional army, but it hardly applies now.
This stops them from getting the information without due process. Didn't this already happen to the RIAA? (I think, maybe it was in Canada) I don't think they can get the information without actually filing a lawsuit now.
It's funny when you talk about illiteracy and then spell "apologies" and "summary" wrong.
Depends who you ask. Some think that in English, they should be 3-5-3 instead.
For example, this one or this one. Or perhaps the form is not so rigid about syllables at all, like they claim in this one.
Putting "the genie back in the bottle" is not something the patent holder is requried to do, it's simply a practical measure, but that's where the lawsuits come in.</IANAL>
Or perhaps that's another application: Modify the wing shape also to enhance control. Certainly the gist of the article seems to not concentrate on control changes (in place of ailerons and flaps) as much as improving performance for different situations.
Here's a new trick for you: read the article. They aren't talking about wing warping for flight control, they're talking about changing the wing shape (e.g. from swept back narrow to wide and short) to be optimal for different situations. A more flexible (literally) version of the variable geometry "swing wings" used on F-14s, F-111s, etc.
I'm with you on that one. My favourite, possibly apocryphal, quote on the subject is from Majel (Barrett) Roddenberry. When asked what she thought the next Star Trek project (or series?) should be, she replied "Hiatus".
When there are other, non-Star Trek series out there that are at least as good (probably way better), like "Firefly", "Farscape" etc., getting cancelled, it makes me want to petition Majel to allow them to put Gene's name on them, just to keep them on the air. Seriously, I swear that turds like "Andromeda" and "Earth: Final Conflict" only stayed on the air as long as they did because of his name.
According to the linked Wiki page, the talk was with regard to Oberon 1, which did not support inheritance or polymorphism. Oberon 2, they claim, does support those features.
"Where would you put it?"
I believe you mean P4t.